Financial Speculation Impact on Agricultural and Other Commodity Return Volatility: Implications for Sustainable Development and Food Security

Algirdas Justinas Staugaitis and Bernardas Vaznonis ()
Additional contact information
Algirdas Justinas Staugaitis: Department of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Bioeconomy, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio str. 58, LT-44248 Kaunas, Lithuania
Bernardas Vaznonis: Department of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Bioeconomy, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio str. 58, LT-44248 Kaunas, Lithuania

Agriculture, 2022, vol. 12, issue 11, 1-27

Abstract: Global commodity markets, due to major health crises, political tension, sanctions, growing demand, and other global supply and demand factors, are currently particularly unstable. In addition to the macro-environmental factors that drive the prices, agricultural and other commodity markets are becoming more susceptible to the continuously-growing speculation on major commodity exchanges. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of financial speculation on agricultural and other commodity prices and return volatility. In our study, we use daily returns on wheat, soybean, corn, and oats futures from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange as well as two additional commodities (crude oil and gold) to compare the extent of this effect. To measure this impact, we, besides traditional tools for time-series analysis, apply the threshold autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (TGARCH) technique. We also provide a model using dummy variables for the season to determine whether or not financial speculation’s impact on return volatility differs among seasons, as seasonality plays an important role in return dynamics for agriculture. Our study’s findings show that financial speculation, except for the oats market, either has no impact or makes the underlying futures returns less volatile. Therefore, we draw the conclusion that either there is no relationship between the rise in short-run speculation and the volatility of agricultural commodity prices, or the link is at best questionable. Research results provide important implications for the sustainable development of commodity markets, as passive legislation measurers can be seen as more effective ones compared to more strict active ones in order to maintain these markets liquid and capable of distributing price risks for agricultural producers and manufacturers in a challenging economic and geopolitical environment.

Keywords: financial speculation; agricultural futures; return volatility; commodity futures markets; TGARCH (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/11/1892/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/11/1892/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:11:p:1892-:d:969147

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().