-
Machine-Checked Categorical Diagrammatic Reasoning
Authors:
Benoît Guillemet,
Assia Mahboubi,
Matthieu Piquerez
Abstract:
This paper describes a formal proof library, developed using the Coq proof assistant, designed to assist users in writing correct diagrammatic proofs, for 1-categories. This library proposes a deep-embedded, domain-specific formal language, which features dedicated proof commands to automate the synthesis, and the verification, of the technical parts often eluded in the literature.
This paper describes a formal proof library, developed using the Coq proof assistant, designed to assist users in writing correct diagrammatic proofs, for 1-categories. This library proposes a deep-embedded, domain-specific formal language, which features dedicated proof commands to automate the synthesis, and the verification, of the technical parts often eluded in the literature.
△ Less
Submitted 29 February, 2024; v1 submitted 22 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Malicious Package Detection using Metadata Information
Authors:
S. Halder,
M. Bewong,
A. Mahboubi,
Y. Jiang,
R. Islam,
Z. Islam,
R. Ip,
E. Ahmed,
G. Ramachandran,
A. Babar
Abstract:
Protecting software supply chains from malicious packages is paramount in the evolving landscape of software development. Attacks on the software supply chain involve attackers injecting harmful software into commonly used packages or libraries in a software repository. For instance, JavaScript uses Node Package Manager (NPM), and Python uses Python Package Index (PyPi) as their respective package…
▽ More
Protecting software supply chains from malicious packages is paramount in the evolving landscape of software development. Attacks on the software supply chain involve attackers injecting harmful software into commonly used packages or libraries in a software repository. For instance, JavaScript uses Node Package Manager (NPM), and Python uses Python Package Index (PyPi) as their respective package repositories. In the past, NPM has had vulnerabilities such as the event-stream incident, where a malicious package was introduced into a popular NPM package, potentially impacting a wide range of projects. As the integration of third-party packages becomes increasingly ubiquitous in modern software development, accelerating the creation and deployment of applications, the need for a robust detection mechanism has become critical. On the other hand, due to the sheer volume of new packages being released daily, the task of identifying malicious packages presents a significant challenge. To address this issue, in this paper, we introduce a metadata-based malicious package detection model, MeMPtec. This model extracts a set of features from package metadata information. These extracted features are classified as either easy-to-manipulate (ETM) or difficult-to-manipulate (DTM) features based on monotonicity and restricted control properties. By utilising these metadata features, not only do we improve the effectiveness of detecting malicious packages, but also we demonstrate its resistance to adversarial attacks in comparison with existing state-of-the-art. Our experiments indicate a significant reduction in both false positives (up to 97.56%) and false negatives (up to 91.86%).
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
A First Order Theory of Diagram Chasing
Authors:
Assia Mahboubi,
Matthieu Piquerez
Abstract:
This paper discusses the formalization of proofs "by diagram chasing", a standard technique for proving properties in abelian categories. We discuss how the essence of diagram chases can be captured by a simple many-sorted first-order theory, and we study the models and decidability of this theory. The longer-term motivation of this work is the design of a computer-aided instrument for writing rel…
▽ More
This paper discusses the formalization of proofs "by diagram chasing", a standard technique for proving properties in abelian categories. We discuss how the essence of diagram chases can be captured by a simple many-sorted first-order theory, and we study the models and decidability of this theory. The longer-term motivation of this work is the design of a computer-aided instrument for writing reliable proofs in homological algebra, based on interactive theorem provers.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2023; v1 submitted 3 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Trocq: Proof Transfer for Free, With or Without Univalence
Authors:
Cyril Cohen,
Enzo Crance,
Assia Mahboubi
Abstract:
Libraries of formalized mathematics use a possibly broad range of different representations for a same mathematical concept. Yet light to major manual input from users remains most often required for obtaining the corresponding variants of theorems, when such obvious replacements are typically left implicit on paper. This article presents Trocq, a new proof transfer framework for dependent type th…
