-
Magnetospheric origin of a fast radio burst constrained using scintillation
Authors:
Kenzie Nimmo,
Ziggy Pleunis,
Paz Beniamini,
Pawan Kumar,
Adam E. Lanman,
D. Z. Li,
Robert Main,
Mawson W. Sammons,
Shion Andrew,
Mohit Bhardwaj,
Shami Chatterjee,
Alice P. Curtin,
Emmanuel Fonseca,
B. M. Gaensler,
Ronniy C. Joseph,
Zarif Kader,
Victoria M. Kaspi,
Mattias Lazda,
Calvin Leung,
Kiyoshi W. Masui,
Ryan Mckinven,
Daniele Michilli,
Ayush Pandhi,
Aaron B. Pearlman,
Masoud Rafiei-Ravandi
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are micro-to-millisecond duration radio transients that originate mostly from extragalactic distances. The emission mechanism responsible for these high luminosity, short duration transients remains debated. The models are broadly grouped into two classes: physical processes that occur within close proximity to a central engine; and central engines that release energy whic…
▽ More
Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are micro-to-millisecond duration radio transients that originate mostly from extragalactic distances. The emission mechanism responsible for these high luminosity, short duration transients remains debated. The models are broadly grouped into two classes: physical processes that occur within close proximity to a central engine; and central engines that release energy which moves to large radial distances and subsequently interacts with surrounding media producing radio waves. The expected emission region sizes are notably different between these two types of models. FRB emission size constraints can therefore be used to distinguish between these competing models and inform on the physics responsible. Here we present the measurement of two mutually coherent scintillation scales in the frequency spectrum of FRB 20221022A: one originating from a scattering screen located within the Milky Way, and the second originating from a scattering screen located within its host galaxy or local environment. We use the scattering media as an astrophysical lens to constrain the size of the lateral emission region, $R_{\star\mathrm{obs}} \lesssim 3\times10^{4}$ km. We find that this is inconsistent with the expected emission sizes for the large radial distance models, and is more naturally explained with an emission process that operates within or just beyond the magnetosphere of a central compact object. Recently, FRB 20221022A was found to exhibit an S-shaped polarisation angle swing, supporting a magnetospheric emission process. The scintillation results presented in this work independently support this conclusion, while highlighting scintillation as a useful tool in our understanding of FRB emission physics and progenitors.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Updating the first CHIME/FRB catalog of fast radio bursts with baseband data
Authors:
The CHIME/FRB Collaboration,
:,
Mandana Amiri,
Bridget C. Andersen,
Shion Andrew,
Kevin Bandura,
Mohit Bhardwaj,
P. J. Boyle,
Charanjot Brar,
Daniela Breitman,
Tomas Cassanelli,
Pragya Chawla,
Amanda M. Cook,
Alice P. Curtin,
Matt Dobbs,
Fengqiu Adam Dong,
Gwendolyn Eadie,
Emmanuel Fonseca,
B. M. Gaensler,
Utkarsh Giri,
Antonio Herrera-Martin,
Hans Hopkins,
Adaeze L. Ibik,
Ronniy C. Joseph,
J. F. Kaczmarek
, et al. (36 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In 2021, a catalog of 536 fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected with the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) radio telescope was released by the CHIME/FRB Collaboration. This large collection of bursts, observed with a single instrument and uniform selection effects, has advanced our understanding of the FRB population. Here we update the results for 140 of these FRBs for which chan…
▽ More
In 2021, a catalog of 536 fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected with the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) radio telescope was released by the CHIME/FRB Collaboration. This large collection of bursts, observed with a single instrument and uniform selection effects, has advanced our understanding of the FRB population. Here we update the results for 140 of these FRBs for which channelized raw voltage ('baseband') data are available. With the voltages measured by the telescope's antennas, it is possible to maximize the telescope sensitivity in any direction within the primary beam, an operation called 'beamforming'. This allows us to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the bursts and to localize them to sub-arcminute precision. The improved localization is also used to correct the beam response of the instrument and to measure fluxes and fluences with a ~10% uncertainty. Additionally, the time resolution is increased by three orders of magnitude relative to that in the first CHIME/FRB catalog, and, applying coherent dedispersion, burst morphologies can be studied in detail. Polarization information is also available for the full sample of 140 FRBs, providing an unprecedented dataset to study the polarization properties of the population. We release the baseband data beamformed to the most probable position of each FRB. These data are analyzed in detail in a series of accompanying papers.
