-
GPTs and Language Barrier: A Cross-Lingual Legal QA Examination
Authors:
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Hiroaki Yamada,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
In this paper, we explore the application of Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) in cross-lingual legal Question-Answering (QA) systems using the COLIEE Task 4 dataset. In the COLIEE Task 4, given a statement and a set of related legal articles that serve as context, the objective is to determine whether the statement is legally valid, i.e., if it can be inferred from the provided contextua…
▽ More
In this paper, we explore the application of Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) in cross-lingual legal Question-Answering (QA) systems using the COLIEE Task 4 dataset. In the COLIEE Task 4, given a statement and a set of related legal articles that serve as context, the objective is to determine whether the statement is legally valid, i.e., if it can be inferred from the provided contextual articles or not, which is also known as an entailment task. By benchmarking four different combinations of English and Japanese prompts and data, we provide valuable insights into GPTs' performance in multilingual legal QA scenarios, contributing to the development of more efficient and accurate cross-lingual QA solutions in the legal domain.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Enhancing Legal Document Retrieval: A Multi-Phase Approach with Large Language Models
Authors:
Hai-Long Nguyen,
Duc-Minh Nguyen,
Tan-Minh Nguyen,
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Thi-Hai-Yen Vuong,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
Large language models with billions of parameters, such as GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and LLaMA, are increasingly prevalent. Numerous studies have explored effective prompting techniques to harness the power of these LLMs for various research problems. Retrieval, specifically in the legal data domain, poses a challenging task for the direct application of Prompting techniques due to the large number and subs…
▽ More
Large language models with billions of parameters, such as GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and LLaMA, are increasingly prevalent. Numerous studies have explored effective prompting techniques to harness the power of these LLMs for various research problems. Retrieval, specifically in the legal data domain, poses a challenging task for the direct application of Prompting techniques due to the large number and substantial length of legal articles. This research focuses on maximizing the potential of prompting by placing it as the final phase of the retrieval system, preceded by the support of two phases: BM25 Pre-ranking and BERT-based Re-ranking. Experiments on the COLIEE 2023 dataset demonstrate that integrating prompting techniques on LLMs into the retrieval system significantly improves retrieval accuracy. However, error analysis reveals several existing issues in the retrieval system that still need resolution.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in LLM using Soft RLLF for Enhanced Negation Understanding
Authors:
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
Finetuning approaches in NLP often focus on exploitation rather than exploration, which may lead to suboptimal models. Given the vast search space of natural language, this limited exploration can restrict their performance in complex, high-stakes domains, where accurate negation understanding and logical reasoning abilities are crucial. To address this issue, we leverage Reinforcement Learning fr…
▽ More
Finetuning approaches in NLP often focus on exploitation rather than exploration, which may lead to suboptimal models. Given the vast search space of natural language, this limited exploration can restrict their performance in complex, high-stakes domains, where accurate negation understanding and logical reasoning abilities are crucial. To address this issue, we leverage Reinforcement Learning from Logical Feedback (RLLF) to create an effective balance between exploration and exploitation in LLMs. Our approach employs an appropriate benchmark dataset for training and evaluation, highlighting the importance of exploration in enhancing negation understanding capabilities. We compare the performance of our RLLF-enhanced LLMs with baseline models trained without RLLF, demonstrating the value of this balanced approach. Furthermore, we showcase the potential of our method in legal AI applications by employing transfer learning and evaluating its impact on negation understanding. Our experimental results exhibit the effectiveness of balancing exploration and exploitation with RLLF in improving LLMs' negation capabilities. This has implications for the development of more accurate, reliable, and logically consistent language models in high-stakes domains.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Enhancing Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models to Facilitate Legal Applications
Authors:
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Wachara Fungwacharakorn,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
Language serves as a vehicle for conveying thought, enabling communication among individuals. The ability to distinguish between diverse concepts, identify fairness and injustice, and comprehend a range of legal notions fundamentally relies on logical reasoning. Large Language Models (LLMs) attempt to emulate human language understanding and generation, but their competency in logical reasoning re…
▽ More
