南海深部构造特征及其地质意义:来自重磁位场反演的认识

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

上一篇

下一篇

文章导航 > 地球物理学报 > 2018 > 61(10): 4231-4241
鲁宝亮, 王万银, 赵志刚, 冯旭亮, 张功成, 罗新刚, 姚攀, 纪晓琳. 2018. 南海深部构造特征及其地质意义:来自重磁位场反演的认识. 地球物理学报, 61(10): 4231-4241, doi: 10.6038/cjg2018L0564
引用本文: 鲁宝亮, 王万银, 赵志刚, 冯旭亮, 张功成, 罗新刚, 姚攀, 纪晓琳. 2018. 南海深部构造特征及其地质意义:来自重磁位场反演的认识. 地球物理学报, 61(10): 4231-4241, doi: 10.6038/cjg2018L0564
shu
LU BaoLiang, WANG WanYin, ZHAO ZhiGang, FENG XuLiang, ZHANG GongCheng, LUO XinGang, YAO Pan, JI XiaoLin. 2018. Characteristics of deep structure in the South China Sea and geological implications:Insights from gravity and magnetic inversion. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 61(10): 4231-4241, doi: 10.6038/cjg2018L0564
Citation: LU BaoLiang, WANG WanYin, ZHAO ZhiGang, FENG XuLiang, ZHANG GongCheng, LUO XinGang, YAO Pan, JI XiaoLin. 2018. Characteristics of deep structure in the South China Sea and geological implications:Insights from gravity and magnetic inversion. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 61(10): 4231-4241, doi: 10.6038/cjg2018L0564
shu

南海深部构造特征及其地质意义:来自重磁位场反演的认识

    • 1.

      长安大学重磁方法技术研究所 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院西部矿产资源与地质工程教育部重点实验室, 西安 710054

    • 2.

      中海油研究总院, 北京 100027

    • 3.

      西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065

  • 基金项目:

    国家科技重大专项"海洋深水区油气勘探关键技术"（2008ZX05025）、中海油研究总院科技项目"重磁震联合研究南海新生代盆地分布与构造区划"以及中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（310826163301）联合资助

详细信息
    作者简介:

    鲁宝亮, 男, 1984年生, 博士, 讲师, 主要从事构造地质与地球物理教学与研究.E-mail:lusky333@aliyun.com, lulb@chd.edu.cn

    通讯作者: 王万银, 男, 1962年生, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师, 主要从事重、磁方法理论及应用的研究和教学工作.E-mail:wwy7902@chd.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: P631

Characteristics of deep structure in the South China Sea and geological implications:Insights from gravity and magnetic inversion

    • 1.

      Institute of Gravity and Magnetic Technology, School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Key Laboratory of Western China's Mineral Resources and Geological Engineering, Ministry of Education, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China

    • 2.

      Exploration Department of CNOOC China Ltd., Beijing 100027, China

    • 3.

      School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China

More Information

    摘要

  • 莫霍面和居里面是认识深部过程重要的地质与地球物理界面.为了进一步理解南海深部构造活动与洋盆扩张的关系，本文以OBS剖面和深反射地震剖面作为约束，对卫星测高重力异常进行海水、沉积层影响校正，采用最小曲率位场分离方法消除局部密度体的重力影响，获取了反映莫霍面起伏的重力异常，并利用双界面模型重力场快速反演方法计算得到了南海地区莫霍面深度值.通过与居里面起伏的对比研究，发现南海莫霍面和居里面整体均表现为"洋盆浅、周缘深"的菱形特征，两者在洋陆转换区呈现明显的窄梯级带特征，反映了南海扩张期岩石圈的强烈伸展减薄、南北向构造拉张作用等深部构造过程.洋盆莫霍面和居里面的西南向楔形形态是对南海由东向西渐进式扩张的深部构造响应.洋盆南部莫霍面浅于北部，这与扩张中心逐渐向南迁移的特征一致，而洋盆居里面南深北浅的特征则可能与洋盆的简单剪切扩张方式以及洋盆北部的岩浆活动更活跃有关.南海地区莫霍面和居里面呈现交错叠置关系，南、北陆缘表现为明显的深部构造差异，说明南海为非对称式扩张.北部陆缘区居里面深度浅于莫霍面，而洋盆区和南部陆缘区居里面深于莫霍面，这与南、北陆缘性质的差异和南部陆缘复杂的中-新生代俯冲碰撞等构造演化相关，而洋盆区居里面深于莫霍面的现象推测与大洋上地幔橄榄岩蛇纹石化导致的岩石磁性增强有关.

