Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

HTML conversions sometimes display errors due to content that did not convert correctly from the source. This paper uses the following packages that are not yet supported by the HTML conversion tool. Feedback on these issues are not necessary; they are known and are being worked on.

  • failed: floatrow
  • failed: mhchem
  • failed: pbox
  • failed: stackengine
  • failed: scalerel
  • failed: bigdelim
  • failed: bigdelim

Authors: achieve the best HTML results from your LaTeX submissions by following these best practices.

License: CC BY 4.0
arXiv:2310.05219v2 [cond-mat.str-el] 20 Dec 2023
thanks: These authors contributed equally.thanks: These authors contributed equally.thanks: These authors contributed equally.thanks: These authors contributed equally.

Quantum paramagnetism in the decorated square-kagome antiferromagnet \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3

Nils Niggemann Dahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems and Fachbereich Physik, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, 14109 Berlin, Germany Department of Physics and Quantum Centre of Excellence for Diamond and Emergent Materials (QuCenDiEM), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India    Nikita Astrakhantsev Department of Physics, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland    Arnaud Ralko Institut Néel, UPR2940, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble, FR-38042 France Department of Physics and Quantum Centre of Excellence for Diamond and Emergent Materials (QuCenDiEM), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India    Francesco Ferrari Institut für Theoretische Physik, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Straße 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Department of Physics and Quantum Centre of Excellence for Diamond and Emergent Materials (QuCenDiEM), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India    Atanu Maity Department of Physics and Quantum Centre of Excellence for Diamond and Emergent Materials (QuCenDiEM), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India    Tobias Müller Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany    Johannes Richter Institut für Physik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, P.O. Box 4120, 39016 Magdeburg, Germany Max-Planck-Institut für Physik Komplexer Systeme, Nöthnitzer Straße 38, D-01187 Dresden, Germany    Ronny Thomale Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany Department of Physics and Quantum Centre of Excellence for Diamond and Emergent Materials (QuCenDiEM), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India    Titus Neupert Department of Physics, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland    Johannes Reuther Dahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems and Fachbereich Physik, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, 14109 Berlin, Germany Department of Physics and Quantum Centre of Excellence for Diamond and Emergent Materials (QuCenDiEM), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India    Yasir Iqbal Department of Physics and Quantum Centre of Excellence for Diamond and Emergent Materials (QuCenDiEM), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India    Harald O. Jeschke Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Science, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan Department of Physics and Quantum Centre of Excellence for Diamond and Emergent Materials (QuCenDiEM), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
(December 20, 2023)
Abstract

The square-kagome lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet is a highly frustrated Hamiltonian whose material realizations have been scarce. We theoretically investigate the recently synthesized \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3 where a Cu2+limit-from2{}^{2+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT spin-1/2121/21 / 2 square-kagome lattice (with six site unit cell) is decorated by a seventh magnetic site alternatingly above and below the layers. The material does not show any sign of long-range magnetic order down to 50 mK despite a Curie-Weiss temperature of 212212-212- 212 K indicating a quantum paramagnetic phase. Our DFT energy mapping elicits a purely antiferromagnetic Hamiltonian that features longer range exchange interactions beyond the pure square-kagome model and, importantly, we find the seventh site to be strongly coupled to the plane. We combine two variational Monte Carlo approaches, pseudo-fermion/Majorana functional renormalization group and Schwinger-Boson mean field calculations to show that the complex Hamiltonian of \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3 still features a nonmagnetic ground state. We explain how the seventh Cu2+limit-from2{}^{2+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT site actually aids the stabilization of the disordered state. We predict static and dynamic spin structure factors to guide future neutron scattering experiments.

Introduction. Magnetic ions forming the kagome lattice, a corner sharing network of triangles, have been the focus of several decades of highly frustrated magnetism research [1]. Kagome lattice antiferromagnets provide some of the most promising examples of highly correlated nonmagnetic ground states [2, 3], and are therefore subject of intense experimental efforts while inspiring a wealth of theoretical developments [4, 5]. Interestingly, the square-kagome lattice as a differently connected lattice of corner sharing triangles [6], can also support a quantum paramagnetic ground state [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. The precise nature of the ground state is under debate, with proposals spanning a pinwheel valence bond crystal (VBC) [13, 14], length six loop VBC [15, 16], and (lattice) nematic quantum spin liquid [17]. The field of frustrated quantum magnetism is currently poised with the arrival of new materials based on the square-kagome lattice geometry promising to host exotic nonmagnetic phases at low temperatures [18, 19, 20, 21]. In the most prominently studied example KCu66{}_{6}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 6 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTAlBiO44{}_{4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT(SO44{}_{4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT)55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCl, the Cu2+limit-from2{}^{2+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT S=1/2𝑆12S=1/2italic_S = 1 / 2 moments do not show any sign of long-range dipolar magnetic order down to 50 mK despite Curie-Weiss temperatures of 237237-237- 237 K, with indications of gapless quantum spin liquid behavior [22]. Recently, \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4[Cl,(OH)]3, a novel sodium bismuth oxo-cuprate phosphate chloride containing square-kagome layers of \ceCu^2+ ions was synthesized [18]. It contains, besides the six magnetic sites making up the square-kagome lattice, a seventh decorating site which is placed either above or below the square in checkerboard fashion. A study of specific heat indicates that the compound does not order magnetically down to 50 mK [19] despite a large negative Curie-Weiss temperature of 212212-212- 212 K. The scenario in both these compounds is then strikingly similar to the kagome lattice based candidate quantum spin liquid material Herbertsmithite [1].

