Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2429759.2430053acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of terrain in computational methods for indirect fire

Published: 09 December 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Modeling of artillery fire is a well studied concept in military simulations. There are known models which give accurate results, but they usually assume flat terrain with no obstacles. We develop an artillery fire model that takes terrain shapes into account, extending the previous models. We implemented the extended model and used it to compute the effects of firing onto terrains with differing slopes and angles. The results show that taking terrain elevations into account can make drastic differences in kill probabilities compared to the flat earth model.

References

[1]
Åkesson, B., and E. Lappi. 2010, December. "An improved model for simulating indirect fire". In Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference, edited by B. Johansson, S. Jain, J. Montoya-Torres, J. Hugan, and E. Yücesan. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
[2]
Courtney-Green, P. R. 1991. Ammunition for the Land Battle. London, England: Brassey's Ltd.
[3]
Departments of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force 1990. Technical Manual TM 5-1300: Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. Washington, DC: Departments of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force.
[4]
Heininen, T. 2006. "A method to calculate the lethality of fragmenting ammunition". In Lanchester and Beyond---A Workshop on Operational Analysis Methodology, edited by J. S. Hämäläinen, Volume 11 of Defence Forces Technical Research Centre Publications, 19--30. Riihimäki: Defence Forces Technical Research Centre.
[5]
Janzon, B. 1971. "Underlag för verkansberäkningar. H5. Splitters luftmotstånd. (Air resistance of fragments, in Swedish)". Technical Report FOA 2 A 2539-44, Försvarets forskningsanstalt, Stockholm.
[6]
Koskimaa, M. 1968. "Prikaatin ja ylijohdon kenttätykkikalustolle asetettavat vaatimukset ja niiden toteut-tamismahdollisuudet asetekniikan viikeaikaisen kehityksen kannalta tarkasteltuna (Requirements on field artillery equipment of the brigade and high command, and their possibilities of being fullfilled regarding the recent development in arms technology)". In Tiede ja Ase -- Suomen Sotatieteellisen Seuran Vuosijulkaisu No: 26, edited by S. Simelius, K. J. Mikkola, and H. Seppälä, 160--236.
[7]
Lappi, E. 2008. "Sandis Military Operation Analysis Tool". 2nd Nordic Military Analysis Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, November 17--18, 2008.
[8]
Lappi, E., O. Pottonen, S. Mäki, K. Jokinen, O. Saira, B. Åkesson, and M. Vulli. 2008. "Simulating indirect fire -- a numerical model and validation trough field tests". 2nd Nordic Military Analysis Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, November 17--18, 2008.
[9]
National Land Survey of Finland 2012. "Laser scanning data". Accessed 27 March 2012. http://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/en/node/3177.
[10]
Pääesikunta (Defence Command Finland) 1984. Todennäköisyys- ja ampumaopin perusteet (Basics in probability and gunnery, in Finnish). Pääesikunta.
[11]
Rilbe, U. 1970. "Splitters genomslagsförmåga---Sammanställning av numeriska värden grundade på försök och beräkningar (Perforation capability of fragments---Compilation of numerical values based on experiments and calculations, in Swedish)". Technical Report FOA 2 A 2525--44, Försvarets forskningsanstalt, Stockholm.
[12]
Washburn, A. 2003. "Diffuse Gaussian multiple-shot probabilities". Military Operations Research 8 (3): 59--64.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSC '12: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference
December 2012
4271 pages

Sponsors

Publisher

Winter Simulation Conference

Publication History

Published: 09 December 2012

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WSC '12
Sponsor:
WSC '12: Winter Simulation Conference
December 9 - 12, 2012
Berlin, Germany

Acceptance Rates

WSC '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 189 of 384 submissions, 49%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 65
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media