-
Stable Normative Explanations: From Argumentation to Deontic Logic
Authors:
Cecilia Di Florio,
Guido Governatori,
Antonino Rotolo,
Giovanni Sartor
Abstract:
This paper examines how a notion of stable explanation developed elsewhere in Defeasible Logic can be expressed in the context of formal argumentation. With this done, we discuss the deontic meaning of this reconstruction and show how to build from argumentation neighborhood structures for deontic logic where this notion of explanation can be characterised. Some direct complexity results are offer…
▽ More
This paper examines how a notion of stable explanation developed elsewhere in Defeasible Logic can be expressed in the context of formal argumentation. With this done, we discuss the deontic meaning of this reconstruction and show how to build from argumentation neighborhood structures for deontic logic where this notion of explanation can be characterised. Some direct complexity results are offered.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Deontic Meta-Rules
Authors:
Francesco Olivieri,
Guido Governatori,
Matteo Cristani,
Antonino Rotolo,
Abdul Sattar
Abstract:
The use of meta-rules in logic, i.e., rules whose content includes other rules, has recently gained attention in the setting of non-monotonic reasoning: a first logical formalisation and efficient algorithms to compute the (meta)-extensions of such theories were proposed in Olivieri et al (2021) This work extends such a logical framework by considering the deontic aspect. The resulting logic will…
▽ More
The use of meta-rules in logic, i.e., rules whose content includes other rules, has recently gained attention in the setting of non-monotonic reasoning: a first logical formalisation and efficient algorithms to compute the (meta)-extensions of such theories were proposed in Olivieri et al (2021) This work extends such a logical framework by considering the deontic aspect. The resulting logic will not just be able to model policies but also tackle well-known aspects that occur in numerous legal systems. The use of Defeasible Logic (DL) to model meta-rules in the application area we just alluded to has been investigated. Within this line of research, the study mentioned above was not focusing on the general computational properties of meta-rules.
This study fills this gap with two major contributions. First, we introduce and formalise two variants of Defeasible Deontic Logic with Meta-Rules to represent (1) defeasible meta-theories with deontic modalities, and (2) two different types of conflicts among rules: Simple Conflict Defeasible Deontic Logic, and Cautious Conflict Defeasible Deontic Logic. Second, we advance efficient algorithms to compute the extensions for both variants.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Avoiding Pragmatic Oddity: A Bottom-up Defeasible Deontic Logic
Authors:
Guido Governatori,
Silvano Colombo Tosatto,
Antonino Rotolo
Abstract:
This paper presents an extension of Defeasible Deontic Logic to deal with the Pragmatic Oddity problem. The logic applies three general principles: (1) the Pragmatic Oddity problem must be solved within a general logical treatment of CTD reasoning; (2) non-monotonic methods must be adopted to handle CTD reasoning; (3) logical models of CTD reasoning must be computationally feasible and, if possibl…
▽ More
This paper presents an extension of Defeasible Deontic Logic to deal with the Pragmatic Oddity problem. The logic applies three general principles: (1) the Pragmatic Oddity problem must be solved within a general logical treatment of CTD reasoning; (2) non-monotonic methods must be adopted to handle CTD reasoning; (3) logical models of CTD reasoning must be computationally feasible and, if possible, efficient. The proposed extension of Defeasible Deontic Logic elaborates a preliminary version of the model proposed by Governatori and Rotolo (2019). The previous solution was based on particular characteristics of the (constructive, top-down) proof theory of the logic. However, that method introduces some degree of non-determinism. To avoid the problem, we provide a bottom-up characterisation of the logic. The new characterisation offers insights for the efficient implementation of the logic and allows us to establish the computational complexity of the problem.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Semi-automated checking for regulatory compliance in e-Health
Authors:
Ilaria Angela Amantea,
Livio Robaldo,
Emilio Sulis,
Guido Boella,
Guido Governatori
Abstract:
One of the main issues of every business process is to be compliant with legal rules. This work presents a methodology to check in a semi-automated way the regulatory compliance of a business process. We analyse an e-Health hospital service in particular: the Hospital at Home (HaH) service. The paper shows, at first, the analysis of the hospital business using the Business Process Management and N…
▽ More
One of the main issues of every business process is to be compliant with legal rules. This work presents a methodology to check in a semi-automated way the regulatory compliance of a business process. We analyse an e-Health hospital service in particular: the Hospital at Home (HaH) service. The paper shows, at first, the analysis of the hospital business using the Business Process Management and Notation (BPMN) standard language, then, the formalization in Defeasible Deontic Logic (DDL) of some rules of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The aim is to show how to combine a set of tasks of a business with a set of rules to be compliant with, using a tool.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