    The Moho and Curie surfaces are significant geological and geophysical interfaces in understanding the evolution of the deep earth. Constrained by OBS profiles and deep reflecting seismic profiles, Bouguer gravity anomalies which reflect the undulation of the Moho were acquired by correcting the gravity effect of sea water and shallower sediments from satellite altimetry gravity data, and by eliminating the effect of gravity caused by the local density bodies through the application of the minimum-curvature method. Also, based on study of gravity field inversion in a dual interface model, the Moho depth of the South China Sea (SCS) was calculated, and a comparative study with the Curie surface was carried out. The results show that the Moho and Curie surface of the SCS are shallow in the ocean basin and deep in the margins, and both of the two surfaces in the continent-ocean transition zone show the distinct narrow gradient bands, which reflect the lithospheric extension-thinning and NS tectonic extension during the expansion of the SCS. The typical wedge-shaped Moho and Curie surfaces in the ocean basin generally corresponds to the gradual expansion from east to west of the SCS. The Moho of the ocean basin is shallower in the south than that in the north, consistent with the gradual southward migration of the expansion center. While the Curie surface of ocean is deeper in the south and shallower in the north, which is probably related to the simple shear expansion of the ocean basin and occurrence of more active magmatic activity in the north of the ocean basin. The Moho and Curie surfaces exhibit staggered overlapping relationships in the SCS. The south and north continental margins show obvious deep structural differences, indicating that the SCS is an asymmetric expansion. The Curie surface is shallower than Moho in the north, but deeper in the ocean basin and south margin. These differences are closely related with the different continental marginal natures between south and north margins of the SCS, and also with the complicated Meso-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the southern margin of the SCS. The Curie surface is deeper than Moho in the ocean basin, which is presumably related with magnetic enhancement of lithosphere, caused by the oceanic peridotite serpentinization in the upper mantle.

    • HTML全文
  • 加载中

  • 图 1 

    南海地区大地构造背景(Hall, 1996)

    Figure 1. 

    Tectonic setting of the SCS from Hall (1996)

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 2 

    南海地形特征及剖面位置

    Figure 2. 

    Terrain feature of the SCS and the profiles location

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 3 

    南海及邻区卫星测高重力异常(Sandwell et al., 2013, 2014)

    Figure 3. 

    Satellite altimetric gravity anomalies in the SCS (Sandwell et al., 2013, 2014)

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 4 

    南海及邻区布格重力异常

    Figure 4. 

    Bouguer gravity anomalies in the SCS

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 5 

    南海海域沉积层厚度(冯旭亮等, 2018)

    Figure 5. 

    Sediment thickness map of the SCS (Feng et al., 2018)

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 6 

    南海地区莫霍面起伏重力异常

    Figure 6. 

    Gravity anomalies caused by Moho undulation in the SCS

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 7 

    南海地区莫霍面深度图

    Figure 7. 

    Moho depth of the SCS

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 8 

    南海地区居里面深度图(马杰等, 2018)

    Figure 8. 

    Curie surface depth of the SCS (Ma et al., 2018)

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 9 

    (a) A-A'剖面莫霍面、居里面深度特征(位置见图 1); (b) A-A'中部地学断面(姚伯初等, 2006)

    Figure 9. 

    (a) Depth of the Moho surface, Curie surface of AA' profile (Location is shown in Fig. 1); (b) The central geotransection A-A' (Yao et al., 2006)

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
    • 参考文献(105)
  •  

    Arndt N T, Goldstein S L. 1989. An open boundary between lower continental crust and mantle:its role in crust formation and crustal recycling. Tectonophys, 161(3-4):201-212. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(89)90154-6

     

    Barckhausen U, Engels M, Franke D, et al. 2014. Evolution of the South China Sea:Revised ages for breakup and seafloor spreading. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 58:599-611. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.02.022

     

    Ben-Avraham Z, Uyeda S. 1973. The evolution of the China Basin and the Mesozoic paleogeography of Borneo. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 18(2):365-376. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(73)90077-0

     

    Blakely R J, Brocher T M, Wells R E. 2005. Subduction-zone magnetic anomalies and implications for hydrated forearc mantle. Geology, 33(6):445-448. doi: 10.1130/G21447.1