Language serves as a vehicle for conveying thought, enabling communication among individuals. The ability to distinguish between diverse concepts, identify fairness and injustice, and comprehend a range of legal notions fundamentally relies on logical reasoning. Large Language Models (LLMs) attempt to emulate human language understanding and generation, but their competency in logical reasoning remains limited. This paper seeks to address the philosophical question: How can we effectively teach logical reasoning to LLMs while maintaining a deep understanding of the intricate relationship between language and logic? By focusing on bolstering LLMs' capabilities in logical reasoning, we aim to expand their applicability in law and other logic-intensive disciplines. To this end, we propose a Reinforcement Learning from Logical Feedback (RLLF) approach, which serves as a potential framework for refining LLMs' reasoning capacities. Through RLLF and a revised evaluation methodology, we explore new avenues for research in this domain and contribute to the development of LLMs capable of handling complex legal reasoning tasks while acknowledging the fundamental connection between language and logic.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Encoded Summarization: Summarizing Documents into Continuous Vector Space for Legal Case Retrieval
Authors:
Vu Tran,
Minh Le Nguyen,
Satoshi Tojo,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
We present our method for tackling a legal case retrieval task by introducing our method of encoding documents by summarizing them into continuous vector space via our phrase scoring framework utilizing deep neural networks. On the other hand, we explore the benefits from combining lexical features and latent features generated with neural networks. Our experiments show that lexical features and l…
▽ More
We present our method for tackling a legal case retrieval task by introducing our method of encoding documents by summarizing them into continuous vector space via our phrase scoring framework utilizing deep neural networks. On the other hand, we explore the benefits from combining lexical features and latent features generated with neural networks. Our experiments show that lexical features and latent features generated with neural networks complement each other to improve the retrieval system performance. Furthermore, our experimental results suggest the importance of case summarization in different aspects: using provided summaries and performing encoded summarization. Our approach achieved F1 of 65.6% and 57.6% on the experimental datasets of legal case retrieval tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 15 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Black-Box Analysis: GPTs Across Time in Legal Textual Entailment Task
Authors:
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Randy Goebel,
Francesca Toni,
Kostas Stathis,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
The evolution of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models has led to significant advancements in various natural language processing applications, particularly in legal textual entailment. We present an analysis of GPT-3.5 (ChatGPT) and GPT-4 performances on COLIEE Task 4 dataset, a prominent benchmark in this domain. The study encompasses data from Heisei 18 (2006) to Reiwa 3 (2021), explo…
▽ More
The evolution of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models has led to significant advancements in various natural language processing applications, particularly in legal textual entailment. We present an analysis of GPT-3.5 (ChatGPT) and GPT-4 performances on COLIEE Task 4 dataset, a prominent benchmark in this domain. The study encompasses data from Heisei 18 (2006) to Reiwa 3 (2021), exploring the models' abilities to discern entailment relationships within Japanese statute law across different periods. Our preliminary experimental results unveil intriguing insights into the models' strengths and weaknesses in handling legal textual entailment tasks, as well as the patterns observed in model performance. In the context of proprietary models with undisclosed architectures and weights, black-box analysis becomes crucial for evaluating their capabilities. We discuss the influence of training data distribution and the implications on the models' generalizability. This analysis serves as a foundation for future research, aiming to optimize GPT-based models and enable their successful adoption in legal information extraction and entailment applications.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
A negation detection assessment of GPTs: analysis with the xNot360 dataset
Authors:
Ha Thanh Nguyen,
Randy Goebel,
Francesca Toni,
Kostas Stathis,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
Negation is a fundamental aspect of natural language, playing a critical role in communication and comprehension. Our study assesses the negation detection performance of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models, specifically GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4. We focus on the identification of negation in natural language using a zero-shot prediction approach applied to our custom xNot360 da…
▽ More
Negation is a fundamental aspect of natural language, playing a critical role in communication and comprehension. Our study assesses the negation detection performance of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models, specifically GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4. We focus on the identification of negation in natural language using a zero-shot prediction approach applied to our custom xNot360 dataset. Our approach examines sentence pairs labeled to indicate whether the second sentence negates the first. Our findings expose a considerable performance disparity among the GPT models, with GPT-4 surpassing its counterparts and GPT-3.5 displaying a marked performance reduction. The overall proficiency of the GPT models in negation detection remains relatively modest, indicating that this task pushes the boundaries of their natural language understanding capabilities. We not only highlight the constraints of GPT models in handling negation but also emphasize the importance of logical reliability in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, science, and law.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Beyond Logic Programming for Legal Reasoning
