-
Anatomy of Elite and Mass Polarization in Social Networks
Authors:
Ali Salloum,
Ted Hsuan Yun Chen,
Mikko Kivelä
Abstract:
Existing methods for quantifying polarization in social networks typically report a single value describing the amount of polarization in a social system. While this approach can be used to confirm the observation that many societies have witnessed an increase in political polarization in recent years, it misses the complexities that could be used to understand the reasons behind this phenomenon.…
▽ More
Existing methods for quantifying polarization in social networks typically report a single value describing the amount of polarization in a social system. While this approach can be used to confirm the observation that many societies have witnessed an increase in political polarization in recent years, it misses the complexities that could be used to understand the reasons behind this phenomenon. Notably, opposing groups can have unequal impact on polarization, and the elites are often understood to be more divided than the masses, making it critical to differentiate their roles in polarized systems. We propose a method to characterize these distinct hierarchies in polarized networks, enabling separate polarization measurements for these groups within a single social system. Applied to polarized topics in the Finnish Twittersphere surrounding the 2019 and 2023 parliamentary elections, our analysis reveals valuable insights: 1) The impact of opposing groups on observed polarization is rarely balanced, and 2) while the elite strongly contributes to structural polarization and consistently display greater alignment across various topics, the masses have also recently experienced a surge in issue alignment, a special form of polarization. Our findings suggest that the masses may not be as immune to an increasingly polarized environment as previously thought.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
The empirical study of e-learning post-acceptance after the spread of COVID-19: A multi-analytical approach based hybrid SEM-ANN
Authors:
Ashraf Elnagar,
Imad Afyouni,
Ismail Shahin,
Ali Bou Nassif,
Said A. Salloum
Abstract:
There are several reasons why the fear of vaccination has caused population rejection. Questions have been raised by students regarding the effectiveness of vaccines, which in turn has led to vaccination hesitancy. Students perceptions are influenced by vaccination hesitancy, which affects the acceptance of e-learning platforms. Hence, this research aimed to examine the post-acceptance of e-learni…
▽ More
There are several reasons why the fear of vaccination has caused population rejection. Questions have been raised by students regarding the effectiveness of vaccines, which in turn has led to vaccination hesitancy. Students perceptions are influenced by vaccination hesitancy, which affects the acceptance of e-learning platforms. Hence, this research aimed to examine the post-acceptance of e-learning platforms on the basis of a conceptual model that employs different variables. Distinct contribution is made by every variable to the post-acceptance of e-learning platforms. A hybrid model was used in the current study in which technology acceptance model (TAM) determinants were employed along with other external factors such as fear of vaccination, perceived routine use, perceived enjoyment, perceived critical mass, and self-efficiency which are directly linked to post-acceptance of e-learning platforms. The focus of earlier studies on this topic has been on the significance of e-learning acceptance in various environments and countries. However, in this study, the newly-spread use of e-learning platforms in the gulf area was examined using a hybrid conceptual model. The empirical studies carried out in the past mainly used structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis; however, this study used an evolving hybrid analysis approach, in which SEM and the artificial neural network (ANN) that are based on deep learning were employed. The importance-performance map analysis (IPMA) was also used in this study to determine the significance and performance of each factor. The proposed model is backed by the findings of data analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 26 November, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Separating Polarization from Noise: Comparison and Normalization of Structural Polarization Measures
Authors:
Ali Salloum,
Ted Hsuan Yun Chen,
Mikko Kivelä
Abstract:
Quantifying the amount of polarization is crucial for understanding and studying political polarization in political and social systems. Several methods are used commonly to measure polarization in social networks by purely inspecting their structure. We analyse eight of such methods and show that all of them yield high polarization scores even for random networks with similar density and degree d…
▽ More
Quantifying the amount of polarization is crucial for understanding and studying political polarization in political and social systems. Several methods are used commonly to measure polarization in social networks by purely inspecting their structure. We analyse eight of such methods and show that all of them yield high polarization scores even for random networks with similar density and degree distributions to typical real-world networks. Further, some of the methods are sensitive to degree distributions and relative sizes of the polarized groups. We propose normalization to the existing scores and a minimal set of tests that a score should pass in order for it to be suitable for separating polarized networks from random noise. The performance of the scores increased by 38%-220% after normalization in a classification task of 203 networks. Further, we find that the choice of method is not as important as normalization, after which most of the methods have better performance than the best-performing method before normalization. This work opens up the possibility to critically assess and compare the features and performance of different methods for measuring structural polarization.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2021; v1 submitted 18 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Polarization of Climate Politics Results from Partisan Sorting: Evidence from Finnish Twittersphere
Authors:
Ted Hsuan Yun Chen,
Ali Salloum,
Antti Gronow,
Tuomas Ylä-Anttila,
Mikko Kivelä
Abstract:
Prior research shows that public opinion on climate politics sorts along partisan lines. However, they leave open the question of whether climate politics and other politically salient issues exhibit tendencies for issue alignment, which the political polarization literature identifies as among the most deleterious aspects of polarization. Using a network approach and social media data from the Tw…
▽ More
Prior research shows that public opinion on climate politics sorts along partisan lines. However, they leave open the question of whether climate politics and other politically salient issues exhibit tendencies for issue alignment, which the political polarization literature identifies as among the most deleterious aspects of polarization. Using a network approach and social media data from the Twitter platform, we study polarization of public opinion toward climate politics and ten other politically salient topics during the 2019 Finnish elections as the emergence of opposing groups in a public forum. We find that while climate politics is not particularly polarized compared to the other topics, it is subject to partisan sorting and issue alignment within the universalist-communitarian dimension of European politics that arose following the growth of right-wing populism. Notably, climate politics is consistently aligned with the immigration issue, and temporal trends indicate that this phenomenon will likely persist.
△ Less
Submitted 6 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
