Abstract
Bound states in the continuum (BICs) can be derived from a generalized waveguide condition in which the total internal reflection is substituted by coherent perfect reflection. Coherent perfect reflection can occur in the truncated photonic crystal (PhC) due to the interference of different Bloch modes. Based on the coherent reflection, BICs can be constructed by the bulk Bloch modes of PhC slabs. In contrast to the determination of BICs from the topological vortices of far-field radiation, this interpretation from coherent reflection can give the spatial field profile in detail in the near field. We show that the BICs can be characterized by the indices (or number of nodes) of their constituent Bloch modes. Moreover, all the guided resonances in addition to BICs can also be labelled by these mode indices. It is found that for the guided resonances the mode indices can change suddenly on the same frequency band. Our results may have potential applications in guided-wave optics and enhanced light-matter interaction.
© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement
1. Introduction
Guiding light is significant in the classical and modern optics. The concept of total internal reflection, as the basis of guided-wave optics, plays a key role in modern fiber optic communication networks [1,2]. Compared to the index guiding, the existence of photonic band gaps provides another mechanism to guide light [3–5]. Essentially, both of these two mechanisms are to design a mirror made of dielectrics to reflect and guide light, where outgoing waves are forbidden owing to the mismatch of momentum or band-gap effect [6]. Recently, another mechanism called coherent perfect reflection (CPR) is proposed. The CPR comes from the destructive interference of Bloch modes and can occur at the interface between the photonic crystal (PhC) and uniform dielectric medium [7].
If a periodic modulation is introduced in an optical waveguide or fiber, the original waveguide mode may turn into a guided resonance with a finite lifetime due to Bragg scattering. Guided resonances appear above the light line and can couple to external radiation modes [8], which have been studied by the multimode Fabry-Perot model in high-contrast gratings [9–11]. However, an exception is that some isolated state embedded in the continuum can be perfectly bounded with no radiation, known as bound state in the continuum (BIC) [12]. This concept was first proposed by von Neumann and Wigner for the electron in a hypothetical quantum system [13]. Since then, BICs have been found to be a widespread wave phenomenon and extended in various physical systems such as photonics [7,14–39], acoustics [40–42], and water waves [43,44]. The remarkable feature of BIC-inspired modes (e.g., quasi-BICs) with ultra-high quality factor renders many applications possible, including lasing [45–47], sensing [48,49], surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy [50] and nonlinear optics [51]. In the PhC slabs, BICs have been theoretically identified and experimentally observed on the frequency band of guided resonances [14–24]. The formation mechanism of the BICs in the PhC slab has been interpreted by the destructive interference of radiation from the bulk states of PhCs [7,19–21]. It is found that BICs can be determined by the polarization vortices of far-field radiation and therefore characterized by topological charges [18]. In addition to the topological properties of BICs in the far field, the near-field behaviors are also significant in the applications of BICs.
Here, the near-field properties of BICs in the PhC slab are analyzed by decomposing the BICs into bulk Bloch modes of PhC. By utilizing the coherent perfect reflection, the conventional waveguide condition (total internal reflection and resonance conditions) for the planar dielectric waveguide has been generalized to determine BICs [7]. Based on this generalized resonance condition, the indices, or the number of nodes, for each Bloch modes can be obtained. These mode indices depend on normal component of the wave vector, thickness of slab, and symmetry of BIC. Since the number of constituted Bloch modes is more than one, there are at least two mode indices for BICs. For the accidental BICs in the region with only two bulk Bloch modes and one diffraction order in the q-ω space, it is found that the difference between indices of Bloch modes is always fixed for the same structure. Furthermore, this analysis is also applicable to the guided resonances of PhC slab. For the guided resonances, the mode indices can undergo a sudden change on the same frequency band.
