Computer Science > Discrete Mathematics
[Submitted on 23 May 2011 (this version), latest version 13 Aug 2014 (v5)]
Title:Submodular Function Maximization via the Multilinear Relaxation and Contention Resolution Schemes
View PDFAbstract:We consider the problem of maximizing a non-negative submodular set function $f:2^N \rightarrow \mathbb{R}_+$ over a ground set $N$ subject to a variety of packing type constraints. In this paper we develop a general framework leading to a number of new results, in particular when $f$ may be a {\em non-monotone} function. Our algorithms are based on (approximately) maximizing the multilinear extension $F$ of $f$ \cite{CCPV07} over a polytope $P$ that represents the constraints, and then effectively rounding the fractional solution. Although this approach has been used quite successfully in some settings \cite{CCPV09,KulikST09,LeeMNS09,CVZ10,BansalKNS10}, it has been limited in some important ways. We overcome these limitations as follows.
First, we give constant factor approximation algorithms to maximize $F$ over any down-closed polytope $P$ that has an efficient separation oracle. Previously this was known only for monotone functions \cite{Vondrak08}. For non-monotone functions, a constant factor was known only when the polytope was either the intersection of a fixed number of knapsack constraints \cite{LeeMNS09} or a matroid polytope \cite{Vondrak09,OV11}. Second, we show that {\em contention resolution schemes} are an effective way to round a fractional solution, even when $f$ is non-monotone. In particular, contention resolution schemes for different polytopes can be combined to handle the intersection of different constraints. Via LP duality we show that a contention resolution scheme for a constraint is related to the {\em correlation gap} \cite{ADSY10} of weighted rank functions of the constraint. This leads to an optimal contention resolution scheme for the matroid polytope.
Our results provide a broadly applicable framework for maximizing linear and submodular functions subject to independence constraints. We give several illustrative examples.
Submission history
From: Rico Zenklusen [view email][v1] Mon, 23 May 2011 19:38:56 UTC (40 KB)
[v2] Mon, 4 Jul 2011 01:11:19 UTC (44 KB)
[v3] Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:23:23 UTC (66 KB)
[v4] Tue, 22 Jul 2014 20:20:13 UTC (56 KB)
[v5] Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:38:18 UTC (57 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.