Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2772879.2772942acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

DIRECT: A Scalable Approach for Route Guidance in Selfish Orienteering Problems

Published: 04 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We address the problem of crowd congestion at venues like theme parks, museums and world expos by providing route guidance to multiple selfish users (with budget constraints) moving through the venue simultaneously. To represent these settings, we introduce the Selfish Orienteering Problem (SeOP) that combines two well studied problems from literature, namely Orienteering Problem (OP) and Selfish Routing (SR). OP is a single agent routing problem where the goal is to minimize latency (or maximize reward) in traversing a subset of nodes while respecting budget constraints. SR is a game between selfish agents looking for minimum latency routes from source to destination along edges of a network available to all agents. Thus, SeOP is a multi-agent planning problem where agents have selfish interests and individual budget constraints. As with Selfish Routing, we employ Nash Equilibrium as the solution concept in solving SeOP. A direct mathematical program formulation to find a Nash equilibrium in SeOP cannot scale because the number of constraints is quadratic in the number of paths, which itself is an exponential quantity. To address scalability issues, we make two key contributions. First, we provide a compact non-pairwise formulation with linear number of constraints in the number of paths to enforce the equilibrium condition. Second, we introduce DIRECT, an incremental and iterative master-slave decomposition approach to compute an approximate equilibrium solution. Similar to existing flow based approaches, DIRECT is scale invariant in the number of agents. We also provide a theoretical discussion of our approximation quality and present extensive empirical results on synthetic and real-world graphs demonstrating the scalability of combining DIRECT with our non-pairwise formulation.

References

[1]
C. Archetti, A. Hertz, and M. G. Speranza. Metaheuristics for the team orienteering problem. Journal of Heuristics, 13(1):49--76, 2007.
[2]
G. W. Brown. Iterative solution of games by fictitious play. Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, 13(1):374--376, 1951.
[3]
A. Fabrikant, C. Papadimitriou, and K. Talwar. The complexity of pure nash equilibria. In Proc. of STOC, 2004.
[4]
T. L. Friesz, D. Bernstein, T. E. Smith, R. L. Tobin, and B. W. Wie. A variational inequality formulation of the dynamic network user equilibrium problem. Operations Research, 41(1):179--191, 1993.
[5]
B. L. Golden, L. Levy, and R. Vohra. The orienteering problem. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 34(3):307--318, 1987.
[6]
L. Ke, C. Archetti, and Z. Feng. Ants can solve the team orienteering problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 54(3):648--665, 2008.
[7]
K. Kollias and T. Roughgarden. Restoring pure equilibria to weighted congestion games. In Proceedings of the 38th international conference on Automata, languages and programming - Volume Part II, ICALP'11, pages 539--551, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. Springer-Verlag.
[8]
I. Milchtaich. Congestion games with player-specific payoff functions. Games and Economic Behavior, 13:111--124, 1996.
[9]
R. W. Rosenthal. A class of games possessing pure-strategy nash equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory, 2:65--67, 1973.
[10]
T. Roughgarden and E. Tardos. How bad is selfish routing? Journal of the ACM, 49(2):236--259, Mar. 2002.
[11]
W. Souffriau, P. Vansteenwegen, G. Vanden Berghe, and D. Van Oudheusden. A path relinking approach for the team orienteering problem. Computers & Operations Research, 37(11):1853--1859, 2010.
[12]
G. N. T. Leventhal and L. Trotter. A column generation algorithm for optimal traffic assignment. Transportation Science, 7(2):168--176, 1973.
[13]
T. Tsiligirides. Heuristic methods applied to orienteering. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35(9):797--809, 1984.
[14]
P. Vansteenwegen, W. Souffriau, G. V. Berghe, and D. V. Oudheusden. A guided local search metaheuristic for the team orienteering problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(1):118--127, 2009.
[15]
P. Vansteenwegen, W. Souffriau, and D. V. Oudheusden. The orienteering problem: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 209(1):1--10, 2011.
[16]
J. G. Wardrop and J. I. Whitehead. Correspondence. some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. ICE Proceedings: Engineering Divisions, 1, 1952.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Balanced Task Allocation by Partitioning the Multiple Traveling Salesperson ProblemProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3306127.3331861(1479-1487)Online publication date: 8-May-2019
  • (2018)Orienteering Algorithms for Generating Travel ItinerariesProceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3159652.3159697(180-188)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2018

Index Terms

  1. DIRECT: A Scalable Approach for Route Guidance in Selfish Orienteering Problems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AAMAS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
    May 2015
    2072 pages
    ISBN:9781450334136

    Sponsors

    • IFAAMAS

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

    Richland, SC

    Publication History

    Published: 04 May 2015

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. constraint generation
    2. game theory
    3. network congestion games
    4. orienteering
    5. selfish routing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Singapore National Research Foundation under its International Research Centre @ Singapore Funding Initiative

    Conference

    AAMAS'15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    AAMAS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 108 of 670 submissions, 16%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2019)Balanced Task Allocation by Partitioning the Multiple Traveling Salesperson ProblemProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3306127.3331861(1479-1487)Online publication date: 8-May-2019
    • (2018)Orienteering Algorithms for Generating Travel ItinerariesProceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3159652.3159697(180-188)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2018

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media