▽ More
Libraries of formalized mathematics use a possibly broad range of different representations for a same mathematical concept. Yet light to major manual input from users remains most often required for obtaining the corresponding variants of theorems, when such obvious replacements are typically left implicit on paper. This article presents Trocq, a new proof transfer framework for dependent type theory. Trocq is based on a novel formulation of type equivalence, used to generalize the univalent parametricity translation. This framework takes care of avoiding dependency on the axiom of univalence when possible, and may be used with more relations than just equivalences. We have implemented a corresponding plugin for the Coq proof assistant, in the CoqElpi meta-language. We use this plugin on a gallery of representative examples of proof transfer issues in interactive theorem proving, and illustrate how Trocq covers the spectrum of several existing tools, used in program verification as well as in formalized mathematics in the broad sense.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2024; v1 submitted 21 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Compression Optimality of Asymmetric Numeral Systems
Authors:
Josef Pieprzyk,
Jarek Duda,
Marcin Pawlowski,
Seyit Camtepe,
Arash Mahboubi,
Pawel Morawiecki
Abstract:
Compression also known as entropy coding has a rich and long history. However, a recent explosion of multimedia Internet applications (such as teleconferencing and video streaming for instance) renews an interest in fast compression that also squeezes out as much redundancy as possible. In 2009 Jarek Duda invented his asymmetric numeral system (ANS). Apart from a beautiful mathematical structure,…
▽ More
Compression also known as entropy coding has a rich and long history. However, a recent explosion of multimedia Internet applications (such as teleconferencing and video streaming for instance) renews an interest in fast compression that also squeezes out as much redundancy as possible. In 2009 Jarek Duda invented his asymmetric numeral system (ANS). Apart from a beautiful mathematical structure, it is very efficient and offers compression with a very low residual redundancy. ANS works well for any symbol source statistics. Besides, ANS has become a preferred compression algorithm in the IT industry. However, designing ANS instance requires a random selection of its symbol spread function. Consequently, each ANS instance offers compression with a slightly different compression rate.
The paper investigates compression optimality of ANS. It shows that ANS is optimal (i.e. the entropies of encoding and source are equal) for any symbol sources whose probability distribution is described by natural powers of 1/2. We use Markov chains to calculate ANS state probabilities. This allows us to determine ANS compression rate precisely. We present two algorithms for finding ANS instances with high compression rates. The first explores state probability approximations in order to choose ANS instances with better compression rates. The second algorithm is a probabilistic one. It finds ANS instances, whose compression rate can be made as close to the best rate as required. This is done at the expense of the number $θ$ of internal random ``coin'' tosses. The algorithm complexity is ${\cal O}(θL^3)$, where $L$ is the number of ANS states. The complexity can be reduced to ${\cal O}(θL\log{L})$ if we use a fast matrix inversion. If the algorithm is implemented on quantum computer, its complexity becomes ${\cal O}(θ(\log{L})^3)$.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Compositional pre-processing for automated reasoning in dependent type theory
Authors:
Valentin Blot,
Denis Cousineau,
Enzo Crance,
Louise Dubois de Prisque,
Chantal Keller,
Assia Mahboubi,
Pierre Vial
Abstract:
In the context of interactive theorem provers based on a dependent type theory, automation tactics (dedicated decision procedures, call of automated solvers, ...) are often limited to goals which are exactly in some expected logical fragment. This very often prevents users from applying these tactics in other contexts, even similar ones.
This paper discusses the design and the implementation of…
▽ More
In the context of interactive theorem provers based on a dependent type theory, automation tactics (dedicated decision procedures, call of automated solvers, ...) are often limited to goals which are exactly in some expected logical fragment. This very often prevents users from applying these tactics in other contexts, even similar ones.
