Showing 1–47 of 47 results for author: Garg, J

Fair Division of Indivisible Chores via Earning Restricted Equilibria

Authors: Jugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar, John Qin

Abstract: We study fair division of $m$ indivisible chores among $n$ agents with additive preferences. We consider the desirable fairness notions of envy-freeness up to any chore (EFX) and envy-freeness up to $k$ chores (EF$k$), alongside the efficiency notion of Pareto optimality (PO). We present the first constant approximations of these notions, showing the existence of: - 4-EFX allocations, which impr… ▽ More We study fair division of $m$ indivisible chores among $n$ agents with additive preferences. We consider the desirable fairness notions of envy-freeness up to any chore (EFX) and envy-freeness up to $k$ chores (EF$k$), alongside the efficiency notion of Pareto optimality (PO). We present the first constant approximations of these notions, showing the existence of: - 4-EFX allocations, which improves the best-known factor of $O(n^2)$-EFX. - 2-EF2 and PO allocations, which improves the best-known factor of EF$m$ and PO. In particular, we show the existence of an allocation that is PO and for every agent, either EF2 or 2-EF1. - 3-EFX and PO allocations for the special case of bivalued instances, which improves the best-known factor of $O(n)$-EFX without any efficiency guarantees. A notable contribution of our work is the introduction of the novel concept of earning-restricted (ER) competitive equilibrium for fractional allocations, which limits agents' earnings from each chore. Technically, our work addresses two main challenges: proving the existence of an ER equilibrium and designing algorithms that leverage ER equilibria to achieve the above results. To tackle the first challenge, we formulate a linear complementarity problem (LCP) formulation that captures all ER equilibria and show that the classic complementary pivot algorithm on the LCP must terminate at an ER equilibrium. For the second challenge, we carefully set the earning limits and use properties of ER equilibria to design sophisticated procedures that involve swapping and merging bundles to meet the desired fairness and efficiency criteria. We expect that the concept of ER equilibrium will be instrumental in deriving further results on related problems. △ Less

Submitted 27 August, 2024; v1 submitted 3 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: Improves the existence result from 5-EFX to 4-EFX. 59 pages

Improvement in Semantic Address Matching using Natural Language Processing

Authors: Vansh Gupta, Mohit Gupta, Jai Garg, Nitesh Garg

Abstract: Address matching is an important task for many businesses especially delivery and take out companies which help them to take out a certain address from their data warehouse. Existing solution uses similarity of strings, and edit distance algorithms to find out the similar addresses from the address database, but these algorithms could not work effectively with redundant, unstructured, or incomplet… ▽ More Address matching is an important task for many businesses especially delivery and take out companies which help them to take out a certain address from their data warehouse. Existing solution uses similarity of strings, and edit distance algorithms to find out the similar addresses from the address database, but these algorithms could not work effectively with redundant, unstructured, or incomplete address data. This paper discuss semantic Address matching technique, by which we can find out a particular address from a list of possible addresses. We have also reviewed existing practices and their shortcoming. Semantic address matching is an essentially NLP task in the field of deep learning. Through this technique We have the ability to triumph the drawbacks of existing methods like redundant or abbreviated data problems. The solution uses the OCR on invoices to extract the address and create the data pool of addresses. Then this data is fed to the algorithm BM-25 for scoring the best matching entries. Then to observe the best result, this will pass through BERT for giving the best possible result from the similar queries. Our investigation exhibits that our methodology enormously improves both accuracy and review of cutting-edge technology existing techniques. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: 5 pages, 7 tables, 2021 2nd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET)

Journal ref: 2021 2nd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), Belagavi, India, 2021, pp. 1-5

Designing an Intelligent Parcel Management System using IoT & Machine Learning

Authors: Mohit Gupta, Nitesh Garg, Jai Garg, Vansh Gupta, Devraj Gautam

Abstract: Parcels delivery is a critical activity in railways. More importantly, each parcel must be thoroughly checked and sorted according to its destination address. We require an efficient and robust IoT system capable of doing all of these tasks with great precision and minimal human interaction. This paper discusses, We created a fully-fledged solution using IoT and machine learning to assist trains i… ▽ More Parcels delivery is a critical activity in railways. More importantly, each parcel must be thoroughly checked and sorted according to its destination address. We require an efficient and robust IoT system capable of doing all of these tasks with great precision and minimal human interaction. This paper discusses, We created a fully-fledged solution using IoT and machine learning to assist trains in performing this operation efficiently. In this study, we covered the product, which consists mostly of two phases. Scanning is the first step, followed by sorting. During the scanning process, the parcel will be passed through three scanners that will look for explosives, drugs, and any dangerous materials in the parcel and will trash it if any of the tests fail. When the scanning step is over, the parcel moves on to the sorting phase, where we use QR codes to retrieve the details of the parcels and sort them properly. The simulation of the system is done using the blender software. Our research shows that our procedure significantly improves accuracy as well as the assessment of cutting-edge technology and existing techniques. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: 6 pages, 6 figures, 2022 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Emerging Technologies (GlobConET)

Journal ref: 2022 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Emerging Technologies (GlobConET), Arad, Romania, 2022, pp. 751-756

Soft-constrained Schrodinger Bridge: a Stochastic Control Approach

Authors: Jhanvi Garg, Xianyang Zhang, Quan Zhou

Abstract: Schrödinger bridge can be viewed as a continuous-time stochastic control problem where the goal is to find an optimally controlled diffusion process whose terminal distribution coincides with a pre-specified target distribution. We propose to generalize this problem by allowing the terminal distribution to differ from the target but penalizing the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the two distri… ▽ More Schrödinger bridge can be viewed as a continuous-time stochastic control problem where the goal is to find an optimally controlled diffusion process whose terminal distribution coincides with a pre-specified target distribution. We propose to generalize this problem by allowing the terminal distribution to differ from the target but penalizing the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the two distributions. We call this new control problem soft-constrained Schrödinger bridge (SSB). The main contribution of this work is a theoretical derivation of the solution to SSB, which shows that the terminal distribution of the optimally controlled process is a geometric mixture of the target and some other distribution. This result is further extended to a time series setting. One application is the development of robust generative diffusion models. We propose a score matching-based algorithm for sampling from geometric mixtures and showcase its use via a numerical example for the MNIST data set. △ Less

Submitted 22 April, 2024; v1 submitted 3 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: Made minor changes about the references. 38 pages, 7 figures. Accepted by AISTATS 2024

MSC Class: 60J60; 60J70; 93E20

Weighted EF1 and PO Allocations with Few Types of Agents or Chores

Authors: Jugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar, John Qin

Abstract: We investigate the existence of fair and efficient allocations of indivisible chores to asymmetric agents who have unequal entitlements or weights. We consider the fairness notion of weighted envy-freeness up to one chore (wEF1) and the efficiency notion of Pareto-optimality (PO). The existence of EF1 and PO allocations of chores to symmetric agents is a major open problem in discrete fair divisio… ▽ More We investigate the existence of fair and efficient allocations of indivisible chores to asymmetric agents who have unequal entitlements or weights. We consider the fairness notion of weighted envy-freeness up to one chore (wEF1) and the efficiency notion of Pareto-optimality (PO). The existence of EF1 and PO allocations of chores to symmetric agents is a major open problem in discrete fair division, and positive results are known only for certain structured instances. In this paper, we study this problem for a more general setting of asymmetric agents and show that an allocation that is wEF1 and PO exists and can be computed in polynomial time for instances with: - Three types of agents, where agents with the same type have identical preferences but can have different weights. - Two types of chores, where the chores can be partitioned into two sets, each containing copies of the same chore. For symmetric agents, our results establish that EF1 and PO allocations exist for three types of agents and also generalize known results for three agents, two types of agents, and two types of chores. Our algorithms use a weighted picking sequence algorithm as a subroutine; we expect this idea and our analysis to be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 26 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: 27 pages

Approximating Competitive Equilibrium by Nash Welfare

Authors: Jugal Garg, Yixin Tao, László A. Végh

Abstract: We explore the relationship between two popular concepts on allocating divisible items: competitive equilibrium (CE) and allocations with maximum Nash welfare, i.e., allocations where the weighted geometric mean of the utilities is maximal. When agents have homogeneous concave utility functions, these two concepts coincide: the classical Eisenberg-Gale convex program that maximizes Nash welfare ov… ▽ More We explore the relationship between two popular concepts on allocating divisible items: competitive equilibrium (CE) and allocations with maximum Nash welfare, i.e., allocations where the weighted geometric mean of the utilities is maximal. When agents have homogeneous concave utility functions, these two concepts coincide: the classical Eisenberg-Gale convex program that maximizes Nash welfare over feasible allocations yields a competitive equilibrium. However, these two concepts diverge for non-homogeneous utilities. From a computational perspective, maximizing Nash welfare amounts to solving a convex program for any concave utility functions, computing CE becomes PPAD-hard already for separable piecewise linear concave (SPLC) utilities. We introduce the concept of Gale-substitute utility functions, an analogue of the weak gross substitutes (WGS) property for the so-called Gale demand system. For Gale-substitutes utilities, we show that any allocation maximizing Nash welfare provides an approximate-CE with surprisingly strong guarantees, where every agent gets at least half the maximum utility they can get at any CE, and is approximately envy-free. Gale-substitutes include examples of utilities where computing CE is PPAD hard: in particular, all separable concave utilities, and the previously studied non-separable class of Leontief-free utilities. We introduce a new, general class of utility functions called generalized network utilities based on the generalized flow model; this class includes SPLC and Leontief-free utilities. We show that all such utilities are Gale-substitutes. Conversely, although some agents may get much higher utility at a Nash welfare maximizing allocation than at a CE, we show a price of anarchy type result: for general concave utilities, every CE achieves at least $(1/e)^{1/e} > 0.69$ fraction of the maximum Nash welfare, and this factor is tight. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Improving Approximation Guarantees for Maximin Share

