Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Use newly added InvalidCommandId instead of 0
authorAlvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:32:30 +0000 (15:32 -0400)
committerAlvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:32:30 +0000 (15:32 -0400)
The symbol was added by 71901ab6d; the original code was introduced by
6868ed749.  Development of both overlapped which is why we apparently
failed to notice.

This is a (very slight) behavior change, so I'm not backpatching this to
9.4 for now, even though the symbol does exist there.

src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c

index 9d2775bab1934d9caaf030af5364401ea06df296..5141fcab7af06f8e4b84a5613fd58b915fe52888 100644 (file)
@@ -2818,7 +2818,7 @@ l1:
        if (result == HeapTupleSelfUpdated)
            hufd->cmax = HeapTupleHeaderGetCmax(tp.t_data);
        else
-           hufd->cmax = 0;     /* for lack of an InvalidCommandId value */
+           hufd->cmax = InvalidCommandId;
        UnlockReleaseBuffer(buffer);
        if (have_tuple_lock)
            UnlockTupleTuplock(relation, &(tp.t_self), LockTupleExclusive);
@@ -3415,7 +3415,7 @@ l2:
        if (result == HeapTupleSelfUpdated)
            hufd->cmax = HeapTupleHeaderGetCmax(oldtup.t_data);
        else
-           hufd->cmax = 0;     /* for lack of an InvalidCommandId value */
+           hufd->cmax = InvalidCommandId;
        UnlockReleaseBuffer(buffer);
        if (have_tuple_lock)
            UnlockTupleTuplock(relation, &(oldtup.t_self), *lockmode);
@@ -4573,7 +4573,7 @@ failed:
        if (result == HeapTupleSelfUpdated)
            hufd->cmax = HeapTupleHeaderGetCmax(tuple->t_data);
        else
-           hufd->cmax = 0;     /* for lack of an InvalidCommandId value */
+           hufd->cmax = InvalidCommandId;
        LockBuffer(*buffer, BUFFER_LOCK_UNLOCK);
        if (have_tuple_lock)
            UnlockTupleTuplock(relation, tid, mode);