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2024; v1 submitted 31 October, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
The Impact of Tandem Redundant/Sky-Based Calibration in MWA Phase II Data Analysis
Authors:
Zheng Zhang,
Jonathan C. Pober,
Wenyang Li,
Bryna J. Hazelton,
Miguel F. Morales,
Cathryn M. Trott,
Christopher H. Jordan,
Ronniy C. Joseph,
Adam Beardsley,
Nichole Barry,
Ruby Byrne,
Steven J. Tingay,
Aman Chokshi,
Kenji Hasegawa,
Daniel C. Jacobs,
Adam Lanman,
Jack L. B. Line,
Christene Lynch,
Benjamin McKinley,
Daniel A. Mitchell,
Steven Murray,
Bart Pindor,
Mahsa Rahimi,
Keitaro Takahashi,
Randall B. Wayth
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Precise instrumental calibration is of crucial importance to 21-cm cosmology experiments. The Murchison Widefield Array's (MWA) Phase II compact configuration offers us opportunities for both redundant calibration and sky-based calibration algorithms; using the two in tandem is a potential approach to mitigate calibration errors caused by inaccurate sky models. The MWA Epoch of Reionization (EoR)…
▽ More
Precise instrumental calibration is of crucial importance to 21-cm cosmology experiments. The Murchison Widefield Array's (MWA) Phase II compact configuration offers us opportunities for both redundant calibration and sky-based calibration algorithms; using the two in tandem is a potential approach to mitigate calibration errors caused by inaccurate sky models. The MWA Epoch of Reionization (EoR) experiment targets three patches of the sky (dubbed EoR0, EoR1, and EoR2) with deep observations. Previous work in \cite{Li_2018} and \cite{Wenyang_2019} studied the effect of tandem calibration on the EoR0 field and found that it yielded no significant improvement in the power spectrum over sky-based calibration alone. In this work, we apply similar techniques to the EoR1 field and find a distinct result: the improvements in the power spectrum from tandem calibration are significant. To understand this result, we analyze both the calibration solutions themselves and the effects on the power spectrum over three nights of EoR1 observations. We conclude that the presence of the bright radio galaxy Fornax A in EoR1 degrades the performance of sky-based calibration, which in turn enables redundant calibration to have a larger impact. These results suggest that redundant calibration can indeed mitigate some level of model-incompleteness error.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Deep multi-redshift limits on Epoch of Reionisation 21cm Power Spectra from Four Seasons of Murchison Widefield Array Observations
Authors:
Cathryn M. Trott,
C. H. Jordan,
S. Midgley,
N. Barry,
B. Greig,
B. Pindor,
J. H. Cook,
G. Sleap,
S. J. Tingay,
D. Ung,
P. Hancock,
A. Williams,
J. Bowman,
R. Byrne,
A. Chokshi,
B. J. Hazelton,
K. Hasegawa,
D. Jacobs,
R. C. Joseph,
W. Li,
J. L. B Line,
C. Lynch,
B. McKinley,
D. A. Mitchell,
M. F. Morales
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We compute the spherically-averaged power spectrum from four seasons of data obtained for the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR) project observed with the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA). We measure the EoR power spectrum over $k= 0.07-3.0~h$Mpc$^{-1}$ at redshifts $z=6.5-8.7$. The largest aggregation of 110 hours on EoR0 high-band (3,340 observations), yields a lowest measurement of (43~mK)$^2$ = 1.8…
▽ More
We compute the spherically-averaged power spectrum from four seasons of data obtained for the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR) project observed with the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA). We measure the EoR power spectrum over $k= 0.07-3.0~h$Mpc$^{-1}$ at redshifts $z=6.5-8.7$. The largest aggregation of 110 hours on EoR0 high-band (3,340 observations), yields a lowest measurement of (43~mK)$^2$ = 1.8$\times$10$^3$ mK$^2$ at $k$=0.14~$h$Mpc$^{-1}$ and $z=6.5$ (2$σ$ thermal noise plus sample variance). Using the Real-Time System to calibrate and the CHIPS pipeline to estimate power spectra, we select the best observations from the central five pointings within the 2013--2016 observing seasons, observing three independent fields and in two frequency bands. This yields 13,591 2-minute snapshots (453 hours), based on a quality assurance metric that measures ionospheric activity. We perform another cut to remove poorly-calibrated data, based on power in the foreground-dominated and EoR-dominated regions of the two-dimensional power spectrum, reducing the set to 12,569 observations (419 hours). These data are processed in groups of 20 observations, to retain the capacity to identify poor data, and used to analyse the evolution and structure of the data over field, frequency, and data quality. We subsequently choose the cleanest 8,935 observations (298 hours of data) to form integrated power spectra over the different fields, pointings and redshift ranges.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Calibration and 21-cm Power Spectrum Estimation in the Presence of Antenna Beam Variations