Authors: Hannaneh Akrami, Jugal Garg, Eklavya Sharma, Setareh Taki

Abstract: We consider fair division of a set of indivisible goods among $n$ agents with additive valuations using the fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). MMS is the most popular share-based notion, in which an agent finds an allocation fair to her if she receives goods worth at least her ($1$-out-of-$n$) MMS value. An allocation is called MMS if all agents receive their MMS values. However, since MMS al… ▽ More We consider fair division of a set of indivisible goods among $n$ agents with additive valuations using the fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). MMS is the most popular share-based notion, in which an agent finds an allocation fair to her if she receives goods worth at least her ($1$-out-of-$n$) MMS value. An allocation is called MMS if all agents receive their MMS values. However, since MMS allocations do not always exist, the focus shifted to investigating its ordinal and multiplicative approximations. In the ordinal approximation, the goal is to show the existence of $1$-out-of-$d$ MMS allocations (for the smallest possible $d>n$). A series of works led to the state-of-the-art factor of $d=\lfloor3n/2\rfloor$ [Hosseini et al.'21]. We show that $1$-out-of-$4\lceil n/3\rceil$ MMS allocations always exist, thereby improving the state-of-the-art of ordinal approximation. In the multiplicative approximation, the goal is to show the existence of $α$-MMS allocations (for the largest possible $α< 1$), which guarantees each agent at least $α$ times her MMS value. We introduce a general framework of "approximate MMS with agent priority ranking". An allocation is said to be $T$-MMS, for a non-increasing sequence $T = (τ_1, \ldots, τ_n)$ of numbers, if the agent at rank $i$ in the order gets a bundle of value at least $τ_i$ times her MMS value. This framework captures both ordinal approximation and multiplicative approximation as special cases. We show the existence of $T$-MMS allocations where $τ_i \ge \max(\frac{3}{4} + \frac{1}{12n}, \frac{2n}{2n+i-1})$ for all $i$. Furthermore, we can get allocations that are $(\frac{3}{4} + \frac{1}{12n})$-MMS ex-post and $(0.8253 + \frac{1}{36n})$-MMS ex-ante. We also prove that our algorithm does not give better than $(0.8631 + \frac{1}{2n})$-MMS ex-ante. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2024; v1 submitted 24 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Breaking the $3/4$ Barrier for Approximate Maximin Share

Authors: Hannaneh Akrami, Jugal Garg

Abstract: We study the fundamental problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among $n$ agents with additive valuations using the desirable fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). MMS is the most popular share-based notion, in which an agent finds an allocation fair to her if she receives goods worth at least her MMS value. An allocation is called MMS if all agents receive at least their MMS va… ▽ More We study the fundamental problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among $n$ agents with additive valuations using the desirable fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). MMS is the most popular share-based notion, in which an agent finds an allocation fair to her if she receives goods worth at least her MMS value. An allocation is called MMS if all agents receive at least their MMS value. Since MMS allocations need not exist when $n>2$, a series of works showed the existence of approximate MMS allocations with the current best factor of $\frac34 + O(\frac{1}{n})$. However, a simple example in [DFL82, BEF21, AGST23] showed the limitations of existing approaches and proved that they cannot improve this factor to $3/4 + Ω(1)$. In this paper, we bypass these barriers to show the existence of $(\frac{3}{4} + \frac{3}{3836})$-MMS allocations by developing new reduction rules and analysis techniques. △ Less

Submitted 24 July, 2023; v1 submitted 14 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Fair and Efficient Allocation of Indivisible Chores with Surplus

Authors: Hannaneh Akrami, Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Kurt Mehlhorn, Ruta Mehta

Abstract: We study fair division of indivisible chores among $n$ agents with additive disutility functions. Two well-studied fairness notions for indivisible items are envy-freeness up to one/any item (EF1/EFX) and the standard notion of economic efficiency is Pareto optimality (PO). There is a noticeable gap between the results known for both EF1 and EFX in the goods and chores settings. The case of chores… ▽ More We study fair division of indivisible chores among $n$ agents with additive disutility functions. Two well-studied fairness notions for indivisible items are envy-freeness up to one/any item (EF1/EFX) and the standard notion of economic efficiency is Pareto optimality (PO). There is a noticeable gap between the results known for both EF1 and EFX in the goods and chores settings. The case of chores turns out to be much more challenging. We reduce this gap by providing slightly relaxed versions of the known results on goods for the chores setting. Interestingly, our algorithms run in polynomial time, unlike their analogous versions in the goods setting. We introduce the concept of $k$ surplus which means that up to $k$ more chores are allocated to the agents and each of them is a copy of an original chore. We present a polynomial-time algorithm which gives EF1 and PO allocations with $(n-1)$ surplus. We relax the notion of EFX slightly and define tEFX which requires that the envy from agent $i$ to agent $j$ is removed upon the transfer of any chore from the $i$'s bundle to $j$'s bundle. We give a polynomial-time algorithm that in the chores case for $3$ agents returns an allocation which is either proportional or tEFX. Note that proportionality is a very strong criterion in the case of indivisible items, and hence both notions we guarantee are desirable. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2023; v1 submitted 8 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Simplification and Improvement of MMS Approximation

Authors: Hannaneh Akrami, Jugal Garg, Eklavya Sharma, Setareh Taki

Abstract: We consider the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among $n$ agents with additive valuations, using the popular fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). Since MMS allocations do not always exist, a series of works provided existence and algorithms for approximate MMS allocations. The Garg-Taki algorithm gives the current best approximation factor of… ▽ More We consider the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among $n$ agents with additive valuations, using the popular fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). Since MMS allocations do not always exist, a series of works provided existence and algorithms for approximate MMS allocations. The Garg-Taki algorithm gives the current best approximation factor of $(\frac{3}{4} + \frac{1}{12n})$. Most of these results are based on complicated analyses, especially those providing better than $2/3$ factor. Moreover, since no tight example is known of the Garg-Taki algorithm, it is unclear if this is the best factor of this approach. In this paper, we significantly simplify the analysis of this algorithm and also improve the existence guarantee to a factor of $(\frac{3}{4} + \min(\frac{1}{36}, \frac{3}{16n-4}))$. For small $n$, this provides a noticeable improvement. Furthermore, we present a tight example of this algorithm, showing that this may be the best factor one can hope for with the current techniques. △ Less

Submitted 21 July, 2023; v1 submitted 29 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

New Algorithms for the Fair and Efficient Allocation of Indivisible Chores

Authors: Jugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar, John Qin

Abstract: We study the problem of fairly and efficiently allocating indivisible chores among agents with additive disutility functions. We consider the widely-used envy-based fairness properties of EF1 and EFX, in conjunction with the efficiency property of fractional Pareto-optimality (fPO). Existence (and computation) of an allocation that is simultaneously EF1/EFX and fPO are challenging open problems, a… ▽ More We study the problem of fairly and efficiently allocating indivisible chores among agents with additive disutility functions. We consider the widely-used envy-based fairness properties of EF1 and EFX, in conjunction with the efficiency property of fractional Pareto-optimality (fPO). Existence (and computation) of an allocation that is simultaneously EF1/EFX and fPO are challenging open problems, and we make progress on both of them. We show existence of an allocation that is - EF1+fPO, when there are three agents, - EF1+fPO, when there are at most two disutility functions, - EFX+fPO, for three agents with bivalued disutilities. These results are constructive, based on strongly polynomial-time algorithms. We also investigate non-existence and show that an allocation that is EFX+fPO need not exist, even for two agents. △ Less

Submitted 15 October, 2023; v1 submitted 5 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: 43 pages. Accepted to IJCAI 2023. This version corrects a typo in Theorem 2

Approximating Nash Social Welfare by Matching and Local Search

Authors: Jugal Garg, Edin Husić, Wenzheng Li, László A. Végh, Jan Vondrák

Abstract: For any $\eps>0$, we give a simple, deterministic $(4+\eps)$-approximation algorithm for the Nash social welfare (NSW) problem under submodular valuations. We also consider the asymmetric variant of the problem, where the objective is to maximize the weighted geometric mean of agents' valuations, and give an $(ω+ 2 + \eps) \ee$-approximation if the ratio between the largest weight and the average… ▽ More For any $\eps>0$, we give a simple, deterministic $(4+\eps)$-approximation algorithm for the Nash social welfare (NSW) problem under submodular valuations. We also consider the asymmetric variant of the problem, where the objective is to maximize the weighted geometric mean of agents' valuations, and give an $(ω+ 2 + \eps) \ee$-approximation if the ratio between the largest weight and the average weight is at most $ω$. We also show that the $\nfrac12$-EFX envy-freeness property can be attained simultaneously with a constant-factor approximation. More precisely, we can find an allocation in polynomial time that is both $\nfrac12$-EFX and a $(8+\eps)$-approximation to the symmetric NSW problem under submodular valuations. △ Less

Submitted 13 August, 2024; v1 submitted 7 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: 27 pages. Appeared in STOC 2023. This version improves the proofs and gives a new FPT result

