Article

Free access

Computing budget allocation for simulation experiments with different system structure

Authors:

Chun-Hung Chen,

Yu Yuan,

Hsiao-Chang Chen,

Enver Yücesan,

Liyi DaiAuthors Info & Claims

WSC '98: Proceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation

Pages 735 - 742

Published: 01 December 1998 Publication History

PDF eReader

References

[1]

Bechofer R.E., T.J. Santner, and D.M. Goldsman. 1995. Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening, and Multiple Comparisons. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Google Scholar

[2]

Berger, J. O. 1980. Statistical Decision Theory, Foundations, Concepts, and Methods. Springer Verlag.

Google Scholar

[3]

Berger, J. O., and J. Deely. 1994. "A Bayesian Approach to Ranking and Selection of Related Means with Alternative to AOV Methodology," Journal of American Statistics Association. 83,364-373.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[4]

Bernardo, J.M., and A.F.M. Smith. 1994. Bayesian Theory. Wiley.

Google Scholar

[5]

Chen, C. H. 1996. "A Lower Bound for the Correct Subset- Selection Probability and Its Application to Discrete Event System Simulations." IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41 8, 1227-1231.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[6]

Chen, C. H. 1995. An Effective Approach to Smartly Allocate Computing Budget for Discrete Event Simulation. Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2598-2605.

Google Scholar

[7]

Chen, C. H., L. Dai, H. S. Chen, and E. Yticesan. 1998. "Efficient Computation of Optimal Budget Allocation for Discrete Event Simulation Experiment," submitted to Operations Research.

Google Scholar

[8]

Chen, H. C., C. H. Chen, L. Dai, and E. Yticesan. 1997. "New Development of Optimal Computing Budget Allocation For Discrete Event Simulation," Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Chen, C. H., H. C. Chen, and L. Dai. 1996. A Gradient Approach for Smartly Allocating Computing Budget for Discrete Event Simulation. Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference, 398-405.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

Chick, S. E. 1997. Selecting The Best System: a Decision- Theoretic Approach. Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, 326-333.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

Chiu, W.K., 1974. The Ranking of Means of Normal Populations for a Generalized Selection Goal. Biometrika, 61,579-584.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[12]

DeGroot. 1970. Optimal Statistical Decisions. McGraw- Hill Book Co., New York.

Google Scholar

[13]

Dudewicz, E. J. and S.R. Dalal. 1975. Allocation of Observations in Ranking and Selection with Unequal Variances. Sankhya, B37:28-78.

Google Scholar

[14]

Goldsman, D., B. L. Nelson, and B. Schmeiser. 1991. Methods for Selecting the Best System. Proceedings of the 1991 Winter Simulation Conference, 177-186.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[15]

Goldsman, D., and B. L. Nelson. 1994. Ranking, Selection, and Multiple Comparison in Computer Simulation. Proceedings of the 1994 Winter Simulation Conference, 192-199.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[16]

Gupta, S. S. and J.O. Berger. 1988. Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics IV. Springer Verlag.

Google Scholar

[17]

Gupta, S. S. and S. Panchapakesan. 1979. Multiple Decision Procedures: Theory and Methodology of Selecting and Ranking Populations. John Wiley.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[18]

Hsu, J. C. 1996. Multiple Comparisons Theory and Methods. Chapman & Hall.

Google Scholar

[19]

Inoue, K., and S. E. Chick. 1998. "Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Assessments of Uncertainty for Selecting the Best System," to appear in the Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[20]

Luenberger, D. G., 1984. Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Addison-Wesley.

Google Scholar

[21]

Matejcik, F. J. and B.L. Nelson. 1993. Simultaneous Ranking, Selection and Multiple Comparisons for Simulation. Proceeding of the 1993 Winter Simulation Confidence, 386-391.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[22]

Matejcik, F. J. and B. L. Nelson. 1995. "Two-stage multiple comparisons with the best for computer simulation." Operations Research, 43,633-640.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[23]

Rinott, Y. 1978. On Two-stage Selection Procedures and Related Probability Inequalities. Communications in Statistics A7,799-811.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[24]

