Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms
[Submitted on 10 Dec 2011 (this version), latest version 27 Mar 2014 (v3)]
Title:On Problems as Hard as CNFSAT
View PDFAbstract:Exact exponential time algorithms for NP-hard problems have thrived over the last decade. Non-trivial exponential time algorithms have been found for a myriad of problems, including Graph Coloring, Hamiltonian Path, Dominating Set and 3-CNF-SAT, that is, satisfiability of 3-CNF formulas. For some basic problems, however, there has been no progress over their trivial solution. For others, non-trivial solutions have been found, but improving these algorithms further seems to be out of reach. The CNF-SAT problem is the canonical example of a problem for which the brute force 2^n * poly(n) time algorithm remains the best known. The assumption that k-CNF-SAT requires 2^n time in the worst case when k grows to infinity is known as the strong exponential time hypothesis (SETH) of Impagliazzo and Paturi. In this paper we reveal connections between well-studied problems, and show that improving over the currently best known algorithms for several of them would violate SETH.
Specifically, we show that for every epsilon < 1, an O(2^{epsilon n})-time algorithm for Hitting Set, Set Splitting, or NAE-SAT would violate SETH. Here n is the number of elements (or variables) in the input set system (or formula). We conjecture that an O(2^{epsilon n})-time algorithm for Set Cover would violate SETH as well, and prove under this assumption, that improving the fastest known algorithms for Steiner Tree, Connected Vertex Cover, Set Partition or the pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for Subset Sum would violate SETH. Finally, we justify our assumption about the hardness of Set Cover. In particular we prove that, assuming SETH, there does not exist an O(2^{epsilon n})-time algorithm that counts the number of set covers in a set system modulo two.
Submission history
From: Saket Saurabh [view email][v1] Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:19:33 UTC (50 KB)
[v2] Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:57:25 UTC (103 KB)
[v3] Thu, 27 Mar 2014 01:34:30 UTC (288 KB)
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.