Physics > Physics and Society
[Submitted on 14 Nov 2012 (this version), latest version 26 Jun 2013 (v3)]
Title:Collective Adoption of Max-Min Strategy in an Information Cascade Voting Experiment
View PDFAbstract:When one have to choose an option, he shows a strong tendency to choose the majority if he does not know the correct one. If each option has a multiplier m and the return for choosing a correct choice is set to be m, which option does one choose? Game theory predicts that the max-min strategy where one divides one's choice inversely proportional to m is optimal. We study the prediction by a voting experiment in which 50 to 60 subjects answer a two-choice quiz sequentially with and without information about prior subjects' choices. The information is given to the subjects in two patterns, C and M. In case C, the subjects know how many previous subjects have chosen each choice and the payoff for the correct choice is constant. In case M, each choice has a multiplier m that is inversely proportional to the number of prior subjects who have chosen it. The payoff for the correct choice is proportional to the multiplier. In case C, the probability of selecting a choice by the subject who did not know the correct choice rapidly increases as the proportion of subjects who have chosen it increases. In case M, the probability is inversely proportional to m for 4/3<= m <=4. The subjects collectively adopt the Max-Min strategy in the range. The threshold value of the information cascade phase transition increases considerably as compared to in case C.
Submission history
From: Shintaro Mori [view email][v1] Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:21:46 UTC (440 KB)
[v2] Wed, 13 Feb 2013 23:37:20 UTC (409 KB)
[v3] Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:38:55 UTC (432 KB)
Current browse context:
physics.soc-ph
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.