Authors:
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Francesca Toni,
Kostas Stathis,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
Logic programming has long being advocated for legal reasoning, and several approaches have been put forward relying upon explicit representation of the law in logic programming terms. In this position paper we focus on the PROLEG logic-programming-based framework for formalizing and reasoning with Japanese presupposed ultimate fact theory. Specifically, we examine challenges and opportunities in…
▽ More
Logic programming has long being advocated for legal reasoning, and several approaches have been put forward relying upon explicit representation of the law in logic programming terms. In this position paper we focus on the PROLEG logic-programming-based framework for formalizing and reasoning with Japanese presupposed ultimate fact theory. Specifically, we examine challenges and opportunities in leveraging deep learning techniques for improving legal reasoning using PROLEG identifying four distinct options ranging from enhancing fact extraction using deep learning to end-to-end solutions for reasoning with textual legal descriptions. We assess advantages and limitations of each option, considering their technical feasibility, interpretability, and alignment with the needs of legal practitioners and decision-makers. We believe that our analysis can serve as a guideline for developers aiming to build effective decision-support systems for the legal domain, while fostering a deeper understanding of challenges and potential advancements by neuro-symbolic approaches in legal applications.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Proceedings of the International Workshop on Methodologies for Translating Legal Norms into Formal Representations (LN2FR 2022) in association with 35th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2022)
Authors:
Georg Borges,
Ken Satoh,
Erich Schweighofer
Abstract:
This volume contains the papers presented at LN2FR 2022: The International Workshop on Methodologies for Translating Legal Norms into Formal Representations, held on December 14, 2022 in association with 35th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2022). Using symbolic logic or similar methods of knowledge representation to formalise legal norms is one of the mo…
▽ More
This volume contains the papers presented at LN2FR 2022: The International Workshop on Methodologies for Translating Legal Norms into Formal Representations, held on December 14, 2022 in association with 35th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2022). Using symbolic logic or similar methods of knowledge representation to formalise legal norms is one of the most traditional goals of legal informatics as a scientific discipline. More than mere theoretical value, this approach is also connected to promising real-world applications involving, e.g., the observance of legal norms by highly automated machines or even the (partial) automatisation of legal reasoning, leading to new automated legal services. Albeit the long research tradition on the use of logic to formalise legal norms, many challenges involved in the development of an adequate methodology for the formalisation of concrete legal regulations remain unsolved. This includes not only the choice of a sufficiently expressive formal language or model, but also the concrete way through which a legal text formulated in natural language is to be translated into the formal representation. The workshop LN2FR seeked to explore the various challenges connected with the task of using formal languages and models to represent legal norms in a machine-readable manner.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
CNN-based fully automatic mitral valve extraction using CT images and existence probability maps
Authors:
Yukiteru Masuda,
Ryo Ishikawa,
Toru Tanaka,
Gakuto Aoyama,
Keitaro Kawashima,
James V. Chapman,
Masahiko Asami,
Michael Huy Cuong Pham,
Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed,
Takuya Sakaguchi,
Kiyohide Satoh
Abstract:
Accurate extraction of mitral valve shape from clinical tomographic images acquired in patients has proven useful for planning surgical and interventional mitral valve treatments. However, manual extraction of the mitral valve shape is laborious, and the existing automatic extraction methods have not been sufficiently accurate. In this paper, we propose a fully automated method of extracting mitra…
▽ More
Accurate extraction of mitral valve shape from clinical tomographic images acquired in patients has proven useful for planning surgical and interventional mitral valve treatments. However, manual extraction of the mitral valve shape is laborious, and the existing automatic extraction methods have not been sufficiently accurate. In this paper, we propose a fully automated method of extracting mitral valve shape from computed tomography (CT) images for the all phases of the cardiac cycle. This method extracts the mitral valve shape based on DenseNet using both the original CT image and the existence probability maps of the mitral valve area inferred by U-Net as input. A total of 1585 CT images from 204 patients with various cardiac diseases including mitral regurgitation (MR) were collected and manually annotated for mitral valve region. The proposed method was trained and evaluated by 10-fold cross validation using the collected data and was compared with the method without the existence probability maps. The mean error of shape extraction error in the proposed method is 0.88 mm, which is an improvement of 0.32 mm compared with the method without the existence probability maps.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2023; v1 submitted 30 April, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
How well do SOTA legal reasoning models support abductive reasoning?
