Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

This chapter aims to investigate the relationship between Friedrich von Hayek’s (neo)liberal theory and conservative thought. Analyzing the concepts used by Hayek to distinguish his liberal doctrine from conservatism in the essay Why I am not a Conservative and contrasting them with their broader use in his most important works – The Constitution of Liberty (1960), Law, Legislation and Liberty (1982) and The Fatal Conceit (1988) – this chapter seeks to highlight the internal tensions and contradictions in the liberal principles defended by Hayek. The main hypothesis is that it is possible to find a conservative core within Hayek’s thought that constitutes the fundamental ideological weapon employed in his “battle of ideas” against socialism. Conservative concepts, such as tradition, family, property, inequality, and religion, are therefore used to assert his market doctrine against the egalitarian and collectivist claim advanced by socialism. Following the antitheses drawn by Hayek to distinguish liberalism from conservatism, the chapter identifies the antirevolutionary conception of change, the authoritative role of tradition and religion, the disciplinary function of morals, the admission of the dictatorial exception, and the anti-democratic and anti-egalitarian stand as the conservative tools deployed by Hayek to think the conditions for the functioning and re- production of the market order.

The Conservative Core of Hayek’s (Neo)liberal Doctrine : Evolution, Tradition, and Authority in the Market Society / M. Ciolli (POLIDEMOS). - In: Constitutional Democracy and the Challenges of Anti-Liberalism Lessons from Experience : essons from Experience / [a cura di] M. Postigo, G. Silvestrini, M. Simonazzi. - Milano : EDUCatt, 2023. - ISBN 9791255351887. - pp. 139-175

The Conservative Core of Hayek’s (Neo)liberal Doctrine : Evolution, Tradition, and Authority in the Market Society

M. Ciolli
Primo
Membro del Collaboration Group
2023

Abstract

This chapter aims to investigate the relationship between Friedrich von Hayek’s (neo)liberal theory and conservative thought. Analyzing the concepts used by Hayek to distinguish his liberal doctrine from conservatism in the essay Why I am not a Conservative and contrasting them with their broader use in his most important works – The Constitution of Liberty (1960), Law, Legislation and Liberty (1982) and The Fatal Conceit (1988) – this chapter seeks to highlight the internal tensions and contradictions in the liberal principles defended by Hayek. The main hypothesis is that it is possible to find a conservative core within Hayek’s thought that constitutes the fundamental ideological weapon employed in his “battle of ideas” against socialism. Conservative concepts, such as tradition, family, property, inequality, and religion, are therefore used to assert his market doctrine against the egalitarian and collectivist claim advanced by socialism. Following the antitheses drawn by Hayek to distinguish liberalism from conservatism, the chapter identifies the antirevolutionary conception of change, the authoritative role of tradition and religion, the disciplinary function of morals, the admission of the dictatorial exception, and the anti-democratic and anti-egalitarian stand as the conservative tools deployed by Hayek to think the conditions for the functioning and re- production of the market order.
market order; conservatism; evolution; tradition; dictatorship; morals; religion
Settore SPS/02 - Storia delle Dottrine Politiche
2023
https://www.polidemos.it/en/volume-8-2023/
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ciolli, The Conservative Core of Hayek Neoliberal Doctrine.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 349.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
349.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1086151
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact