Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2447556.2447588acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Human-agent teaming for robot management in multitasking environments

Published: 03 March 2013 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In the current experiment, we simulated a multitasking environment and evaluated the effects of an intelligent agent, RoboLeader, on the performance of human operators who had the responsibility of managing the plans/routes for three vehicles (their own manned ground vehicle, an aerial robotic vehicle, and a ground robotic vehicle) while maintaining proper awareness of their immediate environment (i.e., threat detection). Results showed that RoboLeader's level of autonomy had a significant impact on participants' concurrent target detection task. Participants detected more targets in the Semi-Auto and Full-Auto conditions than in the Manual condition. Participants reported significantly higher workload in the Manual condition than in the two RoboLeader conditions (Semi-Auto and Full-Auto). Operator spatial ability also had a significant impact on target detection and situation awareness performance measures.

    References

    [1]
    Chen, J.Y.C., Barnes, M.J., and Harper-Sciarini, M. 2011. Supervisory control of multiple robots: Human performance issues and user interface design. IEEE Trans. Sys., Man, & Cybern.--Part C: App. & Rev., 41, 4 (July 2011), 435--454.
    [2]
    Cummings, M. L., Bruni, S., and Mitchell, P. 2010. Human supervisory control challenges in network-centric operations. Rev. Human Factors & Ergon., 6, 1 (May 2010), 34--78.
    [3]
    Chen, J.Y.C. and Barnes, M.J. 2012. Supervisory control of multiple robots in dynamic tasking environments. Ergonomics, 55, 9 (Sept. 2012), 1043--1058.
    [4]
    Fern, L. and Shively, R. J., 2009. A comparison of varying levels of automation on the supervisory control of multiple UASs. Proc. AUVSI's Unmanned Systems North America, 10--13 Aug, 2009, Washington, DC.
    [5]
    Miller, C. and Parasuraman, R., 2007. Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: Delegation interfaces for supervisory control. Human Factors, 49, 1 (Feb. 2007), 57--75.
    [6]
    Defense Science Board, 2012. The role of autonomy in DoD systems. Washington DC: Undersecretary of Defense.
    [7]
    Chen, J.Y.C. and Barnes, M.J. 2012. Supervisory control of multiple robots: Effects of imperfect automation and individual differences. Human Factors, 54, 2, 157--174.
    [8]
    Snyder, M., Qu, Z., Chen, J., and Barnes, M. 2010. RoboLeader for reconnaissance by a team of robotic vehicles. Proc. Int. Symp. Collab. Tech. & Sys. (Chicago, May 17--21, 2010). IEEE, New York, 522--530.
    [9]
    Barber, D., Davis, L., Nicholson, D., Finkelstein, N, and Chen, J. 2008. The mixed initiative experimental (MIX) testbed for human robot interactions with varied levels of automation. Proc. Army Sci. Conf (Orlando, FL, Dec. 1--4, 2008). US Army, Washington, DC.

    Index Terms

    1. Human-agent teaming for robot management in multitasking environments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '13: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction
      March 2013
      452 pages
      ISBN:9781467330558

      Sponsors

      In-Cooperation

      • AAAI: American Association for Artificial Intelligence
      • Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc: Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc

      Publisher

      IEEE Press

      Publication History

      Published: 03 March 2013

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. human robot interaction
      2. individual differences
      3. military
      4. multitasking
      5. simulation

      Qualifiers

      • Abstract

      Conference

      HRI'13
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 153
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media