@inproceedings{huber-etal-2019-aligning,
title = "Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining",
author = "Huber, Laurine and
Toussaint, Yannick and
Roze, Charlotte and
Dargnat, Mathilde and
Braud, Chlo\'e",
editor = "Stein, Benno and
Wachsmuth, Henning",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining",
month = aug,
year = "2019",
address = "Florence, Italy",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W19-4504/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W19-4504",
pages = "35--40",
abstract = "In this paper, we investigate similarities between discourse and argumentation structures by aligning subtrees in a corpus containing both annotations. Contrary to previous works, we focus on comparing sub-structures and not only relations matches. Using data mining techniques, we show that discourse and argumentation most often align well, and the double annotation allows to derive a mapping between structures. Moreover, this approach enables the study of similarities between discourse structures and differences in their expressive power."
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="huber-etal-2019-aligning">
<titleInfo>
<title>Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Laurine</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Huber</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yannick</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Toussaint</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Charlotte</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Roze</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mathilde</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dargnat</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chloé</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Braud</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2019-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Benno</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Stein</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Henning</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wachsmuth</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Florence, Italy</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>In this paper, we investigate similarities between discourse and argumentation structures by aligning subtrees in a corpus containing both annotations. Contrary to previous works, we focus on comparing sub-structures and not only relations matches. Using data mining techniques, we show that discourse and argumentation most often align well, and the double annotation allows to derive a mapping between structures. Moreover, this approach enables the study of similarities between discourse structures and differences in their expressive power.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">huber-etal-2019-aligning</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W19-4504</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W19-4504/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2019-08</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>35</start>
<end>40</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining
%A Huber, Laurine
%A Toussaint, Yannick
%A Roze, Charlotte
%A Dargnat, Mathilde
%A Braud, Chloé
%Y Stein, Benno
%Y Wachsmuth, Henning
%S Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining
%D 2019
%8 August
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Florence, Italy
%F huber-etal-2019-aligning
%X In this paper, we investigate similarities between discourse and argumentation structures by aligning subtrees in a corpus containing both annotations. Contrary to previous works, we focus on comparing sub-structures and not only relations matches. Using data mining techniques, we show that discourse and argumentation most often align well, and the double annotation allows to derive a mapping between structures. Moreover, this approach enables the study of similarities between discourse structures and differences in their expressive power.
%R 10.18653/v1/W19-4504
%U https://aclanthology.org/W19-4504/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-4504
%P 35-40
Markdown (Informal)
[Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining](https://aclanthology.org/W19-4504/) (Huber et al., ArgMining 2019)
- Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining (Huber et al., ArgMining 2019)
ACL
- Laurine Huber, Yannick Toussaint, Charlotte Roze, Mathilde Dargnat, and Chloé Braud. 2019. Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining, pages 35–40, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.