Experimentally Elicited Beliefs Explain Privacy Behavior

David Rivenbark ()
Additional contact information
David Rivenbark: University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL

No 2010-09, Working Papers from University of Central Florida, Department of Economics

Abstract: The privacy literature has recognized a dichotomy between reported values of privacy and actual behavior. People tend to say they value privacy highly, and then behave in ways which seem to contradict these statements. In this experiment, the consequences of privacy loss were controlled using a voluntary contributions mechanism that isolated personal information from the natural world. Elicited values were higher than what has typically been observed in the literature. The evidence does not support a “privacy paradox.” Subjective expected utility maximization explains the dichotomy. Trust and asymmetric beliefs are substantial determinants of (information) values.

Keywords: elicitation; expected utility; privacy; privacy paradox; subjective beliefs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M59 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 Pages
Date: 2010-09, Revised 2011-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://economics.itweb.ucf.edu/workingpapers/2010-09.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cfl:wpaper:2010-09

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Central Florida, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Uluc Aysun ().