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Heisenberg Hamiltonian parameters of \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3 determined by DFT energy mapping as function of onsite interaction strength U𝑈Uitalic_U (negligible couplings are not shown). The vertical line indicates the U𝑈Uitalic_U value where the exchange couplings match the experimental [18] Curie-Weiss temperature. The resulting nonnegligible exchange couplings are J1=109.1(8)subscript𝐽1109.18J_{1}=109.1(8)italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 109.1 ( 8 ) K, J2=186.2(7)subscript𝐽2186.27J_{2}=186.2(7)italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 186.2 ( 7 ) K, J3=155.3(1.4)subscript𝐽3155.31.4J_{3}=155.3(1.4)italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 155.3 ( 1.4 ) K, J4=46.9(4)subscript𝐽446.94J_{4}=46.9(4)italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 46.9 ( 4 ) K, J10=64.6(2)subscript𝐽1064.62J_{10}=64.6(2)italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 64.6 ( 2 ) K. (b) Relevant exchange paths of \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3. (c) Finite-size scaling of the maxima of the equal-time structure factor S(𝐐)/Ns𝑆𝐐subscript𝑁𝑠S(\mathbf{Q})/N_{s}italic_S ( bold_Q ) / italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT from many-variable VMC (mVMC), VMC, pseudo-fermion FRG (PFFRG), pseudo-Majorana FRG (PMFRG) (at T=0.2J2𝑇0.2subscript𝐽2T=0.2J_{2}italic_T = 0.2 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT), and the Schwinger-Boson mean-field theory method. Note that, compared to the other methods, PFFRG and PMFRG use a different definition of the system size Nssubscript𝑁𝑠N_{s}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which counts the number of correlated sites around a reference site, likely explaining the quantitative differences of our results. Furthermore, PMFRG results are obtained at a finite temperature T=0.2J2𝑇0.2subscript𝐽2T=0.2J_{2}italic_T = 0.2 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

In this work, we will establish the Hamiltonian of \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3 by density functional theory based energy mapping. As it is highly nontrivial to work out the ground state and excited state properties of this complex lattice with three symmetry inequivalent magnetic sites, we apply two types of variational Monte Carlo (VMC), two flavors of functional renormalization group (FRG) calculations and the Schwinger boson (SB) formalism. We establish that the Hamiltonian of \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3 indeed realizes a nonmagnetic ground state, and provide evidence that the seventh magnetic site decorating the square-kagome lattice plays an important role in enhancing the degree of frustration, thus aiding the formation of a magnetically disordered phase in this material. This phase is shown to be a gapped VBC breaking translation symmetry, with a dimer pattern that is periodic in a 2×2222\times 22 × 2 enlarged unit cell. We present its spectroscopic signatures to compare with future neutron scattering experiments.