Authors:
Ronniy C. Joseph,
C. M. Trott,
R. B. Wayth,
A. Nasirudin
Abstract:
Detecting a signal from the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR) requires an exquisite understanding of galactic and extra-galactic foregrounds, low frequency radio instruments, instrumental calibration, and data analysis pipelines. In this work we build upon existing work that aims to understand the impact of calibration errors on 21-cm power spectrum (PS) measurements. It is well established that calibra…
▽ More
Detecting a signal from the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR) requires an exquisite understanding of galactic and extra-galactic foregrounds, low frequency radio instruments, instrumental calibration, and data analysis pipelines. In this work we build upon existing work that aims to understand the impact of calibration errors on 21-cm power spectrum (PS) measurements. It is well established that calibration errors have the potential to inhibit EoR detections by introducing additional spectral features that mimic the structure of EoR signals. We present a straightforward way to estimate the impact of a wide variety of modelling residuals in EoR PS estimation. We apply this framework to the specific case of broken dipoles in Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) to understand its effect and estimate its impact on PS estimation. Combining an estimate of the percentage of MWA tiles that have at least one broken dipole (15%-40%) with an analytic description of beam errors induced by such dipoles, we compute the residuals of the foregrounds after calibration and source subtraction. We find that that incorrect beam modelling introduces bias in the 2D-PS on the order of $\sim 10^3\, \mathrm{mK}^2 \,h^{-3}\, \mathrm{Mpc}^{3}$. Although this is three orders of magnitude lower than current lowest limits, it is two orders of magnitude higher than the expected signal. Determining the accuracy of both current beam models and direction dependent calibration pipelines is therefore crucial in our search for an EoR signal.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2020; v1 submitted 29 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
First Season MWA Phase II EoR Power Spectrum Results at Redshift 7
Authors:
W. Li,
J. C. Pober,
N. Barry,
B. J. Hazelton,
M. F. Morales,
C. M. Trott,
A. Lanman,
M. Wilensky,
I. Sullivan,
A. P. Beardsley,
T. Booler,
J. D. Bowman,
R. Byrne,
B. Crosse,
D. Emrich,
T. M. O. Franzen,
K. Hasegawa,
L. Horsley,
M. Johnston-Hollitt,
D. C. Jacobs,
C. H. Jordan,
R. C. Joseph,
T. Kaneuji,
D. L. Kaplan,
D. Kenney
, et al. (22 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The compact configuration of Phase II of the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) consists of both a redundant subarray and pseudo-random baselines, offering unique opportunities to perform sky-model and redundant interferometric calibration. The highly redundant hexagonal cores give improved power spectrum sensitivity. In this paper, we present the analysis of nearly 40 hours of data targeting one of…
▽ More
The compact configuration of Phase II of the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) consists of both a redundant subarray and pseudo-random baselines, offering unique opportunities to perform sky-model and redundant interferometric calibration. The highly redundant hexagonal cores give improved power spectrum sensitivity. In this paper, we present the analysis of nearly 40 hours of data targeting one of the MWA's EoR fields observed in 2016. We use both improved analysis techniques presented in Barry et al. (2019) as well as several additional techniques developed for this work, including data quality control methods and interferometric calibration approaches. We show the EoR power spectrum limits at redshift 6.5, 6.8 and 7.1 based on our deep analysis on this 40-hour data set. These limits span a range in $k$ space of $0.18$ $h$ $\mathrm{Mpc^{-1}}$ $<k<1.6$ $h$ $\mathrm{Mpc^{-1}}$, with a lowest measurement of $Δ^2\leqslant2.39\times 10^3$ $\mathrm{mK}^2$ at $k=0.59$ $h$ $\mathrm{Mpc^{-1}}$ and $z=6.5$.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2019; v1 submitted 22 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Science with the Murchison Widefield Array: Phase I Results and Phase II Opportunities
