-
The Two Body Problem in the Presence of Dark Energy and Modified Gravity: Application to the Local Group
Authors:
Michael McLeod,
Ofer Lahav
Abstract:
We explore mass estimation of the Local Group via the use of the simple, dynamical `timing argument' in the context of a variety of theories of dark energy and modified gravity: a cosmological constant, a perfect fluid with constant equation of state $w$, quintessence (minimally coupled scalar field), MOND, and symmetrons (coupled scalar field). We explore generic coupled scalar field theories, wi…
▽ More
We explore mass estimation of the Local Group via the use of the simple, dynamical `timing argument' in the context of a variety of theories of dark energy and modified gravity: a cosmological constant, a perfect fluid with constant equation of state $w$, quintessence (minimally coupled scalar field), MOND, and symmetrons (coupled scalar field). We explore generic coupled scalar field theories, with the symmetron model as an explicit example. We find that theories which attempt to eliminate dark matter by fitting rotation curves produce mass estimates in the timing argument which are not compatible with the luminous mass of the galaxies alone. Assuming that the galaxies are approaching their first encounter, MOND gives of around $2.7\times 10^{10} M_\odot$, roughly 10\% of the luminous mass of the LG, although a higher mass can be obtained in the case of a previous fly-by event between the MW and M31. The symmetron model suggests a mass too high to be explained without additional dark matter ($\mathcal{O}(10^{12}) M_\odot$), suggesting that there is a missing mass problem in this model. We also demonstrate that tensions in measurements of $H_0$ can produce an uncertainty in the Local Group mass estimate comparable to observational uncertainties on the separation and relative velocity of the galaxies, with values for the mass ranging from $4.5 - 5.4 \times 10^{12} M_{\odot}$ varying $h$ between 0.67 and 0.76.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2020; v1 submitted 26 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Upper Bound of Neutrino Masses from Combined Cosmological Observations and Particle Physics Experiments
Authors:
Arthur Loureiro,
Andrei Cuceu,
Filipe B. Abdalla,
Bruno Moraes,
Lorne Whiteway,
Michael McLeod,
Sreekumar T. Balan,
Ofer Lahav,
Aurélien Benoit-Lévy,
Marc Manera,
Richard P. Rollins,
Henrique S. Xavier
Abstract:
We investigate the impact of prior models on the upper bound of the sum of neutrino masses, $\sum m_ν$. We use data from Large Scale Structure of galaxies, Cosmic Microwave Background, Type Ia SuperNovae, and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. We probe physically motivated neutrino mass models (respecting oscillation experiment constraints) and compare them to constraints using standard cosmological approx…
▽ More
We investigate the impact of prior models on the upper bound of the sum of neutrino masses, $\sum m_ν$. We use data from Large Scale Structure of galaxies, Cosmic Microwave Background, Type Ia SuperNovae, and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. We probe physically motivated neutrino mass models (respecting oscillation experiment constraints) and compare them to constraints using standard cosmological approximations. The former give a consistent upper bound of $\sum m_ν \lesssim 0.26$ eV ($95\%$ CI) and yields a strong competitive upper bound for the lightest neutrino mass species, $m_0^ν < 0.086$ eV ($95\%$ CI). By contrast one of the approximations, which is somewhat inconsistent with oscillation experiments, yields an upper bound of $\sum m_ν \lesssim 0.15$ eV ($95\%$ CI), which differs substantially from the former upper bound. We, therefore, argue that cosmological neutrino mass and hierarchy determination should be pursued using physically motivated models since approximations might lead to incorrect and nonphysical upper bounds.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2019; v1 submitted 6 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
Cosmological Measurements from Angular Power Spectra Analysis of BOSS DR12 Tomography
Authors:
Arthur Loureiro,
Bruno Moraes,
Filipe B. Abdalla,
Andrei Cuceu,
Michael McLeod,
Lorne Whiteway,
Sreekumar T. Balan,
Aurélien Benoit-Lévy,
Ofer Lahav,
Marc Manera,
Richard Rollins,
Henrique S. Xavier
Abstract:
We constrain cosmological parameters by analysing the angular power spectra of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR12 galaxies, a spectroscopic follow-up of around 1.3 million SDSS galaxies over 9,376 deg$^2$ with an effective volume of $\sim 6.5$ (Gpc $h^{-1}$)$^3$ in the redshift range $0.15 \leq z < 0.80$. We split this sample into 13 tomographic bins ($Δz = 0.05$); angular power spec…
▽ More
We constrain cosmological parameters by analysing the angular power spectra of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR12 galaxies, a spectroscopic follow-up of around 1.3 million SDSS galaxies over 9,376 deg$^2$ with an effective volume of $\sim 6.5$ (Gpc $h^{-1}$)$^3$ in the redshift range $0.15 \leq z < 0.80$. We split this sample into 13 tomographic bins ($Δz = 0.05$); angular power spectra were calculated using a Pseudo-$C_{\ell}$ estimator, and covariance matrices were estimated using log-normal simulated maps. Cosmological constraints obtained from these data were combined with constraints from Planck CMB experiment as well as the JLA supernovae compilation. Considering a $w$CDM cosmological model measured on scales up to $k_{max} = 0.07h$ Mpc$^{-1}$, we constrain a constant dark energy equation-of-state with a $\sim 4\%$ error at the 1-$σ$ level: $w_0 = -0.993^{+0.046}_{-0.043}$, together with $Ω_m = 0.330\pm 0.012$, $Ω_b = 0.0505 \pm 0.002$, $S_8 \equiv σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_m/0.3} = 0.863 \pm 0.016$, and $h = 0.661 \pm 0.012$. For the same combination of datasets, but now considering a $Λ$CDM model with massive neutrinos and the same scale cut, we find: $Ω_m = 0.328 \pm 0.009$, $Ω_b = 0.05017^{+0.0009}_{-0.0008}$, $S_8 = 0.862 \pm 0.017$, and $h = 0.663^{+0.006}_{-0.007}$ and a 95\% credible interval (CI) upper limit of $\sum m_ν < 0.14$ eV for a normal hierarchy. These results are competitive if not better than standard analyses with the same dataset, and demonstrate this should be a method of choice for future surveys, opening the door for their full exploitation in cross-correlations probes.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2019; v1 submitted 19 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
