Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

The diversity of household assets holdings in the United States in 2007 and 2009: measurement and determinants

  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We apply diversity indices, such as the Gini-Simpson index and entropy related indices, to the study of the distribution of individual asset holdings in the United States in 2007 and 2009. We examine the impact of the 2008 recession on asset diversity and the way individual socio-economic characteristics as well as important life events affect this measure. The focus of our analysis is on financial assets. We use a unique panel data set that provides us with comprehensive household level data for 2007 and 2009 in the United States—the Survey of Consumer Finances. We find that asset diversity increases between 2007 and 2009. In addition, it increases with age, education and income and it is lower at the bottom of the wealth distribution. Life changing situations such as getting divorced or losing one’s job have a statistically significant negative effect on a change in diversity, while getting married or having deteriorating health have a positive effect. Active money management also affects asset diversity positively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to the official NBER (National Bureau of Economic Research) dates of the recession (December 2007 to June 2009; http://www.nber.org/cycles/), during this period the adjusted unemployment rate increased from 5 to 9.5%.

  2. Risk is measured as the standard deviation of asset price fluctuations. Thus, by investing in assets whose returns are not perfectly correlated, individuals reduce the total variance of their portfolio return.

  3. Almost 95% of the population holds some type of financial asset (see Table 8). The components of financial assets are introduced in Section 3.

  4. Details on the collection and construction of the 2007–2009 panel are found in Bricker et al. (2015).

  5. Financial assets are owned by over 94% of households. Details of ownership are in Table 8.

  6. Their summary statistics are given in the Appendix, Table 7.

  7. When addressing wealth endogeneity, the literature sometimes drops this control or the specific type of asset modeled is excluded from the aggregate measure and the remaining “aggregate wealth” distribution is used.

  8. This is in contradiction to the predictions of classical portfolio theory.

  9. Adelman (1969), in a note on the measurement of industrial concentration, derived also this result, though in a different way. Stigler (1968) also mentioned that the inverse of the Herfindahl index of the concentration of firms gives the number of equivalent firms.

  10. In the particular case, where r = 1 in Eqs. (4) and (5), the individual diversity measure may be shown to correspond to the concept of entropy. It is then expressed as \(P_{j,entropy} = e^{ - \mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{k = 1}^K {\left( {\frac{{s_{jk}}}{{s_{j.}}}} \right)ln\left( {\frac{{s_{jk}}}{{s_{j.}}}} \right)} }\) Hackbart and Anderson (1975), as well as Attaran and Zwick (1987), for example, used this kind of entropy related measure to analyze economic or industrial diversification.

  11. The correlation between the different diversity indices is shown in Tables 1315.

  12. The results are available upon request from the authors.

  13. Table 3 indicates that asset diversity increased for those that are actively engaged in changing their investment patterns.

  14. We have excluded the remaining part of the sample, which amounts to 343 observations.

  15. The correlation could not be computed in the case where r → 1.

References

  • Adelman, M. A. (1969). Comments on the “H” concentration measure as a numbers-equivalent. Review of Economics and Statistics, 51(1), 99–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attaran, M., & Zwick, M. (1987). Entropy and other measures of industrial diversification. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 26(4), 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badarinza, C., John, Y. C., & Ramadorai, T. (2016). International comparative household finance. Annual Review of Economics, 8(1), 111–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barasinska, N., Schäfer, D., & Stephan, A. (2012). Individual risk attitudes and the composition of financial portfolios: evidence from german household portfolios. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 52(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). Naïve diversification strategies in defined contribution savings plans. American Economic Review, 91(1), 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. H. (1971). Corporate growth and diversification. Journal of Law and Economics, 14(2), 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, B. (2012). Economic consequences of the Great Recession: evidence from the panel study of income dynamics. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, Working Paper No. 2014-4, Chestnut Hill, MA.

  • Bricker, J., Bucks, B. K., Kennickell, A., Mach, T. L., & Moore, K. (2015). Drowning or weathering the storm? Changes in family finances from 2007 to 2009. In: C. R. Hulten, M. B. Reinsdorf, (eds.), Measuring wealth and financial intermediation and their links to the real economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Briggs, J., Cesarini, D., Lindqvist, E., & Ostling, R. (2015). Windfall gains and stock market participation. NBER Working Paper No. 21673, Cambridge, MA.

