Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2772879.2772935acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Semantic Framework for Socially Adaptive Agents: Towards strong norm compliance

Published: 04 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We address the question of how an agent can adapt its behavior to comply with newly adopted norms. This is particularly relevant in the case of open systems where agents may enter and leave norm-governed social contexts not known at design time. This requires norms to be explicitly and separately stated and presented to an agent as rules to which it then can try to adapt its behavior.
We propose a formal semantic framework that specifies an execution mechanism for such socially adaptive agents. This framework is based on expressing norms using Linear Temporal Logic. The formality of the framework allows us to rigorously study its norm compliance properties. A weak form of norm compliance allows agents to abort execution in order to prevent norm violation. In this paper we investigate a stronger notion of norm compliance that is evaluated over infinite traces. We show that it is not possible for all agents to be strongly compliant with any arbitrary set of norms. We then investigate situations when strong norm compliance can be guaranteed.

References

[1]
N. Alechina, M. Dastani, and B. Logan. Programming norm-aware agents. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'12), pages 1057--1064. IFAAMAS, 2012.
[2]
G. Andrighetto, M. Campenni, F. Cecconi, and R. Conte. The complex loop of norm emergence: A simulation model. In Simulating Interacting Agents and Social Phenomena: The second world congress, volume 7 of Agent-Based Social Systems, pages 19--35. Springer, 2010.
[3]
G. Andrighetto, G. Governatori, P. Noriega, and L. W. N. van der Torre, editors. Normative Multi-Agent Systems, volume 4 of Dagstuhl Follow-Ups. Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2013.
[4]
G. Boella and R. Damiano. An architecture for normative reactive agents. In Proceedings of the 5th Pacific Rim International Workshop on Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA'02), volume 2413 of LNCS, pages 1--17, 2002.
[5]
R. H. Bordini, M. Dastani, J. Dix, and A. El Fallah Seghrouchni. Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Platforms and Applications. Springer, Berlin, 2005.
[6]
J. Broersen and J. Brunel. Preservation of obligations in a temporal and deontic framework. In Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'07), pages 1108--1110. ACM, 2007.
[7]
J. Broersen, S. Cranefield, Y. Elrakaiby, D. Gabbay, D. Grossi, E. Lorini, X. Parent, L. W. N. van der Torre, L. Tummolini, P. Turrini, and F. Schwarzentruber. Normative reasoning and consequence. In G. Andrighetto, G. Governatori, P. Noriega, and L. W. N. van der Torre, editors, Normative Multi-Agent Systems, volume 4 of Dagstuhl Follow-Ups, pages 33--70. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2013.
[8]
N. Bulling, M. Dastani, and M. Knobbout. Monitoring norm violations in multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the twelfth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS'13), pages 491--498. IFAAMAS, 2013.
[9]
R. Conte, C. Castelfranchi, and F. Dignum. Autonomous norm acceptance. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL'98), volume 1555 of LNCS, pages 99--112. Springer, 1999.
[10]
S. Cranefield, M. Winikoff, and W. Vasconcelos. Modelling and monitoring interdependent expectations. In S. Cranefield, M. Riemsdijk, J. Vázquez-Salceda, and P. Noriega, editors, Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent System VII, volume 7254 of LNCS, pages 149--166. Springer, 2012.
[11]
N. Criado, E. Argente, P. Noriega, and V. Botti. Human-inspired model for norm compliance decision making. Information Sciences, 245:218--239, 2013.
[12]
D. D'Aprile, L. Giordano, V. Gliozzi, A. Martelli, G. Pozzato, and D. T. Dupré. Verifying business process compliance by reasoning about actions. In J. Dix, J. Leite, G. Governatori, and W. Jamroga, editors, Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems, volume 6245 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 99--116. Springer, 2010.
[13]
F. Dignum, V. Dignum, J. Thangarajah, L. Padgham, and M. Winikoff. Open agent systems??? In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE'07), volume 4951 of LNCS, pages 73--87. Springer, 2008.
[14]
F. Dignum and R. Kuiper. Combining dynamic deontic logic and temporal logic for the specification of deadlines. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, volume 5, pages 336--346. IEEE, 1997.
[15]
A. Elgammal. Towards a comprehensive framework for business process compliance. PhD thesis, 2012.
[16]
E. Emerson. Temporal and modal logic. In J. van Leeuwen, editor, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, volume B: Formal Models and Semantics, pages 996--1072. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.
[17]
M. S. Fagundes, H. Billhardt, and S. Ossowski. Normative reasoning with an adaptive self-interested agent model based on Markov Decision Processes. In Proceedings of the 12th Ibero-American Conference on AI (IBERAMIA'10), volume 6433 of LNCS, pages 274--283. Springer, 2010.
[18]
M. Fisher. A normal form for temporal logics and its applications in theorem-proving and execution. Journal of Logic and Computation, 7(4):429--456, 1997.
[19]
M. Fisher. Agent deliberation in an executable temporal framework. Journal of Applied Logic, 9(4):223--238, 2011.
[20]