Existence and Computation of Epistemic EFX Allocations

Authors: Ioannis Caragiannis, Jugal Garg, Nidhi Rathi, Eklavya Sharma, Giovanna Varricchio

Abstract: We consider the problem of allocating indivisible goods among $n$ agents in a fair manner. For this problem, one of the best notions of fairness is envy-freeness up to any good (EFX). However, it is not known if EFX allocations always exist. Hence, several relaxations of EFX allocations have been studied. We propose another relaxation of EFX, called epistemic EFX (EEFX). An allocation is EEFX iff… ▽ More We consider the problem of allocating indivisible goods among $n$ agents in a fair manner. For this problem, one of the best notions of fairness is envy-freeness up to any good (EFX). However, it is not known if EFX allocations always exist. Hence, several relaxations of EFX allocations have been studied. We propose another relaxation of EFX, called epistemic EFX (EEFX). An allocation is EEFX iff for every agent $i$, it is possible to shuffle the goods of the other agents such that agent $i$ does not envy any other agent up to any good. We show that EEFX allocations always exist for additive valuations, and give a polynomial-time algorithm for computing them. We also show how EEFX is related to some previously-known notions of fairness. △ Less

Submitted 4 November, 2022; v1 submitted 3 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: Edit: include additional authors and some minor changes

Competitive Equilibrium with Chores: Combinatorial Algorithm and Hardness

Authors: Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Peter McGlaughlin, Ruta Mehta

Abstract: We study the computational complexity of finding a competitive equilibrium (CE) with chores when agents have linear preferences. CE is one of the most preferred mechanisms for allocating a set of items among agents. CE with equal incomes (CEEI), Fisher, and Arrow-Debreu (exchange) are the fundamental economic models to study allocation problems, where CEEI is a special case of Fisher and Fisher is… ▽ More We study the computational complexity of finding a competitive equilibrium (CE) with chores when agents have linear preferences. CE is one of the most preferred mechanisms for allocating a set of items among agents. CE with equal incomes (CEEI), Fisher, and Arrow-Debreu (exchange) are the fundamental economic models to study allocation problems, where CEEI is a special case of Fisher and Fisher is a special case of exchange. When the items are goods (giving utility), the CE set is convex even in the exchange model, facilitating several combinatorial polynomial-time algorithms (starting with the seminal work of Devanur, Papadimitriou, Saberi and Vazirani) for all of these models. In sharp contrast, when the items are chores (giving disutility), the CE set is known to be non-convex and disconnected even in the CEEI model. Further, no combinatorial algorithms or hardness results are known for these models. In this paper, we give two main results for CE with chores: 1) A combinatorial algorithm to compute a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate CEEI in time $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^4m^2 / \varepsilon^2)$, where $n$ is the number of agents and $m$ is the number of chores. 2) PPAD-hardness of finding a $(1-1/\mathit{poly}(n))$-approximate CE in the exchange model under a sufficient condition. To the best of our knowledge, these results show the first separation between the CEEI and exchange models when agents have linear preferences, assuming PPAD $\neq $ P. Finally, we show that our new insight implies a straightforward proof of the existence of an allocation that is both envy-free up to one chore (EF1) and Pareto optimal (PO) in the discrete setting when agents have factored bivalued preferences. △ Less

Submitted 23 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: Accepted in EC 2022. The PPAD hardness section also appeared in arXiv:2008.00285

MSC Class: Computer Science

EFX Allocations: Simplifications and Improvements

Authors: Hannaneh Akrami, Noga Alon, Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Kurt Mehlhorn, Ruta Mehta

Abstract: The existence of EFX allocations is a fundamental open problem in discrete fair division. Given a set of agents and indivisible goods, the goal is to determine the existence of an allocation where no agent envies another following the removal of any single good from the other agent's bundle. Since the general problem has been illusive, progress is made on two fronts: $(i)$ proving existence when t… ▽ More The existence of EFX allocations is a fundamental open problem in discrete fair division. Given a set of agents and indivisible goods, the goal is to determine the existence of an allocation where no agent envies another following the removal of any single good from the other agent's bundle. Since the general problem has been illusive, progress is made on two fronts: $(i)$ proving existence when the number of agents is small, $(ii)$ proving existence of relaxations of EFX. In this paper, we improve results on both fronts (and simplify in one of the cases). We prove the existence of EFX allocations with three agents, restricting only one agent to have an MMS-feasible valuation function (a strict generalization of nice-cancelable valuation functions introduced by Berger et al. which subsumes additive, budget-additive and unit demand valuation functions). The other agents may have any monotone valuation functions. Our proof technique is significantly simpler and shorter than the proof by Chaudhury et al. on existence of EFX allocations when there are three agents with additive valuation functions and therefore more accessible. Secondly, we consider relaxations of EFX allocations, namely, approximate-EFX allocations and EFX allocations with few unallocated goods (charity). Chaudhury et al. showed the existence of $(1-ε)$-EFX allocation with $O((n/ε)^{\frac{4}{5}})$ charity by establishing a connection to a problem in extremal combinatorics. We improve their result and prove the existence of $(1-ε)$-EFX allocations with $\tilde{O}((n/ ε)^{\frac{1}{2}})$ charity. In fact, some of our techniques can be used to prove improved upper-bounds on a problem in zero-sum combinatorics introduced by Alon and Krivelevich. △ Less

Submitted 23 December, 2022; v1 submitted 16 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Computing Pareto-Optimal and Almost Envy-Free Allocations of Indivisible Goods

Authors: Jugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar

Abstract: We study the problem of fair and efficient allocation of a set of indivisible goods to agents with additive valuations using the popular fairness notions of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and equitability up to one good (EQ1) in conjunction with Pareto-optimality (PO). There exists a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm to compute an EF1+PO allocation and a non-constructive proof of the existence… ▽ More We study the problem of fair and efficient allocation of a set of indivisible goods to agents with additive valuations using the popular fairness notions of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and equitability up to one good (EQ1) in conjunction with Pareto-optimality (PO). There exists a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm to compute an EF1+PO allocation and a non-constructive proof of the existence of allocations that are both EF1 and fractionally Pareto-optimal (fPO), which is a stronger notion than PO. We present a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm to compute an EF1+fPO allocation, thereby improving the earlier results. Our techniques also enable us to show that an EQ1+fPO allocation always exists when the values are positive and that it can be computed in pseudo-polynomial time. We also consider the class of $k$-ary instances where $k$ is a constant, i.e., each agent has at most $k$ different values for the goods. For such instances, we show that an EF1+fPO allocation can be computed in strongly polynomial time. When all values are positive, we show that an EQ1+fPO allocation for such instances can be computed in strongly polynomial time. Next, we consider instances where the number of agents is constant and show that an EF1+PO (likewise, an EQ1+PO) allocation can be computed in polynomial time. These results significantly extend the polynomial-time computability beyond the known cases of binary or identical valuations. We also design a polynomial-time algorithm that computes a Nash welfare maximizing allocation when there are constantly many agents with constant many different values for the goods. Finally, on the complexity side, we show that the problem of computing an EF1+fPO allocation lies in the complexity class PLS. △ Less

Submitted 15 October, 2023; v1 submitted 29 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: 23 pages. A preliminary version appeared at AAAI 2021

Tractable Fragments of the Maximum Nash Welfare Problem

Authors: Jugal Garg, Edin Husić, Aniket Murhekar, László Végh

Abstract: We study the problem of maximizing Nash welfare (MNW) while allocating indivisible goods to asymmetric agents. The Nash welfare of an allocation is the weighted geometric mean of agents' utilities, and the allocation with maximum Nash welfare is known to satisfy several desirable fairness and efficiency properties. However, computing such an MNW allocation is NP-hard, even for two agents with iden… ▽ More We study the problem of maximizing Nash welfare (MNW) while allocating indivisible goods to asymmetric agents. The Nash welfare of an allocation is the weighted geometric mean of agents' utilities, and the allocation with maximum Nash welfare is known to satisfy several desirable fairness and efficiency properties. However, computing such an MNW allocation is NP-hard, even for two agents with identical, additive valuations. Hence, we aim to identify tractable classes that either admit a PTAS, an FPTAS, or an exact polynomial-time algorithm. To this end, we design a PTAS for finding an MNW allocation for the case of asymmetric agents with identical, additive valuations, thus generalizing a similar result for symmetric agents. Our techniques can also be adapted to give a PTAS for the problem of computing the optimal $p$-mean welfare. We also show that an MNW allocation can be computed exactly in polynomial time for identical agents with $k$-ary valuations when $k$ is a constant, where every agent has at most $k$ different values for the goods. Next, we consider the special case where every agent finds at most two goods valuable, and show that this class admits an efficient algorithm, even for general monotone valuations. In contrast, we note that when agents can value three or more goods, maximizing Nash welfare is NP-hard, even when agents are symmetric and have additive valuations, showing our algorithmic result is essentially tight. Finally, we show that for constantly many asymmetric agents with additive valuations, the MNW problem admits an FPTAS. △ Less

Submitted 28 April, 2022; v1 submitted 19 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 20 pages