Heisenberg Hamiltonian. We determined the magnetic interactions of \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3 using all electron density functional theory calculations. We use the crystal structure determined in Ref. 18 but simplify it slightly by choosing the majority Na(2) position and by removing O(5) from the Cl(3) position. All 14 \ceCu^2+ ions in the primitive unit cell of the tetragonal structure are in square planar coordination with oxygen. The network they form is shown in Fig. 1 (b), with the three symmetry inequivalent Cu(1), Cu(2) and Cu(3) shown in different colors. Cu(1) and Cu(2) form a square-kagome lattice, and Cu(3) is decorating this lattice above and below. Spin-polarized calculations show that the Cu2+limit-from2{}^{2+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ions have S=12𝑆12S=\frac{1}{2}italic_S = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG moments, and at U=6.5𝑈6.5U=6.5italic_U = 6.5 eV the system is insulating with a gap of Eg=1.7subscript𝐸g1.7E_{\rm g}=1.7italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.7 eV. We use the energy mapping technique that has yielded very good results in other copper based magnets [23, 24] to extract the Heisenberg Hamiltonian parameters. Figure 1 (a) shows the result of these calculations. Exchange couplings evolve smoothly with the on-site Coulomb repulsion U𝑈Uitalic_U, and the Hamiltonian reproduces the experimental Curie-Weiss temperature at U=6.66𝑈6.66U=6.66italic_U = 6.66 eV (vertical line). Some couplings that are less than 3% of the largest coupling J2subscript𝐽2J_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are not shown in the plot. Among the couplings we resolve, there is only one, negligibly small, interlayer coupling (see Ref. [25]); as there is a full Na and Cl layer separating the magnetic layers, we expect the deviations from magnetic two-dimensionality to be small and beyond the scope of the present study. The two couplings making up the square-kagome lattice, J1=0.59J2subscript𝐽10.59subscript𝐽2J_{1}=0.59J_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.59 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and J2subscript𝐽2J_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, are the third largest and largest coupling, respectively. The diagonal in the squares, J3=0.83J2subscript𝐽30.83subscript𝐽2J_{3}=0.83J_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.83 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, is the second largest coupling. One second nearest neighbor of the square-kagome lattice, J4=0.25J2subscript𝐽40.25subscript𝐽2J_{4}=0.25J_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.25 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, is also substantial. Furthermore, the J10=0.35J2subscript𝐽100.35subscript𝐽2J_{10}=0.35J_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.35 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT interaction, which couples the square-kagome site Cu(2) to the magnetic decorating sites Cu(3) is found to be important. Strong buckling of the square-kagome lattice means that this coupling is the closest connection between Cu(3) and Cu(2) sites. It has a reasonable superexchange path through a phosphate group. On the other hand, the closer connection of a Cu(3) site to a Cu(1) site turns out to be negligible (J5=0.03J2subscript𝐽50.03subscript𝐽2J_{5}=0.03J_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.03 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (a)-(c) The pattern of real space (equal-time) spin-spin correlations 𝐒^i𝐒^jdelimited-⟨⟩subscript^𝐒𝑖subscript^𝐒𝑗\langle\mathbf{\hat{S}}_{i}\cdot\mathbf{\hat{S}}_{j}\rangle⟨ over^ start_ARG bold_S end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ over^ start_ARG bold_S end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ from mVMC measured with respect to the three symmetry inequivalent sites. The radius of the circle is proportional to the magnitude of the correlator and blue (red) denote antiferromagnetic (ferromagnetic) correlations. The largest red circle corresponds to i=j𝑖𝑗i=jitalic_i = italic_j. (d) The pattern of 𝐒^i𝐒^jdelimited-⟨⟩subscript^𝐒𝑖subscript^𝐒𝑗\langle\mathbf{\hat{S}}_{i}\cdot\mathbf{\hat{S}}_{j}\rangle⟨ over^ start_ARG bold_S end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ over^ start_ARG bold_S end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ within a 2×2222\times 22 × 2 unit cell showing the pattern of strong/weak bonds in the VBC ground state. The thickness is proportional to |𝐒^i𝐒^j|delimited-⟨⟩subscript^𝐒𝑖subscript^𝐒𝑗|\langle\mathbf{\hat{S}}_{i}\cdot\mathbf{\hat{S}}_{j}\rangle|| ⟨ over^ start_ARG bold_S end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ over^ start_ARG bold_S end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ | and blue (red) denote antiferromagnetic (ferromagnetic) bonds, while the dashed lines denote the J10subscript𝐽10J_{10}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bonds. Note that the idealized 2D unit cell shown here is rotated by 45superscript4545^{\circ}45 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with respect to Fig. 1(b).

The space group P4/nmm𝑃4𝑛𝑚𝑚P4/nmmitalic_P 4 / italic_n italic_m italic_m of \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3 dictates that the J1subscript𝐽1J_{1}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (light blue) square and the J2subscript𝐽2J_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (purple) triangle couplings are symmetry inequivalent as for the ideal lattice. The isotropic J1=J2subscript𝐽1subscript𝐽2J_{1}=J_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Heisenberg antiferromagnet is host to a VBC ground state with a finite spin gap Δ0.04J1similar-toΔ0.04subscript𝐽1\Delta\sim 0.04J_{1}roman_Δ ∼ 0.04 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [15], whose precise nature is still under debate [15, 13, 16, 14]. For J2/J12subscript𝐽2subscript𝐽12J_{2}/J_{1}\geqslant 2italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⩾ 2, classically the system is host to a long-range ferrimagnetically ordered ground state (up-up-down) [10], however, for S=1/2𝑆12S=1/2italic_S = 1 / 2, exact diagonalization studies on N=24,30,36𝑁243036N=24,30,36italic_N = 24 , 30 , 36 site clusters [10, 26, 27] find that the system enters the ferrimagnetic ground state for J2/J11.65greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝐽2subscript𝐽11.65J_{2}/J_{1}\gtrsim 1.65italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ 1.65. The DFT estimated material couplings with J2/J11.7similar-tosubscript𝐽2subscript𝐽11.7J_{2}/J_{1}\sim 1.7italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 1.7 thus precariously places the system in the vicinity of the nonmagnetic-magnetic phase boundary. It is then likely that the significant J3subscript𝐽3J_{3}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT diagonal couplings (J3/J11.45similar-tosubscript𝐽3subscript𝐽11.45J_{3}/J_{1}\sim 1.45italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 1.45) within the squares generate the necessary frustration to tip the balance in favor of a nonmagnetic ground state. If so, the precise nature of the nonmagnetic state, in the presence of further neighbor coupling J4subscript𝐽4J_{4}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the coupling J10subscript𝐽10J_{10}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to the decorating Cu(3) site, needs to be carefully investigated by probing the delicate energetic competition between various quantum spin liquid and VBC ansätze.

Results. We begin our analysis by addressing the issue of the existence of long-range magnetic order in the ground state of the DFT Hamiltonian. Employing state-of-the-art numerical approaches of mVMC [28, 29], fermionic VMC [30, 31], PFFRG [32, 33, 34], PMFRG [35, 36], and SB analysis [37, 38, 39, 17, 40], we compute the static (equal-time) spin structure factor

S(𝐪)=1Ns0i,j<Ns𝐒^i𝐒^jei𝐪(𝐫i𝐫j),𝑆𝐪1subscript𝑁𝑠subscriptformulae-sequence0𝑖𝑗subscript𝑁𝑠delimited-⟨⟩subscript^𝐒𝑖subscript^𝐒𝑗superscript𝑒𝑖𝐪subscript𝐫𝑖subscript𝐫𝑗S(\mathbf{q})=\frac{1}{N_{s}}\sum\limits_{0\leqslant i,\,j<N_{s}}\langle{% \mathbf{\hat{S}}}_{i}\cdot{\mathbf{\hat{S}}}_{j}\rangle e^{i\mathbf{q}\cdot(% \mathbf{r}_{i}-\mathbf{r}_{j})},italic_S ( bold_q ) = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 ⩽ italic_i , italic_j < italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ over^ start_ARG bold_S end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ over^ start_ARG bold_S end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i bold_q ⋅ ( bold_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (1)

where Nssubscript𝑁𝑠N_{s}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the number of sites in the lattice, 𝐪𝐪\mathbf{q}bold_q is a momentum inside the extended Brillouin zone, and 𝐫isubscript𝐫𝑖\mathbf{r}_{i}bold_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denotes the site positions (accounting for sublattice displacements), following the convention outlined in Supp. Mat. [25]. Long-range dipolar magnetic order sets in when the maximum of S(𝐪)𝑆𝐪S(\mathbf{q})italic_S ( bold_q ) at 𝐪=𝐐𝐪𝐐\mathbf{q}=\mathbf{Q}bold_q = bold_Q scales as S(𝐐)Nsproportional-to𝑆𝐐subscript𝑁𝑠S(\mathbf{Q})\propto N_{s}italic_S ( bold_Q ) ∝ italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for large Nssubscript𝑁𝑠N_{s}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [41]. The size scaling of S(𝐐)/Ns𝑆𝐐subscript𝑁𝑠S(\mathbf{Q})/N_{s}italic_S ( bold_Q ) / italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [see Fig. 1 (c)], yields the magnetization m2limNsS(𝐐)/Nsproportional-tosuperscript𝑚2subscriptlimsubscript𝑁𝑠𝑆𝐐subscript𝑁𝑠m^{2}\propto{\rm lim}_{{N}_{s}\to\infty}S(\mathbf{Q})/N_{s}italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∝ roman_lim start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT → ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( bold_Q ) / italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which we consistently find to be zero (within error bars) from different approaches. This provides evidence for a nonmagnetic ground state which is corroborated by the rapid decay of the real space spin-spin correlations seen in Fig. 2 (a)–(c) [see Ref. 25 for results from fermionic VMC and Schwinger boson approaches].

Unit cell 4×4444\times 44 × 4 6×6666\times 66 × 6 8×8888\times 88 × 8
1×1111\times 11 × 1 -0.4256(1) -0.4205(1) -0.4172(1) \rdelim}2*[

With Cu(3)

]
2×2222\times 22 × 2 -0.4426(1) -0.4304(1) -0.4277(1)
1×1111\times 11 × 1 -0.4729(1) -0.4783(1) -0.4698(2) \rdelim}2*[

Without Cu(3)

]
2×2222\times 22 × 2 -0.4857(1) -0.4816(1) -0.4811(2)
Table 1: mVMC energies E/J2𝐸subscript𝐽2E/J_{2}italic_E / italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT on the 4×4444\times 44 × 4, 6×6666\times 66 × 6 and 8×8888\times 88 × 8 lattices with a 1×1111\times 11 × 1 and 2×2222\times 22 × 2 unit cell after symmetrization.

To further elucidate the nature of the nonmagnetic ground state, we perform mVMC simulations with ansätze of different unit cell sizes. Table 1 shows variational ground state energies for the \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3 Hamiltonian on three different clusters after symmetrization. The energies without the J10subscript𝐽10J_{10}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT coupling to Cu(3) sites are also given. Independent of the system size, the energies for 2×2222\times 22 × 2 enlarged, i.e., 24-site unit cells are slightly (about 2%) lower compared to translation invariant states, i.e., either quantum spin liquids or lattice nematic. Other independent approaches reach similar conclusions, lending support for a translation symmetry broken ground state. These include a fermionic VMC analysis guided by different ansätze, a self-consistent fermionic mean-field analysis of different U(1) and 2subscript2\mathds{Z}_{2}blackboard_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT spin liquids  [42], as well as a Schwinger-Boson mean-field study. The pattern of real space (equal-time) spin-spin correlations is shown in Fig. 2(d), which points to its VBC nature. Here, one observes a checkerboard pattern, whereby the J1subscript𝐽1J_{1}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bonds featuring ferromagnetic (antiferromagnetic) correlations are always complemented by J2subscript𝐽2J_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bonds hosting strong (weak) antiferromagnetic correlations thus forming a staggered horizontal/vertical pattern. The frustrating diagonal bonds inside the squares (J3subscript𝐽3J_{3}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) show the strongest (antiferromagnetic) correlations, while the Cu(2) and Cu(3) sites are also found to be strongly correlated via J10subscript𝐽10J_{10}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bonds, the latter highlighting the decorated nature of the lattice geometry. The VBC pattern possesses only C2subscript𝐶2C_{2}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT symmetry.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (a) Static (equal-time) structure factor from mVMC [Eq. (1)] obtained w.r.t. true crystal lattice site positions [25] obtained on a 8×8×78878\times 8\times 78 × 8 × 7 site cluster [Note: the (S𝐪𝑆𝐪S\mathbf{q}italic_S bold_q) is not periodic, and the Brillouin zones and high-symmetry points of the ideal geometrical lattice are only drawn for illustrative purposes], (b) The corresponding powder average after accounting for the form factor.

Interestingly, we notice that the inclusion of J10subscript𝐽10J_{10}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT interactions in the Hamiltonian increases the frustration thereby enhancing the disordering tendency. This is reflected in an increase of the ground state energy per site [see Table 1] and decreasing correlations between Cu(1) and Cu(2) sites in favor of bonds containing a Cu(3) site (see Fig. S7 in Ref. 25). In particular, the ratio of J10/J20.34similar-tosubscript𝐽10subscript𝐽20.34J_{10}/J_{2}\sim 0.34italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 0.34 places the material in the vicinity of the high point of frustration (largest ground state energy) (Table S2 in Ref. 25). In mVMC calculations, the effect of increasing J10subscript𝐽10J_{10}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is to induce the rotation and reflection symmetry breaking, and broadening of the maxima in S(q) leading to a more diffuse signal (see Fig. S4 in Ref. 25). Thus, an important aspect of this result is that despite an appreciable magnetic coupling of the decorated Cu(3) ions with the square-kagome layers, it does not result in magnetic ordering. Quite the contrary, we show that the presence of these strongly correlated interlayer Cu2+limit-from2{}^{2+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ions aids the stabilization of a magnetically disordered ground state – thus settling the question raised by specific heat measurements [19]. It is interesting to note that in a related square-kagome material nabokoite KCu77{}_{7}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 7 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTTeO44{}_{4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT(SO44{}_{4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT)55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCl which similarly features decorating Cu sites, signatures of long-range ordering have recently been reported [20].

The symmetry breaking manifests itself in the static spin structure factor which is likewise C2subscript𝐶2C_{2}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT symmetric [see Fig. 3(a)] as obtained from mVMC. The maxima are located at 𝐪=±2π(3.75,2.25)𝐪plus-or-minus2𝜋3.752.25\mathbf{q}=\pm 2\pi(3.75,2.25)bold_q = ± 2 italic_π ( 3.75 , 2.25 ) with the follow-up maxima at 𝐪=±2π(1.75,0.25)𝐪plus-or-minus2𝜋1.750.25\mathbf{q}=\pm 2\pi(1.75,0.25)bold_q = ± 2 italic_π ( 1.75 , 0.25 ). The powder average structure factor is presented in Fig. 3(b) in order to facilitate comparison with potential neutron scattering studies.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Dynamical structure factors as function of S𝑆Sitalic_S and J10subscript𝐽10J_{10}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The other parameters are as given in the caption of Fig 1. As J10subscript𝐽10J_{10}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increases and/or S𝑆Sitalic_S decreases, a gap opens and a quantum paramagnet is stabilized. The Bose condensations appear at incommensurate q vectors. In the condensed state, the Cu(3) spins are ordered but the other spins in the square-kagome lattice remain very weakly ordered. This is reflected by the gap between the lower branch excitations and the continuum in the lower panels.

The flexibility of the SBMFT method allows to efficiently compute the dynamical structure factor

S(𝐪,ω)𝑆𝐪𝜔\displaystyle S(\mathbf{q},\omega)italic_S ( bold_q , italic_ω ) =\displaystyle== 1Nsi,jei𝐪(𝐫𝐢𝐫𝐣)𝑑teiωt𝐒^i(t)𝐒^j(0),1subscript𝑁𝑠subscript𝑖𝑗superscript𝑒𝑖𝐪subscript𝐫𝐢subscript𝐫𝐣superscriptsubscriptdifferential-d𝑡superscript𝑒𝑖𝜔𝑡delimited-⟨⟩subscript^𝐒𝑖𝑡subscript^𝐒𝑗0\displaystyle\frac{1}{N_{s}}\sum_{i,j}e^{i\bf{q}\cdot(\bf{r}_{i}-\bf{r}_{j})}% \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dte^{-i\omega t}\langle{\mathbf{\hat{S}}}_{i}(t){% \mathbf{\hat{S}}}_{j}(0)\rangle,divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i bold_q ⋅ ( bold_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_t italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i italic_ω italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟨ over^ start_ARG bold_S end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) over^ start_ARG bold_S end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) ⟩ ,

and to extract interesting magnon features with information on the Bose condensations of specific branches. Here, Nssubscript𝑁𝑠N_{s}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the total number of sites given by nu×2×l×lsubscript𝑛𝑢2𝑙𝑙n_{u}\times 2\times l\times litalic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × 2 × italic_l × italic_l, where nusubscript𝑛𝑢n_{u}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the number of sites per unit cell (here 14 in the presence of the Cu(3) atoms), and l𝑙litalic_l is the linear size of the system. This quantity can be compared with with neutron scattering experiments. Within this approach one can artificially tune S𝑆Sitalic_S to lower values in order to enhance quantum fluctuations [40, 43]. Thus, in Fig. 4, we show the dynamical structure factor for two representative spin values S=0.12,0.15𝑆0.120.15S=0.12,0.15italic_S = 0.12 , 0.15 for which a quantum paramagnetic ground state can be stabilized, and also for various values of Cu(3)3(3)( 3 ) coupling, J10subscript𝐽10J_{10}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, for a system size of l=12𝑙12l=12italic_l = 12 with 4032403240324032 spins. This figure displays several features: (i) decreasing J10subscript𝐽10J_{10}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT or increasing S𝑆Sitalic_S favours Bose condensation of the Cu(3) atom spins, (ii) they appear at incommensurate values of the BZ, (iii) the rotational symmetry breaking is evident from asymmetric excitation spectra around the K1subscript𝐾1K_{1}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and K2subscript𝐾2K_{2}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT points, see Fig. 3(a) and (iv) the gap closes at the extracted parameters but a secondary gap between the lower branch and the continuum appears, reflecting ordered Cu(3) spins, while the others remain weakly ordered. This allows us to reveal the proximity to a phase transition between a quantum paramagnetic state and its Bose condensate counterpart.

As seen in the fermion approaches, the effect of projecting the wave function on exact physical states increases the quantum fluctuations and help the system to remain disordered even in the presence of the Cu(3) atoms. In the SBMFT, since magnetic orders are more competitive by construction, they are favoured at S=1/2𝑆12S=1/2italic_S = 1 / 2. Thus, in order to reach the quantum paramagnet, one has to reduce the spin value.

We can see that the Bose condensation arises on the Cu(3) spins while the others on the square-kagome lattice remain disordered. This is reflected in Fig. 4 in a clear gap in the lower panels between the condensed branches and the excitations in the continuum [see Fig. S11 of Supp. Mat. [25] for real space spin correlation profiles]. As one can see, a clear magnetic order appears on the Cu(3) spins while the spins on the square-kagome lattice are disordered.

Conclusions We have determined a Heisenberg Hamiltonian for \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3 with five significant antiferromagnetic exchange interactions. While triangle couplings in the square-kagome lattice dominate at about twice the size of the square couplings, the diagonals in the squares are the second largest interaction. The Cu(3) sites decorating the square kagome lattice in \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3 turn out to be substantially coupled to the square sites. Our five numerical techiques all corroborate that the Hamiltonian has a nonmagnetic ground state, in agreement with the fact that experimentally, no order was found down to 50 mK. We find the nature of this ground state to be a VBC which breaks translational symmetry. We predict static as well as dynamical structure factors to motivate studies of \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3 with inelastic neutron scattering.

Acknowledgments. We thank A. Vasiliev and S. Streltsov for helpful discussions during the early stages of this project. N. A. is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant number: PP00P2_176877. The mVMC simulations were supported by the RSF grant (project No. 21-12-00237). Funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) is acknowledged by F. F. through TRR 288 – 422213477 (project A05), by N. N. and J. R. within Project-ID 277101999 CRC 183 (Project A04), J. Ri. through project RI 615/25-1, T. M. and R. T. through Project-ID 258499086-SFB 1170 and the Wurzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence on Complexity and Topology in Quantum Matter – ct.qmat Project-ID 390858490-EXC 2147. The work of Y.I. was performed in part at the Aspen Center for Physics, which is supported by National Science Foundation grant PHY-2210452. The participation of Y.I. at the Aspen Center for Physics was supported by the Simons Foundation. The research of Y.I. was supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF PHY-1748958. Y.I. acknowledges support from the ICTP through the Associates Programme and from the Simons Foundation through grant number 284558FY19, IIT Madras through the IoE program for establishing QuCenDiEM (Project No. SP22231244CPETWOQCDHOC), the International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS), Bengaluru, India during a visit for participating in the program “Frustrated Metals and Insulators” (Code: ICTS/frumi2022/9). Y.I. acknowledges the use of the computing resources at HPCE, IIT Madras. F. F., A. R., N. N., R. T., J. R., and H. O, J. thank IIT Madras for funding a visiting research fellow position under the IoE program during which this collaboration was initiated, and the initial parts of the research work were performed. N. N. and J. R. acknowledge the use of the JUWELS cluster at the Forschungszentrum Jülich and the Noctua2 cluster at the Paderborn Center for Parallel Computing (PC22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT). N. A. acknowledges the usage of computing resources of the federal collective usage center “Complex for simulation and data processing for mega-science facilities” at NRC “Kurchatov Institute”. T. M. and R. T. gratefully acknowledge the Gauss Centre for Supercomputing e. V. for funding this project by providing computing time on the GCS Supercomputer SuperMUC at Leibniz Supercomputing Centre.

References

  • Norman [2016] M. R. Norman, Colloquium: Herbertsmithite and the search for the quantum spin liquid, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 041002 (2016).
  • Iqbal et al. [2013] Y. Iqbal, F. Becca, S. Sorella, and D. Poilblanc, Gapless spin-liquid phase in the kagome spin-1212\frac{1}{2}divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 87, 060405(R) (2013).
  • He et al. [2017] Y.-C. He, M. P. Zaletel, M. Oshikawa, and F. Pollmann, Signatures of Dirac cones in a DMRG study of the kagome Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031020 (2017).
  • Harrison [2004] A. Harrison, First catch your hare*: the design and synthesis of frustrated magnets, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, S553 (2004).
  • Savary and Balents [2016] L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2016).
  • Siddharthan and Georges [2001] R. Siddharthan and A. Georges, Square kagome quantum antiferromagnet and the eight-vertex model, Phys. Rev. B 65, 014417 (2001).
  • Richter et al. [2009] J. Richter, J. Schulenburg, P. Tomczak, and D. Schmalfuß, The Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square-kagomé lattice, Condens. Matter Phys. 12, 507 (2009).
  • Nakano and Sakai [2013] H. Nakano and T. Sakai, The Two-Dimensional S=1/2 Heisenberg Antiferromagnet on the Shuriken Lattice –A Lattice Composed of Vertex-Sharing Triangles–, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 083709 (2013).
  • Hasegawa et al. [2018] Y. Hasegawa, H. Nakano, and T. Sakai, Metamagnetic jump in the spin-1212\frac{1}{2}divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on the square kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 98, 014404 (2018).
  • Morita and Tohyama [2018] K. Morita and T. Tohyama, Magnetic Phase Diagrams and Magnetization Plateaus of the Spin-1/2 Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Model on a Square-Kagome Lattice with Three Nonequivalent Exchange Interactions, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 043704 (2018).
  • Tomczak and Richter [2003] P. Tomczak and J. Richter, Specific heat of the spin-1/2121/21 / 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on squagome lattice, J. Phys. A 36, 5399 (2003).
  • Gembé et al. [2023] M. Gembé, H.-J. Schmidt, C. Hickey, J. Richter, Y. Iqbal, and S. Trebst, Noncoplanar magnetic order in classical square-kagome antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043204 (2023).
  • Astrakhantsev et al. [2021] N. Astrakhantsev, F. Ferrari, N. Niggemann, T. Müller, A. Chauhan, A. Kshetrimayum, P. Ghosh, N. Regnault, R. Thomale, J. Reuther, T. Neupert, and Y. Iqbal, Pinwheel valence bond crystal ground state of the spin-1212\frac{1}{2}divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the shuriken lattice, Phys. Rev. B 104, L220408 (2021).
  • Rousochatzakis et al. [2013] I. Rousochatzakis, R. Moessner, and J. van den Brink, Frustrated magnetism and resonating valence bond physics in two-dimensional kagome-like magnets, Phys. Rev. B 88, 195109 (2013).
  • Schmoll et al. [2023] P. Schmoll, A. Kshetrimayum, J. Naumann, J. Eisert, and Y. Iqbal, Tensor network study of the spin-1212\frac{1}{2}divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the shuriken lattice, Phys. Rev. B 107, 064406 (2023).
  • Ralko and Rousochatzakis [2015] A. Ralko and I. Rousochatzakis, Resonating-Valence-Bond Physics Is Not Always Governed by the Shortest Tunneling Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 167202 (2015).
  • Lugan et al. [2019] T. Lugan, L. D. C. Jaubert, and A. Ralko, Topological nematic spin liquid on the square kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033147 (2019).
  • Yakubovich et al. [2021] O. V. Yakubovich, L. V. Shvanskaya, G. V. Kiriukhina, A. S. Volkov, O. V. Dimitrova, and A. N. Vasiliev, Hydrothermal Synthesis and a Composite Crystal Structure of \ceNa6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4[Cl,(OH)]3 as a Candidate for Quantum Spin Liquid, Inorg. Chem. 60, 11450 (2021).
  • Liu et al. [2022] B. Liu, Z. Zeng, A. Xu, Y. Sun, O. Yakubovich, L. Shvanskaya, S. Li, and A. Vasiliev, Low-temperature specific-heat studies on two square-kagome antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 105, 155153 (2022).
  • Markina et al. [2022] M. M. Markina, P. S. Berdonosov, T. M. Vasilchikova, K. V. Zakharov, A. F. Murtazoev, V. A. Dolgikh, A. V. Moskin, V. N. Glazkov, A. I. Smirnov, and A. N. Vasiliev, Static and resonant properties of decorated square kagome lattice compound KCu77{}_{7}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 7 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT(TeO44{}_{4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT)(SO44{}_{4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT)55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCl (2022), arXiv:2212.11623 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  • Murtazoev et al. [2023] A. F. Murtazoev, K. A. Lyssenko, M. M. Markina, V. A. Dolgikh, A. N. Vasiliev, and P. S. Berdonosov, New Nabokoite-like Phases ACu77{}_{7}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 7 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTTeO44{}_{4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT(SO44{}_{4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT)55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCl (A=Na, K, Rb, Cs) with Decorated and Distorted Square Kagome Lattices, Chem. Phys. Chem. 24, e202300111 (2023).