     

    Briais A, Patriat P, Tapponnier P. 1993. Updated interpretation of magnetic anomalies and seafloor spreading stages in the South China Sea-implications for the Tertiary tectonics of Southeast Asia. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98(B4):6299-6328. doi: 10.1029/92JB02280

     

    Cann J R, Blackman D K, Smith D K, et al. 1997. Corrugated slip surfaces formed at ridge-transform intersections on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Nature, 385(6614):329-332. doi: 10.1038/385329a0

     

    Chen J, Gao D Z, Wen N, et al. 2010. Characteristics of the geomagnetic field in the South China Sea. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 25(2):376-388, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2010.02.002.

     

    Cullen A, Reemst P, Henstra G, et al. 2010. Rifting of the South China Sea new perspectives. Petroleum Geoscience, 16(3):273-282. doi: 10.1144/1354-079309-908

     

    Ding W W, Li J B. 2011. Seismic stratigraphy, tectonic structure and extension factors across the southern margin of the South China Sea:evidence from two regional multi-channel seismic profiles. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(12):3038-3056, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.006.

     

    Escartín J, Hirth G, Evans B. 1997. Nondilatant brittle deformation of serpentinites:implications for Mohr-Coulomb theory and the strength of faults. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 102(B2):2897-2913. doi: 10.1029/96JB02792

     

    Feng X L, Zhang G C, Wang W Y, et al. 2018. An integrated study on distribution of Cenozoic basins in the South China Sea based on gravity, magnetic and seismic data. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 61(10):4242-4254, doi:10.6038/cjg2018L0567.

     

    Ferré E C, Friedman S A, Martín-Hernández F, et al. 2013. The magnetism of mantle xenoliths and potential implications for sub-moho magnetic sources. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(1):105-110. doi: 10.1029/2012GL054100

     

    Ferré E C, Friedman S A, Martin-Hernández F, et al. 2014. Eight good reasons why the uppermost mantle could be magnetic. Tectonophysics, 624-625:3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.01.004

     

    Flower M, Tamaki K, Hoang N. 1998. Mantle extrusion: a model for dispersed volcanism and DUPAL-like asthenosphere in East Asia and the western Pacific.//Flower M F J, Chun S L, Lo C H, et al eds. Mantle Dynamics and Plate Interactions in East Asia. Geodynamics 27, Washington, D C: AGU, 67-88.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/284417178_Mantle_extrusion_A_model_for_dispersed_volcanism_and_DUPAL-like_asthenosphere_in_East_Asia_and_the_western_Pacific

     

    Griffin W L, O'Reilly S Y. 1987. Is the continental Moho the crust-mantle boundary? Geology, 15(3):241-244. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1987)15<241:ITCMTC>2.0.CO;2

     

    Guan D L, Ke X P, Wang Y. 2016. Basement structures of East and South China Seas and adjacent regions from gravity inversion. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 117:242-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.12.017

     

    Guimarães S N P, Ravat D, Hamza V M. 2014. Combined use of the centroid and matched filtering spectral magnetic methods in determining thermomagnetic characteristics of the crust in the structural provinces of Central Brazil. Tectonophysics, 624-625:87-99. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.01.025

     

    Hall R. 1996. Reconstructing Cenozoic SE Asia. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 106(1):153-184. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.106.01.11

     

    Hao T Y, Huang S, Xu Y, et al. 2008. Comprehensive geophysical research on the deepstructure of Northeastern South China Sea. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 51(6):1785-1796. http://en.cnki.com.cn/article_en/cjfdtotal-dqwx200806020.htm

     

    He L S, Chen B Y. 1987. Atlas of Geology and Geophysics of South China Sea (in Chinese). Guangzhou:Guangdong Map Publishing House.

     

    Holloway N H. 1982. North Palawan block, Philippines-its relation to Asian mainland and role in evolution of South China Sea. AAPG Bulletin, 66(9):1355-1383.

     

    Hsu S K, Yeh Y C, Doo W B, et al. 2004. New bathymetry and magnetic lineations identifications in the northernmost South China Sea and their tectonic implications. Marine Geophysical Researches, 25(1-2):29-44. doi: 10.1007/s11001-005-0731-7

     

    Hu L T, Hao T Y, Xing J, et al. 2016. The Moho depth in the China Sea-West Pacific and its geological implications. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 59(3):871-883, doi:10.6038/cjg20160310.