Fair and Efficient Allocations of Chores under Bivalued Preferences

Authors: Jugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar, John Qin

Abstract: We study the problem of fair and efficient allocation of a set of indivisible chores to agents with additive cost functions. We consider the popular fairness notion of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) with the efficiency notion of Pareto-optimality (PO). While it is known that an EF1+PO allocation exists and can be computed in pseudo-polynomial time in the case of goods, the same problem is open… ▽ More We study the problem of fair and efficient allocation of a set of indivisible chores to agents with additive cost functions. We consider the popular fairness notion of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) with the efficiency notion of Pareto-optimality (PO). While it is known that an EF1+PO allocation exists and can be computed in pseudo-polynomial time in the case of goods, the same problem is open for chores. Our first result is a strongly polynomial-time algorithm for computing an EF1+PO allocation for bivalued instances, where agents have (at most) two disutility values for the chores. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first non-trivial class of indivisible chores to admit an EF1+PO allocation and an efficient algorithm for its computation. We also study the problem of computing an envy-free (EF) and PO allocation for the case of divisible chores. While the existence of an EF+PO allocation is known via competitive equilibrium with equal incomes, its efficient computation is open. Our second result shows that for bivalued instances, an EF+PO allocation can be computed in strongly polynomial-time. △ Less

Submitted 18 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: 25 pages

On Fair and Efficient Allocations of Indivisible Public Goods

Authors: Jugal Garg, Pooja Kulkarni, Aniket Murhekar

Abstract: We study fair allocation of indivisible public goods subject to cardinality (budget) constraints. In this model, we have n agents and m available public goods, and we want to select $k \leq m$ goods in a fair and efficient manner. We first establish fundamental connections between the models of private goods, public goods, and public decision making by presenting polynomial-time reductions for the… ▽ More We study fair allocation of indivisible public goods subject to cardinality (budget) constraints. In this model, we have n agents and m available public goods, and we want to select $k \leq m$ goods in a fair and efficient manner. We first establish fundamental connections between the models of private goods, public goods, and public decision making by presenting polynomial-time reductions for the popular solution concepts of maximum Nash welfare (MNW) and leximin. These mechanisms are known to provide remarkable fairness and efficiency guarantees in private goods and public decision making settings. We show that they retain these desirable properties even in the public goods case. We prove that MNW allocations provide fairness guarantees of Proportionality up to one good (Prop1), $1/n$ approximation to Round Robin Share (RRS), and the efficiency guarantee of Pareto Optimality (PO). Further, we show that the problems of finding MNW or leximin-optimal allocations are NP-hard, even in the case of constantly many agents, or binary valuations. This is in sharp contrast to the private goods setting that admits polynomial-time algorithms under binary valuations. We also design pseudo-polynomial time algorithms for computing an exact MNW or leximin-optimal allocation for the cases of (i) constantly many agents, and (ii) constantly many goods with additive valuations. We also present an O(n)-factor approximation algorithm for MNW which also satisfies RRS, Prop1, and 1/2-Prop. △ Less

Submitted 21 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: 25 pages

Approximating Equilibrium under Constrained Piecewise Linear Concave Utilities with Applications to Matching Markets

Authors: Jugal Garg, Yixin Tao, László A. Végh

Abstract: We study the equilibrium computation problem in the Fisher market model with constrained piecewise linear concave (PLC) utilities. This general class captures many well-studied special cases, including markets with PLC utilities, markets with satiation, and matching markets. For the special case of PLC utilities, although the problem is PPAD-hard, Devanur and Kannan (FOCS 2008) gave a polynomial-t… ▽ More We study the equilibrium computation problem in the Fisher market model with constrained piecewise linear concave (PLC) utilities. This general class captures many well-studied special cases, including markets with PLC utilities, markets with satiation, and matching markets. For the special case of PLC utilities, although the problem is PPAD-hard, Devanur and Kannan (FOCS 2008) gave a polynomial-time algorithm when the number of items is constant. Our main result is a fixed parameter approximation scheme for computing an approximate equilibrium, where the parameters are the number of agents and the approximation accuracy. This provides an answer to an open question by Devanur and Kannan for PLC utilities, and gives a simpler and faster algorithm for matching markets as the one by Alaei, Jalaly and Tardos (EC 2017). The main technical idea is to work with the stronger concept of thrifty equilibria, and approximating the input utility functions by `robust' utilities that have favorable marginal properties. With some restrictions, the results also extend to the Arrow--Debreu exchange market model. △ Less

Submitted 12 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Improving EFX Guarantees through Rainbow Cycle Number

Authors: Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Kurt Mehlhorn, Ruta Mehta, Pranabendu Misra

Abstract: We study the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among $n$ agents with additive valuations. Envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) is arguably the most compelling fairness notion in this context. However, the existence of EFX allocations has not been settled and is one of the most important problems in fair division. Towards resolving this problem, many impressive results show the… ▽ More We study the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among $n$ agents with additive valuations. Envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) is arguably the most compelling fairness notion in this context. However, the existence of EFX allocations has not been settled and is one of the most important problems in fair division. Towards resolving this problem, many impressive results show the existence of its relaxations, e.g., the existence of $0.618$-EFX allocations, and the existence of EFX at most $n-1$ unallocated goods. The latter result was recently improved for three agents, in which the two unallocated goods are allocated through an involved procedure. Reducing the number of unallocated goods for arbitrary number of agents is a systematic way to settle the big question. In this paper, we develop a new approach, and show that for every $\varepsilon \in (0,1/2]$, there always exists a $(1-\varepsilon)$-EFX allocation with sublinear number of unallocated goods and high Nash welfare. For this, we reduce the EFX problem to a novel problem in extremal graph theory. We introduce the notion of rainbow cycle number $R(\cdot)$. For all $d \in \mathbb{N}$, $R(d)$ is the largest $k$ such that there exists a $k$-partite digraph $G =(\cup_{i \in [k]} V_i, E)$, in which 1) each part has at most $d$ vertices, i.e., $\lvert V_i \rvert \leq d$ for all $i \in [k]$, 2) for any two parts $V_i$ and $V_j$, each vertex in $V_i$ has an incoming edge from some vertex in $V_j$ and vice-versa, and 3) there exists no cycle in $G$ that contains at most one vertex from each part. We show that any upper bound on $R(d)$ directly translates to a sublinear bound on the number of unallocated goods. We establish a polynomial upper bound on $R(d)$, yielding our main result. Furthermore, our approach is constructive, which also gives a polynomial-time algorithm for finding such an allocation. △ Less

Submitted 2 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Limited-Trust in Social Network Games

Authors: Timothy Murray, Jugal Garg, Rakesh Nagi

Abstract: We consider agents in a social network competing to be selected as partners in collaborative, mutually beneficial activities. We study this through a model in which an agent i can initiate a limited number k_i>0 of games and selects the ideal partners from its one-hop neighborhood. On the flip side it can accept as many games offered from its neighbors. Each game signifies a productive joint econo… ▽ More We consider agents in a social network competing to be selected as partners in collaborative, mutually beneficial activities. We study this through a model in which an agent i can initiate a limited number k_i>0 of games and selects the ideal partners from its one-hop neighborhood. On the flip side it can accept as many games offered from its neighbors. Each game signifies a productive joint economic activity, and players attempt to maximize their individual utilities. Unsurprisingly, more trustworthy agents are more desirable as partners. Trustworthiness is measured by the game theoretic concept of Limited-Trust, which quantifies the maximum cost an agent is willing to incur in order to improve the net utility of all agents. Agents learn about their neighbors' trustworthiness through interactions and their behaviors evolve in response. Empirical trials performed on realistic social networks show that when given the option, many agents become highly trustworthy; most or all become highly trustworthy when knowledge of their neighbors' trustworthiness is based on past interactions rather than known a priori. This trustworthiness is not the result of altruism, instead agents are intrinsically motivated to become trustworthy partners by competition. Two insights are presented: first, trustworthy behavior drives an increase in the utility of all agents, where maintaining a relatively modest level of trustworthiness may easily improve net utility by as much as 14.5%. If only one agent exhibits modest trust among self-centered ones, it can increase its average utility by up to 25% in certain cases! Second, and counter-intuitively, when partnership opportunities are abundant agents become less trustworthy. △ Less

Submitted 20 January, 2024; v1 submitted 1 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: Main paper plus e-companion

Approximating Nash Social Welfare under Rado Valuations

Authors: Jugal Garg, Edin Husic, Laszlo A. Vegh

Abstract: We consider the problem of approximating maximum Nash social welfare (NSW) while allocating a set of indivisible items to $n$ agents. The NSW is a popular objective that provides a balanced tradeoff between the often conflicting requirements of fairness and efficiency, defined as the weighted geometric mean of agents' valuations. For the symmetric additive case of the problem, where agents have th… ▽ More We consider the problem of approximating maximum Nash social welfare (NSW) while allocating a set of indivisible items to $n$ agents. The NSW is a popular objective that provides a balanced tradeoff between the often conflicting requirements of fairness and efficiency, defined as the weighted geometric mean of agents' valuations. For the symmetric additive case of the problem, where agents have the same weight with additive valuations, the first constant-factor approximation algorithm was obtained in 2015. This led to a flurry of work obtaining constant-factor approximation algorithms for the symmetric case under mild generalizations of additive, and $O(n)$-approximation algorithms for more general valuations and for the asymmetric case. In this paper, we make significant progress towards both symmetric and asymmetric NSW problems. We present the first constant-factor approximation algorithm for the symmetric case under Rado valuations. Rado valuations form a general class of valuation functions that arise from maximum cost independent matching problems, including as special cases assignment (OXS) valuations and weighted matroid rank functions. Furthermore, our approach also gives the first constant-factor approximation algorithm for the asymmetric case under Rado valuations, provided that the maximum ratio between the weights is bounded by a constant. △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Comments: 44 pages, 3 figures

