Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Implications of biomass pretreatment to cost and carbon emissions: case study of rice straw and Pennisetum in Taiwan

Bioresour Technol. 2012 Mar:108:285-94. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Jan 11.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of feedstock collection and torrefaction pretreatment on the efficiency of a biomass co-firing system. Considering the transformation of existing municipal solid waste incinerators, several scenarios in which biomass supply chains depend on centralised pretreatment and transportation alternatives are presented. The cost, net energy output, and greenhouse gas effects of these scenarios were analysed using a spreadsheet model. Based on the Taoyuan County case in Taiwan, the mitigation costs of carbon emissions for rice straw and Pennisetum are 77.0 $/Mg CO(2) and 63.8 $/Mg CO(2), respectively. Results indicate that transporting feedstock from its source to the pretreatment and co-firing stations contributes the most to logistical costs for both straw and Pennisetum, regardless of whether torrefaction was adopted. Nonetheless, torrefaction requires more demonstrated cases at various scales to obtain the technical and economic data required for further analysis.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Air Pollution / prevention & control*
  • Biomass
  • Carbon Dioxide / metabolism
  • Geographic Information Systems
  • Incineration / methods*
  • Models, Chemical*
  • Oryza / chemistry*
  • Pennisetum / chemistry*
  • Plant Components, Aerial / chemistry*
  • Refuse Disposal / economics
  • Refuse Disposal / methods*
  • Taiwan

Substances

  • Carbon Dioxide