Authors:
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Randy Goebel,
Francesca Toni,
Kostas Stathis,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
We examine how well the state-of-the-art (SOTA) models used in legal reasoning support abductive reasoning tasks. Abductive reasoning is a form of logical inference in which a hypothesis is formulated from a set of observations, and that hypothesis is used to explain the observations. The ability to formulate such hypotheses is important for lawyers and legal scholars as it helps them articulate l…
▽ More
We examine how well the state-of-the-art (SOTA) models used in legal reasoning support abductive reasoning tasks. Abductive reasoning is a form of logical inference in which a hypothesis is formulated from a set of observations, and that hypothesis is used to explain the observations. The ability to formulate such hypotheses is important for lawyers and legal scholars as it helps them articulate logical arguments, interpret laws, and develop legal theories. Our motivation is to consider the belief that deep learning models, especially large language models (LLMs), will soon replace lawyers because they perform well on tasks related to legal text processing. But to do so, we believe, requires some form of abductive hypothesis formation. In other words, while LLMs become more popular and powerful, we want to investigate their capacity for abductive reasoning. To pursue this goal, we start by building a logic-augmented dataset for abductive reasoning with 498,697 samples and then use it to evaluate the performance of a SOTA model in the legal field. Our experimental results show that although these models can perform well on tasks related to some aspects of legal text processing, they still fall short in supporting abductive reasoning tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2023; v1 submitted 13 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Law to Binary Tree -- An Formal Interpretation of Legal Natural Language
Authors:
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Vu Tran,
Ngoc-Cam Le,
Thi-Thuy Le,
Quang-Huy Nguyen,
Le-Minh Nguyen,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
Knowledge representation and reasoning in law are essential to facilitate the automation of legal analysis and decision-making tasks. In this paper, we propose a new approach based on legal science, specifically legal taxonomy, for representing and reasoning with legal documents. Our approach interprets the regulations in legal documents as binary trees, which facilitates legal reasoning systems t…
▽ More
Knowledge representation and reasoning in law are essential to facilitate the automation of legal analysis and decision-making tasks. In this paper, we propose a new approach based on legal science, specifically legal taxonomy, for representing and reasoning with legal documents. Our approach interprets the regulations in legal documents as binary trees, which facilitates legal reasoning systems to make decisions and resolve logical contradictions. The advantages of this approach are twofold. First, legal reasoning can be performed on the basis of the binary tree representation of the regulations. Second, the binary tree representation of the regulations is more understandable than the existing sentence-based representations. We provide an example of how our approach can be used to interpret the regulations in a legal document.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Transformer-based Approaches for Legal Text Processing
Authors:
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Minh-Phuong Nguyen,
Thi-Hai-Yen Vuong,
Minh-Quan Bui,
Minh-Chau Nguyen,
Tran-Binh Dang,
Vu Tran,
Le-Minh Nguyen,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
In this paper, we introduce our approaches using Transformer-based models for different problems of the COLIEE 2021 automatic legal text processing competition. Automated processing of legal documents is a challenging task because of the characteristics of legal documents as well as the limitation of the amount of data. With our detailed experiments, we found that Transformer-based pretrained lang…
▽ More
In this paper, we introduce our approaches using Transformer-based models for different problems of the COLIEE 2021 automatic legal text processing competition. Automated processing of legal documents is a challenging task because of the characteristics of legal documents as well as the limitation of the amount of data. With our detailed experiments, we found that Transformer-based pretrained language models can perform well with automated legal text processing problems with appropriate approaches. We describe in detail the processing steps for each task such as problem formulation, data processing and augmentation, pretraining, finetuning. In addition, we introduce to the community two pretrained models that take advantage of parallel translations in legal domain, NFSP and NMSP. In which, NFSP achieves the state-of-the-art result in Task 5 of the competition. Although the paper focuses on technical reporting, the novelty of its approaches can also be an useful reference in automated legal document processing using Transformer-based models.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
