Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/1854360.1854454dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiclsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The impact of web-based collaborative inquiry for science learning in secondary education

Published: 29 June 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Current educational practice in higher education shows a growing use of CSCL-environments. In secondary education, however, we only see the first signs of transformation in the age of technology and the Internet, and many of these signs are particularly at the administrative level rather than in the classroom. Nevertheless, research, as well as national standards, support collaborative learning and the integration of ICT as an answer to the decreased interest and motivation in science learning and the growing importance that is attached to inquiry skills. This research project deals with the use of web-based collaborative inquiry as a promising approach for secondary science education. In particular, this study investigated the impact of the implementation of a Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE) on students' content knowledge, their inquiry skills and their attitude and engagement towards science. An empirical study in 19 secondary science classes was conducted and 375 students were involved. Additionally, this study focused on gender differences and highlighted the transformation of the teachers' role in web-based teaching. The present study demonstrates the effectiveness of this innovative instructional approach in the attempt of making science accessible and interesting to all and to rectify the gender imbalance in science education.

References

[1]
Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Paper presented at the AERA 2003 Symposium, Chicago, IL.
[2]
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
[3]
Collins, A. (1986). A sample dialogue based on a theory of inquiry teaching (Tech. Rep. No. 367). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman
[4]
Cox, M., Abbott, C., Webb, M., Blakely, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2004). ICT and pedagogy: a review of the research literature. ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series, 18. London: DfES/BECTA.
[5]
DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
[6]
De Meyer, I. (2008). Science competencies for the future in Flanders. The first results from PISA 2006. Ghent: OECD.
[7]
European Commission.(2008). Flash Eurobarometer: Young people and science: analytical report, from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_239_en.pdf
[8]
Flemish Governmental enquiry (2005). Say what you want...about sciences, from http://ewi-vlaanderen.be/documenten/rapport_resultaten_enquete.pdf
[9]
Galili, I. (1996). Students' conceptual change in geometrical optics. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 847--869.
[10]
Gillies, R. M. (2003). Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 35--49.
[11]
Kyle, W. C., Jr., et al. (1985). What research says: Science through discovery: students love it. Science and Children, 23(2), 39--41.
[12]
Lazonder, A. W. (2003). Principles for designing web searching instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 8, 179--193.
[13]
Lindberg, D. H. (1990). What goes 'round comes 'round doing science. Childhood Education, 67(2), 79--81.
[14]
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d'Appolonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449--521.
[15]
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004), Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
[16]
Nichols, J. D. & Miller, R. B. (1994). Cooperative Learning and Student Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 167--178.
[17]
Nichols, J. D. (1996). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Student Achievement and Motivation in a High School Geometry Class. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 467--476.
[18]
Osborne, M., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: Implications of children's knowledge. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
[19]
Peters, V. L., & Slotta, J. D. (2009). Co-designing curricula to promote collaborative knowledge construction in secondary school science. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - Volume 1, Rhodes, Greece.
[20]
Rakow, S. J. (1986). Teaching science as inquiry. Fastback 246. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
[21]
Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuiLE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263--305). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[22]
Sedeno, E. P., Balmaseda, I. S., Suarez, M. J. M., & Dauder, S. G. (2008). Perception of Science and Technology in teenage students from Madrid. Arbor-Ciencia Pensamiento Y Cultura, 184(733), 949--966.
[23]
Slotta, J. D. (2004). Web-Based Inquiry Science Environment. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.). Internet Environments for Science Education (pp. 203--231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[24]
Slotta, J. D., & Linn, M. (2009). WISE Science: Web-Based Inquiry in the Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
[25]
Springer, L., Stanne, M. & Donovan, S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21--51.
[26]
Stark, R., & Gray, D. (1999). Gender preferences in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 633--643.
[27]
Stevens, R. J. & Slavin, R. E. (1995). The Cooperative Elementary School: Effects on Students' Achievement, Attitudes and Social Relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 321--352.
[28]
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2007). Towards a typology of computer use in primary education. Journal for Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 197--206.
[29]
van Joolingen, W. R., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E., & Manlove, S. (2005). Co-Lab: Research and development of an on-line learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 671--688.
[30]
Wallace, R. M., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75--104.
[31]
Woodgate, D. & Stanton Fraser, D. (2007). Workshop of Emerging Technologies for Inquiry-Based Learning in Science. Supplementary Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of Artificial Intelligence in Education, from http://aied.inf.ed.ac.uk/AIED2007/InquiryBasedLearning.pdf

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
ICLS '10: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 1
June 2010
1190 pages

Publisher

International Society of the Learning Sciences

Publication History

Published: 29 June 2010

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 307 of 307 submissions, 100%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 204
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media