One-Sided Matching Markets with Endowments: Equilibria and Algorithms

Authors: Jugal Garg, Thorben Tröbst, Vijay V. Vazirani

Abstract: The Arrow-Debreu extension of the classic Hylland-Zeckhauser scheme for a one-sided matching market -- called ADHZ in this paper -- has natural applications but has instances which do not admit equilibria. By introducing approximation, we define the $ε$-approximate ADHZ model, and we give the following results. * Existence of equilibrium under linear utility functions. We prove that the equilibr… ▽ More The Arrow-Debreu extension of the classic Hylland-Zeckhauser scheme for a one-sided matching market -- called ADHZ in this paper -- has natural applications but has instances which do not admit equilibria. By introducing approximation, we define the $ε$-approximate ADHZ model, and we give the following results. * Existence of equilibrium under linear utility functions. We prove that the equilibrium satisfies Pareto optimality, approximate envy-freeness, and approximate weak core stability. * A combinatorial polynomial-time algorithm for an $ε$-approximate ADHZ equilibrium for the case of dichotomous, and more generally bi-valued, utilities. * An instance of ADHZ, with dichotomous utilities and a strongly connected demand graph, which does not admit an equilibrium. Since computing an equilibrium for HZ is likely to be highly intractable and because of the difficulty of extending HZ to more general utility functions, Hosseini and Vazirani proposed (a rich collection of) Nash-bargaining-based matching market models. For the dichotomous-utilities case of their model linear Arrow-Debreu Nash bargaining one-sided matching market (1LAD), we give a combinatorial, strongly polynomial-time algorithm and show that it admits a rational convex program. △ Less

Submitted 20 July, 2021; v1 submitted 22 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Comments: 30 pages, 2 figures, added new results

ACM Class: F.2.2

Competitive Allocation of a Mixed Manna

Authors: Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Peter McGlaughlin, Ruta Mehta

Abstract: We study the fair division problem of allocating a mixed manna under additively separable piecewise linear concave (SPLC) utilities. A mixed manna contains goods that everyone likes and bads that everyone dislikes, as well as items that some like and others dislike. The seminal work of Bogomolnaia et al. [Econometrica'17] argue why allocating a mixed manna is genuinely more complicated than a good… ▽ More We study the fair division problem of allocating a mixed manna under additively separable piecewise linear concave (SPLC) utilities. A mixed manna contains goods that everyone likes and bads that everyone dislikes, as well as items that some like and others dislike. The seminal work of Bogomolnaia et al. [Econometrica'17] argue why allocating a mixed manna is genuinely more complicated than a good or a bad manna, and why competitive equilibrium is the best mechanism. They also provide the existence of equilibrium and establish its peculiar properties (e.g., non-convex and disconnected set of equilibria even under linear utilities), but leave the problem of computing an equilibrium open. This problem remained unresolved even for only bad manna under linear utilities. Our main result is a simplex-like algorithm based on Lemke's scheme for computing a competitive allocation of a mixed manna under SPLC utilities, a strict generalization of linear. Experimental results on randomly generated instances suggest that our algorithm will be fast in practice. The problem is known to be PPAD-hard for the case of good manna, and we also show a similar result for the case of bad manna. Given these PPAD-hardness results, designing such an algorithm is the only non-brute-force (non-enumerative) option known, e.g., the classic Lemke-Howson algorithm (1964) for computing a Nash equilibrium in a 2-player game is still one of the most widely used algorithms in practice. Our algorithm also yields several new structural properties as simple corollaries. We obtain a (constructive) proof of existence for a far more general setting, membership of the problem in PPAD, rational-valued solution, and odd number of solutions property. The last property also settles the conjecture of Bogomolnaia et al. in the affirmative. △ Less

Submitted 6 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

PAI-BPR: Personalized Outfit Recommendation Scheme with Attribute-wise Interpretability

Authors: Dikshant Sagar, Jatin Garg, Prarthana Kansal, Sejal Bhalla, Rajiv Ratn Shah, Yi Yu

Abstract: Fashion is an important part of human experience. Events such as interviews, meetings, marriages, etc. are often based on clothing styles. The rise in the fashion industry and its effect on social influencing have made outfit compatibility a need. Thus, it necessitates an outfit compatibility model to aid people in clothing recommendation. However, due to the highly subjective nature of compatibil… ▽ More Fashion is an important part of human experience. Events such as interviews, meetings, marriages, etc. are often based on clothing styles. The rise in the fashion industry and its effect on social influencing have made outfit compatibility a need. Thus, it necessitates an outfit compatibility model to aid people in clothing recommendation. However, due to the highly subjective nature of compatibility, it is necessary to account for personalization. Our paper devises an attribute-wise interpretable compatibility scheme with personal preference modelling which captures user-item interaction along with general item-item interaction. Our work solves the problem of interpretability in clothing matching by locating the discordant and harmonious attributes between fashion items. Extensive experiment results on IQON3000, a publicly available real-world dataset, verify the effectiveness of the proposed model. △ Less

Submitted 4 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Comments: 10 pages, 5 figures, to be published in IEEE BigMM, 2020

Dividing Bads is Harder than Dividing Goods: On the Complexity of Fair and Efficient Division of Chores

Authors: Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Peter McGlaughlin, Ruta Mehta

Abstract: We study the chore division problem where a set of agents needs to divide a set of chores (bads) among themselves fairly and efficiently. We assume that agents have linear disutility (cost) functions. Like for the case of goods, competitive division is known to be arguably the best mechanism for the bads as well. However, unlike goods, there are multiple competitive divisions with very different d… ▽ More We study the chore division problem where a set of agents needs to divide a set of chores (bads) among themselves fairly and efficiently. We assume that agents have linear disutility (cost) functions. Like for the case of goods, competitive division is known to be arguably the best mechanism for the bads as well. However, unlike goods, there are multiple competitive divisions with very different disutility value profiles in bads. Although all competitive divisions satisfy the standard notions of fairness and efficiency, some divisions are significantly fairer and efficient than the others. This raises two important natural questions: Does there exist a competitive division in which no agent is assigned a chore that she hugely dislikes? Are there simple sufficient conditions for the existence and polynomial-time algorithms assuming them? We investigate both these questions in this paper. We show that the first problem is strongly NP-hard. Further, we derive a simple sufficient condition for the existence, and we show that finding a competitive division is PPAD-hard assuming the condition. These results are in sharp contrast to the case of goods where both problems are strongly polynomial-time solvable. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first hardness results for the chore division problem, and, in fact, for any economic model under linear preferences. △ Less

Submitted 1 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

MSC Class: Computer Science

Fair and Efficient Allocations under Subadditive Valuations

Authors: Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Ruta Mehta

Abstract: We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible goods among agents with subadditive valuations in a fair and efficient manner. Envy-Freeness up to any good (EFX) is the most compelling notion of fairness in the context of indivisible goods. Although the existence of EFX is not known beyond the simple case of two agents with subadditive valuations, some good approximations of EFX are known… ▽ More We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible goods among agents with subadditive valuations in a fair and efficient manner. Envy-Freeness up to any good (EFX) is the most compelling notion of fairness in the context of indivisible goods. Although the existence of EFX is not known beyond the simple case of two agents with subadditive valuations, some good approximations of EFX are known to exist, namely $\tfrac{1}{2}$-EFX allocation and EFX allocations with bounded charity. Nash welfare (the geometric mean of agents' valuations) is one of the most commonly used measures of efficiency. In case of additive valuations, an allocation that maximizes Nash welfare also satisfies fairness properties like Envy-Free up to one good (EF1). Although there is substantial work on approximating Nash welfare when agents have additive valuations, very little is known when agents have subadditive valuations. In this paper, we design a polynomial-time algorithm that outputs an allocation that satisfies either of the two approximations of EFX as well as achieves an $\mathcal{O}(n)$ approximation to the Nash welfare. Our result also improves the current best-known approximation of $\mathcal{O}(n \log n)$ and $\mathcal{O}(m)$ to Nash welfare when agents have submodular and subadditive valuations, respectively. Furthermore, our technique also gives an $\mathcal{O}(n)$ approximation to a family of welfare measures, $p$-mean of valuations for $p\in (-\infty, 1]$, thereby also matching asymptotically the current best known approximation ratio for special cases like $p =-\infty$ while also retaining the fairness properties. △ Less

Submitted 16 August, 2020; v1 submitted 13 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

MSC Class: Computer Science

EFX Exists for Three Agents

Authors: Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Kurt Mehlhorn

Abstract: We study the problem of distributing a set of indivisible items among agents with additive valuations in a $\mathit{fair}$ manner. The fairness notion under consideration is Envy-freeness up to any item (EFX). Despite significant efforts by many researchers for several years, the existence of EFX allocations has not been settled beyond the simple case of two agents. In this paper, we show construc… ▽ More We study the problem of distributing a set of indivisible items among agents with additive valuations in a $\mathit{fair}$ manner. The fairness notion under consideration is Envy-freeness up to any item (EFX). Despite significant efforts by many researchers for several years, the existence of EFX allocations has not been settled beyond the simple case of two agents. In this paper, we show constructively that an EFX allocation always exists for three agents. Furthermore, we falsify the conjecture by Caragiannis et al. by showing an instance with three agents for which there is a partial EFX allocation (some items are not allocated) with higher Nash welfare than that of any complete EFX allocation. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2020; v1 submitted 12 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: Full version of a paper published at Economics and Computation (EC) 2020