2. Theory and simulation
Firstly, we demonstrate the coherent perfect reflection for a semi-infinite one-dimensional (1D) PhC. This PhC is periodic in the y direction with a period a, uniform in the x direction, and truncated at the interface of z = 0, as schematically shown in Fig. 1(a). The dielectric at the space of z > 0 has a relative permittivity εb. The alternating dielectric layers of PhC have relative permittivities ε1 and ε2, and thicknesses a – d and d, respectively. Here, transverse electric (TE) waves are taken as an example, and similar results can be obtained for TM waves. For the PhC, the dispersion relation can relate the frequency ω, the normal component of the wave vector kz, and the Bloch wave vector q as follows [1]:
Supposing that a number of Bloch modes in the PhC with a fixed frequency ω and wave vector q impinge on the interface at z = 0, the electric field inside the PhC [region I of Fig. 1(a)] can be expressed as superposition of these modes:
In simulations, the Bloch waves in the semi-infinite PhC can be excited by periodic point sources. The incident wave with only one propagating Bloch mode can be achieved by introducing several dipole sources with appropriately chosen complex amplitude [7]. The spatial field profiles of Ex at ω = 0.6 (2πc/a) are shown for the incidence of different Bloch modes in Fig. 1(c). There exist only two Bloch modes at this frequency, which are labelled by point ① and ② in Fig. 1(b), respectively. The spatial profiles of the left two figures in Fig. 1(c) correspond to the single mode incidence with respectively only the propagating mode ① and propagating mode ② impinging on the interface. As the ratio of these two incident waves, namely, a1/a2, satisfies the CPR condition, their corresponding transmitted waves have the same amplitudes but opposite phases. Therefore, if these two Bloch waves impinge on the interface simultaneously, CPR can be achieved as shown in the third figure of Fig. 1(c). As the frequency increases to ω = 0.8 (2πc/a), there are three Bloch modes in the PhC, which are indicated by point ③, ④ and ⑤ in Fig. 1(b), respectively. If these three modes impinge on the interface individually with their relative ratio set to match the CPR condition, the spatial field profiles of Ex are shown by the left three figures of Fig. 1(d). Similarly, if the incident wave is the superposition of these three Bloch modes, the transmitted waves cancel out exactly and CPR is formed as shown in the last figure of Fig. 1(d). These simulated results confirm our theoretical predictions.
Based on the CPR mechanism, light can be further guided in the PhC slab with a finite thickness h as sketched in Fig. 2(a). The origin of the z axis is now set at the center of this slab for convenience. Assuming that the incident and reflected wave vectors are respectively {q, $k_z^{(n)}$} and {q, $- k_z^{(n)}$}, the corresponding coefficients at the upper interface are respectively ${a_n}{e^{ik_z^{(n)}h/2}}$ and ${r_n}{e^{ - ik_z^{(n)}h/2}}$ due to the shift of the origin by h/2 compared to the above semi-infinite case. The CPR condition can be maintained at the two interfaces of the PhC slab if the relative ratio between the two modes keep the same after a bounce, that is, rn/an = const.