Authors:
A. P. Beardsley,
M. Johnston-Hollitt,
C. M. Trott,
J. C. Pober,
J. Morgan,
D. Oberoi,
D. L. Kaplan,
C. R. Lynch,
G. E. Anderson,
P. I. McCauley,
S. Croft,
C. W. James,
O. I. Wong,
C. D. Tremblay,
R. P. Norris,
I. H. Cairns,
C. J. Lonsdale,
P. J. Hancock,
B. M. Gaensler,
N. D. R. Bhat,
W. Li,
N. Hurley-Walker,
J. R. Callingham,
N. Seymour,
S. Yoshiura
, et al. (34 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) is an open access telescope dedicated to studying the low frequency (80$-$300 MHz) southern sky. Since beginning operations in mid 2013, the MWA has opened a new observational window in the southern hemisphere enabling many science areas. The driving science objectives of the original design were to observe 21\,cm radiation from the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR),…
▽ More
The Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) is an open access telescope dedicated to studying the low frequency (80$-$300 MHz) southern sky. Since beginning operations in mid 2013, the MWA has opened a new observational window in the southern hemisphere enabling many science areas. The driving science objectives of the original design were to observe 21\,cm radiation from the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR), explore the radio time domain, perform Galactic and extragalactic surveys, and monitor solar, heliospheric, and ionospheric phenomena. All together 60$+$ programs recorded 20,000 hours producing 146 papers to date. In 2016 the telescope underwent a major upgrade resulting in alternating compact and extended configurations. Other upgrades, including digital back-ends and a rapid-response triggering system, have been developed since the original array was commissioned. In this paper we review the major results from the prior operation of the MWA, and then discuss the new science paths enabled by the improved capabilities. We group these science opportunities by the four original science themes, but also include ideas for directions outside these categories.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Improving the Epoch of Reionization Power Spectrum Results from Murchison Widefield Array Season 1 Observations
Authors:
N. Barry,
M. Wilensky,
C. M. Trott,
B. Pindor,
A. P. Beardsley,
B. J. Hazelton,
I. S. Sullivan,
M. F. Morales,
J. C. Pober,
J. Line,
B. Greig,
R. Byrne,
A. Lanman,
W. Li,
C. H. Jordan,
R. C. Joseph,
B. McKinley,
M. Rahimi,
S. Yoshiura,
J. D. Bowman,
B. M. Gaensler,
J. N. Hewitt,
D. C. Jacobs,
D. A. Mitchell,
N. Udaya Shankar
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Measurements of 21 cm Epoch of Reionization (EoR) structure are subject to systematics originating from both the analysis and the observation conditions. Using 2013 data from the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA), we show the importance of mitigating both sources of contamination. A direct comparison between results from Beardsley et al. 2016 and our updated analysis demonstrates new precision techn…
▽ More
Measurements of 21 cm Epoch of Reionization (EoR) structure are subject to systematics originating from both the analysis and the observation conditions. Using 2013 data from the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA), we show the importance of mitigating both sources of contamination. A direct comparison between results from Beardsley et al. 2016 and our updated analysis demonstrates new precision techniques, lowering analysis systematics by a factor of 2.8 in power. We then further lower systematics by excising observations contaminated by ultra-faint RFI, reducing by an additional factor of 3.8 in power for the zenith pointing. With this enhanced analysis precision and newly developed RFI mitigation, we calculate a noise-dominated upper limit on the EoR structure of $Δ^2 \leq 3.9 \times 10^3$ mK$^2$ at $k=0.20$ $\textit{h}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ and $z=7$ using 21 hr of data, improving previous MWA limits by almost an order of magnitude.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2019; v1 submitted 2 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
The Bias and Uncertainty of Redundant and Sky-Based Calibration under Realistic Sky and Telescope Conditions
Authors:
Ronniy C. Joseph,