JNLP Team: Deep Learning Approaches for Legal Processing Tasks in COLIEE 2021
Authors:
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Phuong Minh Nguyen,
Thi-Hai-Yen Vuong,
Quan Minh Bui,
Chau Minh Nguyen,
Binh Tran Dang,
Vu Tran,
Minh Le Nguyen,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
COLIEE is an annual competition in automatic computerized legal text processing. Automatic legal document processing is an ambitious goal, and the structure and semantics of the law are often far more complex than everyday language. In this article, we survey and report our methods and experimental results in using deep learning in legal document processing. The results show the difficulties as we…
▽ More
COLIEE is an annual competition in automatic computerized legal text processing. Automatic legal document processing is an ambitious goal, and the structure and semantics of the law are often far more complex than everyday language. In this article, we survey and report our methods and experimental results in using deep learning in legal document processing. The results show the difficulties as well as potentials in this family of approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2021; v1 submitted 24 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
ParaLaw Nets -- Cross-lingual Sentence-level Pretraining for Legal Text Processing
Authors:
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Vu Tran,
Phuong Minh Nguyen,
Thi-Hai-Yen Vuong,
Quan Minh Bui,
Chau Minh Nguyen,
Binh Tran Dang,
Minh Le Nguyen,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
Ambiguity is a characteristic of natural language, which makes expression ideas flexible. However, in a domain that requires accurate statements, it becomes a barrier. Specifically, a single word can have many meanings and multiple words can have the same meaning. When translating a text into a foreign language, the translator needs to determine the exact meaning of each element in the original se…
▽ More
Ambiguity is a characteristic of natural language, which makes expression ideas flexible. However, in a domain that requires accurate statements, it becomes a barrier. Specifically, a single word can have many meanings and multiple words can have the same meaning. When translating a text into a foreign language, the translator needs to determine the exact meaning of each element in the original sentence to produce the correct translation sentence. From that observation, in this paper, we propose ParaLaw Nets, a pretrained model family using sentence-level cross-lingual information to reduce ambiguity and increase the performance in legal text processing. This approach achieved the best result in the Question Answering task of COLIEE-2021.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
JNLP Team: Deep Learning for Legal Processing in COLIEE 2020
Authors:
Ha-Thanh Nguyen,
Hai-Yen Thi Vuong,
Phuong Minh Nguyen,
Binh Tran Dang,
Quan Minh Bui,
Sinh Trong Vu,
Chau Minh Nguyen,
Vu Tran,
Ken Satoh,
Minh Le Nguyen
Abstract:
We propose deep learning based methods for automatic systems of legal retrieval and legal question-answering in COLIEE 2020. These systems are all characterized by being pre-trained on large amounts of data before being finetuned for the specified tasks. This approach helps to overcome the data scarcity and achieve good performance, thus can be useful for tackling related problems in information r…
▽ More
We propose deep learning based methods for automatic systems of legal retrieval and legal question-answering in COLIEE 2020. These systems are all characterized by being pre-trained on large amounts of data before being finetuned for the specified tasks. This approach helps to overcome the data scarcity and achieve good performance, thus can be useful for tackling related problems in information retrieval, and decision support in the legal domain. Besides, the approach can be explored to deal with other domain specific problems.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Building Legal Case Retrieval Systems with Lexical Matching and Summarization using A Pre-Trained Phrase Scoring Model
Authors:
Vu Tran,
Minh Le Nguyen,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
We present our method for tackling the legal case retrieval task of the Competition on Legal Information Extraction/Entailment 2019. Our approach is based on the idea that summarization is important for retrieval. On one hand, we adopt a summarization based model called encoded summarization which encodes a given document into continuous vector space which embeds the summary properties of the docu…
▽ More