M. Fisher and A. Hepple. Executing logical agent specifications. In R. H. Bordini, M. Dastani, J. Dix, and A. El Fallah Seghrouchni, editors, Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Tools and Applications, pages 1--27. Springer, Berlin, 2009.
[21]
G. Governatori, F. Olivieri, S. Scannapieco, and M. Cristani. Designing for compliance: Norms and goals. In F. Olken, M. Palmirani, and D. Sottara, editors, 5th International Symposium on Rule-Based Modeling and Computing on the Semantic Web (RuleML'11), pages 282--297. Springer, 2011.
[22]
G. Governatori and S. Shazia. The journey to business process compliance. pages 426--454. IGI Global, 2009.
[23]
H. Groefsema and D. Bucur. A survey of formal business process verification: From soundness to variability. In International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design, pages 198--203, 2013.
[24]
J. Hansen, G. Pigozzi, and L. van der Torre. Ten philosophical problems in deontic logic. In G. Boella, L. van der Torre, and H. Verhagen, editors, Normative Multi-agent Systems, number 07122 in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings. Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, 2007.
[25]
K. Hindriks and M. B. van Riemsdijk. Satisfying maintenance goals. In Proceedings of the fifth International Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT'07), volume 4897 of LNAI, pages 86--103. Springer, 2007.
[26]
F. López y López, M. Luck, and M. d'Inverno. Constraining autonomy through norms. In The First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'02), pages 674--681. ACM, 2002.
[27]
F. López y López, M. Luck, and M. d'Inverno. Normative agent reasoning in dynamic societies. In The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'04), pages 732--739. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
[28]
F. M. Maggi, M. Westergaard, M. Montali, and W. M. van der Aalst. Runtime verification of ltl-based declarative process models. In S. Khurshid and K. Sen, editors, Runtime Verification, volume 7186 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 131--146. Springer, 2012.
[29]
F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck. Norm-based behaviour modification in BDI agents. In Proceedings of the eighth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS'09), pages 177--184, Budapest, 2009.
[30]
M. Montali, P. Torroni, F. Chesani, P. Mello, M. Alberti, and E. Lamma. Abductive logic programming as an effective technology for the static verification of declarative business processes. Fundamenta Informaticae, 102(3-4):325--361, 2010.
[31]
S. Panagiotidi and J. Vázquez-Salceda. Norm-aware planning: Semantics and implementation. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 03, pages 33--36. IEEE, 2011.
[32]
M. B. van Riemsdijk, L. Dennis, M. Fisher, and K. V. Hindriks. Agent reasoning for norm compliance: a semantic approach. In Proceedings of the twelfth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS'13), pages 499--506. IFAAMAS, 2013.
[33]
M. B. van Riemsdijk, K. V. Hindriks, C. M. Jonker, and M. Sierhuis. Formalizing organizational constraints: A semantic approach. In Proceedings of the nineth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS'10), pages 823--830. IFAAMAS, 2010.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Robust norm emergence by revealing and reasoning about contextProceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3304415.3304421(28-34)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2018
  • (2018)Automatic Resolution of Normative Conflicts in Supportive Technology Based on User ValuesACM Transactions on Internet Technology10.1145/315837118:4(1-21)Online publication date: 25-May-2018
  • (2017)Engineering Socially Intelligent Personal Agents via NormsProceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3091125.3091453(1822-1823)Online publication date: 8-May-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
AAMAS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
May 2015
2072 pages
ISBN:9781450334136

Sponsors

  • IFAAMAS

In-Cooperation

Publisher

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

Richland, SC

Publication History

Published: 04 May 2015

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. agent programming languages
  2. executable temporal logic
  3. formal semantics
  4. norm compliance
  5. norm-aware agents

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • NWO
  • EPSRC

Conference

AAMAS'15
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

AAMAS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 108 of 670 submissions, 16%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 22 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Robust norm emergence by revealing and reasoning about contextProceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3304415.3304421(28-34)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2018
  • (2018)Automatic Resolution of Normative Conflicts in Supportive Technology Based on User ValuesACM Transactions on Internet Technology10.1145/315837118:4(1-21)Online publication date: 25-May-2018
  • (2017)Engineering Socially Intelligent Personal Agents via NormsProceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3091125.3091453(1822-1823)Online publication date: 8-May-2017
  • (2017)ArnorProceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3091125.3091163(230-238)Online publication date: 8-May-2017
  • (2015)Creating Socially Adaptive Electronic PartnersProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/2772879.2773303(1201-1206)Online publication date: 4-May-2015

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media