     

    Iyer K. 2007. Mechanisms of serpentinization and some geochemical effects[Ph. D. Thesis]. Oslo: University of Oslo, 2007.https://core.ac.uk/display/30842062

     

    Iyer K, Austrheim H, John T, et al. 2008. Serpentinization of the oceanic lithosphere and some geochemical consequences:Constraints from the Leka Ophiolite Complex, Norway. Chemical Geology, 249(1-2):66-90. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.12.005

     

    Ji X L, Wang W Y, Qiu Z Y. 2015. The research to the minimum curvature technique for potential field data separation. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 58(3):1042-1058, doi:10.6038/cjg20150329.

     

    Karig D E. 1971. Origin and development of marginal basins in the western Pacific. Journal of Geophysical Research, 76(11):2542-2561. doi: 10.1029/JB076i011p02542

     

    Leloup P H, Arnaud N, Lacassin R, et al. 2001. New constraints on the structure, thermochronology, and timing of the Ailao Shan-Red River shear zone, SE Asia. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 66(B4):1083-6732. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001JGR...106.6683L

     

    Li C F, Shi X B, Zhou Z Y, et al. 2010. Depths to the magnetic layer bottom in the South China Sea area and their tectonic implications, Geophysical Journal International, 182(3):1229-1247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04702.x

     

    Li C F, Song T R. 2012. Magnetic recording of the Cenozoic oceanic crustal accretion and evolution of the South China Sea basin. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(24):3165-3181. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201203512616

     

    Li C F, Xu X, Lin J, et al. 2014. Ages and magnetic structures of the South China Sea constrained by deep tow magnetic surveys and IODP Expedition 349. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(12):4958-4983. doi: 10.1002/2014GC005567

     

    Li J B, Ding W W, Gao J Y, et al. 2011. Cenozoic evolution model of the sea-floor spreading in South China Sea:new constraints from high resolution geophysical data. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(12):3004-3015, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.003.

     

    Lowrie W. 2007. Fundamentals of Geophysics. 2nd ed. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 381.

     

    Lv W Z, Ke C Z, Wu S D, et al. 1987. Central Basin strip magnetic anomalies and tectonic evolution of the South China Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica (in Chinese), 9(1):69-78.

     

    Ma C Q. 1998. The Moho, lower continental crust and magmatism. Earth Science Frontiers (in Chinese), 5(4):201-208.

     

    Ma J, Wang W Y, Luo X G, et al. 2018. The magnetic basement and Curie surface depth in the South China Sea and adjacent areas derived from magnetic data. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 61(10):4269-4280, doi:10.6038/cjg2018L0574.

     

    Martin-Hernandez F, Ferré E C, Friedman S A. 2014. Remanent magnetization in fresh xenoliths derived from combined demagnetization experiments:magnetic mineralogy, origin and implications for mantle sources of magnetic anomalies. Tectonophysics, 624-625:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.04.006

     

    McIntosh K, Lavier L, Van Avendonk H, et al. 2014. Crustal structure and inferred rifting processes in the northeast South China Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 58:612-626. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.03.012

     

    Meissner R, Werer T, Fluck E R. 1987. The Moho in Europe-implications for crustal development. Annales Geophysicae, 5B:357-364. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275715636_The_Moho_in_Europe_-_Implications_for_crustal_development

     

    Morley C K. 2002. A tectonic model for the Tertiary evolution of strike-slip faults and rift basins in SE Asia. Tectonophysics, 347(4):189-215. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00061-6

     

    Nissen S S, Hayes D E, Buhl P, et al. 1995. Deep penetration seismic soundings across the northern margin of the South China Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B11):22407-22433. doi: 10.1029/95JB01866

     

    Oufi O, Cannat M, Horen H. 2002. Magnetic properties of variably serpentinized abyssal peridotites. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 107(B5):2095, doi:10.1029/2001JB000549.

     

    Pichot T, Delescluse M, Chamot-Rooke N, et al. 2014. Deep crustal structure of the conjugate margins of the SW South China Sea from wide-angle refraction seismic data. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 58:627-643. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.10.008

     

    Qin J X, Hao T Y, Xu Y, et al. 2011. The distribution characteristics and the relationship between the tectonic units of the Moho Depth in South China Sea and Adjacent Areas. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(12):3171-3183, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.017.

