Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science

arXiv:1809.03103 (cs)
[Submitted on 10 Sep 2018]

Title:Complexity of Timeline-Based Planning over Dense Temporal Domains: Exploring the Middle Ground

Authors:Laura Bozzelli (University of Napoli Federico II, Italy), Alberto Molinari (University of Udine, Italy), Angelo Montanari (University of Udine, Italy), Adriano Peron (University of Napoli Federico II, Italy)
View PDF
Abstract:In this paper, we address complexity issues for timeline-based planning over dense temporal domains. The planning problem is modeled by means of a set of independent, but interacting, components, each one represented by a number of state variables, whose behavior over time (timelines) is governed by a set of temporal constraints (synchronization rules). While the temporal domain is usually assumed to be discrete, here we consider the dense case. Dense timeline-based planning has been recently shown to be undecidable in the general case; decidability (NP-completeness) can be recovered by restricting to purely existential synchronization rules (trigger-less rules). In this paper, we investigate the unexplored area of intermediate cases in between these two extremes. We first show that decidability and non-primitive recursive-hardness can be proved by admitting synchronization rules with a trigger, but forcing them to suitably check constraints only in the future with respect to the trigger (future simple rules). More "tractable" results can be obtained by additionally constraining the form of intervals in future simple rules: EXPSPACE-completeness is guaranteed by avoiding singular intervals, PSPACE-completeness by admitting only intervals of the forms [0,a] and [b,$\infty$[.
Comments: In Proceedings GandALF 2018, arXiv:1809.02416
Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
Cite as: arXiv:1809.03103 [cs.LO]
  (or arXiv:1809.03103v1 [cs.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.03103
Journal reference: EPTCS 277, 2018, pp. 191-205
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.277.14

Submission history

From: EPTCS [view email] [via EPTCS proxy]
[v1] Mon, 10 Sep 2018 02:33:42 UTC (106 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CC

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)