Cathryn M. Trott,
Randall B. Wayth
Abstract:
The advent of a new generation of low frequency interferometers has opened a direct window into the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR). However, key to a detection of the faint 21-cm signal, and reaching the sensitivity limits of these arrays, is a detailed understanding of the instruments and their calibration. In this work we use simulations to investigate the bias and uncertainty of redundancy based c…
▽ More
The advent of a new generation of low frequency interferometers has opened a direct window into the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR). However, key to a detection of the faint 21-cm signal, and reaching the sensitivity limits of these arrays, is a detailed understanding of the instruments and their calibration. In this work we use simulations to investigate the bias and uncertainty of redundancy based calibration. Specifically, we study the influence of the flux distribution of the radio sky and the impact of antenna position offsets on the complex calibration solutions. We find that the position offsets introduce a bias into the phase component of the calibration solutions. This phase bias increases with the distance between bright radio sources and the pointing center, and with the flux density of these sources. This is potentially problematic for redundant calibration on MWA observations of EoR fields 1 and 2. EoR field 0, however, lacks such sources. We also compared the simulations with theoretical estimates for the bias and uncertainty in sky model based calibration on incomplete sky models for the redundant antenna tiles in the MWA. Our results indicate that redundant calibration outperforms sky based calibration due to the high positional precision of the MWA antenna tiles.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Comparing Redundant and Sky Model Based Interferometric Calibration: A First Look with Phase II of the MWA
Authors:
W. Li,
J. C. Pober,
B. J. Hazelton,
N. Barry,
M. F. Morales,
I. Sullivan,
A. R. Parsons,
Z. S. Ali,
J. S. Dillon,
A. P. Beardsley,
J. D. Bowman,
F. Briggs,
R. Byrne,
P. Carroll,
B. Crosse,
D. Emrich,
A. Ewall-Wice,
L. Feng,
T. M. O. Franzen,
J. N. Hewitt,
L. Horsley,
D. C. Jacobs,
M. Johnston-Hollitt,
C. Jordan,
R. C. Joseph
, et al. (31 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Interferometric arrays seeking to measure the 21 cm signal from the Epoch of Reionization must contend with overwhelmingly bright emission from foreground sources. Accurate recovery of the 21 cm signal will require precise calibration of the array, and several new avenues for calibration have been pursued in recent years, including methods using redundancy in the antenna configuration. The newly u…
▽ More
Interferometric arrays seeking to measure the 21 cm signal from the Epoch of Reionization must contend with overwhelmingly bright emission from foreground sources. Accurate recovery of the 21 cm signal will require precise calibration of the array, and several new avenues for calibration have been pursued in recent years, including methods using redundancy in the antenna configuration. The newly upgraded Phase II of Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) is the first interferometer that has large numbers of redundant baselines while retaining good instantaneous UV-coverage. This array therefore provides a unique opportunity to compare redundant calibration with sky-model based algorithms. In this paper, we present the first results from comparing both calibration approaches with MWA Phase II observations. For redundant calibration, we use the package OMNICAL, and produce sky-based calibration solutions with the analysis package Fast Holographic Deconvolution (FHD). There are three principal results. (1) We report the success of OMNICAL on observations of ORBComm satellites, showing substantial agreement between redundant visibility measurements after calibration. (2) We directly compare OMNICAL calibration solutions with those from FHD, and demonstrate these two different calibration schemes give extremely similar results. (3) We explore improved calibration by combining OMNICAL and FHD. We evaluate these combined methods using power spectrum techniques developed for EoR analysis and find evidence for marginal improvements mitigating artifacts in the power spectrum. These results are likely limited by signal-to-noise in the six hours of data used, but suggest future directions for combining these two calibration schemes.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