     

    Qiu X L, Zhao M H, Ao W, et al. 2011. OBS survey and crustal structure of the Southwest Sub-basin and Nansha Block, South China Sea. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(12):3117-3128, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.012.

     

    Ranero C R, Morgan J P, Mcintosh K, et al. 2003. Bending-related faulting and mantle serpentinization at the Middle America trench. Nature, 425(6956):367-373. doi: 10.1038/nature01961

     

    Ross H E, Blakely R J, Zoback M D. 2006. Testing the use of aeromagnetic data for the determination of Curie depth in California. Geophysics, 71(5):51-59. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AGUFM.T31A1287R

     

    Ru K, Pigott J D. 1986. Episodic rifting and subsidence in the South China Sea. AAPG Bulletin, 70(9):1136-1155. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=CAS201303040000263646

     

    Ruan A G, Niu X W, Qiu X L, et al. 2011. A wide angle ocean bottom seismometer profile across Liyue Bank, the southern margin of South China Sea. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(12):319-3149, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.014.

     

    Salem A, Green C, Ravat D, et al. 2014. Depth to Curie temperature across the central Red Sea from magnetic data using the de-fractal method. Tectonophysics, 624-625:75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.04.027

     

    Sandwell D T, Garcia E, Soofi K, et al. 2013. Towards 1-mGal accuracy in global marine gravity from CryoSat-2, Envisat, and Jason-1. The Leading Edge, 32(8):892-899. doi: 10.1190/tle32080892.1

     

    Sandwell D T, Müller R D, Smith W H F, et al. 2014. New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure. Science, 346(6205):65-67. doi: 10.1126/science.1258213

     

    Schroeder T, John B, Frost B R. 2002. Geologic implications of seawater circulation through peridotite exposed at slow-spreading mid-ocean ridges. Geology, 30(4):367-370. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0367:GIOSCT>2.0.CO;2

     

    Smith W H F, Sandwell D T. 1997. Global sea floor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings. Science, 277(5334):1957-1962. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ021297025/

     

    Song H B, Hao T Y, Jiang W W, et al. 2002. Researches on geophysical field characteristics and basement fault system of South China Sea. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 17(1):24-34.

     

    Sun Z, Zhou D, Wu S M, et al. 2009. Patterns and dynamics of rifting on passive continental margin from shelf to slope of the northern South China Sea:evidence from 3D analogue modeling. Journal of Earth Science, 20(1):136-146. doi: 10.1007/s12583-009-0011-6

     

    Tamaki K. 1995. Upper mantle extrusion tectonics of Southeast Asia and formation of the western Pacific back-arc basins. Workshop: Cenozoic Evolution of the Indochina Peninsula, Hanoi/Do son, Abstract with Program, 89.

     

    Tanaka A, Okubo Y, Matsubayashi O. 1999. Curie point depth based on spectrum analysis of the magnetic anomaly data in East and Southeast Asia. Tectonophysics, 306(3-4):461-470. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00072-4

     

    Tapponnier P, Lacassin R, Leloup P H, et al. 1990. The Ailao Shan/Red River metamorphic belt:Tertiary leftlateral shear between Indochina and South China. Nature, 243(6257):431-437. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v343/n6257/abs/343431a0.html

     

    Taylor B, Hayes D E. 1980. The tectonic evolution of the South China Sea.//Hay D E ed. The Tectonic and Geologic Evolution of Southeast Asian Seas and Islands. Washington D C: AGU, 89-104.

     

    Taylor B, Hayes D E. 1983. Origin and history of the South China Sea basin.//Hay D E ed. The Tectonic and Geologic Evolution of Southeast Asian Seas and Islands: Part 2. Washington D C: AGU, 23-56.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/258928283_Origin_and_history_of_the_South_China_Sea_basin

     

    Wang T K, Chen M K, Lee C S, et al. 2006. Seismic imaging of the transitional crust across the northeastern margin of the South China Sea. Tectonophysics, 412(3-4):237-254. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2005.10.039

     

    Wang W Y, Pan Z S. 1993. Fast solution of forward and inverse problems for Gravity field in a dual interface model. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum (in Chinese), 32(2):81-87. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000003044210

     

    Wasilewski P J, Mayhew M A. 1992. The Moho as a magnetic boundary revisited. Geophysical Research Letters, 19(22):2259-2262. doi: 10.1029/92GL01997

     

    Wasilewski P J, Thomas H H, Mayhew M A. 1979. The Moho as a magnetic boundary. Geophysical Research Letters, 6:541-544. doi: 10.1029/GL006i007p00541

     

    Wei X D, Ruan A G, Zhao M H, et al. 2011a. A wide-angle OBS profile across Dongsha Uplift and Chaoshan Depression in the mid-northern South China Sea. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(12):3325-3335, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.030.

