Computer Science > Social and Information Networks
[Submitted on 8 Oct 2018 (v1), revised 19 Apr 2022 (this version, v4), latest version 20 Aug 2023 (v5)]
Title:Long ties accelerate noisy threshold-based contagions
View PDFAbstract:Network structure can affect when and how widely new ideas, products, and behaviors are adopted. In widely-used models of biological contagion, interventions that randomly rewire edges (generally making them "longer") accelerate spread. However, there are other models relevant to social contagion, such as those motivated by myopic best-response in games with strategic complements, in which an individual's behavior is described by a threshold number of adopting neighbors above which adoption occurs (i.e., complex contagions). Recent work has argued that highly clustered, rather than random, networks facilitate spread of these complex contagions. Here we show that minor modifications to this model, which make it more realistic, reverse this result, thereby harmonizing qualitative facts about how network structure affects contagion. To model the trade-off between long and short edges we analyze the rate of spread over networks that are the union of circular lattices and random graphs on $n$ nodes. Allowing for noise in adoption decisions (i.e., adoptions below threshold) to occur with order $1/\sqrt{n}$ probability along some "short" cycle edges) is enough to ensure that random rewiring accelerates spread. This conclusion continues to hold true under partial but frequent enough rewiring and when adoption decisions are reversible but infrequently so. Simulations illustrate the robustness of these results to several variations on this noisy best-response behavior. Hypothetical interventions that randomly rewire existing edges or add random edges (versus adding "short", triad-closing edges) in hundreds of empirical social networks reduce time to spread. This revised conclusion suggests that those wanting to increase spread should induce formation of long ties, rather than triad-closing ties. More generally, this highlights the importance of noise in game-theoretic analyses of behavior.
Submission history
From: M. Amin Rahimian [view email][v1] Mon, 8 Oct 2018 17:01:18 UTC (3,058 KB)
[v2] Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:07:18 UTC (2,996 KB)
[v3] Thu, 23 May 2019 00:02:04 UTC (3,224 KB)
[v4] Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:43:32 UTC (4,023 KB)
[v5] Sun, 20 Aug 2023 20:41:46 UTC (5,233 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.SI
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.