Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2491568.2491598acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesperdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A practical framework for ethics: the PD-net approach to supporting ethics compliance in public display studies

Published: 04 June 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Research involving public displays often faces the need to study the effects of a deployment in the wild. While many organizations have institutionalized processes for ensuring ethical compliance of such human subject experiments, these may fail to stimulate sufficient awareness for ethical issues among all project members. Some organizations even require such assessments only for medical research, leaving computer scientists without any incentive to consider and reflect on their study design and data collection practices. Faced with similar problems in the context of the EU-funded PD-Net project, we have implemented a step-by-step ethics process that aims at providing structured yet lightweight guidance to all project members both stimulating the design of ethical user studies, as well as providing continuous documentation. This paper describes our process and reports on 3 years of experience using it. All materials are publicly available and we hope that other projects in the area of public displays, and beyond, will adopt them to suit their particular needs.

References

[1]
Ojala, T., and Kostakos, V. 2012. UBI challenge: research competition on real-world urban computing. In Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Beijing, China, December 07 - 09, 2011). MUM'11. ACM, New York, NY, 205--208. DOI= dx.doi.org/10.1145/2107596.2107622
[2]
Chalmers, M., McMillan, D., Morrison, A., Cramer, H., Rost, M., and Mackay, W. 2011. Ethics, logs and videotape: ethics in large scale user trials and user generated content. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 07 - 12, 2011). CHI EA'11. ACM, New York, NY, 2421--2424. DOI= dx.doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979574
[3]
Morrison, A., Brown, O., McMillan, D., and Chalmers, M. 2011. Informed consent and users' attitudes to logging in large scale trials. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 07 - 12, 2011). CHI EA'11. ACM, New York, NY, 2421--2424. DOI= dx.doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979798
[4]
Wald, D. S. 2004. Bureaucracy of ethics applications. British Medical Journal, 329, 7460 (July 2004), 282--284. DOI= dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7460.282
[5]
Davies, N., Langheinrich, M. José, R., and Schmidt, A. 2012. Open Display Networks: A Communications Medium for the 21st Century. IEEE Computer, 45, 5 (May 2012), 58--64. DOI= dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.114
[6]
Alt, F., Müller, J., Schneegaß, S., Schmidt, A., and Memarovic, N. 2012. How to evaluate public displays. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Porto, Portugal, June 4--5, 2012). PerDis'2012. ACM, New York, NY, 17-. DOI= dx.doi.org/10.1145/2307798.2307815
[7]
Gaskell, G., Einsiedel, E. Hallman, W., Hornig Priest, S., Jackson, J., and Olsthoorn, J. 2005. Social Values and the Governance of Science. Science, 310, 5756 (Dec. 2005). 1908--1909. DOI= dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1119444
[8]
Brey, P. A. E. 2012. Anticipating ethical issues in emerging IT. Ethics and Information Technology. 14, 4 (Dec.2012), 305--317. DOI= dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-012-9293-y
[9]
Gans-Combe, C. 2009: Data Protection and Privacy Ethical Guidelines (Version 5). European Commission, Sept.18, 2009. See ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/privacy.doc
[10]
Henderson, T., Hutton, L., and McNeilly, S. 2012. Ethics and online social network research - developing best practices. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the 26th BCS Conference on Human Computer Interaction (Birmingham, UK, 12 - 14 September 2012). BCSHCI'12. BCS, Swindon, UK.
[11]
Pauwels, E. 2007. Ethics for Researchers. Facilitating Research Excellence in FP7. See ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/ethics-for-researchers.pdf
[12]
ISTAG. 2012. Towards Horizon 2020 -- Recommendations of ISTAG on FP7 ICT Work Program 2013. March 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A Scoping Review of Ethics Across SIGCHIProceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3532106.3533511(137-154)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
  • (2022)A Biocentric Perspective on HCI Design Research Involving PlantsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/351288729:5(1-37)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2022
  • (2016)Opportunistic deploymentsProceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/2914920.2915020(106-117)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Reviews

Barrett Hazeltine

Langheinrich et al. present a formal process for ensuring ethical compliance in the implementation of the EU-funded PD-Net project. (PD refers to "public display." The project involves "large scale networks of pervasive public displays and associated sensors.") The process is especially useful in countries that do not have well-established human factors protocols. The formal aspect of the process enhances research that is multi-disciplinary and multi-site. The process has four components: an ethics advisory board, base documentation, study process templates, and worksheets. The process itself has three phases: 1) preparatory, during which the ethics advisory board is established; 2) research, during which the worksheets are developed and the research is matched to existing study process templates (if no existing templates match, then new ones are prepared); and 3) closing, during which collected personal data is deleted and the report is submitted to the board. The advisory board approves new templates. In the research phase, informed consent documents are prepared. Other documents, for the use of all researchers, are also prepared, including an "ethics primer" and guides for interviews, surveys, public trials, and volunteer studies. Templates for each of these documents are available at http://pd-net.org/ethics/, and sample pages are included in the paper. Using the study process templates makes the process modular and thus scalable. Basing the process on written documents reviewed by the entire research team improves the quality of the overall research and forces each aspect to be examined. The library of templates should be useful to anyone doing related research. The process seems reasonable. Online Computing Reviews Service

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
PerDis '13: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays
June 2013
158 pages
ISBN:9781450320962
DOI:10.1145/2491568
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 June 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. data protection
  2. ethical awareness
  3. human subject experiments
  4. in-the-wild studies
  5. public displays

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

PerDis '13
PerDis '13: The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays
June 4 - 5, 2013
California, Mountain View

Acceptance Rates

PerDis '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 34 submissions, 71%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 213 of 384 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A Scoping Review of Ethics Across SIGCHIProceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3532106.3533511(137-154)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
  • (2022)A Biocentric Perspective on HCI Design Research Involving PlantsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/351288729:5(1-37)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2022
  • (2016)Opportunistic deploymentsProceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/2914920.2915020(106-117)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2016
  • (2016)Computerized Assessment of the Skills of Impaired and Elderly WorkersProceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/2910674.2910675(1-8)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2016
  • (2016)Gamification of a WorkdayProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2851581.2892283(3114-3121)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
  • (2016)On the ethics of social network research in librariesJournal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society10.1108/JICES-05-2015-001314:2(139-151)Online publication date: 9-May-2016
  • (2015)Supporting Ethical Web ResearchProceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2736277.2741654(151-161)Online publication date: 18-May-2015
  • (2015)Deep Cover HCIProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2702613.2732500(543-554)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2015
  • (2013)Ethics in Pervasive Computing ResearchIEEE Pervasive Computing10.1109/MPRV.2013.4812:3(2-4)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media