Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:1304.2713 (cs)
[Submitted on 27 Mar 2013]

Title:Dempster-Shafer vs. Probabilistic Logic

Authors:Daniel Hunter
View PDF
Abstract:The combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory is compared with the combination of evidence in probabilistic logic. Sufficient conditions are stated for these two methods to agree. It is then shown that these conditions are minimal in the sense that disagreement can occur when any one of them is removed. An example is given in which the traditional assumption of conditional independence of evidence on hypotheses holds and a uniform prior is assumed, but probabilistic logic and Dempster's rule give radically different results for the combination of two evidence events.
Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Third Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1987)
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Report number: UAI-P-1987-PG-22-29
Cite as: arXiv:1304.2713 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:1304.2713v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1304.2713

Submission history

From: Daniel Hunter [view email] [via AUAI proxy]
[v1] Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:46:27 UTC (295 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2013-04
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Daniel Hunter
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)