http://www.ctvolympics.ca/figure-skating/news/newsid=50985.html
http://www.washingt onpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/24/AR2010022400302.html
http://www.huffingt onpost.com/2010/02/24/kim-yunas-short-program-g_n_474274.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/24/sports/olympics/24skate.html

しかし一番目のサイトでふれられているぐらい。

But at least one veteran skater, former Ca nadian medallist Elvis Stojko, suggested that Kim's marks were too high. He noted that Asada had successfully landed a triple Axel - she's the only woman who executes them regularly in competition - and got fewer marks than Kim's easier triple Lutz.
The argument is similar to the one over whether American Evan Lysacek should have won the gold medal without having landed a quad like his competitor Evgeni Plushenko.
"Yu-Na Kim is way too far ahead. I don't agree with that," said Stojko. "She skated great. Don't get me wrong, she's awesome. But for Mao to do an awesome triple Axel like that, a triple [Axel] is worth way more than a triple Lutz, triple toe."
http://www.ctvolympics.ca/figure-skating/news/newsid=50985.html

でもコメントでは批判されている。

Stojko is WRONG again! I can't believe how he's embarassing himself with his commentary. Asada's triple Axel-double toe combo is worth LESS than Kim's triple Lutz-triple toe combo. In fact for the GOE(Grade of Execution), Asada only received .60 extra for ther opening combo last night whereas Kim received 2.00 bonus for her's.
cw_pianoman22@yahoo.ca

triple axel itself does have higher score than triple lutz, but Mao combined it with double toe loop while Yuna Kim's combination was triple-triple. And she executed it way better than anyone else. Just doing one difficult jump doesn't make a great skater. How you do it also matters. Yuna Kim's program is higher difficulty overall, therefore has higher basic score than anyone else's program. And she got higher execution mark for the quality. If Stojko wants to see more jump, he can go to Cirque du soleil. Stop insulting a quality program and great effort of other athlets.
hohoho323

まじめに全部読んだ訳じゃないから絶対という訳ではないけど、コメント欄でStojkoの意見に賛成する人はいなかったはず。他の記事では不当に得点が高いと書かれていなかったはず。

ただ外国の２ちゃんねるのようなところでは違うかもしれないと思って、4chanを見てみたのだが全く話題になっていなかった。そこでずばり「Kim Yu-Na bribe（＝賄賂）」でググってみた。で、見つけたのがこれ。

Korean newspapers report on the internet proxy wars that are going on between Japan and Korea, through Kim Yuna and Asada Mao.
http://www.newdaily.co.kr/html.....41244.html
http://news.chosun.com/site/da.....p;Dep3=top
These describe how Japanese netizens are behaving. Some were noted for their wishing and rambling “fall fall, roll over, fall fall, trip and fall and roll over” during Kim Yuna’s performance. Once Kim’s score was announced, the Japanese internet sites exploded with comments of Koreans bribing the judges and buying the competition. The report in Chosun’s article noted how Korean netizens were taking the high road.
This is why I don’t watch nor care about this sports. Not only is it boring to watch, the overt nationalism on both sides of the sea dirties up the sports.
cm
http://www.rjkoehler.com/2010/02/24/kim-yu-na-scores-world-record/

どちらかというと日本のネチズンを批判するもの。まぁ、韓国系のブログだから不正採点とか騒いでいる人たちには意味がないけど。日本系のだと見つからなかったけど、去年のものがあってそれが興味深かった。去年というか半年ぐらい前にもあったのかという点に驚き。２ちゃんねるも知ってるブログなのだけど、コメント欄ではあきれられてる。

I must agree with you that some of the feuds between Korea/Japan/China indeed stem out of pure hatred and unjustified bias, resulting in posting videos like this that are obviously made of 100% malicious intent.
fracturedcow

Nationalism is a form of brain damage.
William George

個人的には日本の一部のネチズンが世界的に迷惑をかけて申し訳ないと感じる。

キムヨナの不正が疑われているってどこの話なの。

Permalink | 記事への反応(2) | 08:03

ようこそゲストさん