Computer Science > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 11 Aug 2014 (v1), last revised 21 Jul 2017 (this version, v9)]
Title:On the Consistency of Ordinal Regression Methods
View PDFAbstract:Many of the ordinal regression models that have been proposed in the literature can be seen as methods that minimize a convex surrogate of the zero-one, absolute, or squared loss functions. A key property that allows to study the statistical implications of such approximations is that of Fisher consistency. Fisher consistency is a desirable property for surrogate loss functions and implies that in the population setting, i.e., if the probability distribution that generates the data were available, then optimization of the surrogate would yield the best possible model. In this paper we will characterize the Fisher consistency of a rich family of surrogate loss functions used in the context of ordinal regression, including support vector ordinal regression, ORBoosting and least absolute deviation. We will see that, for a family of surrogate loss functions that subsumes support vector ordinal regression and ORBoosting, consistency can be fully characterized by the derivative of a real-valued function at zero, as happens for convex margin-based surrogates in binary classification. We also derive excess risk bounds for a surrogate of the absolute error that generalize existing risk bounds for binary classification. Finally, our analysis suggests a novel surrogate of the squared error loss. We compare this novel surrogate with competing approaches on 9 different datasets. Our method shows to be highly competitive in practice, outperforming the least squares loss on 7 out of 9 datasets.
Submission history
From: Fabian Pedregosa [view email] [via CCSD proxy][v1] Mon, 11 Aug 2014 06:52:46 UTC (65 KB)
[v2] Fri, 7 Nov 2014 11:26:39 UTC (45 KB)
[v3] Sun, 7 Dec 2014 15:56:55 UTC (46 KB)
[v4] Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:38:59 UTC (46 KB)
[v5] Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:43:35 UTC (189 KB)
[v6] Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:56:31 UTC (190 KB)
[v7] Fri, 2 Oct 2015 08:44:54 UTC (190 KB)
[v8] Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:20:16 UTC (266 KB)
[v9] Fri, 21 Jul 2017 05:50:43 UTC (266 KB)
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.