Papers by Tytus Mikołajczak
From April 2014, the objects from Persepolis in the Oriental Institute
Museum have been the main... more From April 2014, the objects from Persepolis in the Oriental Institute
Museum have been the main focus of the Achemenet Project.
In 522 B.C. Darius I seized the Persian throne, most likely as a usurper. It appears that he was ... more In 522 B.C. Darius I seized the Persian throne, most likely as a usurper. It appears that he was not related to Cambyses, Cyrus or their family. It seems that Darius and Cyrus differed also in their religion. Despite the fact that the religion of the first rulers of ancient Persia is uncertain, the differences between Darius and his predecessors can be listed. Darius' attachment to Iranian cults can be concluded on basis of his inscriptions, but there is no unambiguous evidence about Iranian religion in case of Cyrus. Cyrus and his son, for example, never invoked the name of Ahuramazda. Furthermore, the art during their reign does not present Iranian motifs; rather, it is more connected with Elamite and Mesopotamian designs. Similarly there are significant differences in tomb architecture between Cyrus and Darius. Introducing the cult of Ahuramazda as the official religion by Darius could have served some political purposes that resulted in legitimizing and strengthening the rule of this king.
The Achaemenids' beliefs are a matter of dispute and discussion. During the reign of Artaxerxes I... more The Achaemenids' beliefs are a matter of dispute and discussion. During the reign of Artaxerxes II some significant changes in religious practices were occurring. In sources relating to this period, we find a description of the royal initiation for the for the time (by Plutarch). This subject has been frequently taken up by scholars. The religious aspect is very important in this ceremony in which the Magi appear to have played a major role.
Very debatable is an increase of significance of two deities: Anahita and Mithra during the reign of Artaxerxes II. This is connected with the introduction of a statue cult at the king's suggestion. Reasons for this decision have met with different analysis. The effects of these events were also different. The role of the king and Magi in this process is a matter of debate among scholars.
According to some scholars (mainly M. Boyce) a temple cult of fire was introduced in this period as well. I consider when and if there was the temple cult of fire introduced and the role of the Magi in its development. The results of archaeological excavations were reviewed. They can verify theories about temple cult of fire during this period.
During the reign of the last Achaemenids, perhaps when Artaxerxes II ruled, a new Zoroastrian calendar was introduced officially throughout the empire. The Magi probably played the important role in this event.
All these changes mentioned above could have a significant influence on the priesthood. The role of the Magi is not clear-- were they initiators or only tools in the court's hands during the religious reforms? These problems were described in detail.
Talks by Tytus Mikołajczak
The Persepolis Fortification Archive records activities of hundreds of individuals involved in th... more The Persepolis Fortification Archive records activities of hundreds of individuals involved in the administration in Fārs, Iran, throughout the period reflected by the documents (509-493 BC). Making sense of the underlying, complex administrative structure is a challenging task. This process can be facilitated by tracing the correlations between seals impressed on the cuneiform documents and their contents. Methods of the social network analysis and visualization are very useful with finding and recognizing such correlations. Preliminary network analysis confirms the results of the study of the texts contents. There is no doubt that the seals impressed on the tablets reflect an organizational structure of the offices producing these documents. The paper discusses the preliminary results and explores possibilities and perspectives for the further use of the social network analysis for the study of the Persepolis Fortification Archive.
A high proportion of the “accounting seals” used on Persepolis Fortification tablets are inscribe... more A high proportion of the “accounting seals” used on Persepolis Fortification tablets are inscribed. These accounting seals are impressed on late-stage Elamite documents of the kinds called “journals” and “accounts” but rarely on other kinds of Fortification documents. Of ca. 62 accounting seals about 22% have inscriptions (as opposed to ca. 8% of all seals used on Elamite Fortification texts), and the inscriptions are predominantly in Elamite cuneiform script (79%, as opposed to 44% inscribed seals on all Elamite documents). None of the inscribed accounting seals name contemporary users, which highlights the circumstances that seal inscriptions naming contemporary users are rare in the Archive as a whole. This paper also touches on features of the epigraphy of the inscribed accounting seals, which might inform us about procedures of seal cutting and level of literacy among artisans making them.
Ten documents from the Persepolis Fortification Archive (PFA) that have impressions of Persepolis... more Ten documents from the Persepolis Fortification Archive (PFA) that have impressions of Persepolis Fortification Seal (PFS) 1155, along with six other documents that have related contents constitute a dossier that represents activities in a district of the territory monitored from Persepolis. This dossier sheds new light on operating relationships between district administration and central accounting, suggesting that district administrators were more directly involved than previously supposed in compilation of final records at Persepolis.