MSC Class: Computer Science

Approximating Nash Social Welfare under Submodular Valuations through (Un)Matchings

Authors: Jugal Garg, Pooja Kulkarni, Rucha Kulkarni

Abstract: We study the problem of approximating maximum Nash social welfare (NSW) when allocating m indivisible items among n asymmetric agents with submodular valuations. The NSW is a well-established notion of fairness and efficiency, defined as the weighted geometric mean of agents' valuations. For special cases of the problem with symmetric agents and additive(-like) valuation functions, approximation a… ▽ More We study the problem of approximating maximum Nash social welfare (NSW) when allocating m indivisible items among n asymmetric agents with submodular valuations. The NSW is a well-established notion of fairness and efficiency, defined as the weighted geometric mean of agents' valuations. For special cases of the problem with symmetric agents and additive(-like) valuation functions, approximation algorithms have been designed using approaches customized for these specific settings, and they fail to extend to more general settings. Hence, no approximation algorithm with factor independent of m is known either for asymmetric agents with additive valuations or for symmetric agents beyond additive(-like) valuations. In this paper, we extend our understanding of the NSW problem to far more general settings. Our main contribution is two approximation algorithms for asymmetric agents with additive and submodular valuations respectively. Both algorithms are simple to understand and involve non-trivial modifications of a greedy repeated matchings approach. Allocations of high valued items are done separately by un-matching certain items and re-matching them, by processes that are different in both algorithms. We show that these approaches achieve approximation factors of O(n) and O(n log n) for additive and submodular case respectively, which is independent of the number of items. For additive valuations, our algorithm outputs an allocation that also achieves the fairness property of envy-free up to one item (EF1). Furthermore, we show that the NSW problem under submodular valuations is strictly harder than all currently known settings with an e/(e-1) factor of the hardness of approximation, even for constantly many agents. For this case, we provide a different approximation algorithm that achieves a factor of e/(e-1), hence resolving it completely. △ Less

Submitted 28 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Comments: Full version of SODA 2020 paper

Auction Algorithms for Market Equilibrium with Weak Gross Substitute Demands

Authors: Jugal Garg, Edin Husić, László A. Végh

Abstract: We consider the Arrow--Debreu exchange market model under the assumption that the agents' demands satisfy the weak gross substitutes (WGS) property. We present a simple auction algorithm that obtains an approximate market equilibrium for WGS demands assuming the availability of a price update oracle. We exhibit specific implementations of such an oracle for WGS demands with bounded price elasticit… ▽ More We consider the Arrow--Debreu exchange market model under the assumption that the agents' demands satisfy the weak gross substitutes (WGS) property. We present a simple auction algorithm that obtains an approximate market equilibrium for WGS demands assuming the availability of a price update oracle. We exhibit specific implementations of such an oracle for WGS demands with bounded price elasticities and for Gale demand systems. As an application of our result, we obtain an efficient algorithm to find an approximate spending-restricted market equilibrium for WGS demands, a model that has been recently introduced as a continuous relaxation of the Nash social welfare (NSW) problem. This leads to a polynomial-time constant factor approximation algorithm for the NSW problem with capped additive separable piecewise linear utility functions; only a pseudopolynomial approximation algorithm was known for this setting previously. △ Less

Submitted 1 May, 2022; v1 submitted 21 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Comments: 42 pages, 1 figure. A preliminary version appeared in STACS 2021

An Improved Approximation Algorithm for Maximin Shares

Authors: Jugal Garg, Setareh Taki

Abstract: Fair division is a fundamental problem in various multi-agent settings, where the goal is to divide a set of resources among agents in a fair manner. We study the case where m indivisible items need to be divided among n agents with additive valuations using the popular fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). An MMS allocation provides each agent a bundle worth at least her maximin share. While it… ▽ More Fair division is a fundamental problem in various multi-agent settings, where the goal is to divide a set of resources among agents in a fair manner. We study the case where m indivisible items need to be divided among n agents with additive valuations using the popular fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). An MMS allocation provides each agent a bundle worth at least her maximin share. While it is known that such an allocation need not exist, a series of work provided approximation algorithms for a 2/3-MMS allocation in which each agent receives a bundle worth at least 2/3 times her maximin share. More recently, Ghodsi et al. [EC'2018] showed the existence of a 3/4-MMS allocation and a PTAS to find a (3/4-ε)-MMS allocation for an ε> 0. Most of the previous works utilize intricate algorithms and require agents' approximate MMS values, which are computationally expensive to obtain. In this paper, we develop a new approach that gives a simple algorithm for showing the existence of a 3/4-MMS allocation. Furthermore, our approach is powerful enough to be easily extended in two directions: First, we get a strongly polynomial-time algorithm to find a 3/4-MMS allocation, where we do not need to approximate the MMS values at all. Second, we show that there always exists a (3/4 + 1/(12n))-MMS allocation, improving the best previous factor. This improves the approximation guarantee, most notably for small n. We note that 3/4 was the best factor known for n> 4. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2021; v1 submitted 28 February, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: Fixed typos and added more details. A two-page abstract appeared in ACM EC 2020

Fast Algorithms for Rank-1 Bimatrix Games

Authors: Bharat Adsul, Jugal Garg, Ruta Mehta, Milind Sohoni, Bernhard von Stengel

Abstract: The rank of a bimatrix game is the matrix rank of the sum of the two payoff matrices. This paper comprehensively analyzes games of rank one, and shows the following: (1) For a game of rank r, the set of its Nash equilibria is the intersection of a generically one-dimensional set of equilibria of parameterized games of rank r-1 with a hyperplane. (2) One equilibrium of a rank-1 game can be found in… ▽ More The rank of a bimatrix game is the matrix rank of the sum of the two payoff matrices. This paper comprehensively analyzes games of rank one, and shows the following: (1) For a game of rank r, the set of its Nash equilibria is the intersection of a generically one-dimensional set of equilibria of parameterized games of rank r-1 with a hyperplane. (2) One equilibrium of a rank-1 game can be found in polynomial time. (3) All equilibria of a rank-1 game can be found by following a piecewise linear path. In contrast, such a path-following method finds only one equilibrium of a bimatrix game. (4) The number of equilibria of a rank-1 game may be exponential. (5) There is a homeomorphism between the space of bimatrix games and their equilibrium correspondence that preserves rank. It is a variation of the homeomorphism used for the concept of strategic stability of an equilibrium component. △ Less

Submitted 22 December, 2019; v1 submitted 11 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: New in v4: detailed comparison with Theobald (2009) on page 6. Footnotes removed. Final version accepted by OPERATIONS RESEARCH

Journal ref: Operations Research 69(2), 613-631, 2021

A Strongly Polynomial Algorithm for Linear Exchange Markets

Authors: Jugal Garg, László A. Végh

Abstract: We present a strongly polynomial algorithm for computing an equilibrium in Arrow-Debreu exchange markets with linear utilities. Our algorithm is based on a variant of the weakly-polynomial Duan-Mehlhorn (DM) algorithm. We use the DM algorithm as a subroutine to identify revealed edges, i.e. pairs of agents and goods that must correspond to best bang-per-buck transactions in every equilibrium solut… ▽ More We present a strongly polynomial algorithm for computing an equilibrium in Arrow-Debreu exchange markets with linear utilities. Our algorithm is based on a variant of the weakly-polynomial Duan-Mehlhorn (DM) algorithm. We use the DM algorithm as a subroutine to identify revealed edges, i.e. pairs of agents and goods that must correspond to best bang-per-buck transactions in every equilibrium solution. Every time a new revealed edge is found, we use another subroutine that decides if there is an optimal solution using the current set of revealed edges, or if none exists, finds the solution that approximately minimizes the violation of the demand and supply constraints. This task can be reduced to solving a linear program (LP). Even though we are unable to solve this LP in strongly polynomial time, we show that it can be approximated by a simpler LP with two variables per inequality that is solvable in strongly polynomial time. △ Less

Submitted 2 February, 2022; v1 submitted 17 September, 2018; originally announced September 2018.

Deep Cross Modal Learning for Caricature Verification and Identification(CaVINet)

Authors: Jatin Garg, Skand Vishwanath Peri, Himanshu Tolani, Narayanan C Krishnan

Abstract: Learning from different modalities is a challenging task. In this paper, we look at the challenging problem of cross modal face verification and recognition between caricature and visual image modalities. Caricature have exaggerations of facial features of a person. Due to the significant variations in the caricatures, building vision models for recognizing and verifying data from this modality is… ▽ More Learning from different modalities is a challenging task. In this paper, we look at the challenging problem of cross modal face verification and recognition between caricature and visual image modalities. Caricature have exaggerations of facial features of a person. Due to the significant variations in the caricatures, building vision models for recognizing and verifying data from this modality is an extremely challenging task. Visual images with significantly lesser amount of distortions can act as a bridge for the analysis of caricature modality. We introduce a publicly available large Caricature-VIsual dataset [CaVI] with images from both the modalities that captures the rich variations in the caricature of an identity. This paper presents the first cross modal architecture that handles extreme distortions of caricatures using a deep learning network that learns similar representations across the modalities. We use two convolutional networks along with transformations that are subjected to orthogonality constraints to capture the shared and modality specific representations. In contrast to prior research, our approach neither depends on manually extracted facial landmarks for learning the representations, nor on the identities of the person for performing verification. The learned shared representation achieves 91% accuracy for verifying unseen images and 75% accuracy on unseen identities. Further, recognizing the identity in the image by knowledge transfer using a combination of shared and modality specific representations, resulted in an unprecedented performance of 85% rank-1 accuracy for caricatures and 95% rank-1 accuracy for visual images. △ Less