When light bounces back and forth between the upper and lower interfaces without any leakage, it forms a perfectly guided mode along the y direction. In addition to the CPR, a generalized resonance condition is also required. At the interface of PhC slab, for each time of reflection, a phase shift $\varphi _\textrm{r}^{(n)} = \textrm{arg(}{r_n}/{a_n}{e^{ - ik_z^{(n)}h}})$ takes place. The term of ${e^{ - ik_z^{(n)}h}}$ comes from the redefinition of origin compared to the previous semi-infinite PhC case. For the guided mode, the total phase change of light for a round trip should be an integer multiple of 2π for each Bloch mode. This resonance condition is similar to that in the conventional waveguide condition. The generalized resonance condition for the n-th Bloch mode can be written as:
where m(n) is an integer and $\varphi _\textrm{r}^{(n)}$ is defined in the interval (-π, π]. We note that similar conditions have been achieved in Ref [10,20]. By substituting $\varphi _\textrm{r}^{(n)}$, it is found that Eq. (6) is equivalent to arg(rn / an) = 0 or π, where arg(rn / an) is the phase shift for the n-th mode at the plane of z = 0 instead of at the interface. The value 0 (π) corresponds to the even (odd) symmetry of the waveguide mode in the z direction. This waveguide mode, existing inside the light cone and satisfying both the CPR and generalized resonance condition rigorously, is precisely the BIC. CPR and generalized resonance condition can be treated as a generalized waveguide condition for these special waveguide modes, namely, BICs. The index m(n) for the n-th Bloch mode can thus be obtained from Eq. (6), which is determined by the symmetry, normal component of the wave vector $k_z^{(n)}$, and thickness h. For the different position in the q-ω space and for the different thickness h, mode indices will vary accordingly. Examples of the indices of the Bloch modes for the BICs with different symmetries are shown in Table 1. Equation (6) gives the phase shift encountered when a Bloch wave travels a distance h (half the round trip) in the z direction. Inside the slab, every phase shift π will give a node. The number m(n) corresponds to the number of nodes of the constituent Bloch mode. In particular, when $\varphi _\textrm{r}^{(n)}$ is equal to the upper bound of the interval (-π, π], i.e., $k_z^{(n)}h$= (m(n) − 1)π, two nodes appear exactly at the upper (z = h / 2) and lower (z = −h / 2) interface of the slab.Combined the CPR and above resonance conditions together, we can obtain ${{{r_n}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{r_n}} {{a_n}}}} \right.} {{a_n}}} ={\pm} \textrm{1}$ for all the modes, where the positive and negative signs correspond to respectively the even and odd symmetries of BICs. It is worth noting that the evanescent modes with purely imaginary $k_z^{(n)}$ obtained from Eq. (1) should also be taken into account in addition to the ordinary Bloch modes with real $k_z^{(n)}$ when the PhC is finite in the z direction. These evanescent modes will diverge and is not physical in an infinite system, but play a significant role near the interface of finite system.
If N modes are considered in total, for the 0-th diffraction order l = 0, Eqs. (4) and (5) for the BICs can be rewritten as
As is known, BICs possess a divergent radiative quality factor and are decoupled from the radiation modes in the free space. If the PhC slab is illuminated by external waves, the resonant peak will disappear at the BIC points. Here, the simulated reflection spectra as a function of q and ω for the PhC slab with different thickness h are shown in Figs. 2(b-e). We focus on those BICs in the region with only two Bloch modes in the PhC and one diffraction order outside the PhC slab, which is enclosed by the cyan dashed and black dashed lines. There are two types of BICs, one is accidental BICs marked by the red dots and the other belongs to symmetry-protected BICs marked by the black dots.
To examine the near-field properties of BICs, two BICs highlighted by the rhombuses in Fig. 2(b) are taken as examples. For the BIC marked by red rhombus, it is consisted of two bulk Bloch modes with wave vectors $k_z^{(1)}$ and $k_z^{(\textrm{2})}$ which can be obtained from Eq. (1) and the corresponding mode indices can be identified as m(1) = 0 and m(2) = 2 when h = 1.4a. Hence, we use $\textrm{TE}_{\textrm{0 + 2}}^{(\textrm{ - }1)}$ to denote this BIC, where the subscripts are the indices of constituent Bloch modes and the superscript −1 corresponds to the index of band folding in the reduced-zone scheme. It should be emphasized that for the conventional waveguide mode, only one index, namely, number of nodes, is enough to characterize the corresponding spatial field profile normal to the axis of waveguide. However, for BICs in the PhC slab, at least two indices are required since there are more than one constituent Bloch modes to form coherent reflection and construct BICs.