AI and Ethics -- Operationalising Responsible AI
Authors:
Liming Zhu,
Xiwei Xu,
Qinghua Lu,
Guido Governatori,
Jon Whittle
Abstract:
In the last few years, AI continues demonstrating its positive impact on society while sometimes with ethically questionable consequences. Building and maintaining public trust in AI has been identified as the key to successful and sustainable innovation. This chapter discusses the challenges related to operationalizing ethical AI principles and presents an integrated view that covers high-level e…
▽ More
In the last few years, AI continues demonstrating its positive impact on society while sometimes with ethically questionable consequences. Building and maintaining public trust in AI has been identified as the key to successful and sustainable innovation. This chapter discusses the challenges related to operationalizing ethical AI principles and presents an integrated view that covers high-level ethical AI principles, the general notion of trust/trustworthiness, and product/process support in the context of responsible AI, which helps improve both trust and trustworthiness of AI for a wider set of stakeholders.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Proving Regulatory Compliance: Full Compliance Against an Expressive Unconditional Obligation is coNP-Complete
Authors:
Silvano Colombo Tosatto,
Guido Governatori,
Nick van Beest
Abstract:
Organisations are required to show that their procedures and processes satisfy the relevant regulatory requirements. The computational complexity of proving regulatory compliance is known to be generally hard. However, for some of its simpler variants the computational complexity is still unknown. We focus on the eight variants of the problem that can be identified by the following binary properti…
▽ More
Organisations are required to show that their procedures and processes satisfy the relevant regulatory requirements. The computational complexity of proving regulatory compliance is known to be generally hard. However, for some of its simpler variants the computational complexity is still unknown. We focus on the eight variants of the problem that can be identified by the following binary properties: whether the requirements consists of one or multiple obligations, whether the obligations are conditional or always in force, and whether only propositional literals or formulae can be used to describe the obligations. This paper in particular shows that proving full compliance of a model against a single unconditional obligation whose elements can be described using formulae is coNP-complete. Finally we show how this result allows to fully map the computational complexity of these variants for proving full and non compliance, while for partial compliance the complexity result of one of the variants is still missing.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2022; v1 submitted 12 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Business Process Full Compliance with Respect to a Set of Conditional Obligation in Polynomial Time
Authors:
Silvano Colombo Tosatto,
Guido Governatori,
Nick Van Beest
Abstract:
In this paper, we present a new methodology to evaluate whether a business process model is fully compliant with a regulatory framework composed of a set of conditional obligations. The methodology is based failure delta-constraints that are evaluated on bottom-up aggregations of a tree-like representation of business process models. While the generic problem of proving full compliance is in coNP-…
▽ More
In this paper, we present a new methodology to evaluate whether a business process model is fully compliant with a regulatory framework composed of a set of conditional obligations. The methodology is based failure delta-constraints that are evaluated on bottom-up aggregations of a tree-like representation of business process models. While the generic problem of proving full compliance is in coNP-complete, we show that verifying full compliance can be done in polynomial time using our methodology, for an acyclic structured process model given a regulatory framework composed by a set of conditional obligations, whose elements are restricted to be represented by propositional literals
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Applications of Linear Defeasible Logic: combining resource consumption and exceptions to energy management and business processes
Authors:
Francesco Olivieri,
Guido Governatori,
Claudio Tomazzoli,
Matteo Cristani
Abstract:
Linear Logic and Defeasible Logic have been adopted to formalise different features of knowledge representation: consumption of resources, and non monotonic reasoning in particular to represent exceptions. Recently, a framework to combine sub-structural features, corresponding to the consumption of resources, with defeasibility aspects to handle potentially conflicting information, has been discu…
▽ More
Linear Logic and Defeasible Logic have been adopted to formalise different features of knowledge representation: consumption of resources, and non monotonic reasoning in particular to represent exceptions. Recently, a framework to combine sub-structural features, corresponding to the consumption of resources, with defeasibility aspects to handle potentially conflicting information, has been discussed in literature, by some of the authors. Two applications emerged that are very relevant: energy management and business process management. We illustrate a set of guide lines to determine how to apply linear defeasible logic to those contexts.