     

    Wei X D, Ruan A G, Zhao M H, et al. 2015. Shear wave velocity structure of Reed Bank, southern continental margin of the South China Sea. Tectonophysics, 644-645:151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.01.006

     

    Wei X D, Zhao M H, Ruan A G, et al. 2011b. Crustal structure of shear waves and its tectonic significance in the mid-northern continental margin of the South China Sea. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(12):3150-3160, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.015.

     

    Wu Z C, Gao J Y, Zhao L H, et al. 2010. Characteristic of magnetic anomalies and Curie point depth at northern continental margin of the South China Sea. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences (in Chinese), 35(6):1060-1068. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2010.120

     

    Wu Z C, Gao J Y, Ding W W. 2017. Moho depth of the South China Sea basin from three-dimensional gravity inversion with constraint points. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 60(7):2599-2613, doi:10.6038/cjg20170709.

     

    Wu Z L, Li J B, Ruan A G, et al. 2011. Crustal structure of the northwestern sub-basin, South China Sea:Results from a wide-angle seismic experiment. Science China Earth Sciences, 55(1):159-172, doi:10.1007/s11430-011-4324-9.

     

    Yan P, Zhou D, Liu Z S. 2001. A crustal structure profile across the northern continental margin of the South China Sea. Tectonophysics, 338(1):1-21. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00062-2

     

    Yao B C. 1995.Characteristics and tectonic meaning of Zhongnan-Liyue fault. Geological Research of South China Sea (in Chinese), (7):1-14. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-NHDZ199500000.htm

     

    Yao B C, Wan L, Wu N Y. 2004. Cenozoic plate tectonic activities in the Great South China Sea area. Chinese Geology (in Chinese), 31(2):113-122. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgdizhi200402001

     

    Yao B C, Wan L, Zeng W J, et al. 2006. The Three-Dimensional Structure of Lithosphere and Its Evolution in the South China Sea (in Chinese). Beijing:Geological Publishing House.

     

    Zhang G C, Zhu W L, Mi L J, et al. 2010. The theory of hydrocarbon genernation controlled by source rock and heat from circle distribution of outside-oil field and inside-gas field in South China Sea. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica (in Chinese), 28(5):987-1005. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201005018.htm

     

    Zhang J, Li J B. 2011. Gravity inversion and thermal modeling about the crust-mantle structure of Southwest basin in the South China Sea. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(12):3026-3037, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.005.

     

    Zhao M H, Qiu X L, Xia S H, et al. 2010. Seismic structure in the northeastern South China Sea:S-wave velocity and Vp/Vs ratios derived from three-component OBS data. Tectonophysics, 480(1-4):183-197. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2009.10.004

     

    Zhou D, Chen H Z, Wu S M, et al. 2002. Opening of the South China Sea by dextral splitting of the east Asian continental margin. Acta Geologica Sinica (in Chinese), 76(2):180-190. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200202005.htm

     

    陈洁, 高德章, 温宁等. 2010.南海磁场特征研究.地球物理学进展, 25(2):376-388, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2010.02.002.

     

    丁巍伟, 李家彪. 2011.南海南部陆缘构造变形特征及伸展作用:来自两条973多道地震测线的证据.地球物理学报, 54(12):3038-3056, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.006. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract8294.shtml

     

    冯旭亮, 张功成, 王万银等. 2018.基于重磁震资料的南海新生代盆地分布综合研究.地球物理学报, 61(10):4242-4254, doi:10.6038/cjg2018L0567. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract14728.shtml

     

    郝天珧, 黄松, 徐亚等. 2008.南海东北部及邻区深部结构的综合地球物理研究.地球物理学报, 51(6):1785-1796. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2008.06.019 http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract842.shtml

     

    何廉声, 陈邦彦. 1987.南海地质地球物理图集.广州:广东省地图出版社.