The incident coefficients of all modes for the BIC can be solved by Eqs. (7–9) and the corresponding field distribution can thus be obtained. The electric field Ex along the red dashed line of Fig. 2(a) is shown by the red solid curves in the left panel of Fig. 2(f) for the BIC marked by the red rhombus in Fig. 2(b). The corresponding simulated results are plotted by the blue dots, showing excellent agreement with the theoretical results. Furthermore, the contributions of the n-th constituent Bloch mode $\textrm{2}{a_n}\cos (k_z^{(n)}z)u_q^{(n)}(y ){e^{iqy}}$ are displayed in the box of Fig. 2(f). It is clearly seen that the two indices m(1) = 0 and m(2) = 2 stand for the number of nodes of the constituent Bloch modes. The mode indices for the other accidental BICs are also shown in the red brackets of Fig. 2(b-e). It is interesting that the index difference Δm = m(2) − m(1) for the accidental BICs is a constant for a fixed thickness h whether the BICs possess even or odd symmetry. For example, when the thickness is 1.4a or 2a, the difference between the two indices of Bloch modes Δm is 2; for the thickness of 2.5a or 3a, the difference is 4.
As for the BIC marked by the black rhombus, in Fig. 2(b) it is a symmetry-protected BIC, and the constituent mode u(1) is antisymmetric along the direction of periodicity (y direction). The corresponding zero-th order Fourier component of u(1) is $\tilde{u}_{q,0}^{(\textrm{1)}} = (1/a)\int_0^a {u_q^{(1)}(y)dy} = 0$. Therefore, the mode u(1) is decoupled from the radiation continuum and an vanish for any n > 1 for this BIC. We label it by $\textrm{TE}_\textrm{0}^{(\textrm{ - }1)}$. Similar to that in Fig. 2(f), the corresponding field profiles are shown in Fig. 2(g).
The construction of BICs by bulk Bloch modes is also applicable to the guided resonances in the PhC slab. Normally, the guided resonances have finite lifetimes because of the leakage to the free space. The generalized waveguide condition can also work for guided resonances if the condition rn/an = const. is relaxed from all the modes to only the propagating modes. In other words, rn/an is no longer a constant for the evanescent modes with purely imaginary $k_z^{(n)}$. This will in fact break the rigorous CPR condition and lead to the leakage to the free space. Remarkably, guided resonances can be obtained from this relaxed condition. By solving Eqs. (4–5) together with rn/an = ±1 for only the propagating modes, the band structure of guided resonances of a PhC slab with h = 1.4a are achieved and shown as solid curves in Fig. 3(a). For comparison, the dispersion determined by the loci of the reflection maxima in Fig. 2(b) are shown as dots, which coincide with the theoretical results. The region marked in yellow or cyan in the q-ω space corresponds to the existence of two or three bulk Bloch modes in the PhC. For the guided resonance with q = 0.3 (2π/a) and ω = 0.468 (2πc/a) indicated by the green rhombus, it has even symmetry in z, possesses two constituent Bloch modes with the indices m(1) = 0 and m(2) = 2, and is labelled by $\textrm{TE}_{\textrm{0 + 2}}^{(\textrm{ - }1)}$. As ω increases to the point marked by a green circle, m(2) varies from 2 to 4 and this mode changes to $\textrm{TE}_{\textrm{0 + 4}}^{(\textrm{ - }1)}$. For the band with odd symmetry shown by the black curve, all the guided resonances can be characterized by the indices m(1) = 1 and m(2) = 3, and thus labelled by $\textrm{TE}_{1 + 3}^{(\textrm{ - }1)}$. It is worth emphasizing that the third band plotted in purple stretches across the regions with two and with three bulk Bloch modes. In the cyan region, one more Bloch mode with the smallest kz is involved in comparison to that in the yellow region. The indices of the guided resonance vary from $\textrm{TE}_{2 + 4}^{(\textrm{ - }1)}$ at the point of purple rhombus to $\textrm{TE}_{\textrm{0 + 2 + 4}}^{(\textrm{ - }1)}$ at the point of purple circle. Similar to Fig. 2(f), the electric fields for the five marked points in Fig. 3(a) are shown as red solid curves at the left panel of Fig. 3(b). The corresponding simulated results are given by the blue dots, which agree well with the theoretical ones. The field of constituent Bloch modes, ${a_n}({e^{ik_z^{(n)}z}} \pm {e^{ - ik_z^{(n)}z}})u_q^{(n)}(y ){e^{iqy}}$, are also displayed in the boxes in Fig. 3(b), manifesting clearly the corresponding mode indices.