Submitted 31 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

On Fair Division of Indivisible Items

Authors: Bhaskar Chaudhury, Yun Kuen Cheung, Jugal Garg, Naveen Garg, Martin Hoefer, Kurt Mehlhorn

Abstract: We consider the task of assigning indivisible goods to a set of agents in a fair manner. Our notion of fairness is Nash social welfare, i.e., the goal is to maximize the geometric mean of the utilities of the agents. Each good comes in multiple items or copies, and the utility of an agent diminishes as it receives more items of the same good. The utility of a bundle of items for an agent is the su… ▽ More We consider the task of assigning indivisible goods to a set of agents in a fair manner. Our notion of fairness is Nash social welfare, i.e., the goal is to maximize the geometric mean of the utilities of the agents. Each good comes in multiple items or copies, and the utility of an agent diminishes as it receives more items of the same good. The utility of a bundle of items for an agent is the sum of the utilities of the items in the bundle. Each agent has a utility cap beyond which he does not value additional items. We give a polynomial time approximation algorithm that maximizes Nash social welfare up to a factor of $e^{1/{e}} \approx 1.445$. The computed allocation is Pareto-optimal and approximates envy-freeness up to one item up to a factor of $2 + \eps$ △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2019; v1 submitted 16 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Journal ref: FSTTCS 2018

Satiation in Fisher Markets and Approximation of Nash Social Welfare

Authors: Jugal Garg, Martin Hoefer, Kurt Mehlhorn

Abstract: We study linear Fisher markets with satiation. In these markets, sellers have earning limits and buyers have utility limits. Beyond natural applications in economics, these markets arise in the context of maximizing Nash social welfare when allocating indivisible items to agents. In contrast to markets with either earning or utility limits, markets with both limits have not been studied before. Th… ▽ More We study linear Fisher markets with satiation. In these markets, sellers have earning limits and buyers have utility limits. Beyond natural applications in economics, these markets arise in the context of maximizing Nash social welfare when allocating indivisible items to agents. In contrast to markets with either earning or utility limits, markets with both limits have not been studied before. They turn out to have fundamentally different properties. In general, the existence of competitive equilibria is not guaranteed. We identify a natural property of markets (termed money clearing) that implies existence. We show that the set of equilibria is not always convex, answering a question of Cole et al. [EC'17]. We design an FPTAS to compute an approximate equilibrium and prove that the problem of computing an exact equilibrium lies in the intersection of complexity classes PLS and PPAD. For a constant number of buyers or goods, we give a polynomial-time algorithm to compute an exact equilibrium. We show how (approximate) equilibria can be rounded and provide the first constant-factor approximation algorithm (with a factor of 2.404) for maximizing Nash social welfare when agents have budget-additive valuations. Finally, we significantly improve the approximation hardness for additive valuations to \sqrt{8/7} > 1.069 (over 1.00008 by Lee [IPL'17]). △ Less

Submitted 30 July, 2019; v1 submitted 14 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Comments: Restructured the paper with improved lower bound

ACM Class: F.2.2

Journal ref: Conference version in SODA 2018

Computing Equilibria in Markets with Budget-Additive Utilities

Authors: Xiaohui Bei, Jugal Garg, Martin Hoefer, Kurt Mehlhorn

Abstract: We present the first analysis of Fisher markets with buyers that have budget-additive utility functions. Budget-additive utilities are elementary concave functions with numerous applications in online adword markets and revenue optimization problems. They extend the standard case of linear utilities and have been studied in a variety of other market models. In contrast to the frequently studied CE… ▽ More We present the first analysis of Fisher markets with buyers that have budget-additive utility functions. Budget-additive utilities are elementary concave functions with numerous applications in online adword markets and revenue optimization problems. They extend the standard case of linear utilities and have been studied in a variety of other market models. In contrast to the frequently studied CES utilities, they have a global satiation point which can imply multiple market equilibria with quite different characteristics. Our main result is an efficient combinatorial algorithm to compute a market equilibrium with a Pareto-optimal allocation of goods. It relies on a new descending-price approach and, as a special case, also implies a novel combinatorial algorithm for computing a market equilibrium in linear Fisher markets. We complement these positive results with a number of hardness results for related computational questions. We prove that it is NP-hard to compute a market equilibrium that maximizes social welfare, and it is PPAD-hard to find any market equilibrium with utility functions with separate satiation points for each buyer and each good. △ Less

Submitted 30 April, 2016; v1 submitted 23 March, 2016; originally announced March 2016.

Comments: 21 pages

ACM Class: F.2.2

A New Class of Combinatorial Markets with Covering Constraints: Algorithms and Applications

Authors: Nikhil Devanur, Jugal Garg, Ruta Mehta, Vijay V. Vazirani, Sadra Yazdanbod

Abstract: We introduce a new class of combinatorial markets in which agents have covering constraints over resources required and are interested in delay minimization. Our market model is applicable to several settings including scheduling, cloud computing, and communicating over a network. This model is quite different from the traditional models, to the extent that neither do the classical equilibrium exi… ▽ More We introduce a new class of combinatorial markets in which agents have covering constraints over resources required and are interested in delay minimization. Our market model is applicable to several settings including scheduling, cloud computing, and communicating over a network. This model is quite different from the traditional models, to the extent that neither do the classical equilibrium existence results seem to apply to it nor do any of the efficient algorithmic techniques developed to compute equilibria seem to apply directly. We give a proof of existence of equilibrium and a polynomial time algorithm for finding one, drawing heavily on techniques from LP duality and submodular minimization. We observe that in our market model, the set of equilibrium prices could be a connected, non-convex set. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first natural example of the phenomenon where the set of solutions could have such complicated structure, yet there is a combinatorial polynomial time algorithm to find one. Finally, we show that our model inherits many of the fairness properties of traditional equilibrium models. △ Less

Submitted 13 April, 2017; v1 submitted 27 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

An Improved Combinatorial Polynomial Algorithm for the Linear Arrow-Debreu Market

Authors: Rann Duan, Jugal Garg, Kurt Mehlhorn

Abstract: We present an improved combinatorial algorithm for the computation of equilibrium prices in the linear Arrow-Debreu model. For a market with $n$ agents and integral utilities bounded by $U$, the algorithm runs in $O(n^7 \log^3 (nU))$ time. This improves upon the previously best algorithm of Ye by a factor of $\tOmega(n)$. The algorithm refines the algorithm described by Duan and Mehlhorn and impro… ▽ More We present an improved combinatorial algorithm for the computation of equilibrium prices in the linear Arrow-Debreu model. For a market with $n$ agents and integral utilities bounded by $U$, the algorithm runs in $O(n^7 \log^3 (nU))$ time. This improves upon the previously best algorithm of Ye by a factor of $\tOmega(n)$. The algorithm refines the algorithm described by Duan and Mehlhorn and improves it by a factor of $\tOmega(n^3)$. The improvement comes from a better understanding of the iterative price adjustment process, the improved balanced flow computation for nondegenerate instances, and a novel perturbation technique for achieving nondegeneracy. △ Less

Submitted 16 October, 2015; v1 submitted 9 October, 2015; originally announced October 2015.

Comments: to appear in SODA 2016

Ascending-Price Algorithms for Unknown Markets

Authors: Xiaohui Bei, Jugal Garg, Martin Hoefer

Abstract: We design a simple ascending-price algorithm to compute a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate equilibrium in Arrow-Debreu exchange markets with weak gross substitute (WGS) property, which runs in time polynomial in market parameters and $\log 1/\varepsilon$. This is the first polynomial-time algorithm for most of the known tractable classes of Arrow-Debreu markets, which is easy to implement and avoids… ▽ More We design a simple ascending-price algorithm to compute a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate equilibrium in Arrow-Debreu exchange markets with weak gross substitute (WGS) property, which runs in time polynomial in market parameters and $\log 1/\varepsilon$. This is the first polynomial-time algorithm for most of the known tractable classes of Arrow-Debreu markets, which is easy to implement and avoids heavy machinery such as the ellipsoid method. In addition, our algorithm can be applied in unknown market setting without exact knowledge about the number of agents, their individual utilities and endowments. Instead, our algorithm only relies on queries to a global demand oracle by posting prices and receiving aggregate demand for goods as feedback. When demands are real-valued functions of prices, the oracles can only return values of bounded precision based on real utility functions. Due to this more realistic assumption, precision and representation of prices and demands become a major technical challenge, and we develop new tools and insights that may be of independent interest. Furthermore, our approach also gives the first polynomial-time algorithm to compute an exact equilibrium for markets with spending constraint utilities, a piecewise linear concave generalization of linear utilities. This resolves an open problem posed by Duan and Mehlhorn (2015). △ Less

Submitted 28 May, 2016; v1 submitted 17 July, 2015; originally announced July 2015.