In the course of work on the Achemenet Project, a joint effort of the Oriental Institute and the ... more In the course of work on the Achemenet Project, a joint effort of the Oriental Institute and the Musée du Louvre to photograph and document Achaemenid objects in the collection of the Oriental Institute Museum, I have identified fragmentary inscriptions that were previously unpublished, incompletely published, and/or misidentified. Of greatest importance is a fragment of an Elamite version of XPl, a text of Xerxes hitherto thought to be monolingual on the basis of an Old Persian exemplar discovered in 1967, that is, thirty years after the OI’s Elamite fragment was excavated. Also notable are two stone blocks inscribed in Greek, possibly from the reign of Alexander the Great or of Peucestas, the satrap of Persis appointed by Alexander. Greek epigraphers have been aware of these inscriptions, but knowledge of the current location was lost until now. This paper will discuss these inscribed fragments and their archaeological context.
The accounting tablets in the Persepolis Fortification Archive (509–1493 BCE), that is, documents... more The accounting tablets in the Persepolis Fortification Archive (509–1493 BCE), that is, documents from Categories V and W, are secondary records, including lists, summaries and digests of transactions previously recorded in primary memoranda or intermediate summaries. The seals impressed on these tablets were rarely used on tablets with Fortification texts of other categories. Hence, these seals constitute a distinct group, and the functional relationships between these seals and the associated texts differ from the relationships in other kinds of Fortification documents. Texts on accounting tablets sealed with a particular seal not only refer to the same commodities and geographical locations, but often conform to similar patterns of contents and text structure. In addition, the use of the most frequently occurring seals used on accounting tablets seems to reflect the main organizational elements of the office which produced the accounts. The present paper will show how correlations between seals and text contents improve understanding of the administrative system reflected by the accounting tablets in the Persepolis Fortification Archive.
Accountants are mentioned in texts from the Persepolis Fortification Archive (509-493 BC) only ve... more Accountants are mentioned in texts from the Persepolis Fortification Archive (509-493 BC) only very occasionally, usually as individuals who “made,” “checked,” or “reckoned” accounting tablets. By contrast, the more numerous “memoranda” rarely fail to note the names of the individuals involved in the transactions they record. As a result, the accountants are largely anonymous group. Only rarely we can identify their names and say something more about them. The present paper, based mostly on unpublished material, will elaborate on the roles of accountants in the Persepolis Fortification Archive, focusing on several well documented examples.
Uploads
Papers by Tytus Mikołajczak
Museum have been the main focus of the Achemenet Project.
Very debatable is an increase of significance of two deities: Anahita and Mithra during the reign of Artaxerxes II. This is connected with the introduction of a statue cult at the king's suggestion. Reasons for this decision have met with different analysis. The effects of these events were also different. The role of the king and Magi in this process is a matter of debate among scholars.
According to some scholars (mainly M. Boyce) a temple cult of fire was introduced in this period as well. I consider when and if there was the temple cult of fire introduced and the role of the Magi in its development. The results of archaeological excavations were reviewed. They can verify theories about temple cult of fire during this period.
During the reign of the last Achaemenids, perhaps when Artaxerxes II ruled, a new Zoroastrian calendar was introduced officially throughout the empire. The Magi probably played the important role in this event.
All these changes mentioned above could have a significant influence on the priesthood. The role of the Magi is not clear-- were they initiators or only tools in the court's hands during the religious reforms? These problems were described in detail.
Talks by Tytus Mikołajczak
Museum have been the main focus of the Achemenet Project.
Very debatable is an increase of significance of two deities: Anahita and Mithra during the reign of Artaxerxes II. This is connected with the introduction of a statue cult at the king's suggestion. Reasons for this decision have met with different analysis. The effects of these events were also different. The role of the king and Magi in this process is a matter of debate among scholars.
According to some scholars (mainly M. Boyce) a temple cult of fire was introduced in this period as well. I consider when and if there was the temple cult of fire introduced and the role of the Magi in its development. The results of archaeological excavations were reviewed. They can verify theories about temple cult of fire during this period.
During the reign of the last Achaemenids, perhaps when Artaxerxes II ruled, a new Zoroastrian calendar was introduced officially throughout the empire. The Magi probably played the important role in this event.
All these changes mentioned above could have a significant influence on the priesthood. The role of the Magi is not clear-- were they initiators or only tools in the court's hands during the religious reforms? These problems were described in detail.
On the other hand, it seems that Median culture was in a large degree dependant of contacts with Iranian nomadic peoples, like Scythians. In addition, the beliefs of these two ethnic groups appear to be closely related. Certainly, the available sources do not allow for attributing Zoroastrianism to Medes, and even the use of more general term of Mazdaism, that is the cult of Ahura Mazda, should be very cautious. It seems that the beliefs of the Medes were more closely linked to Old Iranian roots. In present paper, the evidence for such a character of Median religion will be presented, and the old theories will be evaluated.
"