Using channel correlation to improve decoding -- ORBGRAND-AI
Authors:
Ken R. Duffy,
Moritz Grundei,
Muriel Medard
Abstract:
To meet the Ultra Reliable Low Latency Communication (URLLC) needs of modern applications, there have been significant advances in the development of short error correction codes and corresponding soft detection decoders. A substantial hindrance to delivering low-latency is, however, the reliance on interleaving to break up omnipresent channel correlations to ensure that decoder input matches deco…
▽ More
To meet the Ultra Reliable Low Latency Communication (URLLC) needs of modern applications, there have been significant advances in the development of short error correction codes and corresponding soft detection decoders. A substantial hindrance to delivering low-latency is, however, the reliance on interleaving to break up omnipresent channel correlations to ensure that decoder input matches decoder assumptions. Consequently, even when using short codes, the need to wait to interleave data at the sender and de-interleave at the receiver results in significant latency that acts contrary to the goals of URLLC. Moreover, interleaving reduces channel capacity, so that potential decoding performance is degraded.
Here we introduce a variant of Ordered Reliability Bits Guessing Random Additive Noise Decoding (ORBGRAND), which we call ORBGRAND-Approximate Independence (ORBGRAND-AI), a soft-detection decoder that can decode any moderate redundancy code and overcomes the limitation of existing decoding paradigms by leveraging channel correlations and circumventing the need for interleaving. By leveraging correlation, not only is latency reduced, but error correction performance can be enhanced by multiple dB, while decoding complexity is also reduced, offering one potential solution for the provision of URLLC.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
Evaluation of a Gaussian Mixture Model-based Channel Estimator using Measurement Data
Authors:
Nurettin Turan,
Benedikt Fesl,
Moritz Grundei,
Michael Koller,
Wolfgang Utschick
Abstract:
In this work, we use real-world data in order to evaluate and validate a machine learning (ML)-based algorithm for physical layer functionalities. Specifically, we apply a recently introduced Gaussian mixture model (GMM)-based algorithm in order to estimate uplink channels stemming from a measurement campaign. For this estimator, there is an initial (offline) training phase, where a GMM is fitted…
▽ More
In this work, we use real-world data in order to evaluate and validate a machine learning (ML)-based algorithm for physical layer functionalities. Specifically, we apply a recently introduced Gaussian mixture model (GMM)-based algorithm in order to estimate uplink channels stemming from a measurement campaign. For this estimator, there is an initial (offline) training phase, where a GMM is fitted onto given channel (training) data. Thereafter, the fitted GMM is used for (online) channel estimation. Our experiments suggest that the GMM estimator learns the intrinsic characteristics of a given base station's whole radio propagation environment. Essentially, this ambient information is captured due to universal approximation properties of the initially fitted GMM. For a large enough number of GMM components, the GMM estimator was shown to approximate the (unknown) mean squared error (MSE)-optimal channel estimator arbitrarily well. In our experiments, the GMM estimator shows significant performance gains compared to approaches that are not able to capture the ambient information. To validate the claim that ambient information is learnt, we generate synthetic channel data using a state-of-the-art channel simulator and train the GMM estimator once on these and once on the real data, and we apply the estimator once to the synthetic and once to the real data. We then observe how providing suitable ambient information in the training phase beneficially impacts the later channel estimation performance.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.