Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

HTML conversions sometimes display errors due to content that did not convert correctly from the source. This paper uses the following packages that are not yet supported by the HTML conversion tool. Feedback on these issues are not necessary; they are known and are being worked on.

  • failed: mathcomp

Authors: achieve the best HTML results from your LaTeX submissions by following these best practices.

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
arXiv:2312.15846v1 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 26 Dec 2023

Shell-shaped quantum droplet in a three-component ultracold Bose gas

Yinfeng Ma Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China Department of Basic Courses, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China    Tin-Lun Ho Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA    Xiaoling Cui xlcui@iphy.ac.cn Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
(December 24, 2023)
Abstract

We present a scheme to generate shell-shaped droplet in a three-component (1,2,3) ultracold Bose gas. Here binary mixtures (1,2) and (2,3) form quantum droplets due to inter-species attractions, and the two droplets are mutually immiscible due to strong 1-3 repulsion. Importantly, the shared component-2 serves as a glue to link the two droplets together as a globally self-bound object. In this system, the outer droplet naturally develops a shell structure, and its radius and width can be conveniently tuned through the size of core droplet. Moreover, to reach an equilibrium with the shell, the core droplet displays very different spin densities as compared to the vacuum case. These results have been demonstrated in a realistic 2323{}^{23}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTNa-3939{}^{39}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK-4141{}^{41}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 41 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK mixture. Our scheme liberates the shell-shaped Bose gas from stringent conditions with microgravity or fine-tuned traps, and can be readily implemented in cold atoms laboratories on Earth. This paves the way for future exploration of quantum droplets in curved space with non-trivial real-space topologies.

Quantum systems in curved space exhibit many distinctive features due to their non-trivial real-space topologies. For instance, a periodic boundary allows a persistent superflow of toroidal Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) ring_1 ; ring_2 , and a local curvature gives rise to new topological defectsNelson ; Ho ; Zhou , interesting few-body physicsZhang_Ho ; Shi_Zhai and even non-Hermitian phenomenaZhouQi . As an outstanding case with non-trivial real-space topology, the shell-shaped BEC has attracted a great amount of attention in the field of ultracold atomsreview , and various fascinating properties have been revealed in terms of thermodynamicsTononi ; Rhyno , collective modesLannert ; Padavic ; Sun , expansion dynamicsTononi2 and vortex formationPadavic2 ; Fetter . These studies have been largely stimulated by the experimental plan of creating shell-shaped BECs, or atomic bubbles, using the shell-shaped potentials under radio-frequency dressingproposal_rf_dress_1 ; proposal_rf_dress_2 . However, the Earth’s gravity prevents the formation of a closed shell in such setupColombe , and consequently a microgravity environment is required. Indeed, the first shell-shaped BEC was recently realized in NASA Cold Atom Laboratory aboard the International Space StationNASA_expt . Shortly after that, it was proposed alternatively that binary bosons in immiscible regimeHo_Shenoy ; Pu_Bigelow can also achieve the shell structureWolf . This idea has been successfully implemented in a recent experiment in the presence of Earth’s gravityDajun_expt , where a magic-wavelength optical trap was applied to avoid different gravitational sags between two species.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Interaction model for realizing shell-shaped geometry in three-component(’1’, ’2’, ’3’) bosons. Here (1,2) and (2,3) both form quantum droplet due to inter-species attraction, while the two droplets are immiscible due to 1-3 repulsion. The outer droplet is then shell-shaped. The common component-2 links the whole system together as a self-bound object. (b) Typical half-sphere distribution and according density profile along the radius direction. Here we consider a realistic 2323{}^{23}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTNa-3939{}^{39}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK-4141{}^{41}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 41 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK (’1’-’2’-’3’) mixture near B150similar-to𝐵150B\sim 150italic_B ∼ 150G with a23=70a0subscript𝑎2370subscript𝑎0a_{23}=-70a_{0}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 70 italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (see text). The atom numbers are (N1,N2,N3)/105=(5,10.7,1.5)subscript𝑁1subscript𝑁2subscript𝑁3superscript105510.71.5(N_{1},N_{2},N_{3})/10^{5}=(5,10.7,1.5)( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) / 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( 5 , 10.7 , 1.5 ).

In this work, we introduce a new type of shell-shaped BEC without resorting to any trapping potential, and therefore it does not rely on microgravity environment or fine-tuned traps as in previous experimentsDajun_expt ; NASA_expt . Our scheme is motivated by the recent development of quantum droplet in ultracold atoms, which has been realized in both dipolar gasesferrier-barbut_observation_2016 ; schmitt_self-bound_2016 ; ferrier-barbut_liquid_2016 ; chomaz_quantum-fluctuation-driven_2016 ; tanzi_observation_2019 ; bottcher_transient_2019 ; Chomaz_long_lived_2019 and boson mixturescabrera_quantum_2018 ; cheiney_bright_2018 ; semeghini_self-bound_2018 ; derrico_observation_2019 ; burchianti_dual-species_2020 ; guo_lee-huang-yang_2021 . These droplets are stabilized by a mean-field attraction and the Lee-Huang-Yang repulsion from quantum fluctuationsPetrov , and thus can be self-bound in vacuum. Here we remark that the self-bound nature of quantum droplet offers an ideal opportunity for creating perfect shell geometry on Earth. This is because in the absence of any external trap, different species in the droplet will fall freely with the same speed and therefore no relative displacement will be produced due to the gravity.

Our scheme of creating shell-shaped quantum droplet is illustrated in Fig.1. Specifically, we consider a three-component (1,2,3) boson mixture with contact interactions. Here (1,2) and (2,3) both form quantum droplets due to inter-species attractions, and the two droplets are immiscible due to strong 1-3 repulsion. Importantly, the shared component-2 acts as a glue to link two droplets together as a globally self-bound object. In this way, the outer droplet is repelled by the inner/core one and naturally develops a shell structure in free space. By increasing the core size, we find the outer shell can efficiently expand to larger radius and become gradually thinner. Moreover, to reach an equilibrium with the outer shell, the core droplet exhibits equilibrium densities that are very different from those in vacuum (without shell). As a result, the spin densities of the core are highly tunable, rather than locked to a specific ratio as in vacuum. We have demonstrated these results using a realistic mixture of 2323{}^{23}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTNa-3939{}^{39}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK-4141{}^{41}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 41 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK near B150similar-to𝐵150B\sim 150italic_B ∼ 150G. The shell-shaped droplet presented here opens a new avenue for studying ultracold gases in curved space, where quantum fluctuations and non-trivial real-space topologies can both play important roles and lead to many intriguing phenomena.

We write down the Hamiltonian of three-component boson mixtures H=𝑑𝐫H(𝐫)𝐻differential-d𝐫𝐻𝐫H=\int d{\bf r}H({\bf r})italic_H = ∫ italic_d bold_r italic_H ( bold_r ), with (=1Planck-constant-over-2-pi1\hbar=1roman_ℏ = 1)

H(𝐫)=i=13ϕi(𝐫)(22mi)ϕi(𝐫)+ijgij2ϕiϕjϕjϕi(𝐫).𝐻𝐫superscriptsubscript𝑖13superscriptsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑖𝐫superscript22subscript𝑚𝑖subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑖𝐫subscript𝑖𝑗subscript𝑔𝑖𝑗2superscriptsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑖superscriptsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑗subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑗subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑖𝐫H({\bf r})=\sum_{i=1}^{3}\phi_{i}^{\dagger}({\bf r})\left(-\frac{\nabla^{2}}{2% m_{i}}\right)\phi_{i}({\bf r})+\sum_{ij}\frac{g_{ij}}{2}\phi_{i}^{\dagger}\phi% _{j}^{\dagger}\phi_{j}\phi_{i}({\bf r}).italic_H ( bold_r ) = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_r ) ( - divide start_ARG ∇ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_r ) + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_r ) . (1)

Here 𝐫𝐫{\bf r}bold_r is the coordinate; misubscript𝑚𝑖m_{i}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ϕisubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑖\phi_{i}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the mass and field operator of boson species i𝑖iitalic_i, respectively; gij=2πaij/mijsubscript𝑔𝑖𝑗2𝜋subscript𝑎𝑖𝑗subscript𝑚𝑖𝑗g_{ij}=2\pi a_{ij}/m_{ij}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 italic_π italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the coupling constant between species i𝑖iitalic_i and j𝑗jitalic_j, with scattering length aijsubscript𝑎𝑖𝑗a_{ij}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and reduced mass mij=mimj/(mi+mj)subscript𝑚𝑖𝑗subscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝑚𝑗subscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝑚𝑗m_{ij}=m_{i}m_{j}/(m_{i}+m_{j})italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ).

For a homogeneous dilute gas with densities {ni}subscript𝑛𝑖\{n_{i}\}{ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } (i=1,2,3)𝑖123(i=1,2,3)( italic_i = 1 , 2 , 3 ), the total energy density is composed by the mean-field part ϵmf=12ijgijninjsubscriptitalic-ϵmf12subscript𝑖𝑗subscript𝑔𝑖𝑗subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝑛𝑗\epsilon_{\rm mf}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{ij}g_{ij}n_{i}n_{j}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_mf end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and a correction from quantum fluctuations:

ϵqf=d3𝐤2(2π)3[i(Ei𝐤ϵi𝐤giini)+ij2mijgij2ninj𝐤2]subscriptitalic-ϵqfsuperscript𝑑3𝐤2superscript2𝜋3delimited-[]subscript𝑖subscript𝐸𝑖𝐤subscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝐤subscript𝑔𝑖𝑖subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝑖𝑗2subscript𝑚𝑖𝑗superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑖𝑗2subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝑛𝑗superscript𝐤2\epsilon_{\rm qf}=\int\frac{d^{3}{\bf k}}{2(2\pi)^{3}}\left[\sum_{i}(E_{i{\bf k% }}-\epsilon_{i{\bf k}}-g_{ii}n_{i})+\sum_{ij}\frac{2m_{ij}g_{ij}^{2}n_{i}n_{j}% }{{\bf k}^{2}}\right]italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_qf end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∫ divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bold_k end_ARG start_ARG 2 ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG [ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG 2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG bold_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] (2)

with ϵi𝐤=k2/2misubscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝐤superscript𝑘22subscript𝑚𝑖\epsilon_{i{\bf k}}=k^{2}/2m_{i}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and Ei𝐤subscript𝐸𝑖𝐤E_{i{\bf k}}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the i𝑖iitalic_i-th Bogoliubov modema_borromean_2021 . For a general system with inhomogeneous densities, we employ an extended Gross-Pitaevskii(GP) equations incorporating quantum fluctuations:

itϕi=(22mi+jgijnj+ϵqfni)ϕi.𝑖subscript𝑡subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑖superscript22subscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝑗subscript𝑔𝑖𝑗subscript𝑛𝑗subscriptitalic-ϵqfsubscript𝑛𝑖subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑖\begin{split}i\partial_{t}\phi_{i}=\left(-\frac{\nabla^{2}}{2m_{i}}+\sum_{j}g_% {ij}n_{j}+\frac{\partial\epsilon_{\rm qf}}{\partial n_{i}}\right)\phi_{i}.\end% {split}start_ROW start_CELL italic_i ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( - divide start_ARG ∇ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG ∂ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_qf end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . end_CELL end_ROW (3)

The ground state can be obtained by the imaginary time evolution of above coupled equations.

Different from the miscible three-component droplet in Ref.ma_borromean_2021 , in this work we focus on the situation where components 1 and 3 are immiscible with strong repulsion, while (1,2) and (2,3) are still miscible and can form binary droplets, see Fig.1(a). To achieve this in practice, we consider the boson mixture 2323{}^{23}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTNa-3939{}^{39}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK-4141{}^{41}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 41 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK all at hyperfine state |F=1,mF=1ketformulae-sequence𝐹1subscript𝑚𝐹1|F=1,m_{F}=-1\rangle| italic_F = 1 , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 1 ⟩ (denoted as 1-2-3). Near B150Gsimilar-to𝐵150GB\sim 150{\rm G}italic_B ∼ 150 roman_G, we have (a11,a22,a33,a12,a13)=(52,30,63,50,213)a0subscript𝑎11subscript𝑎22subscript𝑎33subscript𝑎12subscript𝑎1352306350213subscript𝑎0(a_{11},a_{22},a_{33},a_{12},a_{13})=(52,30,63,-50,213)a_{0}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 11 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 22 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 33 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 12 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 13 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ( 52 , 30 , 63 , - 50 , 213 ) italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (a0subscript𝑎0a_{0}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the Bohr radius)lysebo_feshbach_2010 ; viel_feshbach_2016 ; Schulze_2018 , and a23subscript𝑎23a_{23}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is highly tunable via a Feshbach resonance at B0=149.8subscript𝐵0149.8B_{0}=149.8italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 149.8G with width ΔB25similar-toΔ𝐵25\Delta B\sim 25roman_Δ italic_B ∼ 25mGtanzi_feshbach_2018 . Under above parameters, one can easily check that the required mean-field instabilities, i.e., collapse for 1-2 and 2-3 and phase separation for 1-3, will occur as long as a23subscript𝑎23a_{23}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is sufficiently attractive.

Our numerical simulations based on (3) indeed produce two mutually immiscible droplets, (1,2) and (2,3), as the ground state for above system, see typical density distribution in Fig.1(b). Remarkably, the whole system is still self-bound due to the presence of component-2. In such an immiscible phase, in principle each droplet can either stay inside as a core or outside as a shell. However, for the ground state we find the one with a higher density of 2 always stays inside and the lower one stays outside, i.e., n2core>n2shellsuperscriptsubscript𝑛2coresuperscriptsubscript𝑛2shelln_{2}^{\rm core}>n_{2}^{\rm shell}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This can be attributed to the minimized surface energy under this configuration. For the parameter of a23subscript𝑎23a_{23}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT chosen in this work, the core and shell droplets are respectively (2,3) and (1,2).

We note that similar phenomena of immiscible droplets were also found previously in Helium mixturesPi1999 ; Barranco2006 , where a heavy 44{}^{4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTHe droplet was coated with a normal 33{}^{3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTHe liquid, and in dipole-dipole mixtures with anisotropic density profilesbisset_quantum_2021 ; smith_quantum_2021 . In all these studies, a long-range attraction between two droplets is required for their self-binding. This is drastically different from the binding mechanism in our case, which does not rely on any long-range force.

Now we explore the equilibrium expansion of shell (1,2) droplet by increasing the size of core (2,3) droplet. Let us start from the situation with a small core and a thick shell, see Fig.2(a1), where both droplets display flat-top densities. As increasing the size (or atom number) of the core, the shell is repelled to larger radius and becomes gradually thinner, see Fig.2(a2,a3); meanwhile, its flat-top profile gradually disappears and gives way to a Gaussian distribution with quite narrow width and low density. In Fig.2(b), we further extract the maximal density of each component during this process. One can see that the shell densities {n2shell,n1shell}superscriptsubscript𝑛2shellsuperscriptsubscript𝑛1shell\{n_{2}^{\rm shell},n_{1}^{\rm shell}\}{ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } decrease rapidly as the core size increases, and eventually a very thin and dilute shell can be created.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Expansion of shell (1,2) droplet as increasing the size of core (2,3) droplet. Here we consider the 2323{}^{23}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTNa-3939{}^{39}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK-4141{}^{41}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 41 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK (’1’-’2’-’3’) mixture at a23=200a0subscript𝑎23200subscript𝑎0a_{23}=-200a_{0}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 200 italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. (a1,a2,a3) Density profiles of ground states for different atom numbers (N1,N2,N3)/105=(1,1.73,0.01)subscript𝑁1subscript𝑁2subscript𝑁3superscript10511.730.01(N_{1},N_{2},N_{3})/10^{5}=(1,1.73,0.01)( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) / 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( 1 , 1.73 , 0.01 ) (a1), (1,1.86,0.1)11.860.1(1,1.86,0.1)( 1 , 1.86 , 0.1 ) (a2) and (1,2.42,0.5)12.420.5(1,2.42,0.5)( 1 , 2.42 , 0.5 ) (a3). (b) Maximal densities of the core (n2core,n3coresubscriptsuperscript𝑛core2subscriptsuperscript𝑛core3n^{\rm core}_{2},n^{\rm core}_{3}italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) and shell (n1shell,n2shellsubscriptsuperscript𝑛shell1superscriptsubscript𝑛2shelln^{\rm shell}_{1},n_{2}^{\rm shell}italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) as functions of N3subscript𝑁3N_{\rm 3}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The dashed horizontal line with according color denotes the equilibrium density for the shell (nishell=ni(0)superscriptsubscript𝑛𝑖shellsuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝑖0n_{i}^{\rm shell}=n_{i}^{(0)}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) or for the core (nicoresuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝑖coren_{i}^{\rm core}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT).

Because of the shared component-2 as a link, the core and shell droplets, although spatially separated, are strongly correlated with each other. This is clearly reflected in the balance condition as derived below, which leads to very different equilibrium densities for the core if the shell is present. To start with, let us first consider the shell. Since it can transfer atom or energy to vacuum, its equilibration is, similar to an isolated droplet in vacuumPetrov , determined by zero pressure and minimized energy:

Pshell=0;ϵshell=ϵmin.formulae-sequencesubscript𝑃shell0subscriptitalic-ϵshellsubscriptitalic-ϵminP_{\rm shell}=0;\ \ \ \epsilon_{\rm shell}=\epsilon_{\rm min}.italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 ; italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (4)

In the thermodynamic limit, this gives the same equilibrium density nishell=ni(0)superscriptsubscript𝑛𝑖shellsuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝑖0n_{i}^{\rm shell}=n_{i}^{(0)}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as the vacuum droplet, as well as a locked density ratio nishell/njshell=ni(0)/nj(0)=gjj/giisuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝑖shellsuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝑗shellsuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝑖0superscriptsubscript𝑛𝑗0subscript𝑔𝑗𝑗subscript𝑔𝑖𝑖n_{i}^{\rm shell}/n_{j}^{\rm shell}=n_{i}^{(0)}/n_{j}^{(0)}=\sqrt{g_{jj}/g_{ii}}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG. However, the condition (4) does not apply to the core, since it can only transfer atoms to the shell but not directly to vacuum. In this case, the core should have the same pressure and chemical potential as the shell. In view of the presence of component-2 in both droplets, we arrive at the following balance condition:

Pcore=0;μ2core=μ2shell.formulae-sequencesubscript𝑃core0subscriptsuperscript𝜇core2subscriptsuperscript𝜇shell2P_{\rm core}=0;\ \ \ \ \mu^{\rm core}_{2}=\mu^{\rm shell}_{2}.italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 ; italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (5)

Two remarks are in order for the second condition in (5). First, it obviously differs from the second condition in (4), and therefore a different equilibrium density can be resulted for the core as compared to the vacuum case. Secondly, it exactly expresses the correlation between core and shell droplets. Under this condition, the core densities ({nicore}subscriptsuperscript𝑛core𝑖\{n^{\rm core}_{i}\}{ italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT }) depend crucially on the shell chemical potential (μ2shellsubscriptsuperscript𝜇shell2\mu^{\rm shell}_{2}italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT). As a result, {nicore}subscriptsuperscript𝑛core𝑖\{n^{\rm core}_{i}\}{ italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } can be highly tunable by the shell parameters but no longer locked to a specific ratio as in vacuum case.

We now analytically derive {nicore}subscriptsuperscript𝑛core𝑖\{n^{\rm core}_{i}\}{ italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } based on (4,5). Assuming a thermodynamically large (i,j𝑖𝑗i,jitalic_i , italic_j) droplet with uniform densities {ni,nj}subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝑛𝑗\{n_{i},n_{j}\}{ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT }, its total energy density can be written as

ϵ=12(giini2+gjjnj2)+gijninj+ϵqf.italic-ϵ12subscript𝑔𝑖𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑛𝑖2subscript𝑔𝑗𝑗superscriptsubscript𝑛𝑗2subscript𝑔𝑖𝑗subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝑛𝑗subscriptitalic-ϵqf\epsilon=\frac{1}{2}\left(g_{ii}n_{i}^{2}+g_{jj}n_{j}^{2}\right)+g_{ij}n_{i}n_% {j}+\epsilon_{\rm qf}.italic_ϵ = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_qf end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (6)

Here ϵqfsubscriptitalic-ϵqf\epsilon_{\rm qf}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_qf end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the correction from quantum fluctuationsPetrov :

ϵqf=8mi3/215π2(giini)5/2f(α,β,γ)subscriptitalic-ϵqf8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖3215superscript𝜋2superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑖𝑖subscript𝑛𝑖52𝑓𝛼𝛽𝛾\epsilon_{\rm qf}=\frac{8m_{i}^{3/2}}{15\pi^{2}}(g_{ii}n_{i})^{5/2}f\left(% \alpha,\beta,\gamma\right)italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_qf end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 15 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f ( italic_α , italic_β , italic_γ ) (7)

where f>0𝑓0f>0italic_f > 0 is a dimensionless function of

αmjmi,βgij2giigjj,γgjjnjgiini.formulae-sequence𝛼subscript𝑚𝑗subscript𝑚𝑖formulae-sequence𝛽superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑖𝑗2subscript𝑔𝑖𝑖subscript𝑔𝑗𝑗𝛾subscript𝑔𝑗𝑗subscript𝑛𝑗subscript𝑔𝑖𝑖subscript𝑛𝑖\alpha\equiv\frac{m_{j}}{m_{i}},\ \ \beta\equiv\frac{g_{ij}^{2}}{g_{ii}g_{jj}}% ,\ \ \gamma\equiv\frac{g_{jj}n_{j}}{g_{ii}n_{i}}.italic_α ≡ divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , italic_β ≡ divide start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , italic_γ ≡ divide start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG . (8)

The chemical potential μj=ϵ/njsubscript𝜇𝑗italic-ϵsubscript𝑛𝑗\mu_{j}=\partial\epsilon/\partial n_{j}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∂ italic_ϵ / ∂ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is then

μj=gijni+gjjnj+8(migiini)3/215π2fγgjj,subscript𝜇𝑗subscript𝑔𝑖𝑗subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝑔𝑗𝑗subscript𝑛𝑗8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝑔𝑖𝑖subscript𝑛𝑖3215superscript𝜋2𝑓𝛾subscript𝑔𝑗𝑗\mu_{j}=g_{ij}n_{i}+g_{jj}n_{j}+\frac{8\left(m_{i}g_{ii}n_{i}\right)^{3/2}}{15% \pi^{2}}\frac{\partial f}{\partial\gamma}g_{jj},italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 8 ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 15 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ italic_f end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_γ end_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (9)

and the pressure P=μini+μjnjϵ𝑃subscript𝜇𝑖subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝜇𝑗subscript𝑛𝑗italic-ϵP=\mu_{i}n_{i}+\mu_{j}n_{j}-\epsilonitalic_P = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ϵ can be obtained as

P=12(giini2+gjjnj2)+gijninj+32ϵqf.𝑃12subscript𝑔𝑖𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑛𝑖2subscript𝑔𝑗𝑗superscriptsubscript𝑛𝑗2subscript𝑔𝑖𝑗subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝑛𝑗32subscriptitalic-ϵqfP=\frac{1}{2}\left(g_{ii}n_{i}^{2}+g_{jj}n_{j}^{2}\right)+g_{ij}n_{i}n_{j}+% \frac{3}{2}\epsilon_{\rm qf}.italic_P = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_qf end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (10)

Assuming nj/ni=cjisubscript𝑛𝑗subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝑐𝑗𝑖n_{j}/n_{i}=c_{ji}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the P=0𝑃0P=0italic_P = 0 condition leads to the equilibrium density

ni=25π1024aii3(12(gjjcji2+gii)+gijcjigiif)2.subscript𝑛𝑖25𝜋1024superscriptsubscript𝑎𝑖𝑖3superscript12subscript𝑔𝑗𝑗superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑗𝑖2subscript𝑔𝑖𝑖subscript𝑔𝑖𝑗subscript𝑐𝑗𝑖subscript𝑔𝑖𝑖𝑓2n_{i}=\frac{25\pi}{1024a_{ii}^{3}}\left(\frac{\frac{1}{2}\left(g_{jj}c_{ji}^{2% }+g_{ii}\right)+g_{ij}c_{ji}}{g_{ii}f}\right)^{2}.italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 25 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 1024 italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (11)

In this way, both μjsubscript𝜇𝑗\mu_{j}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Eq.9) and ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ (Eq.6) can be expressed as functions of a single unknown parameter cjisubscript𝑐𝑗𝑖c_{ji}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which is to be determined by another condition apart from P=0𝑃0P=0italic_P = 0.

For the shell (1,2) droplet, the second condition in (5), i.e., the energy minimization, results in a locked density ratio c21shellg11/g22subscriptsuperscript𝑐shell21subscript𝑔11subscript𝑔22c^{\rm shell}_{21}\approx\sqrt{g_{11}/g_{22}}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ square-root start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 11 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 22 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG as in the vacuum casePetrov . The densities n1shellsubscriptsuperscript𝑛shell1n^{\rm shell}_{1}italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and n2shellsubscriptsuperscript𝑛shell2n^{\rm shell}_{2}italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can be further obtained via (11), which are the same as n1,2(0)subscriptsuperscript𝑛012n^{(0)}_{1,2}italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for the vacuum droplet. The chemical potential μ2shellsuperscriptsubscript𝜇2shell\mu_{2}^{\rm shell}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT can be obtained via (9) as

μ2shell=(g12+g11g22)n1(123γffγ).superscriptsubscript𝜇2shellsubscript𝑔12subscript𝑔11subscript𝑔22subscript𝑛1123𝛾𝑓𝑓𝛾\mu_{2}^{\rm shell}=(g_{12}+\sqrt{g_{11}g_{22}})n_{1}(1-\frac{2}{3}\frac{% \gamma}{f}\frac{\partial f}{\partial\gamma}).italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 12 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + square-root start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 11 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 22 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 - divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG italic_f end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ italic_f end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_γ end_ARG ) . (12)

For the core (2,3) droplet, by enforcing the second condition μ2core=μ2shellsuperscriptsubscript𝜇2coresuperscriptsubscript𝜇2shell\mu_{2}^{\rm core}=\mu_{2}^{\rm shell}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in (5), and recalling μ2coresuperscriptsubscript𝜇2core\mu_{2}^{\rm core}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is just parametrized by the density ratio c23coresubscriptsuperscript𝑐core23c^{\rm core}_{23}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we can then solve c23coresubscriptsuperscript𝑐core23c^{\rm core}_{23}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and finally the densities n2coresubscriptsuperscript𝑛core2n^{\rm core}_{2}italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and n3coresubscriptsuperscript𝑛core3n^{\rm core}_{3}italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can be obtained via (11). In Fig.2 (b), {n1shell,n2shell}subscriptsuperscript𝑛shell1subscriptsuperscript𝑛shell2\{n^{\rm shell}_{1},n^{\rm shell}_{2}\}{ italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_shell end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } and {n2core,n3core}subscriptsuperscript𝑛core2subscriptsuperscript𝑛core3\{n^{\rm core}_{2},n^{\rm core}_{3}\}{ italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } are respectively shown by horizontal dashed and dotted lines. These analytical results fit well to the actual densities extracted from our numerics when the core and the shell are both in thermodynamical limit.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Tunable equilibrium densities of the core (2,3) droplet in 2323{}^{23}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTNa-3939{}^{39}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK-4141{}^{41}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 41 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK (’1’-’2’-’3’) mixture. (a) Equilibrium densities n2coresuperscriptsubscript𝑛2coren_{2}^{\rm core}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and n3coresuperscriptsubscript𝑛3coren_{3}^{\rm core}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as functions of a23subscript𝑎23a_{23}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, as compared to n2(0)superscriptsubscript𝑛20n_{2}^{(0)}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and n3(0)superscriptsubscript𝑛30n_{3}^{(0)}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in vacuum. (b) Density ratio c23core=n2core/n3coresubscriptsuperscript𝑐core23superscriptsubscript𝑛2coresuperscriptsubscript𝑛3corec^{\rm core}_{23}=n_{2}^{\rm core}/n_{3}^{\rm core}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and its vacuum counterpart c23(0)=n2(0)/n3(0)subscriptsuperscript𝑐023superscriptsubscript𝑛20superscriptsubscript𝑛30c^{(0)}_{23}=n_{2}^{(0)}/n_{3}^{(0)}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as functions of a23subscript𝑎23a_{23}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The stars (\star) show numerical results by simulating the GP equations (3) in imaginary time for large atom number Ni=105106subscript𝑁𝑖superscript105similar-tosuperscript106N_{i}=10^{5}\sim 10^{6}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Inset shows μ2(0)superscriptsubscript𝜇20\mu_{2}^{(0)}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for isolated (2,3) and (1,2) droplets in vacuum.

In Fig.3 (a,b), we further show how the core densities {n2core,n3core}superscriptsubscript𝑛2coresuperscriptsubscript𝑛3core\{n_{2}^{\rm core},n_{3}^{\rm core}\}{ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } and its ratio c23coresubscriptsuperscript𝑐core23c^{\rm core}_{23}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vary with a23subscript𝑎23a_{23}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in comparison to the same quantities for a vacuum droplet. One can see that both n2coresuperscriptsubscript𝑛2coren_{2}^{\rm core}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and n3coresuperscriptsubscript𝑛3coren_{3}^{\rm core}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT change dramatically with a23subscript𝑎23a_{23}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and they both deviate visibly from the vacuum values n2(0)superscriptsubscript𝑛20n_{2}^{(0)}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and n3(0)superscriptsubscript𝑛30n_{3}^{(0)}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Their ratio, c23coresubscriptsuperscript𝑐core23c^{\rm core}_{23}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, also shows a sensitive dependence on a23subscript𝑎23a_{23}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in distinct contrast to the locked c23(0)g33/g22similar-tosubscriptsuperscript𝑐023subscript𝑔33subscript𝑔22c^{(0)}_{23}\sim\sqrt{g_{33}/g_{22}}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ square-root start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 33 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 22 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG in vacuum. Moreover, we see that the deviations between c23coresubscriptsuperscript𝑐core23c^{\rm core}_{23}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and c23(0)subscriptsuperscript𝑐023c^{(0)}_{23}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT become more pronounced if a23subscript𝑎23a_{23}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT gets more attractive. This can be attributed to the larger mismatch of μ2(0)superscriptsubscript𝜇20\mu_{2}^{(0)}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for isolated (2,3) and (1,2) droplets in vacuum, see the inset of Fig.3(b). As a result, to balance the two chemical potentials as required by (5), the (2,3) core has to adjust its densities to change μ2coresuperscriptsubscript𝜇2core\mu_{2}^{\rm core}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_core end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, such that it can match μ2(0)superscriptsubscript𝜇20\mu_{2}^{(0)}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in the (1,2) shell. This is how the correlation is built up between core and shell, and the modified core densities are a direct evidence of such correlation. In this way, the core-shell structure presents a rare situation where the equilibrium density of a quantum droplet can be efficiently tuned by its environment.

In summary, we have demonstrated a scheme to create shell-shaped quantum droplets in three-component ultracold boson mixtures. Different from existing experiments on shell-shaped BECNASA_expt ; Dajun_expt , this scheme does not rely on any trapping potential and therefore can be readily implemented in cold atoms laboratories on Earth. In addition, we have revealed the equilibrium expansion of the shell, the core-shell balance condition, as well as the high tunability of core densities. All these results can be practically detected in 2323{}^{23}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTNa-3939{}^{39}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK-4141{}^{41}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 41 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK boson mixture near B150similar-to𝐵150B\sim 150italic_B ∼ 150G. Other atomic candidates may also be possible in view of a growing number of Bose mixtures nowadays available in cold atoms laboratories with tunable interactionsK-Rb1 ; K-Rb ; Na-Rb ; K-Cs ; Schulze_2018 ; tanzi_feshbach_2018 .

Our work opens up a new avenue to study quantum droplets in curved space, where quantum fluctuations and non-trivial real-space topologies both play important roles and their interplay can lead to many intriguing phenomena. For instance, it would be interesting to investigate the collective excitation and vortex formation of shell droplet. Compared to the corresponding properties of binary droplets in flat geometriesPetrov ; Li2018:TwodimensionalVortexQuantum ; Zhang2019:SemidiscreteQuantumDroplets ; Tengstrand2019:RotatingBinaryBoseEinstein ; Caldara2022:VorticesQuantumDroplets ; Gu ; Oktel , the shell structure is expected to bring substantially new physics due to its compactness and local curvature. Moreover, dynamical expansion of core and shell droplets is another interesting subject to explore, which, for example, can be driven by suddenly quenching the coupling parameters of core or shell (such as a23subscript𝑎23a_{23}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 23 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in our model system). Indeed, the quantum droplet has been shown to exhibit unique dynamical properties that are absent in gaseous statecollision1 ; collision2 ; dynamic1 ; dynamic2 ; dynamic3 ; Ma2 . Furthermore, it is worthwhile to study quantum fluctuation effect when the shell become thin enough, in which limit the fluctuation energy in Eq.2 is no longer applicable since the system behaves as effectively 2D. Given that a 2D droplet can be supported at an arbitrarily low densityPetrov2 , we expect the actual shell can extend to very large radius with extremely thin width. Finally, it is noted that the present scheme of creating a shell droplet in 3D can be directly generalized to quasi-2D system in creating a toroidal (ring) droplet. We hope our current work could stimulate more studies in future on these fascinating curved-space droplets.

Acknowledgements.
Acknowledgment. The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12074419, 12134015, 12205365), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB33000000).

References

  • (1) C. Ryu, M. F. Andersen, P. Clade´´𝑒\acute{e}over´ start_ARG italic_e end_ARG, V. Natarajan, K. Helmerson, W. D. Phillips, Observation of Persistent Flow of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in a Toroidal Trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 260401 (2007).
  • (2) A. Ramanathan, K. C. Wright, S. R. Muniz, M. Zelan, W. T. Hill, C. J. Lobb, K. Helmerson, W. D. Phillips, G. K. Campbell, Superflow in a toroidal Bose–Einstein condensate: an atom circuit with a tunable weak link, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 130401 (2011).
  • (3) A. M. Turner, V. Vitelli, D. R. Nelson, Vortices on curved surfaces, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1301 (2010).
  • (4) T.-L. Ho, B. Huang, Spinor Condensates on a Cylindrical Surface in Synthetic Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 155304 (2015).
  • (5) X.-F. Zhou, C. Wu, G.-C. Guo, R. Wang, H. Pu, Z.-W. Zhou, Synthetic Landau Levels and Spinor Vortex Matter on a Haldane Spherical Surface with a Magnetic Monopole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 130402 (2018).
  • (6) J. Zhang, T.-L. Ho, Potential scattering on a spherical surface, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51, 115301 (2018).
  • (7) Z.-Y. Shi, H. Zhai, Emergent gauge field for a chiral bound state on curved surface, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 50, 184006 (2017).
  • (8) C. Lv, R. Zhang, Z. Zhai, Q. Zhou, Curving the space by non-Hermiticity, Nature Communications 13, 2184 (2022).
  • (9) A. Tononi, Luca Salasnich, Low-dimensional quantum gases in curved geometries, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 398 (2023).
  • (10) A. Tononi, L. Salasnich, Bose-Einstein Condensation on the Surface of a Sphere, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 160403 (2019).
  • (11) B. Rhyno, N. Lundblad, D. C. Aveline, C. Lannert, and S. Vishveshwara, Thermodynamics in expanding shell-shaped Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 104, 063310 (2021).
  • (12) C. Lannert, T. C. Wei, S. Vishveshwara, Dynamics of condensate shells: Collective modes and expansion, Phys. Rev. A 75, 013611 (2007).
  • (13) K. Padavic´´𝑐\acute{c}over´ start_ARG italic_c end_ARG, K. Sun, C. Lannert, S. Vishveshwara, Physics of hollow Bose-Einstein condensates, Europhys. Lett. 120, 20004 (2017).
  • (14) K. Sun, K. Padavic´´𝑐\acute{c}over´ start_ARG italic_c end_ARG, F. Yang, S. Vishveshwara, C. Lannert, Static and dynamic properties of shell-shaped condensates, Phys. Rev. A 98, 013609 (2018).
  • (15) A. Tononi, F. Cinti, L. Salasnich, Quantum Bubbles in Microgravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 010402 (2020).
  • (16) K. Padavic´´𝑐\acute{c}over´ start_ARG italic_c end_ARG, K. Sun, C. Lannert, S. Vishveshwara, Vortex-antivortex physics in shell-shaped Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 102, 043305 (2020).
  • (17) S. J. Bereta, M. A. Caracanhas, A. L. Fetter, Superfluid vortex dynamics on a spherical film, Phys. Rev. A 103, 053306 (2021).
  • (18) O. Zobay, B. M. Garraway, Two-Dimensional Atom Trapping in Field-Induced Adiabatic Potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1195 (2001).
  • (19) O. Zobay, B. M. Garraway, Atom trapping and two-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensates in field-induced adiabatic potentials, Phys. Rev. A 69, 023605 (2004).
  • (20) Y. Colombe, E. Knyazchyan, O. Morizot, B. Mercier, V. Lorent, H. Perrin, Ultracold atoms confined in rf-induced two-dimensional trapping potentials, Europhys. Lett. 67, 593 (2004).
  • (21) R. A. Carollo, D. C. Aveline, B. Rhyno, S. Vishveshwara, C. Lannert, J. D. Murphree, E. R. Elliott, J. R. Williams, R. J. Thompson, N. Lundblad, Observation of ultracold atomic bubbles in orbital microgravity, Nature (London) 606, 281 (2022).
  • (22) T.-L. Ho, V. B. Shenoy, Binary Mixtures of Bose Condensates of Alkali Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3276 (1996).
  • (23) H. Pu, N. P. Bigelow, Properties of Two-Species Bose Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1130 (1998).
  • (24) A. Wolf, P. Boegel, M. Meister, A. Balazˇˇ𝑧\check{z}overroman_ˇ start_ARG italic_z end_ARG, N. Gaaloul, M. A. Efremov, Shell-shaped Bose-Einstein condensates based on dual-species mixtures, Phys. Rev. A 106, 013309 (2022).
  • (25) F. Jia , Z. Huang, L. Qiu, R. Zhou, Y. Yan, D. Wang, Expansion Dynamics of a Shell-Shaped Bose-Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 243402 (2022).
  • (26) I. Ferrier-Barbut, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, T. Pfau, Observation of Quantum Droplets in a Strongly Dipolar Bose Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 215301 (2016).
  • (27) M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, F. Böttcher, I. Ferrier-Barbut, T. Pfau, Self-bound droplets of a dilute magnetic quantum liquid, Nature 539, 259 (2016).
  • (28) I. Ferrier-Barbut, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, H. Kadau, T. Pfau, Liquid quantum droplets of ultracold magnetic atoms, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49, 214004 (2016).
  • (29) L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, F. Wächtler, L. Santos, F. Ferlaino, Quantum-fluctuation-driven crossover from a dilute Bose-Einstein condensate to a macrodroplet in a dipolar quantum fluid, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041039 (2016).
  • (30) L. Tanzi, E. Lucioni, F. Famà, J. Catani, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, G. Modugno, Observation of a Dipolar Quantum Gas with Metastable Supersolid Properties, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130405 (2019).
  • (31) F. Böttcher, J. N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, T. Langen, T. Pfau, Transient Supersolid Properties in an Array of Dipolar Quantum Droplets, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011051 (2019).
  • (32) L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzhöfer, G. Natale, A. Trautmann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, F. Ferlaino, Long-Lived and Transient Supersolid Behaviors in Dipolar Quantum Gases, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021012 (2019).
  • (33) C. R. Cabrera, L. Tanzi, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, P. Thomas, P. Cheiney, L. Tarrue, Quantum liquid droplets in a mixture of Bose-Einstein condensates, Science 359, 301 (2018).
  • (34) P. Cheiney, C. R. Cabrera, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, L. Tanzi, L. Tarruell, Bright Soliton to Quantum Droplet Transition in a Mixture of Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 135301 (2018).
  • (35) G. Semeghini, G. Ferioli, L. Masi, C. Mazzinghi, L. Wolswijk, F. Minardi, M. Modugno, G. Modugno, M. Inguscio, M. Fattori, Self-Bound Quantum Droplets of Atomic Mixtures in Free Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 235301 (2018).
  • (36) C. D’Errico, A. Burchianti, M. Prevedelli, L. Salasnich, F. Ancilotto, M. Modugno, F. Minardi, C. Fort, Observation of quantum droplets in a heteronuclear bosonic mixture, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033155 (2019).
  • (37) A. Burchianti, C. D’Errico, M. Prevedelli, L. Salasnich, F. Ancilotto, M. Modugno, F. Minardi, C. Fort, A Dual-Species Bose-Einstein Condensate with Attractive Interspecies Interactions, Condens. Matter 5, 21 (2020).
  • (38) Z. Guo, F. Jia, L. Li, Y. Ma, J. M. Hutson, X. Cui, D. Wang, Lee-Huang-Yang effects in the ultracold mixture of 2323{}^{23}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTNa and 8787{}^{87}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 87 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTRb with attractive interspecies interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033247 (2021).
  • (39) D. S. Petrov, Quantum Mechanical Stabilization of a Collapsing Bose-Bose Mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 155302 (2015).
  • (40) Y. Ma, C. Peng, X. Cui, Borromean Droplet in Three-Component Ultracold Bose Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 043002 (2021).
  • (41) M. Lysebo, L. Veseth, Feshbach resonances and transition rates for cold homonuclear collisions between 3939{}^{39}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK and 4141{}^{41}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 41 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK atoms, Phys. Rev. A 81, 032702 (2010).
  • (42) A. Viel, A. Simoni, Feshbach resonances and weaklybound molecular states of boson-boson and boson-fermion NaK pairs, Phys. Rev. A 93, 042701 (2016).
  • (43) T. A. Schulze, T. Hartmann, K. K. Voges, M. W. Gempel, E. Tiemann, A. Zenesini, S. Ospelkaus, Feshbach spectroscopy and dual-species Bose-Einstein condensation of 2323{}^{23}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTNa-3939{}^{39}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK mixtures, Phys. Rev. A 97, 023623 (2018).
  • (44) L. Tanzi, C. R. Cabrera, J. Sanz, P. Cheiney, M. Tomza, L. Tarruell, Feshbach resonances in potassium Bose-Bose mixtures, Phys. Rev. A 98, 062712 (2018).
  • (45) M. Pi, R. Mayol, M. Barranco, Structure of Large 33{}^{3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTHe-44{}^{4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTHe Mixed Drops around a Dopant Molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3093 (1999).
  • (46) M. Barranco, R. Guardiola, S. Hernández, R. Mayol, J. Navarro, M. Pi, Helium Nanodroplets: An Overview, J. Low Temp. Phys. 142, 1 (2006).
  • (47) R. N. Bisset, L. A. Ardila, L. Santos, Quantum Droplets of Dipolar Mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 025301 (2021).
  • (48) J. C. Smith, D. Baillie, P. B. Blakie, Quantum Droplet States of a Binary Magnetic Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 025302 (2021).
  • (49) G. Thalhammer, G. Barontini, L. De Sarlo, J. Catani, F. Minardi, M. Inguscio, Double Species Bose-Einstein Condensate with Tunable Interspecies Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210402 (2008).
  • (50) L. Wacker, N. B. Jørgensen, D. Birkmose, R. Horchani, W. Ertmer, C. Klempt, N. Winter, J. Sherson, J. J. Arlt, Tunable dual-species Bose-Einstein condensates of 3939{}^{39}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK and 8787{}^{87}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 87 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTRb, Phys. Rev. A 92, 053602 (2015).
  • (51) F. Wang, X. Li, D. Xiong, D. Wang, A double species 2323{}^{23}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTNa and 8787{}^{87}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 87 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTRb Bose–Einstein condensate with tunable miscibility via an interspecies Feshbach resonance J. Phys. B 49, 015302 (2015).
  • (52) M. Grobner, P. Weinmann, E. Kirilov, H.-C. Nagerl, P. S. Julienne, C. Ruth Le Sueur, J. M. Hutson, Observation of interspecies Feshbach resonances in an ultracold 3939{}^{39}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK-133133{}^{133}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 133 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCs mixture and refinement of interaction potentials, Phys. Rev. A 95, 022715 (2017).
  • (53) Y. Li, Z. Chen, Z. Luo, C. Huang, H. Tan, W. Pang, B. A. Malomed, Two-dimensional vortex quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. A 98, 063602 (2018).
  • (54) X. Zhang, X. Xu, Y. Zheng, Z. Chen, B. Liu, C. Huang, B. A. Malomed, Y. Li, Semidiscrete quantum droplets and vortices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 133901 (2019).
  • (55) M. N. Tengstrand, P. Stürmer, E. Karabulut, S. M. Reimann, Rotating binary Bose-Einstein condensates and vortex clusters in quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 160405 (2019).
  • (56) M. Caldara, F. Ancilotto, Vortices in quantum droplets of heteronuclear Bose mixtures, Phys. Rev. A 105, 063328 (2022).
  • (57) Q. Gu, X. Cui, Self-bound Vortex Lattice in a Rapidly Rotating Quantum Droplet, Phys. Rev. A 108, 063302 (2023).
  • (58) T. A. Yogˇˇ𝑔\check{g}overroman_ˇ start_ARG italic_g end_ARGurt, U. Tanyeri, A. Keleş, M. O¨¨𝑂\ddot{O}over¨ start_ARG italic_O end_ARG. Oktel, Vortex lattices in strongly confined quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. A 108, 033315 (2023).
  • (59) G. E. Astrakharchik, B. A. Malomed, Dynamics of one-dimensional quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. A 98, 013631 (2018).
  • (60) G. Ferioli, G. Semeghini, L. Masi, G. Giusti, G. Modugno,M. Inguscio, A. Gallemí, A. Recati, M. Fattori, Collisions of Self-Bound Quantum Droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 090401 (2019).
  • (61) G. Ferioli, G. Semeghini, S. Terradas-Briansó, L. Masi, M. Fattori, M. Modugno, Dynamical formation of quantum droplets in a 39K mixture, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013269 (2020).
  • (62) V. Cikojević ,L. Vranješ Markić, M. Pi , M. Barranco, F. Ancilotto, J. Boronat, Dynamics of equilibration and collisions in ultradilute quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043139 (2021).
  • (63) C. Fort, M. Modugno, Self-evaporation dynamics of quantum droplets in a 4141{}^{41}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 41 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTK-8787{}^{87}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 87 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTRb mixture, Appl. Sci. 11, 866 (2021).
  • (64) Y. Ma, X. Cui, Quantum-fluctuation-driven dynamics of droplet splashing, recoiling, and deposition in ultracold binary Bose gases, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 013100 (2023).
  • (65) D. S. Petrov, G. E. Astrakharchik, Ultradilute Low-Dimensional Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 100401 (2016).