△ Less
Submitted 13 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Is Free Choice Permission Admissible in Classical Deontic Logic?
Authors:
Guido Governatori,
Antonino Rotolo
Abstract:
In this paper, we explore how, and if, free choice permission (FCP) can be accepted when we consider deontic conflicts between certain types of permissions and obligations. As is well known, FCP can license, under some minimal conditions, the derivation of an indefinite number of permissions. We discuss this and other drawbacks and present six Hilbert-style classical deontic systems admitting a gu…
▽ More
In this paper, we explore how, and if, free choice permission (FCP) can be accepted when we consider deontic conflicts between certain types of permissions and obligations. As is well known, FCP can license, under some minimal conditions, the derivation of an indefinite number of permissions. We discuss this and other drawbacks and present six Hilbert-style classical deontic systems admitting a guarded version of FCP. The systems that we present are not too weak from the inferential viewpoint, as far as permission is concerned, and do not commit to weakening any specific logic for obligations.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2019; v1 submitted 19 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Resource-driven Substructural Defeasible Logic
Authors:
Francesco Olivieri,
Guido Governatori,
Matteo Cristani,
Nick van Beest,
Silvano Colombo-Tosatto
Abstract:
Linear Logic and Defeasible Logic have been adopted to formalise different features relevant to agents: consumption of resources, and reasoning with exceptions. We propose a framework to combine sub-structural features, corresponding to the consumption of resources, with defeasibility aspects, and we discuss the design choices for the framework.
Linear Logic and Defeasible Logic have been adopted to formalise different features relevant to agents: consumption of resources, and reasoning with exceptions. We propose a framework to combine sub-structural features, corresponding to the consumption of resources, with defeasibility aspects, and we discuss the design choices for the framework.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
A Labelling Framework for Probabilistic Argumentation
Authors:
Regis Riveret,
Pietro Baroni,
Yang Gao,
Guido Governatori,
Antonino Rotolo,
Giovanni Sartor
Abstract:
The combination of argumentation and probability paves the way to new accounts of qualitative and quantitative uncertainty, thereby offering new theoretical and applicative opportunities. Due to a variety of interests, probabilistic argumentation is approached in the literature with different frameworks, pertaining to structured and abstract argumentation, and with respect to diverse types of unce…
▽ More
The combination of argumentation and probability paves the way to new accounts of qualitative and quantitative uncertainty, thereby offering new theoretical and applicative opportunities. Due to a variety of interests, probabilistic argumentation is approached in the literature with different frameworks, pertaining to structured and abstract argumentation, and with respect to diverse types of uncertainty, in particular the uncertainty on the credibility of the premises, the uncertainty about which arguments to consider, and the uncertainty on the acceptance status of arguments or statements. Towards a general framework for probabilistic argumentation, we investigate a labelling-oriented framework encompassing a basic setting for rule-based argumentation and its (semi-) abstract account, along with diverse types of uncertainty. Our framework provides a systematic treatment of various kinds of uncertainty and of their relationships and allows us to back or question assertions from the literature.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2018; v1 submitted 31 July, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Annotated Defeasible Logic
Authors:
Guido Governatori,
Michael J. Maher
Abstract:
Defeasible logics provide several linguistic features to support the expression of defeasible knowledge. There is also a wide variety of such logics, expressing different intuitions about defeasible reasoning. However, the logics can only combine in trivial ways. This limits their usefulness in contexts where different intuitions are at play in different aspects of a problem. In particular, in som…
▽ More
Defeasible logics provide several linguistic features to support the expression of defeasible knowledge. There is also a wide variety of such logics, expressing different intuitions about defeasible reasoning. However, the logics can only combine in trivial ways. This limits their usefulness in contexts where different intuitions are at play in different aspects of a problem. In particular, in some legal settings, different actors have different burdens of proof, which might be expressed as reasoning in different defeasible logics.
