Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2665049.2665061acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspringsimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How to model the "human factor" for agent-based simulation in social media analysis?: work in progress paper

Published: 13 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Social networks have evolved to a key technology for information diffusion. Consequently, discourse behavior and communication dynamics have become an important research area. However, privacy settings limit data acquisition extremely, such that empirical online content and discourse analysis are hardly applicable here. Since the "human factor" mostly influences the behavior of individual actors, network analysis also provides a restricted perspective. This leads to the question: How to present the "human factor" in combination with network dynamics?
In this paper, we propose the application of agent-based simulation (ABS) and intelligent agents for analysis of information propagation in social networks. The benefit of a simulation approach is, that dynamic analysis of communication behavior as well as artificial scenarios can be produced. In contrast to conventional ABS, where agents are modeled in a reactive or stochastic way, intelligent behavior of the agents should lead to a more realistic behavior of the simulated human actors. Thus, intelligent agents should provide a comprehensive perspective on communication processes taking place in social networks. We discuss our current state of work in using a variety of psychological theories for accomplishing a representation of different personal traits and relationships between actors.

References

[1]
Facebook friendships network dataset -- KONECT, Oct. 2013.
[2]
Y. Bachrach, M. Kosinski, T. Graepel, P. Kohli, and D. Stillwell. Personality and patterns of facebook usage. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pages 24--32, 2012.
[3]
E. Bonabeau. Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(3):7280--7287, 2002.
[4]
M. S.-Y. Chwe. Communication and coordination in social networks. The Review of Economic Studies, 67(1):1--16, 2000.
[5]
R. Conte, N. Gilbert, and J. S. Sichman. MAS and social simulation: A suitable commitment. In J. S. Sichman, R. Conte, and N. Gilbert, editors, Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation, pages 1--9. Springer, 1998.
[6]
P. Davidsson. Agent based social simulation: a computer science view. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(1), 2002.
[7]
J. Doran and N. Gilbert. Simulating societies: an introduction. Simulating societies: the computer simulation of social phenomena, pages 1--18, 1994.
[8]
Facebook. 2013 Year in Review, 2013.
[9]
M. Gatti, A. P. Appel, C. Pinhanez, C. dos Santos, D. Gribel, P. Cavalin, and S. B. Neto. Large-scale multi-agent-based modeling and simulation of microblogging-based online social network. In Parunak, H. Van Dyke and S. J. Alam, editors, Multi-Agent-Based Simulation, volume 13 of Lecture notes in computer science Lecture notes in artificial intelligence. 2013.
[10]
Goldberg. An alternative description of personality: the big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6):1216--1229, 1990.
[11]
M. S. Granovetter. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, pages 1360--1380, 1973.
[12]
W. O. Kermack and A. G. McKendrick. Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics. II. The problem of endemicity. Proceedings of the Royal society of London. Series A, 138(834):55--83, 1932.
[13]
A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. BDI agents: From theory to practice. In L. Gasser and V. Lesser, editors, Proceedings of the first international Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95), pages 312--319, 1995.
[14]
E. M. Rogers. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press and Collier Macmillan, New York and London, 3rd ed edition, 1983.
[15]
C. Ross, E. S. Orr, M. Sisic, J. M. Arseneault, M. G. Simmering, and R. R. Orr. Personality and motivations associated with facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2):578--586, 2009.
[16]
I. J. Timm. Dynamisches Konfliktmanagement als Verhaltenssteuerung intelligenter Agenten. 2004.
[17]
M. Wooldridge. Intelligent agents: The key concepts. In V. Marík, editor, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, volume 2322, pages 3--43. Springer, Berlin {u.a.}, 2002.
[18]
M. J. Wooldridge. Reasoning about rational agents. The MIT Press, 2000.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ADS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Symposium on Agent Directed Simulation
April 2014
102 pages

Sponsors

  • (SCS): The Society for Modeling and Simulation International

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Society for Computer Simulation International

San Diego, CA, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 April 2014

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. deliberative agents
  2. information propagation
  3. social media analysis
  4. social networks
  5. social simulation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SpringSim '14
Sponsor:
  • (SCS)

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 95
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media