Schmeiser, B. 1982. Batch Size Effects in the Analysis of Simulation Output. Operations Research, 30.3, 556- 567.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Nelson B(2011)Thirty years of "batch size effects"Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference10.5555/2431518.2431561(393-400)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2431518.2431561
Lee LChew EFerrin DMorrice D(2003)Efficient simulation proceduresProceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation10.5555/1030818.1030891(535-542)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2003
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1030818.1030891
Swisher JJacobson SYücesan E(2003)Discrete-event simulation optimization using ranking, selection, and multiple comparison proceduresACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation10.1145/858481.85848413:2(134-154)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2003
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/858481.858484
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Computing budget allocation for simulation experiments with different system structure
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Modeling and simulation
    1. Model development and analysis
      1. Modeling methodologies
    2. Simulation types and techniques
      1. Discrete-event simulation

Recommendations

Computing budget allocation rules for multi-objective simulation models based on different measures of selection quality

In an optimal computing budget allocation problem, different measures of selection quality determine how the best set of designs can be identified and how the simulation budget should be allocated among the designs. In this paper, we look at several ...
Recent advancements in resource allocation techniques for cloud computing environment: a systematic review

There are two actors in cloud computing environment cloud providers and cloud users. On one hand cloud providers hold enormous computing resources in the cloud large data centers that rent the resources out to the cloud users on a pay-per-use basis to ...
Resource allocation mechanisms in cloud computing: a systematic literature review

Cloud computing offers a vast number of processing opportunities and heterogeneous resources and meets the requirements of numerous applications at various levels. Thus, the allocation and management of resources are vital in cloud computing. Resource ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

WSC '98: Proceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation

December 1998

1766 pages

ISBN:0780351347

Publisher

IEEE Computer Society Press

Washington, DC, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 1998

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

WSC98

Sponsor:

IIE
IEEE-SMCS
INFORMS/CS
ASA
ACM
SCS
SIGSIM
IEEE-CS
NIST

WSC98: Winter Simulation Conference 1998

December 13 - 16, 1998

D.C., Washington, USA

Acceptance Rates

WSC '98 Paper Acceptance Rate 164 of 216 submissions, 76%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

10
Total Citations
View Citations
219
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)27
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Nelson B(2011)Thirty years of "batch size effects"Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference10.5555/2431518.2431561(393-400)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2431518.2431561
Lee LChew EFerrin DMorrice D(2003)Efficient simulation proceduresProceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation10.5555/1030818.1030891(535-542)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2003
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1030818.1030891
Swisher JJacobson SYücesan E(2003)Discrete-event simulation optimization using ranking, selection, and multiple comparison proceduresACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation10.1145/858481.85848413:2(134-154)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2003
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/858481.858484
Hyden PSchruben LFishwick PKang KJoines JBarton R(2000)Improved decision processes through simultaneous simulation and time dilationProceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation10.5555/510378.510484(743-748)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2000
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/510378.510484
Ólafsson SGopinath NFishwick PKang KJoines JBarton R(2000)Optimal selection probability in the two-stage nested partitions method for simulation-based optimizationProceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation10.5555/510378.510483(736-742)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2000
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/510378.510483
Shi L(2000)A New Algorithm for Stochastic Discrete Resource AllocationOptimizationDiscrete Event Dynamic Systems10.1023/A:101721401135210:3(271-294)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2000
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1023/A%3A1017214011352
Swisher JJacobson S(1999)A survey of ranking, selection, and multiple comparison procedures for discrete-event simulationProceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation---a bridge to the future - Volume 110.1145/324138.324307(492-501)Online publication date: 1-Dec-1999
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/324138.324307
Ólafsson S(1999)Iterative ranking-and-selection for large-scale optimizationProceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation---a bridge to the future - Volume 110.1145/324138.324302(479-485)Online publication date: 1-Dec-1999
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/324138.324302
Hyden PSchruben L(1999)Designing simultaneous simulation experimentsProceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation---a bridge to the future - Volume 110.1145/324138.324255(389-394)Online publication date: 1-Dec-1999
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/324138.324255
Chen HChen CLin JYücesan E(1999)An asymptotic allocation for simultaneous simulation experimentsProceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation---a bridge to the future - Volume 110.1145/324138.324242(359-366)Online publication date: 1-Dec-1999
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/324138.324242

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Computing budget allocation rules for multi-objective simulation models based on different measures of selection quality

Recent advancements in resource allocation techniques for cloud computing environment: a systematic review

Resource allocation mechanisms in cloud computing: a systematic literature review

Comments

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Other Metrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Cited By

PDF

eReader

Login options

Full Access

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Computing budget allocation rules for multi-objective simulation models based on different measures of selection quality

Recent advancements in resource allocation techniques for cloud computing environment: a systematic review

Resource allocation mechanisms in cloud computing: a systematic literature review

Comments

Information

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

PDF

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations