Reviewing What is Known of the Effects of Partial Reprogramming
Full reprogramming of cells occurs in the early embryo, driven by Yamanaka factor expression, the factors used often abbreviated to OSKM. It turns adult germ cells into embryonic stem cells, resetting epigenetic patterns and restoring mitochondrial function. Researchers have replicated this process to produce induced pluripotent stem cells from any adult cell sample. Partial reprogramming is intended to expose cells to Yamanaka factor expression for long enough to produce the reset of epigenetic patterns and improvement in mitochondrial function, but not for so long as to change cell state in other ways. This is thought to be a promising path to the production of rejuvenation therapies, but there are many challenges to overcome on the way to the clinic. Not least of these is that different cell types in any given tissue may have quite different requirements in terms of length of exposure or level of exposure to produce beneficial reprogramming with mimimal risk of generating potentially cancerous pluripotent cells.
Partial and full reprogramming can partially reverse age-related transcriptomic and epigenetic changes. Yet, it is unclear to what extent aging clocks are measuring biological age or cellular/organismal health. Regardless of what epigenetic aging clocks measure exactly, there are other biomarkers of rejuvenation that can be measured in partial reprogramming experiments. For example, if cycles of short-time reprogramming factor expression are followed by a recovery phase, phenotypic rejuvenation effects can be observed. By default, rejuvenation markers must be evaluated on a tissue-by-tissue basis.
An intriguing example is the brain, where cyclic OSKM without a recovery phase restores the proportion of neuroblasts and improves the production of neurons in vivo. Moreover, in vivo studies performed on mouse neurons and rat dentate gyrus cells suggest that OSKM can reverse age-associated neurological decline and enhance memory. Other mouse in vivo studies have shown that reprogramming enhances liver regeneration, promotes the repair of crushed optic nerves and ameliorates aging-associated loss of visual acuity, allows for muscle fiber regeneration, improves skin wound healing in aged mice, and promotes heart rejuvenation following myocardial infarction.
The mechanism of rejuvenation appears to partially depend on how cells are reprogrammed. Indeed, it was found that the mechanism of somatic cell reprogramming via small molecule regimens is distinct from transcription factor-mediated reprogramming. By constructing chromatin landscapes, researchers identified hierarchal histone modifications and sequential enhancer recommissioning which underlies regeneration programs following chemical reprogramming; this regeneration program appears to reverse the loss of regenerative potential in organismal aging but apparently it is not activated in OSKM reprogramming.
Reprogramming specific cells in vivo affects surrounding tissue. For example, it was found that in vivo activation of OSKM in myofibers led to proliferation of satellite cells in the stem cell niche of the myofibers, without inducing myofiber dedifferentiation; likely these changes are at least partially modulated via changes to the extracellular matrix (ECM). In fact, the ECM and its constituents are frequently affected by partial reprogramming. As mice age, collagen-associated transcript levels decrease in the pancreas but increase again, at least partially, following OSKM treatment with a two-week recovery period. Also, in fibroblast and adipocyte mesenchymal cell experiments with no recovery period, some ECM-associated processes are upregulated by partial reprogramming, including pathways linked to collagen.