  • Campbell, J. Y. (2006). Household finance. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1553–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardak, B. A., & Wilkins, R. (2009). The determinants of household risky asset holdings: Australian evidence on background risk and other factors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33, 850–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celerier, C., & Vallee, B. (2017). Catering to Investors Through Security Design: Headline Rate and Complexity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(3), 1469–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S. R., & Eichhorn, W. (1991). An axiomatic characterization of a generalized index of concentration. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2, 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009). Optinmal versus naïve diversification: how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22(5), 1915–1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, C. W. (1912). Variabilita e mutabilita. Studi Economico-Giuridici della R. Universita di Cagliari, 3, 3–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorecki, P. K. (1974). The measurement of enterprise diversification. Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(3), 399–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M., Jammine, A. P., & Thomas, H. (1988). Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies, 1972–1984. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 771–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Haliassos, M & Jappelli, T. (2002). Household portfolios, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Hackbart, M. M., & Anderson, D. A. (1975). On measuring economic diversification. Land Economics, 51(4), 374–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., & Tideman, N. (1967). Measures of concentration. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(317), 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, L., & Kay, J. A. (1977). Concentration in the modern industry: theory, measurement and the UK experience. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herfindahl, O. C. (1950). Concentration in the U.S. steel industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York City, NY: Columbia Univrersity.

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1945). National power and the structure of foreign trade. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Hoynes, et al. (2012). Who suffers during recessions? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3), 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennickell, A. B. (2011). Tossed and turned: wealth dynamics of U.S. households 2007–2009, finance and economics discussion series 2011–51. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Washington, DC.

  • Kennickell, A. B. (2012). The other, other half: changes in the finances of the least wealthy 50 percent, 2007–2009, finance and economics discussion series 2012–40. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Washington, DC.

  • Kennickell, A., & Lusardi, A. (2004). Disentangling the importance of the precautionary saving motive. NBER Working Paper w10888.

  • Levy, H., & Duchin, R. (2010). Markowitz’s mean-variance rule and the talmudic diversification recommendation. In J. Guerard (Ed.), Handbook of portfolio construction (pp. 97–123). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2011). Wealth gaps rise to record highs between whites, blacks and hispanics. Washington, DC: Pew Social and Demographic Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, F. T., Danziger, S., & Schoeni, R. F. (2013). Wealth disparities before and after the Great Recession. The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650(1), 98–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbluth, G. (1955). The measurement of concentration. In G. Stigler (Ed.), Business concentration and price policy (pp. 57–99). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Shapiro, T., Meschede, T., & Osoro, S. (2013). The roots of the widening racial wealth gap. Explaining the Black-White Economic Divide. Institute on Assets and Social Policy, Waltham, MA.

  • Sierminska, E. & Takhtamanova. (2016). Impact of the Great Recession on industry unemployment: a comparison 1976–2011. IZA Working Paper, Bonn, Germany.

  • Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1964). A theory of oligopoly. Journal of Political Economy, 72(1), 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1968). The organization of industry. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., Kochhar, R., Fry, R., Velasco, G., & Motel, S. (2011). Pew Social & Demographic Trends. Washington, D.C. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2011/07/SDT-Wealth-Report_7-26-11_FINAL.pdf.

  • Utton, M. A. (1977). Large firm diversification in British manufacturing industry. Economic Journal, 87(345), 96–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij, M., Alessie, R., & Lusardi, A. (2011). Financial Literacy and Stock Market Participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(2), 449–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, E. N., Owens, L. A., Burak, E., Grusky, D. B., Western, B., & Wimer, C. (2011). How much wealth was destroyed in the Great Recession? The great recession (pp. 127–158). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, A. C. (2007). Households asset portfolio diversification: evidence from the household, income and labour dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey. Griffiths Business School. Discussion Paper 2009–08, Nathan, Australia.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Brian Bucks, Christos Koulovatianos and those who participated at the 2016 Workshop on Household Finance in Luxembourg for helpful suggestions and comments on a previous version of this paper. This paper was revised, while Sierminska was on sabbatical leave at the University of Arizona, Department of Economics, which she thanks for its hospitality. The authors thank also participants to the annual meeting of the Society of Economics of the Household (SEHO), Paris May 23–24, 2018, as well as three anonymous referees for their very useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Silber.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Tables 715

Table 7 Changes in socio-demographic variables between 2007 and 2009
Table 8 Changes in ownership rates of financial assets between 2007 and 2009
Table 9 Changes in ownership rates of financial assets between 2007 and 2009, by wealth quintile (n = 3857)
Table 10 Changes in portfolio shares between 2007 and 2009, by wealth quintile (n = 3857)
Table 11 Changes in portfolio values between 2007 and 2009, by quintile in USD (mean (top panel) and median (bottom panel)) (n = 3857)
Table 12 The determinants of individual diversity (index P_(total,ind) in Eq. (7), with the parameter r) (merged data for the years 2007–2009)
Table 13 Correlations between individual diversities in 2007 and their values in 2009Footnote

The correlation could not be computed in the case where r → 1.

Table 14 Correlations between the individual diversity indices in a given year (separately for 2007 and 2009) in the case of ten assets
Table 15 Correlations between individual diversity indices in a given year (done separately for 2007 and 2009) in the case of three aggregated assets

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sierminska, E.M., Silber, J. The diversity of household assets holdings in the United States in 2007 and 2009: measurement and determinants. Rev Econ Household 18, 599–634 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-019-09472-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-019-09472-z

Keywords

JEL classification