  • Fujihala et al. [2020] M. Fujihala, K. Morita, R. Mole, S. Mitsuda, T. Tohyama, S.-i. Yano, D. Yu, S. Sota, T. Kuwai, A. Koda, H. Okabe, H. Lee, S. Itoh, T. Hawai, T. Masuda, H. Sagayama, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, S. Ohira-Kawamura, and K. Nakajima, Gapless spin liquid in a square-kagome lattice antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 11, 3429 (2020).
  • Jeschke et al. [2015] H. O. Jeschke, F. Salvat-Pujol, E. Gati, N. H. Hoang, B. Wolf, M. Lang, J. A. Schlueter, and R. Valentí, Barlowite as a canted antiferromagnet: Theory and experiment, Phys. Rev. B 92, 094417 (2015).
  • Hering et al. [2022] M. Hering, F. Ferrari, A. Razpopov, I. I. Mazin, R. Valentí, H. O. Jeschke, and J. Reuther, Phase diagram of a distorted kagome antiferromagnet and application to Y-kapellasite, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 10 (2022).
  • [25] See Supplemental Material at [TO BE INSERTED BY THE EDITORS] for additional information on and results from DFT energy mapping, multivariable variational Monte Carlo and variational Monte Carlo methods, pseudo-Fermion and pseudo-Majorana functional renormalization group approaches and Schwinger boson method. (See also references [18, 44, 45, 46, 18, 47, 48, 28, 29, 30, 31, 30, 35, 36, 36, 37, 38, 39, 17, 40, 40, 49] therein).
  • Richter and Schnack [2023] J. Richter and J. Schnack, Magnetism of the S=12J1J2𝑆12subscript𝐽1subscript𝐽2S=\frac{1}{2}\ {J}_{1}-{J}_{2}italic_S = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-kagome lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245115 (2023).
  • Richter et al. [2022] J. Richter, O. Derzhko, and J. Schnack, Thermodynamics of the spin-half square kagome lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 105, 144427 (2022).
  • Misawa et al. [2019] T. Misawa, S. Morita, K. Yoshimi, M. Kawamura, Y. Motoyama, K. Ido, T. Ohgoe, M. Imada, and T. Kato, mVMC—Open-source software for many-variable variational Monte Carlo method, Comput. Phys. Commun 235, 447 (2019).
  • Tahara and Imada [2008] D. Tahara and M. Imada, Variational Monte Carlo Method Combined with Quantum-Number Projection and Multi-Variable Optimization, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 114701 (2008).
  • Sorella [1998] S. Sorella, Green Function Monte Carlo with Stochastic Reconfiguration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4558 (1998).
  • Becca and Sorella [2017] F. Becca and S. Sorella, Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2017).
  • Reuther and Wölfle [2010] J. Reuther and P. Wölfle, J1J2subscript𝐽1subscript𝐽2{J}_{1}\text{$-$}{J}_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT frustrated two-dimensional Heisenberg model: Random phase approximation and functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 81, 144410 (2010).
  • Iqbal et al. [2016] Y. Iqbal, R. Thomale, F. Parisen Toldin, S. Rachel, and J. Reuther, Functional renormalization group for three-dimensional quantum magnetism, Phys. Rev. B 94, 140408(R) (2016).
  • Müller et al. [2023] T. Müller, D. Kiese, N. Niggemann, B. Sbierski, J. Reuther, S. Trebst, R. Thomale, and Y. Iqbal, Pseudo-fermion functional renormalization group for spin models (2023), arXiv:2307.10359 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  • Niggemann et al. [2021] N. Niggemann, B. Sbierski, and J. Reuther, Frustrated quantum spins at finite temperature: Pseudo-Majorana functional renormalization group approach, Phys. Rev. B 103, 104431 (2021).
  • Niggemann et al. [2022] N. Niggemann, J. Reuther, and B. Sbierski, Quantitative functional renormalization for three-dimensional quantum Heisenberg models, SciPost Phys. 12, 156 (2022).
  • Auerbach [1998] A. Auerbach, Interacting electrons and quantum magnetism (Springer Science & Business Media, 1998).
  • Halimeh and Punk [2016] J. C. Halimeh and M. Punk, Spin structure factors of chiral quantum spin liquids on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 94, 104413 (2016).
  • Schaffer et al. [2017] R. Schaffer, Y. Huh, K. Hwang, and Y. B. Kim, Quantum spin liquid in a breathing kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 95, 054410 (2017).
  • Lugan et al. [2022] T. Lugan, L. D. C. Jaubert, M. Udagawa, and A. Ralko, Schwinger boson theory of the J1,J2=J3subscript𝐽1subscript𝐽2subscript𝐽3{J}_{1},{J}_{2}={J}_{3}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT kagome antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 106, L140404 (2022).
  • Sandvik [1997] A. W. Sandvik, Finite-size scaling of the ground-state parameters of the two-dimensional Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B 56, 11678 (1997).
  • [42] Atanu Maity and Yasir Iqbal, In preparation.
  • Messio et al. [2012] L. Messio, B. Bernu, and C. Lhuillier, Kagome Antiferromagnet: A Chiral Topological Spin Liquid?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 207204 (2012).
  • Koepernik and Eschrig [1999] K. Koepernik and H. Eschrig, Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1743 (1999).
  • Perdew et al. [1996] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  • Liechtenstein et al. [1995] A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators, Phys. Rev. B 52, R5467 (1995).
  • Momma and Izumi [2011] K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011).
  • Ghosh et al. [2023] P. Ghosh, T. Müller, Y. Iqbal, R. Thomale, and H. O. Jeschke, Effective spin-1 breathing kagome Hamiltonian induced by the exchange hierarchy in the maple leaf mineral bluebellite, arXiv  (2023), arXiv:2301.05224 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  • Carleo and Troyer [2017] G. Carleo and M. Troyer, Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks, Science 355, 602 (2017).