Comments: 33 pages

Settling the Complexity of Arrow-Debreu Markets under Leontief and PLC Utilities, using the Classes FIXP and \Exists-R

Authors: Jugal Garg, Ruta Mehta, Vijay V. Vazirani, Sadra Yazdanbod

Abstract: This paper resolves two of the handful of remaining questions on the computability of market equilibria, a central theme within algorithmic game theory (AGT). Our results are as follows: 1. We show FIXP-hardness of computing equilibria in Arrow-Debreu markets under Leontief utility functions, and Arrow-Debreu markets under linear utility functions and Leontief production sets. We note that these… ▽ More This paper resolves two of the handful of remaining questions on the computability of market equilibria, a central theme within algorithmic game theory (AGT). Our results are as follows: 1. We show FIXP-hardness of computing equilibria in Arrow-Debreu markets under Leontief utility functions, and Arrow-Debreu markets under linear utility functions and Leontief production sets. We note that these are the first FIXP-hardness results ever since the introduction of the class FIXP and the hardness of 3-Nash established therein. 2. We note that for the problems stated above, the corresponding results showing membership in FIXP were established after imposing suitable sufficiency conditions to render the problems total, as is customary in economics. However, if all instances are under consideration, then in both cases we prove that the problem of deciding if a given instance admits an equilibrium is \Exists-R-complete, where \Exists-R is the class of decision problems which can be reduced in polynomial time to Existential Theory of the Reals. 3. For Arrow-Debreu markets under Leontief utility functions and a constant number of agents, we give a polynomial-time algorithm for computing an equilibrium. This settles part of an open problem of Devanur and Kannan (FOCS'08). We note that PLC utilities are about the most general utilities of interest in economics and several fundamental utility functions studied within AGT are special cases of it. Several important problems, which have been shown to be in FIXP, are waiting for proofs of FIXP-hardness. In this context, our technique of reducing from 3-Nash to Multivariate Polynomial Equations and then to the problem is likely to be useful in the future. △ Less

Submitted 20 May, 2020; v1 submitted 18 November, 2014; originally announced November 2014.

ACM Class: F.2.0

On Computability of Equilibria in Markets with Production

Authors: Jugal Garg, Vijay V. Vazirani

Abstract: Although production is an integral part of the Arrow-Debreu market model, most of the work in theoretical computer science has so far concentrated on markets without production, i.e., the exchange economy. This paper takes a significant step towards understanding computational aspects of markets with production. We first define the notion of separable, piecewise-linear concave (SPLC) production… ▽ More Although production is an integral part of the Arrow-Debreu market model, most of the work in theoretical computer science has so far concentrated on markets without production, i.e., the exchange economy. This paper takes a significant step towards understanding computational aspects of markets with production. We first define the notion of separable, piecewise-linear concave (SPLC) production by analogy with SPLC utility functions. We then obtain a linear complementarity problem (LCP) formulation that captures exactly the set of equilibria for Arrow-Debreu markets with SPLC utilities and SPLC production, and we give a complementary pivot algorithm for finding an equilibrium. This settles a question asked by Eaves in 1975 of extending his complementary pivot algorithm to markets with production. Since this is a path-following algorithm, we obtain a proof of membership of this problem in PPAD, using Todd, 1976. We also obtain an elementary proof of existence of equilibrium (i.e., without using a fixed point theorem), rationality, and oddness of the number of equilibria. We further give a proof of PPAD-hardness for this problem and also for its restriction to markets with linear utilities and SPLC production. Experiments show that our algorithm runs fast on randomly chosen examples, and unlike previous approaches, it does not suffer from issues of numerical instability. Additionally, it is strongly polynomial when the number of goods or the number of agents and firms is constant. This extends the result of Devanur and Kannan (2008) to markets with production. Finally, we show that an LCP-based approach cannot be extended to PLC (non-separable) production, by constructing an example which has only irrational equilibria. △ Less

Submitted 23 September, 2013; v1 submitted 23 August, 2013; originally announced August 2013.

Comments: An extended abstract will appear in SODA 2014

A Rational Convex Program for Linear Arrow-Debreu Markets

Authors: Nikhil R. Devanur, Jugal Garg, László A. Végh

Abstract: We give a new, flow-type convex program describing equilibrium solutions to linear Arrow-Debreu markets. Whereas convex formulations were previously known [Nenakov, Primak 83; Jain 07; Cornet '89], our program exhibits several new features. It gives a simple necessary and sufficient condition and a concise proof of the existence and rationality of equilibria, settling an open question raised by Va… ▽ More We give a new, flow-type convex program describing equilibrium solutions to linear Arrow-Debreu markets. Whereas convex formulations were previously known [Nenakov, Primak 83; Jain 07; Cornet '89], our program exhibits several new features. It gives a simple necessary and sufficient condition and a concise proof of the existence and rationality of equilibria, settling an open question raised by Vazirani. As a consequence we also obtain a simple new proof of Mertens's result that the equilibrium prices form a convex polyhedral set. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2013; v1 submitted 30 July, 2013; originally announced July 2013.

Bilinear Games: Polynomial Time Algorithms for Rank Based Subclasses

Authors: Jugal Garg, Albert Xin Jiang, Ruta Mehta

Abstract: Motivated by the sequence form formulation of Koller et al. (GEB'96), this paper defines {\em bilinear games}, and proposes efficient algorithms for its rank based subclasses. Bilinear games are two-player non-cooperative single-shot games with compact polytopal strategy sets and two payoff matrices (A,B) such that when (x,y) is the played strategy profile, the payoffs of the players are xAy and x… ▽ More Motivated by the sequence form formulation of Koller et al. (GEB'96), this paper defines {\em bilinear games}, and proposes efficient algorithms for its rank based subclasses. Bilinear games are two-player non-cooperative single-shot games with compact polytopal strategy sets and two payoff matrices (A,B) such that when (x,y) is the played strategy profile, the payoffs of the players are xAy and xBy respectively. We show that bilinear games are very general and capture many interesting classes of games like bimatrix games, two player Bayesian games, polymatrix games, two-player extensive form games with perfect recall etc. as special cases, and hence are hard to solve in general. Existence of a (symmetric) Nash equilibrium for (symmetric) bilinear games follow directly from the known results. For a given bilinear game, we define its {\em Best Response Polytopes} (BRPs) and characterize the set of Nash equilibria as {\em fully-labeled} pairs in the BRPs. We consider a rank based hierarchy of bilinear games, where rank of a game (A,B) is defined as rank(A+B). In this paper, we give polynomial time algorithms to compute Nash equilibrium for special classes of bilinear games: (i) Rank-1 games (i.e., rank(A+B)=1). (ii) FPTAS for constant rank games (i.e., rank(A+B) is constant). (iii) When rank(A) or rank(B) is constant. This improves the results by Lipton et al. (EC'03) and Kannan et al. (ET'09), for bimatrix games with low rank matrices. △ Less

Submitted 28 September, 2011; originally announced September 2011.

Rank-1 Bi-matrix Games: A Homeomorphism and a Polynomial Time Algorithm

Authors: Bharat Adsul, Jugal Garg, Ruta Mehta, Milind Sohoni

Abstract: Given a rank-1 bimatrix game (A,B), i.e., where rank(A+B)=1, we construct a suitable linear subspace of the rank-1 game space and show that this subspace is homeomorphic to its Nash equilibrium correspondence. Using this homeomorphism, we give the first polynomial time algorithm for computing an exact Nash equilibrium of a rank-1 bimatrix game. This settles an open question posed in Kannan and The… ▽ More Given a rank-1 bimatrix game (A,B), i.e., where rank(A+B)=1, we construct a suitable linear subspace of the rank-1 game space and show that this subspace is homeomorphic to its Nash equilibrium correspondence. Using this homeomorphism, we give the first polynomial time algorithm for computing an exact Nash equilibrium of a rank-1 bimatrix game. This settles an open question posed in Kannan and Theobald (SODA 2007) and Theobald (2007). In addition, we give a novel algorithm to enumerate all the Nash equilibria of a rank-1 game and show that a similar technique may also be applied for finding a Nash equilibrium of any bimatrix game. This technique also proves the existence, oddness and the index theorem of Nash equilibria in a bimatrix game. Further, we extend the rank-1 homeomorphism result to a fixed rank game space, and give a fixed point formulation on $[0,1]^k$ for solving a rank-k game. The homeomorphism and the fixed point formulation are piece-wise linear and considerably simpler than the classical constructions. △ Less

Submitted 4 November, 2010; v1 submitted 15 October, 2010; originally announced October 2010.

Nash equilibria in Fisher market

Authors: Bharat Adsul, Ch. Sobhan Babu, Jugal Garg, Ruta Mehta, Milind Sohoni

Abstract: Much work has been done on the computation of market equilibria. However due to strategic play by buyers, it is not clear whether these are actually observed in the market. Motivated by the observation that a buyer may derive a better payoff by feigning a different utility function and thereby manipulating the Fisher market equilibrium, we formulate the {\em Fisher market game} in which buyers str… ▽ More Much work has been done on the computation of market equilibria. However due to strategic play by buyers, it is not clear whether these are actually observed in the market. Motivated by the observation that a buyer may derive a better payoff by feigning a different utility function and thereby manipulating the Fisher market equilibrium, we formulate the {\em Fisher market game} in which buyers strategize by posing different utility functions. We show that existence of a {\em conflict-free allocation} is a necessary condition for the Nash equilibria (NE) and also sufficient for the symmetric NE in this game. There are many NE with very different payoffs, and the Fisher equilibrium payoff is captured at a symmetric NE. We provide a complete polyhedral characterization of all the NE for the two-buyer market game. Surprisingly, all the NE of this game turn out to be symmetric and the corresponding payoffs constitute a piecewise linear concave curve. We also study the correlated equilibria of this game and show that third-party mediation does not help to achieve a better payoff than NE payoffs. △ Less

Submitted 11 May, 2010; v1 submitted 25 February, 2010; originally announced February 2010.