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have analyzed the near-field properties of BICs in PhC slabs based on the constituent Bloch modes. The BICs can be characterized by the mode indices of these Bloch modes. An interesting feature for the accidental BICs in the region with only two Bloch modes is discovered, that is, the index difference of the two Bloch modes is a fixed value for the same PhC slab. This analysis is also applicable to the guided resonances of the PhC slab. The guided resonances can also be characterized by mode indices. It has been found that the guided resonances on the same band can have different mode indices. Our results can have potential applications in guided-wave optics, enhanced light-matter interaction, and high-Q cavity sensing.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (91750102); Projects of President Foundation of Chongqing University (2019CDXZWL002).
Disclosures
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Optical Waves in Crystals (John Wiley & Sons, 1984).
2. B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics (John Wiley & Sons, 1991).
3. E. Yablonovitch, “Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(20), 2059–2062 (1987). [CrossRef]
4. S. John, “Strong localization of photons in certain disordered dielectric superlattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(23), 2486–2489 (1987). [CrossRef]
5. K. M. Ho, C. T. Chan, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Existence of a photonic gap in periodic dielectric structures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 65(25), 3152–3155 (1990). [CrossRef]
6. J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade, Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light, 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008).
7. S. Dai, L. Liu, D. Han, and J. Zi, “From topologically protected coherent perfect reflection to bound states in the continuum,” Phys. Rev. B 98(8), 081405 (2018). [CrossRef]
8. S. Fan and J. D. Joannopoulos, “Analysis of guided resonances in photonic crystal slabs,” Phys. Rev. B 65(23), 235112 (2002). [CrossRef]
9. P. Lalanne, J. P. Hugonin, and P. Chavel, “Optical properties of deep lamellar gratings: a coupled Bloch-mode insight,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(6), 2442–2449 (2006). [CrossRef]
10. V. Karagodsky, C. Chase, and C. J. Chang-Hasnain, “Matrix Fabry–Perot resonance mechanism in high-contrast gratings,” Opt. Lett. 36(9), 1704–1706 (2011). [CrossRef]
11. V. Karagodsky and C. J. Chang-Hasnain, “Physics of near-wavelength high contrast gratings,” Opt. Express 20(10), 10888–10895 (2012). [CrossRef]
12. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. D. Stone, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, “Bound states in the continuum,” Nat. Rev. Mater. 1(9), 16048 (2016). [CrossRef]
13. J. von Neuman and E. Wigner, “Über merkwürdige diskrete Eigenwerte,” Phys. Z. 30, 291–293 (1929). [CrossRef]
14. C. Marinica, A. G. Borisov, and S. V. Shabanov, “Bound States in the continuum in photonics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(18), 183902 (2008). [CrossRef]
15. J. Lee, B. Zhen, S. L. Chua, W. Qiu, J. D. Joannopoulos, M. Soljačić, and O. Shapira, “Observation and differentiation of unique high-Q optical resonances near zero wave vector in macroscopic photonic crystal slabs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(6), 067401 (2012). [CrossRef]
16. C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, J. Lee, S. L. Chua, S. G. Johnson, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, “Observation of trapped light within the radiation continuum,” Nature 499(7457), 188–191 (2013). [CrossRef]