This paper discusses the design and the implementation of pre-processing operations for automating formal proofs in the Coq proof assistant. It presents the implementation of a wide variety of predictible, atomic goal transformations, which can be composed in various ways to target different backends. A gallery of examples illustrates how it helps to expand significantly the power of automation engines.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2024; v1 submitted 6 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
A Formal Proof of the Irrationality of $ζ(3)$
Authors:
Assia Mahboubi,
Thomas Sibut-Pinote
Abstract:
This paper presents a complete formal verification of a proof that the evaluation of the Riemann zeta function at 3 is irrational, using the Coq proof assistant. This result was first presented by Apéry in 1978, and the proof we have formalized essentially follows the path of his original presentation. The crux of this proof is to establish that some sequences satisfy a common recurrence. We forma…
▽ More
This paper presents a complete formal verification of a proof that the evaluation of the Riemann zeta function at 3 is irrational, using the Coq proof assistant. This result was first presented by Apéry in 1978, and the proof we have formalized essentially follows the path of his original presentation. The crux of this proof is to establish that some sequences satisfy a common recurrence. We formally prove this result by an a posteriori verification of calculations performed by computer algebra algorithms in a Maple session. The rest of the proof combines arithmetical ingredients and asymptotic analysis, which we conduct by extending the Mathematical Components libraries.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2021; v1 submitted 13 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Axiomatic constraint systems for proof search modulo theories
Authors:
Damien Rouhling,
Mahfuza Farooque,
Stéphane Graham-Lengrand,
Assia Mahboubi,
Jean-Marc Notin
Abstract:
Goal-directed proof search in first-order logic uses meta-variables to delay the choice of witnesses; substitutions for such variables are produced when closing proof-tree branches, using first-order unification or a theory-specific background reasoner. This paper investigates a generalisation of such mechanisms whereby theory-specific constraints are produced instead of substitutions. In order to…
▽ More
Goal-directed proof search in first-order logic uses meta-variables to delay the choice of witnesses; substitutions for such variables are produced when closing proof-tree branches, using first-order unification or a theory-specific background reasoner. This paper investigates a generalisation of such mechanisms whereby theory-specific constraints are produced instead of substitutions. In order to design modular proof-search procedures over such mechanisms, we provide a sequent calculus with meta-variables, which manipulates such constraints abstractly. Proving soundness and completeness of the calculus leads to an axiomatisation that identifies the conditions under which abstract constraints can be generated and propagated in the same way unifiers usually are. We then extract from our abstract framework a component interface and a specification for concrete implementations of background reasoners.
△ Less
Submitted 3 September, 2015; v1 submitted 21 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
Two simulations about DPLL(T)
Authors:
Mahfuza Farooque,
Stéphane Lengrand,
Assia Mahboubi
Abstract:
In this paper we relate different formulations of the DPLL(T) procedure. The first formulation is based on a system of rewrite rules, which we denote DPLL(T). The second formulation is an inference system of, which we denote LKDPLL(T). The third formulation is the application of a standard proof-search mechanism in a sequent calculus LKp(T) introduced here. We formalise an encoding from DPLL(T) to…
▽ More
In this paper we relate different formulations of the DPLL(T) procedure. The first formulation is based on a system of rewrite rules, which we denote DPLL(T). The second formulation is an inference system of, which we denote LKDPLL(T). The third formulation is the application of a standard proof-search mechanism in a sequent calculus LKp(T) introduced here. We formalise an encoding from DPLL(T) to LKDPLL(T) that was, to our knowledge, never explicitly given and, in the case where DPLL(T) is extended with backjumping and Lemma learning, never even implicitly given. We also formalise an encoding from LKDPLL(T) to LKp(T), building on Ivan Gazeau's previous work: we extend his work in that we handle the "-modulo-Theory" aspect of SAT-modulo-theory, by extending the sequent calculus to allow calls to a theory solver (seen as a blackbox). We also extend his work in that we handle advanced features of DPLL such as backjumping and Lemma learning, etc. Finally, we re fine the approach by starting to formalise quantitative aspects of the simulations: the complexity is preserved (number of steps to build complete proofs). Other aspects remain to be formalised (non-determinism of the search / width of search space).
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2012;
originally announced April 2012.
-
Formal proofs in real algebraic geometry: from ordered fields to quantifier elimination
Authors:
Assia Mahboubi,
Cyril Cohen
Abstract:
This paper describes a formalization of discrete real closed fields in the Coq proof assistant. This abstract structure captures for instance the theory of real algebraic numbers, a decidable subset of real numbers with good algorithmic properties. The theory of real algebraic numbers and more generally of semi-algebraic varieties is at the core of a number of effective methods in real analysis,…
▽ More
This paper describes a formalization of discrete real closed fields in the Coq proof assistant. This abstract structure captures for instance the theory of real algebraic numbers, a decidable subset of real numbers with good algorithmic properties. The theory of real algebraic numbers and more generally of semi-algebraic varieties is at the core of a number of effective methods in real analysis, including decision procedures for non linear arithmetic or optimization methods for real valued functions. After defining an abstract structure of discrete real closed field and the elementary theory of real roots of polynomials, we describe the formalization of an algebraic proof of quantifier elimination based on pseudo-remainder sequences following the standard computer algebra literature on the topic. This formalization covers a large part of the theory which underlies the efficient algorithms implemented in practice in computer algebra. The success of this work paves the way for formal certification of these efficient methods.
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2012; v1 submitted 18 January, 2012;
originally announced January 2012.
