-
Artificial Intelligence in Everyday Life 2.0: Educating University Students from Different Majors
Authors:
Maria Kasinidou,
Styliani Kleanthous,
Matteo Busso,
Marcelo Rodas,
Jahna Otterbacher,
Fausto Giunchiglia
Abstract:
With the surge in data-centric AI and its increasing capabilities, AI applications have become a part of our everyday lives. However, misunderstandings regarding their capabilities, limitations, and associated advantages and disadvantages are widespread. Consequently, in the university setting, there is a crucial need to educate not only computer science majors but also students from various disci…
▽ More
With the surge in data-centric AI and its increasing capabilities, AI applications have become a part of our everyday lives. However, misunderstandings regarding their capabilities, limitations, and associated advantages and disadvantages are widespread. Consequently, in the university setting, there is a crucial need to educate not only computer science majors but also students from various disciplines about AI. In this experience report, we present an overview of an introductory course that we offered to students coming from different majors. Moreover, we discuss the assignments and quizzes of the course, which provided students with a firsthand experience of AI processes and insights into their learning patterns. Additionally, we provide a summary of the course evaluation, as well as students' performance. Finally, we present insights gained from teaching this course and elaborate on our future plans.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Towards Algorithmic Transparency: A Diversity Perspective
Authors:
Fausto Giunchiglia,
Jahna Otterbacher,
Styliani Kleanthous,
Khuyagbaatar Batsuren,
Veronika Bogin,
Tsvi Kuflik,
Avital Shulner Tal
Abstract:
As the role of algorithmic systems and processes increases in society, so does the risk of bias, which can result in discrimination against individuals and social groups. Research on algorithmic bias has exploded in recent years, highlighting both the problems of bias, and the potential solutions, in terms of algorithmic transparency (AT). Transparency is important for facilitating fairness manage…
▽ More
As the role of algorithmic systems and processes increases in society, so does the risk of bias, which can result in discrimination against individuals and social groups. Research on algorithmic bias has exploded in recent years, highlighting both the problems of bias, and the potential solutions, in terms of algorithmic transparency (AT). Transparency is important for facilitating fairness management as well as explainability in algorithms; however, the concept of diversity, and its relationship to bias and transparency, has been largely left out of the discussion. We reflect on the relationship between diversity and bias, arguing that diversity drives the need for transparency. Using a perspective-taking lens, which takes diversity as a given, we propose a conceptual framework to characterize the problem and solution spaces of AT, to aid its application in algorithmic systems. Example cases from three research domains are described using our framework.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Systems -- A Fish-Eye View
Authors:
Kalia Orphanou,
Jahna Otterbacher,
Styliani Kleanthous,
Khuyagbaatar Batsuren,
Fausto Giunchiglia,
Veronika Bogina,
Avital Shulner Tal,
AlanHartman,
Tsvi Kuflik
Abstract:
Mitigating bias in algorithmic systems is a critical issue drawing attention across communities within the information and computer sciences. Given the complexity of the problem and the involvement of multiple stakeholders -- including developers, end-users, and third parties -- there is a need to understand the landscape of the sources of bias, and the solutions being proposed to address them, fr…
▽ More
Mitigating bias in algorithmic systems is a critical issue drawing attention across communities within the information and computer sciences. Given the complexity of the problem and the involvement of multiple stakeholders -- including developers, end-users, and third parties -- there is a need to understand the landscape of the sources of bias, and the solutions being proposed to address them, from a broad, cross-domain perspective. This survey provides a "fish-eye view," examining approaches across four areas of research. The literature describes three steps toward a comprehensive treatment -- bias detection, fairness management and explainability management -- and underscores the need to work from within the system as well as from the perspective of stakeholders in the broader context.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2022; v1 submitted 31 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