17. Y. Yang, C. Peng, Y. Liang, Z. Li, and S. Noda, “Analytical perspective for bound states in the continuum in photonic crystal slabs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(3), 037401 (2014). [CrossRef]
18. B. Zhen, C. W. Hsu, L. Lu, A. D. Stone, and M. Soljačić, “Topological nature of optical bound states in the continuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(25), 257401 (2014). [CrossRef]
19. X. Gao, C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, X. Lin, J. D. Joannopoulos, M. Soljačić, and H. Chen, “Formation mechanism of guided resonances and bound states in the continuum in photonic crystal slabs,” Sci. Rep. 6(1), 31908 (2016). [CrossRef]
20. A. I. Ovcharenko, C. Blanchard, J.-P. Hugonin, and C. Sauvan, “Bound states in the continuum in symmetric and asymmetric photonic crystal slabs,” Phys. Rev. B 101(15), 155303 (2020). [CrossRef]
21. D. A. Bykov, E. A. Bezus, and L. L. Doskolovich, “Coupled-wave formalism for bound states in the continuum in guided-mode resonant gratings,” Phys. Rev. A 99(6), 063805 (2019). [CrossRef]
22. Y. Zhang, A. Chen, W. Liu, C. W. Hsu, B. Wang, F. Guan, X. Liu, L. Shi, L. Lu, and J. Zi, “Observation of Polarization Vortices in Momentum Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(18), 186103 (2018). [CrossRef]
23. H. M. Doeleman, F. Monticone, W. den Hollander, A. Alù, and A. F. Koenderink, “Experimental observation of a polarization vortex at an optical bound state in the continuum,” Nat. Photonics 12(7), 397–401 (2018). [CrossRef]
24. J. Jin, X. Yin, L. Ni, M. Soljačić, B. Zhen, and C. Peng, “Topologically enabled ultrahigh-Q guided resonances robust to out-of-plane scattering,” Nature 574(7779), 501–504 (2019). [CrossRef]
25. N. Bulgakov and A. F. Sadreev, “Bound states in the continuum in photonic waveguides inspired by defects,” Phys. Rev. B 78(7), 075105 (2008). [CrossRef]
26. C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, S. L. Chua, S. G. Johnson, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, “Bloch surface eigenstates within the radiation continuum,” Light: Sci. Appl. 2(7), e84 (2013). [CrossRef]
27. S. Weimann, Y. Xu, R. Keil, A. E. Miroshnichenko, A. Tunnermann, S. Nolte, A. A. Sukhorukov, A. Szameit, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Compact surface Fano states embedded in the continuum of waveguide arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111(24), 240403 (2013). [CrossRef]
28. N. Bulgakov and D. N. Maksimov, “Topological Bound States in the Continuum in Arrays of Dielectric Spheres,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(26), 267401 (2017). [CrossRef]
29. Y. Guo, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, “Topologically Protected Complete Polarization Conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(16), 167401 (2017). [CrossRef]
30. M. Minkov, I. A. D. Williamson, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, “Zero-Index Bound States in the Continuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(26), 263901 (2018). [CrossRef]
31. E. N. Bulgakov and A. F. Sadreev, “Fibers based on propagating bound states in the continuum,” Phys. Rev. B 98(8), 085301 (2018). [CrossRef]
32. L. Yuan and Y. Y. Lu, “Bound states in the continuum on periodic structures surrounded by strong resonances,” Phys. Rev. A 97(4), 043828 (2018). [CrossRef]
33. A. Cerjan, C. W. Hsu, and M. C. Rechtsman, “Bound States in the Continuum through Environmental Design,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(2), 023902 (2019). [CrossRef]
34. V. R. Tuz, V. V. Khardikov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “All-dielectric resonant metasurfaces with a strong toroidal response,” ACS Photonics 5(5), 1871–1876 (2018). [CrossRef]