A Joint Analysis for Cosmology and Photometric Redshift Calculation Using Cross Correlations
Authors:
Michael McLeod,
Sreekumar T. Balan,
Filipe B. Abdalla
Abstract:
We present a method of calibrating the properties of photometric redshift bins as part of a larger Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis for the inference of cosmological parameters. The redshift bins are characterised by their mean and variance, which are varied as free parameters and marginalised over when obtaining the cosmological parameters. We demonstrate that the likelihood function for…
▽ More
We present a method of calibrating the properties of photometric redshift bins as part of a larger Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis for the inference of cosmological parameters. The redshift bins are characterised by their mean and variance, which are varied as free parameters and marginalised over when obtaining the cosmological parameters. We demonstrate that the likelihood function for cross-correlations in an angular power spectrum framework tightly constrains the properties of bins such that they may be well determined, reducing their influence on cosmological parameters and avoiding the bias from poorly estimated redshift distributions. We demonstrate that even with only three photometric and three spectroscopic bins, we can recover accurate estimates of the mean redshift of a bin to within $Δμ\approx 3-4 \times10^{-3}$ and the width of the bin to $Δσ\approx 1\times10^{-3}$ for galaxies near $z = 1$. This indicates that we may be able to bring down the photometric redshift errors to a level which is in line with the requirements for the next generation of cosmological experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
-
Estimating the Mass of the Local Group using Machine Learning Applied to Numerical Simulations
Authors:
Michael McLeod,
Noam Libeskind,
Ofer Lahav,
Yehuda Hoffman
Abstract:
We revisit the estimation of the combined mass of the Milky Way and Andromeda (M31), which dominate the mass of the Local Group. We make use of an ensemble of 30,190 halo pairs from the Small MultiDark simulation, assuming a $Λ$CDM (Cosmological Constant with Cold Dark Matter) cosmology, to investigate the relationship between the bound mass and parameters characterising the orbit of the binary an…
▽ More
We revisit the estimation of the combined mass of the Milky Way and Andromeda (M31), which dominate the mass of the Local Group. We make use of an ensemble of 30,190 halo pairs from the Small MultiDark simulation, assuming a $Λ$CDM (Cosmological Constant with Cold Dark Matter) cosmology, to investigate the relationship between the bound mass and parameters characterising the orbit of the binary and their local environment with the aid of machine learning methods (artificial neural networks, ANN). Results from the ANN are most successful when information about the velocity shear is provided, which demonstrates the flexibility of machine learning to model physical phenomena and readily incorporate new information as it becomes available. The resulting estimate for the Local Group mass, when shear information is included, is $4.9 \times 10^{12} M_\odot$, with an error of $\pm0.8 \times 10^{12} M_\odot$ from the 68% uncertainty in observables, and a 68% confidence interval of $^{+1.3}_{-1.4} \times 10^{12}M_\odot$ from the intrinsic scatter from the differences between the model and simulation masses. We also consider a recently reported large transverse velocity of M31 relative to the Milky Way, and produce an alternative mass estimate of $3.6\pm0.3\pm1.4 \times 10^{12}M_\odot$. Although different methods predict similar values for the most likely mass of the LG, application of ANN compared to the Timing Argument reduces the scatter in the log mass by over half when tested on samples from the simulation.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2017; v1 submitted 8 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
ALMA North American Integration Center Front-End Test System
Authors:
Geoffrey A. Ediss,
Joshua Crabtree,
Kirk Crady,
Erik Gaines,
Morgan McLeod,
Greg Morris,
Rick Williams,
Antonio Perfetto,
John Webber
Abstract:
The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter (ALMA) Array Front End (FE) system is the first element in a complex chain of signal receiving, conversion, processing and recording. 70 Front Ends will be required for the project. The Front End is designed to receive signals in ten different frequency bands. In the initial phase of operations, the antennas will be fully equipped with six bands. These ar…
▽ More
The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter (ALMA) Array Front End (FE) system is the first element in a complex chain of signal receiving, conversion, processing and recording. 70 Front Ends will be required for the project. The Front End is designed to receive signals in ten different frequency bands. In the initial phase of operations, the antennas will be fully equipped with six bands. These are Band 3 (84-116 GHz), Band 4 (125-163 GHz), Band 6 (211-275 GHz), Band 7 (275-373 GHz), Band 8 (385-500 GHz) and Band 9 (602-720 GHz). It is planned to equip the antennas with the missing bands at a later stage of ALMA operations, with a few Band 5 (163-211 GHz) and Band 10 (787-950 GHz) receivers in use before the end of the construction project.
The ALMA Front End is far superior to any existing receiver systems; spin-offs of the ALMA prototypes are leading to improved sensitivities in existing millimeter and submillimeter observatories. The Front End units are comprised of numerous elements, produced at different locations in Europe, North America and East Asia and are integrated at several Front End integration centers (FEIC) to insure timely delivery of all the units to Chile. The North American FEIC (NA FEIC) is at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory facility in Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
This paper describes the design and performance of the test set used at the NA FEIC to check the performance of the Front Ends, following integration and prior to shipment to Chile.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2010;
originally announced September 2010.