     

    胡立天, 郝天珧, 邢健等. 2016.中国海-西太平洋莫霍面深度分布特征及其地质意义.地球物理学报, 59(3):871-883 doi:10. 6038/cjg20160310. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract12606.shtml

     

    纪晓琳, 王万银, 邱之云. 2015.最小曲率位场分离方法研究.地球物理学报, 58(3):1042-1058, doi:10.6038/cjg20150329. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract11372.shtml

     

    李家彪, 丁巍伟, 高金耀等. 2011.南海新生代海底扩张的构造演化模式:来自高分辨率地球物理数据的新认识.地球物理学报, 54(12):3004-3015, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.003. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract8291.shtml

     

    吕文正, 柯长志, 吴声迪等. 1987.南海中央海盆条带磁异常特征及构造演化.海洋学报, 9(1):69-78. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000002626206

     

    马昌前. 1998.莫霍面, 下地壳与岩浆作用.地学前缘, 5(4):201-208. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.1998.04.003

     

    马杰, 王万银, 罗新刚等. 2018.基于磁力资料的南海及邻区磁性基底和居里面深度特征研究.地球物理学报, 61(10):4269-4280, doi:10.6038/cjg2018L0574. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract14730.shtml

     

    秦静欣, 郝天珧, 徐亚等. 2011.南海及邻区莫霍面深度分布特征及其与各构造单元的关系.地球物理学报, 54(12):3171-3183, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.017. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract8305.shtml

     

    丘学林, 赵明辉, 敖威等. 2011.南海西南次海盆与南沙地块的OBS探测和地壳结构.地球物理学报, 54(12):3117-3128, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.012. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract8300.shtml

     

    阮爱国, 牛雄伟, 丘学林等. 2011.穿越南沙礼乐滩的海底地震仪广角地震试验.地球物理学报, 54(12):319-3149, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.014. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract8302.shtml

     

    宋海斌, 郝天珧, 江为为等. 2002.南海地球物理场特征与基底断裂体系研究.地球物理学进展, 17(1):24-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2002.01.003

     

    王万银, 潘作枢. 1993.双界面模型重力场快速正反演问题.石油物探, 32(2):81-87. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000003044210

     

    卫小冬, 阮爱国, 赵明辉等. 2011a.穿越东沙隆起和潮汕坳陷的OBS广角地震剖面.地球物理学报, 54(12):3325-3335, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.030. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract8318.shtml

     

    卫小冬, 赵明辉, 阮爱国等. 2011b.南海中北部陆缘横波速度结构及其构造意义.地球物理学报, 54(12):3150-3160, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.015. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract8303.shtml

     

    吴招才, 高金耀, 赵俐红等. 2010.南海北部陆缘的磁异常特征及居里面深度.地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 35(6):1060-1068. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqkx201006017

     

    吴招才, 高金耀, 丁巍伟等. 2017.南海海盆三维重力约束反演莫霍面深度及其特征.地球物理学报, 60(7):2599-2613, doi:10.6038/cjg20170709. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract13878.shtml

     

    姚伯初. 1995.中南-礼乐断裂的特征及其构造意义.南海地质研究, (7):1-14. http://qikan.cqvip.com/article/detail.aspx?id=1667472

     

    姚伯初, 万玲, 吴能友. 2004.大南海地区新生代板块构造活动.中国地质, 31(2):113-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2004.02.001

     

    姚伯初, 万玲, 曾维军等. 2006.中国南海海域岩石圈三维结构及演化.北京:地质出版社, 2006.

     

    张功成, 朱伟林, 米立军等. 2010. "源热共控论":来自南海海域油气田"外油内气"环带有序分布的新认识.沉积学报, 28(5):987-1005. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syxb201205001

     

    张健, 李家彪. 2011.南海西南海盆壳幔结构重力反演与热模拟分析.地球物理学报, 54(12):3026-3037, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.12.005. http://www.geophy.cn//CN/abstract/abstract8293.shtml

     

    周蒂, 陈汉宗, 吴世敏等. 2002.南海的右行陆缘裂解成因.地质学报, 76(2):180-190. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb200202005

    • 相关文章
  • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中

图(9)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2397
  • PDF下载数:  718
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2017-09-04
修回日期:  2018-08-14
上线日期:  2018-10-05

目录

    返回

    地址：北京9825信箱《地球物理学报》编辑部邮编：100029

    电话：010－82998105，82998139 邮箱：actageop@mail.igcas.ac.cn

    版权所有 © 2009-2023 地球物理学报 京ICP备13017565号-7

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发