In this paper, we introduce annotated defeasible logic as a flexible formalism permitting multiple forms of defeasibility, and establish some properties of the formalism.
This paper is under consideration for acceptance in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities
Authors:
Jan Mendling,
Ingo Weber,
Wil van der Aalst,
Jan vom Brocke,
Cristina Cabanillas,
Florian Daniel,
Soren Debois,
Claudio Di Ciccio,
Marlon Dumas,
Schahram Dustdar,
Avigdor Gal,
Luciano Garcia-Banuelos,
Guido Governatori,
Richard Hull,
Marcello La Rosa,
Henrik Leopold,
Frank Leymann,
Jan Recker,
Manfred Reichert,
Hajo A. Reijers,
Stefanie Rinderle-Ma,
Andreas Rogge-Solti,
Michael Rosemann,
Stefan Schulte,
Munindar P. Singh
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Blockchain technology promises a sizable potential for executing inter-organizational business processes without requiring a central party serving as a single point of trust (and failure). This paper analyzes its impact on business process management (BPM). We structure the discussion using two BPM frameworks, namely the six BPM core capabilities and the BPM lifecycle. This paper provides research…
▽ More
Blockchain technology promises a sizable potential for executing inter-organizational business processes without requiring a central party serving as a single point of trust (and failure). This paper analyzes its impact on business process management (BPM). We structure the discussion using two BPM frameworks, namely the six BPM core capabilities and the BPM lifecycle. This paper provides research directions for investigating the application of blockchain technology to BPM.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2018; v1 submitted 11 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
-
The Rationale behind the Concept of Goal
Authors:
Guido Governatori,
Francesco Olivieri,
Simone Scannapieco,
Antonino Rotolo,
Matteo Cristani
Abstract:
The paper proposes a fresh look at the concept of goal and advances that motivational attitudes like desire, goal and intention are just facets of the broader notion of (acceptable) outcome. We propose to encode the preferences of an agent as sequences of "alternative acceptable outcomes". We then study how the agent's beliefs and norms can be used to filter the mental attitudes out of the sequenc…
▽ More
The paper proposes a fresh look at the concept of goal and advances that motivational attitudes like desire, goal and intention are just facets of the broader notion of (acceptable) outcome. We propose to encode the preferences of an agent as sequences of "alternative acceptable outcomes". We then study how the agent's beliefs and norms can be used to filter the mental attitudes out of the sequences of alternative acceptable outcomes. Finally, we formalise such intuitions in a novel Modal Defeasible Logic and we prove that the resulting formalisation is computationally feasible.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
-
Thou Shalt is not You Will
Authors:
Guido Governatori
Abstract:
In this paper we discuss some reasons why temporal logic might not be suitable to model real life norms. To show this, we present a novel deontic logic contrary-to-duty/derived permission paradox based on the interaction of obligations, permissions and contrary-to-duty obligations. The paradox is inspired by real life norms.
