-
Learning versus Refutation in Noninteractive Local Differential Privacy
Authors:
Alexander Edmonds,
Aleksandar Nikolov,
Toniann Pitassi
Abstract:
We study two basic statistical tasks in non-interactive local differential privacy (LDP): learning and refutation. Learning requires finding a concept that best fits an unknown target function (from labelled samples drawn from a distribution), whereas refutation requires distinguishing between data distributions that are well-correlated with some concept in the class, versus distributions where th…
▽ More
We study two basic statistical tasks in non-interactive local differential privacy (LDP): learning and refutation. Learning requires finding a concept that best fits an unknown target function (from labelled samples drawn from a distribution), whereas refutation requires distinguishing between data distributions that are well-correlated with some concept in the class, versus distributions where the labels are random. Our main result is a complete characterization of the sample complexity of agnostic PAC learning for non-interactive LDP protocols. We show that the optimal sample complexity for any concept class is captured by the approximate $γ_2$~norm of a natural matrix associated with the class. Combined with previous work [Edmonds, Nikolov and Ullman, 2019] this gives an equivalence between learning and refutation in the agnostic setting.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Using Machine Learning to Select High-Quality Measurements
Authors:
Andrew Edmonds,
David Brown,
Luciano Vinas,
Samantha Pagan
Abstract:
We describe the use of machine learning algorithms to select high-quality measurements for the Mu2e experiment. This technique is important for experiments with backgrounds that arise due to measurement errors. The algorithms use multiple pieces of ancillary information that are sensitive to measurement quality to separate high-quality and low-quality measurements.
We describe the use of machine learning algorithms to select high-quality measurements for the Mu2e experiment. This technique is important for experiments with backgrounds that arise due to measurement errors. The algorithms use multiple pieces of ancillary information that are sensitive to measurement quality to separate high-quality and low-quality measurements.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
The Power of Factorization Mechanisms in Local and Central Differential Privacy
Authors:
Alexander Edmonds,
Aleksandar Nikolov,
Jonathan Ullman
Abstract:
We give new characterizations of the sample complexity of answering linear queries (statistical queries) in the local and central models of differential privacy:
*In the non-interactive local model, we give the first approximate characterization of the sample complexity. Informally our bounds are tight to within polylogarithmic factors in the number of queries and desired accuracy. Our character…
▽ More
We give new characterizations of the sample complexity of answering linear queries (statistical queries) in the local and central models of differential privacy:
*In the non-interactive local model, we give the first approximate characterization of the sample complexity. Informally our bounds are tight to within polylogarithmic factors in the number of queries and desired accuracy. Our characterization extends to agnostic learning in the local model.
*In the central model, we give a characterization of the sample complexity in the high-accuracy regime that is analogous to that of Nikolov, Talwar, and Zhang (STOC 2013), but is both quantitatively tighter and has a dramatically simpler proof.
Our lower bounds apply equally to the empirical and population estimation problems. In both cases, our characterizations show that a particular factorization mechanism is approximately optimal, and the optimal sample complexity is bounded from above and below by well studied factorization norms of a matrix associated with the queries.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Blip: JIT and Footloose On The Edge
Authors:
Andy Edmonds,
Chris Woods,
Ana Juan Ferrer,
Juan Francisco Ribera,
Thomas Micheal Bohnert
Abstract:
Edge environments offer a number of advantages for software developers including the ability to create services which can offer lower latency, better privacy, and reduced operational costs than traditional cloud hosted services. However large technical challenges exist, which prevent developers from utilising the Edge; complexities related to the heterogeneous nature of the Edge environment, issue…
▽ More
Edge environments offer a number of advantages for software developers including the ability to create services which can offer lower latency, better privacy, and reduced operational costs than traditional cloud hosted services. However large technical challenges exist, which prevent developers from utilising the Edge; complexities related to the heterogeneous nature of the Edge environment, issues with orchestration and application management and lastly, the inherent issues in creating decentralised distributed applications which operate at a large geographic scale. In this conceptual and architectural paper we envision a solution, Blip, which offers an easy to use programming and operational environment which addresses the these issues. It aims to remove the technical barriers which will inhibit the wider adoption Edge application development. This paper validates the Blip concept by demonstrating how it will deliver on the advantages of the Edge for a familiar scenario.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Towards a Swiss National Research Infrastructure
Authors:
Peter Kunszt,
Sergio Maffioletti,
Dean Flanders,
Markus Eurich,
Thomas Bohnert,
Andrew Edmonds,
Heinz Stockinger,
Sigve Haug,
Almerina Jamakovic-Kapic,
Placi Flury,
Simon Leinen,
Eryk Schiller
Abstract:
In this position paper we describe the current status and plans for a Swiss National Research Infrastructure. Swiss academic and research institutions are very autonomous. While being loosely coupled, they do not rely on any centralized management entities. Therefore, a coordinated national research infrastructure can only be established by federating the various resources available locally at the…
▽ More
In this position paper we describe the current status and plans for a Swiss National Research Infrastructure. Swiss academic and research institutions are very autonomous. While being loosely coupled, they do not rely on any centralized management entities. Therefore, a coordinated national research infrastructure can only be established by federating the various resources available locally at the individual institutions. The Swiss Multi-Science Computing Grid and the Swiss Academic Compute Cloud projects serve already a large number of diverse user communities. These projects also allow us to test the operational setup of such a heterogeneous federated infrastructure.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
