- A Estimating models with high-dimensional fixed e↵ects Following Guimar˜ aes and Portugal (2009), the number of fixed e↵ects can be reduced by half by first demeaning both dependent and explanatory in the sender-year dimension, leaving only the sender-target dummies. Using conditional probabilities, the fixed e↵ects (ci) can be separated from the explanatory variables (Xi,t), which significantly reduces the size of the matrix that needs to be inverted.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- a. Topology of the world trade web. Physical Review E, 68(1): 015101, 2003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- B. Mitchell. International Historical Statistics: Europe 1750-2000. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
B. Siliverstovs and D. Schumacher. Disaggregated trade flows and the missing “globalization puzzleâ€. Economie internationale, (3):141–164, 2009.
C. Bosquet and H. Boulhol. What is really puzzling about the “distance puzzleâ€. Review of World Economics, pages 1–21, 2013.
C.-J. Kim and C. R. Nelson. State-Space Models with Regime Switching: Classical and GibbsSampling Approaches with Applications. MIT Press, 1999.
D. A. Irwin and K. H. O’Rourke. Coping with shocks and shifts: The multilateral trading system in historical perspective. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011. D. S. Jacks. On the death of distance and borders: Evidence from the nineteenth century.
D. S. Jacks, C. M. Meissner, and D. Novy. Trade booms, trade busts, and trade costs. Journal of International Economics, 83(2):185–201, 2011.
D. S. Jacks, C. M. Meissner, and D. Novy. Trade costs, 1870-2000. The American Economic Review, pages 529–534, 2008. D. S. Jacks, C. M. Meissner, and D. Novy. Trade costs in the first wave of globalization.
D. T. Coe, A. Subramanian, and N. T. Tamirisa. The missing globalization puzzle: Evidence of the declining importance of distance. IMF Sta↵ Papers, pages 34–58, 2007.
- Explorations in Economic History, 47(2):127–141, 2010.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
F. Lin and N. Sim. Death of distance and the distance puzzle. Economics Letters, 116(2): 225–228, 2012.
F. P. Mongelli, E. Dorrucci, and I. Agur. What does european institutional integration tell us about trade integration. European Central Bank Occasional Paper Series, (40), December 2005.
G. Duernecker, M. Meyer, and F. Vega-Redondo. Being close to grow faster: A network-based empirical analysis of economic globalization. 2012.
G. Fagiolo, J. Reyes, and S. Schiavo. On the topological properties of the world trade web: A weighted network analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387(15): 3868–3873, 2008.
H. Boulhol and A. De Serres. Have developed countries escaped the curse of distance? Journal of Economic Geography, 10(1):113–139, 2010.
H. Yilmazkuday. A solution to the missing globalization puzzle by non-ces preferences. Available at SSRN 2258804, 2013.
I. Arribas, F. P erez, and E. Tortosa-Ausina. A new interpretation of the distance puzzle based on geographic neutrality. Economic Geography, 87(3):335–362, 2011.
- J. Bolt and J. van Zanden. The first update of the maddison project; reestimating growth before 1820. Maddison Project Working Paper 4, 2013. URL http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/maddison-project/data.htm.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
J. Durbin and S. Koopman. Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods. Oxford University Press, 2 edition, 2012.
J. Smits, P. Woltjer, and D. Ma. A Dataset on Comparative Historical National Accounts, ca. 1870-1950: A Time-Series Perspective. Groningen Growth and Development Research Memorandum GD-107, Groningen: University of Groningen, 2009.
J.-F. Brun, C. Carr` ere, P. Guillaumont, and J. De Melo. Has distance died? evidence from a panel gravity model. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(1):99–120, 2005.
- K. Barbieri and O. Keshk. Correlates of war project trade data set codebook, verion 3.0, 2012. URL http://correlatesofwar.org.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- K. Barbieri, O. Keshk, and B. Pollins. Trading data: Evaluating our assumptions and coding rules. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 26(4):471–491, 2009.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
K. Head and T. Mayer. Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. Centre for Economic Policy Research, 9322, 2013.
- K. O’Rourke. Politics and trade: lessons from past globalisations. Technical report, Bruegel, 2009. G. Rayp and S. Standaert. Measuring actual integration: An outline of a bayesian statespace approach. In P. D. Lombaerde and E. Saucedo, editors, Indicator-Based Monitoring of Regional Economic Integration, UNU series on regionalism. Springer, Dordrecht-New York, forthcoming.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
L. De Benedictis and L. Tajoli. The world trade network. The World Economy, 34(8):1417–1454, 2011. A.-C. Disdier and K. Head. The puzzling persistence of the distance e↵ect on bilateral trade.
- L. E. Grinin, I. V. Ilyin, and A. V. Korotayev. Globalistics and Globalization Studies. Uchitel Publishing House, 2012.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- L. Faqin. Are distance e↵ects really a puzzle. Available at SSRN 1520864, 2009.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
M. Berthelon and C. Freund. On the conservation of distance in international trade. Journal of International Economics, 75(2):310–320, 2008.
M. Flandreau. Trade, finance, and currency blocs in nineteenth century europe: Was the latin monetary union a franc-zone? 1860-1880. Historical Perspective on International Monetary Arrangements. New York: Macmillan, 1995.
M. Karpiarz, P. Fronczak, and A. Fronczak. International trade network: fractal properties and globalization puzzle. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.5963, 2014.
M. Larch, P.-J. Norb ack, S. Sirries, and D. Urban. Heterogeneous firms, globalization and the distance puzzle. Technical report, IFN Working Paper, 2013.
- M. Schi↵ and C. Carrere. On the geography of trade: Distance is alive and well. Available at SSRN 441467, 2003. M. A. Serrano and M. Bogu˜ n
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
N. Crafts. Globalisation and economic growth: a historical perspective. The World Economy, 27(1):45–58, 2004.
P. Guimar˜ aes and P. Portugal. A simple feasable alternative procedure to estimate models with high-dimensional fixed e↵ects. IZA Discussion paper, 3935, 2009.
R. J. Barro and J. F. Ursua. Macroeconomic crises since 1870. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, 39(1):225–350, 2008.
R. Kali and J. Reyes. The architecture of globalization: a network approach to international economic integration. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4):595–620, 2007.
- S. Kim and E.-H. Shin. A longitudinal analysis of globalization and regionalization in international trade: A social network approach. Social Forces, 81(2):445–468, 2002.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
S. Standaert. Divining the level of corruption: a bayesian state-space approach. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2014.
- T. Kastelle, J. Steen, and P. Liesch. Measurig globalisation: an evolutionary economic approach to tracking the evolution of international trade. In DRUID Summer Conference on Knowledge, Innovation and Competitiveness: Dynamycs of Firms, Networks, Regions and InstitutionsCopenhagen, Denemark, June, pages 18–20, 2006.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- The Review of Economics and statistics, 90(1):37–48, 2008.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Y. V. Yotov. A simple solution to the distance puzzle in international trade. Economics Letters, 117(3):794–798, 2012.