In this paper we discuss some reasons why temporal logic might not be suitable to model real life norms. To show this, we present a novel deontic logic contrary-to-duty/derived permission paradox based on the interaction of obligations, permissions and contrary-to-duty obligations. The paradox is inspired by real life norms.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2015; v1 submitted 7 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
-
ICT Support for Regulatory Compliance of Business Processes
Authors:
Guido Governatori
Abstract:
In this paper we propose an ITC (Information and Communication Technology) approach to support regulatory compliance for business processes, and we report on the development and evaluation of a business process compliance checker called Regorous, based on the compliance-by-design methodology proposed by Governatori and Sadiq
In this paper we propose an ITC (Information and Communication Technology) approach to support regulatory compliance for business processes, and we report on the development and evaluation of a business process compliance checker called Regorous, based on the compliance-by-design methodology proposed by Governatori and Sadiq
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Strategic Argumentation is NP-Complete
Authors:
Guido Governatori,
Francesco Olivieri,
Simone Scannapieco,
Antonino Rotolo,
Matteo Cristani
Abstract:
In this paper we study the complexity of strategic argumentation for dialogue games. A dialogue game is a 2-player game where the parties play arguments. We show how to model dialogue games in a skeptical, non-monotonic formalism, and we show that the problem of deciding what move (set of rules) to play at each turn is an NP-complete problem.
In this paper we study the complexity of strategic argumentation for dialogue games. A dialogue game is a 2-player game where the parties play arguments. We show how to model dialogue games in a skeptical, non-monotonic formalism, and we show that the problem of deciding what move (set of rules) to play at each turn is an NP-complete problem.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
Computing Strong and Weak Permissions in Defeasible Logic
Authors:
Guido Governatori,
Francesco Olivieri,
Antonino Rotolo,
Simone Scannapieco
Abstract:
In this paper we propose an extension of Defeasible Logic to represent and compute three concepts of defeasible permission. In particular, we discuss different types of explicit permissive norms that work as exceptions to opposite obligations. Moreover, we show how strong permissions can be represented both with, and without introducing a new consequence relation for inferring conclusions from exp…
▽ More
In this paper we propose an extension of Defeasible Logic to represent and compute three concepts of defeasible permission. In particular, we discuss different types of explicit permissive norms that work as exceptions to opposite obligations. Moreover, we show how strong permissions can be represented both with, and without introducing a new consequence relation for inferring conclusions from explicit permissive norms. Finally, we illustrate how a preference operator applicable to contrary-to-duty obligations can be combined with a new operator representing ordered sequences of strong permissions which derogate from prohibitions. The logical system is studied from a computational standpoint and is shown to have liner computational complexity.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2012;
originally announced December 2012.
-
Revision of Defeasible Logic Preferences
Authors:
Guido Governatori,
Francesco Olivieri,
Simone Scannapieco,
Matteo Cristani
Abstract:
There are several contexts of non-monotonic reasoning where a priority between rules is established whose purpose is preventing conflicts.
One formalism that has been widely employed for non-monotonic reasoning is the sceptical one known as Defeasible Logic. In Defeasible Logic the tool used for conflict resolution is a preference relation between rules, that establishes the priority among them.…
▽ More
There are several contexts of non-monotonic reasoning where a priority between rules is established whose purpose is preventing conflicts.
One formalism that has been widely employed for non-monotonic reasoning is the sceptical one known as Defeasible Logic. In Defeasible Logic the tool used for conflict resolution is a preference relation between rules, that establishes the priority among them.
In this paper we investigate how to modify such a preference relation in a defeasible logic theory in order to change the conclusions of the theory itself. We argue that the approach we adopt is applicable to legal reasoning where users, in general, cannot change facts or rules, but can propose their preferences about the relative strength of the rules.
We provide a comprehensive study of the possible combinatorial cases and we identify and analyse the cases where the revision process is successful.
After this analysis, we identify three revision/update operators and study them against the AGM postulates for belief revision operators, to discover that only a part of these postulates are satisfied by the three operators.
△ Less
Submitted 23 November, 2012; v1 submitted 25 June, 2012;
originally announced June 2012.
-
Embedding Defeasible Logic into Logic Programming
Authors:
Grigoris Antoniou,
David Billington,
Guido Governatori,
Michael J. Maher
Abstract:
Defeasible reasoning is a simple but efficient approach to nonmonotonic reasoning that has recently attracted considerable interest and that has found various applications. Defeasible logic and its variants are an important family of defeasible reasoning methods. So far no relationship has been established between defeasible logic and mainstream nonmonotonic reasoning approaches.
