Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How reliable are administrative reports of paid work hours?

Marta Lachowska, Alexandre Mas and Stephen Woodbury

Labour Economics, 2022, vol. 75, issue C

Abstract: This paper examines the quality of quarterly records on work hours collected from employers in the State of Washington to administer the unemployment insurance (UI) system, specifically to determine eligibility for UI. We subject the administrative records to four “trials,” all of which suggest the records reliably measure paid hours of work. First, distributions of hours in the administrative records and Current Population Survey outgoing rotation groups (CPS) both suggest that 52–54% of workers work approximately 40 hours per week. Second, in the administrative records, quarter-to-quarter changes in the log of earnings are highly correlated with quarter-to-quarter changes in the log of paid hours. Third, annual changes in Washington's minimum wage rate (which is indexed) are clearly reflected in year-to-year changes in the distribution of paid hours in the administrative data. Fourth, Mincer-style wage rate and earnings regressions using the administrative data produce estimates similar to those found elsewhere in the literature.

Keywords: Work hours; Earnings; Measurement; Administrative data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C81 J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537122000240
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: How Reliable are Administrative Reports of Paid Work Hours? (2022) Downloads
Working Paper: How Reliable Are Administrative Reports of Paid Work Hours? (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:labeco:v:75:y:2022:i:c:s0927537122000240

DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102131

Access Statistics for this article

Labour Economics is currently edited by A. Ichino

More articles in Labour Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2024-12-28
Handle: RePEc:eee:labeco:v:75:y:2022:i:c:s0927537122000240