Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/800032.800746acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Test strategy for microprocessers

Published: 27 June 1983 Publication History

Abstract

We divide microprocessor testing into three distinct phases: verification of the control and data transfer functions; verification of the data-manipulation functions; and verification of the input-output functions. Here we deal in detail only with the first of these.
To verify control, appropriate additional signals inside the chip are used and made observable at the terminal pins of the microprocessor chip. Complete instruction sequences, executed in a test mode, then serve to verify the control functions. Procedures for doing this are given and also for verifying data transfer functions.

References

[1]
N. Tredennick, "How to Flowchart for Hardware", IEEE Computer, 14 (12), Dec. 1981, pp. 87-102.
[2]
S. M. Thatte and J.A. Abraham, "Test Generation for Microprocessor", IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-29(6), June 1980, pp. 429-44.
[3]
Z. Kohavi, Switching and Finite Automata Theory, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1978.
[4]
B. Koenemann, J. Mucha, and G. Zwiehoff, "Built-in Logic Block Observation Techniques", Digest 1979 Test Conference, Oct. 1979, pp. 37-41.
[5]
A. H. Ashkinazy, Fault Detection in Asynchronous Sequential Machines, Ph D Thesis, Columbia University, 1970.
[6]
H. Fujiwara, Y. Nagao, T. Sasao, K. Kinoshita, "Easily Testable Sequential Machines with Extra Inputs", IEEE Trans. on Computers, C-24(8), Aug. 1975, pp. 821-826.
[7]
S. K. Jain, "Testable Design of Microprocessors and Other VLSI", M. S. Thesis in Elect. Eng. Lehigh Univ., 1982.

Cited By

View all
  • (1998)Synthesis of Native Mode Self-Test ProgramsJournal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications10.1023/A:100830582097913:2(137-148)Online publication date: 1-Oct-1998
  • (1989)On inherent untestability of unaugmented microprogrammed controlACM SIGMICRO Newsletter10.1145/75395.7540520:3(88-96)Online publication date: 1-Aug-1989
  • (1989)On inherent untestability of unaugmented microprogrammed controlProceedings of the 22nd annual workshop on Microprogramming and microarchitecture10.1145/75362.75405(88-96)Online publication date: 1-Aug-1989

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
DAC '83: Proceedings of the 20th Design Automation Conference
June 1983
700 pages

Sponsors

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 27 June 1983

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,770 of 5,499 submissions, 32%

Upcoming Conference

DAC '25
62nd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
June 22 - 26, 2025
San Francisco , CA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (1998)Synthesis of Native Mode Self-Test ProgramsJournal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications10.1023/A:100830582097913:2(137-148)Online publication date: 1-Oct-1998
  • (1989)On inherent untestability of unaugmented microprogrammed controlACM SIGMICRO Newsletter10.1145/75395.7540520:3(88-96)Online publication date: 1-Aug-1989
  • (1989)On inherent untestability of unaugmented microprogrammed controlProceedings of the 22nd annual workshop on Microprogramming and microarchitecture10.1145/75362.75405(88-96)Online publication date: 1-Aug-1989

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media