In this paper…
▽ More
Defeasible reasoning is a simple but efficient approach to nonmonotonic reasoning that has recently attracted considerable interest and that has found various applications. Defeasible logic and its variants are an important family of defeasible reasoning methods. So far no relationship has been established between defeasible logic and mainstream nonmonotonic reasoning approaches.
In this paper we establish close links to known semantics of logic programs. In particular, we give a translation of a defeasible theory D into a meta-program P(D). We show that under a condition of decisiveness, the defeasible consequences of D correspond exactly to the sceptical conclusions of P(D) under the stable model semantics. Without decisiveness, the result holds only in one direction (all defeasible consequences of D are included in all stable models of P(D)). If we wish a complete embedding for the general case, we need to use the Kunen semantics of P(D), instead.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2005;
originally announced November 2005.
-
Representation results for defeasible logic
Authors:
G. Antoniou,
D. Billington,
G. Governatori,
M. J. Maher
Abstract:
The importance of transformations and normal forms in logic programming, and generally in computer science, is well documented. This paper investigates transformations and normal forms in the context of Defeasible Logic, a simple but efficient formalism for nonmonotonic reasoning based on rules and priorities. The transformations described in this paper have two main benefits: on one hand they c…
▽ More
The importance of transformations and normal forms in logic programming, and generally in computer science, is well documented. This paper investigates transformations and normal forms in the context of Defeasible Logic, a simple but efficient formalism for nonmonotonic reasoning based on rules and priorities. The transformations described in this paper have two main benefits: on one hand they can be used as a theoretical tool that leads to a deeper understanding of the formalism, and on the other hand they have been used in the development of an efficient implementation of defeasible logic.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2000;
originally announced March 2000.
-
A tableau methodology for deontic conditional logics
Authors:
Alberto Artosi,
Guido Governatori
Abstract:
In this paper we present a theorem proving methodology for a restricted but significant fragment of the conditional language made up of (boolean combinations of) conditional statements with unnested antecedents. The method is based on the possible world semantics for conditional logics. The KEM label formalism, designed to account for the semantics of normal modal logics, is easily adapted to th…
▽ More
In this paper we present a theorem proving methodology for a restricted but significant fragment of the conditional language made up of (boolean combinations of) conditional statements with unnested antecedents. The method is based on the possible world semantics for conditional logics. The KEM label formalism, designed to account for the semantics of normal modal logics, is easily adapted to the semantics of conditional logics by simply indexing labels with formulas. The inference rules are provided by the propositional system KE+ - a tableau-like analytic proof system devised to be used both as a refutation and a direct method of proof - enlarged with suitable elimination rules for the conditional connective. The theorem proving methodology we are going to present can be viewed as a first step towards developing an appropriate algorithmic framework for several conditional logics for (defeasible) conditional obligation.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2000;
originally announced March 2000.
-
A flexible framework for defeasible logics
Authors:
G. Antoniou,
D. Billigton,
G. Governatori,
M. J. Maher
Abstract:
Logics for knowledge representation suffer from over-specialization: while each logic may provide an ideal representation formalism for some problems, it is less than optimal for others. A solution to this problem is to choose from several logics and, when necessary, combine the representations. In general, such an approach results in a very difficult problem of combination. However, if we can c…
▽ More
Logics for knowledge representation suffer from over-specialization: while each logic may provide an ideal representation formalism for some problems, it is less than optimal for others. A solution to this problem is to choose from several logics and, when necessary, combine the representations. In general, such an approach results in a very difficult problem of combination. However, if we can choose the logics from a uniform framework then the problem of combining them is greatly simplified. In this paper, we develop such a framework for defeasible logics. It supports all defeasible logics that satisfy a strong negation principle. We use logic meta-programs as the basis for the framework.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2000;
originally announced March 2000.