35. Z. Yu, X. Xi, J. Ma, H. K. Tsang, C.-L. Zou, and X. Sun, “Photonic integrated circuits with bound states in the continuum,” Optica 6(10), 1342–1348 (2019). [CrossRef]
36. G. Zito, S. Romano, S. Cabrini, G. Calafiore, A. C. De Luca, E. Penzo, and V. Mocella, “Observation of spin-polarized directive coupling of light at bound states in the continuum,” Optica 6(10), 1305–1312 (2019). [CrossRef]
37. Q. Song, M. Zhao, L. Liu, J. Chai, G. He, H. Xiang, D. Han, and J. Zi, “Observation of bound states in the continuum in the dimerized chain,” Phys. Rev. A 100(2), 023810 (2019). [CrossRef]
38. W. Chen, Y. Chen, and W. Liu, “Singularities and Poincare Indices of Electromagnetic Multipoles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(15), 153907 (2019). [CrossRef]
39. F. Wu, J. Wu, Z. Guo, H. Jiang, Y. Sun, Y. Li, J. Ren, and H. Chen, “Giant Enhancement of the Goos-Hänchen Shift Assisted by Quasibound States in the Continuum,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 12(1), 014028 (2019). [CrossRef]
40. N. A. Cumpsty and D. S. Whitehead, “The excitation of acoustic resonances by vortex shedding,” J. Sound Vib. 18(3), 353–369 (1971). [CrossRef]
41. A. A. Lyapina, D. N. Maksimov, A. S. Pilipchuk, and A. F. Sadreev, “Bound states in the continuum in open acoustic resonators,” J. Fluid Mech. 780, 370–387 (2015). [CrossRef]
42. Y. X. Xiao, G. Ma, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, “Topological Subspace-Induced Bound State in the Continuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(16), 166803 (2017). [CrossRef]
43. R. Porter and D. V. Evans, “Embedded Rayleigh–Bloch surface waves along periodic rectangular arrays,” Wave Motion 43(1), 29–50 (2005). [CrossRef]
44. C. M. Linton and P. McIver, “Embedded trapped modes in water waves and acoustics,” Wave Motion 45(1-2), 16–29 (2007). [CrossRef]
45. K. Hirose, Y. Liang, Y. Kurosaka, A. Watanabe, T. Sugiyama, and S. Noda, “Watt-class high-power, high-beam-quality photonic-crystal lasers,” Nat. Photonics 8(5), 406–411 (2014). [CrossRef]
46. A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, Q. Gu, B. Bahari, Y. Fainman, and B. Kante, “Lasing action from photonic bound states in continuum,” Nature 541(7636), 196–199 (2017). [CrossRef]
47. C. Huang, C. Zhang, S. Xiao, Y. Wang, Y. Fan, Y. Liu, N. Zhang, G. Qu, H. Ji, J. Han, L. Ge, Y. Kivshar, and Q. Song, “Ultrafast control of vortex microlasers,” Science 367(6481), 1018–1021 (2020). [CrossRef]
48. S. Romano, G. Zito, S. Torino, S. Cabrini, I. Rendina, G. Coppola, G. Calafiore, E. Penzo, and V. Mocella, “Label-free sensing of ultralow-weight molecules with all-dielectric metasurfaces supporting bound states in the continuum,” Photonics Res. 6(7), 726–733 (2018). [CrossRef]
49. F. Yesilkoy, E. R. Arvelo, Y. Jahani, M. Liu, A. Tittl, V. Cevher, Y. Kivshar, and H. Altug, “Ultrasensitive hyperspectral imaging and biodetection enabled by dielectric metasurfaces,” Nat. Photonics 13(6), 390–396 (2019). [CrossRef]
50. S. Romano, G. Zito, S. Managò, G. Calafiore, E. Penzo, S. Cabrini, A. C. De Luca, and V. Mocella, “Surface-enhanced raman and fluorescence spectroscopy with an all-dielectric metasurface,” J. Phys. Chem. C 122(34), 19738–19745 (2018). [CrossRef]
51. K. Koshelev, S. Kruk, E. Melik-Gaykazyanet, J. H. Choi, A. Bogdanov, H. G. Park, and Y. Kivshar, “Subwavelength dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics,” Science 367(6475), 288–292 (2020). [CrossRef]
52. P. Sheng, R. S. Stepleman, and P. N. Sanda, “Exact eigenfunctions for square-wave gratings: Application to diffraction and surface-plasmon calculations,” Phys. Rev. B 26(6), 2907–2916 (1982). [CrossRef]
53. R. L. Chern, D. Han, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, “Additional waves in the graphene layered medium,” Opt. Express 22(26), 31677–31690 (2014). [CrossRef]