We present our method for tackling the legal case retrieval task of the Competition on Legal Information Extraction/Entailment 2019. Our approach is based on the idea that summarization is important for retrieval. On one hand, we adopt a summarization based model called encoded summarization which encodes a given document into continuous vector space which embeds the summary properties of the document. We utilize the resource of COLIEE 2018 on which we train the document representation model. On the other hand, we extract lexical features on different parts of a given query and its candidates. We observe that by comparing different parts of the query and its candidates, we can achieve better performance. Furthermore, the combination of the lexical features with latent features by the summarization-based method achieves even better performance. We have achieved the state-of-the-art result for the task on the benchmark of the competition.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Automatic Catchphrase Extraction from Legal Case Documents via Scoring using Deep Neural Networks
Authors:
Vu Tran,
Minh Le Nguyen,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
In this paper, we present a method of automatic catchphrase extracting from legal case documents. We utilize deep neural networks for constructing scoring model of our extraction system. We achieve comparable performance with systems using corpus-wide and citation information which we do not use in our system.
In this paper, we present a method of automatic catchphrase extracting from legal case documents. We utilize deep neural networks for constructing scoring model of our extraction system. We achieve comparable performance with systems using corpus-wide and citation information which we do not use in our system.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
ConvAMR: Abstract meaning representation parsing for legal document
Authors:
Lai Dac Viet,
Vu Trong Sinh,
Nguyen Le Minh,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have recently achieved remarkable performance in a wide range of applications. In this research, we equip convolutional sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) model with an efficient graph linearization technique for abstract meaning representation parsing. Our linearization method is better than the prior method at signaling the turn of graph traveling. Additionally, c…
▽ More
Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have recently achieved remarkable performance in a wide range of applications. In this research, we equip convolutional sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) model with an efficient graph linearization technique for abstract meaning representation parsing. Our linearization method is better than the prior method at signaling the turn of graph traveling. Additionally, convolutional seq2seq model is more appropriate and considerably faster than the recurrent neural network models in this task. Our method outperforms previous methods by a large margin on both the standard dataset LDC2014T12. Our result indicates that future works still have a room for improving parsing model using graph linearization approach.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2017; v1 submitted 16 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
Abstract Argumentation / Persuasion / Dynamics
Authors:
Ryuta Arisaka,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
The act of persuasion, a key component in rhetoric argumentation, may be viewed as a dynamics modifier. We extend Dung's frameworks with acts of persuasion among agents, and consider interactions among attack, persuasion and defence that have been largely unheeded so far. We characterise basic notions of admissibilities in this framework, and show a way of enriching them through, effectively, CTL…
▽ More
The act of persuasion, a key component in rhetoric argumentation, may be viewed as a dynamics modifier. We extend Dung's frameworks with acts of persuasion among agents, and consider interactions among attack, persuasion and defence that have been largely unheeded so far. We characterise basic notions of admissibilities in this framework, and show a way of enriching them through, effectively, CTL (computation tree logic) encoding, which also permits importation of the theoretical results known to the logic into our argumentation frameworks. Our aim is to complement the growing interest in coordination of static and dynamic argumentation.
△ Less
Submitted 7 November, 2018; v1 submitted 29 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
Coalition Formability Semantics with Conflict-Eliminable Sets of Arguments
Authors:
Ryuta Arisaka,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
We consider abstract-argumentation-theoretic coalition formability in this work. Taking a model from political alliance among political parties, we will contemplate profitability, and then formability, of a coalition. As is commonly understood, a group forms a coalition with another group for a greater good, the goodness measured against some criteria. As is also commonly understood, however, a co…
▽ More
We consider abstract-argumentation-theoretic coalition formability in this work. Taking a model from political alliance among political parties, we will contemplate profitability, and then formability, of a coalition. As is commonly understood, a group forms a coalition with another group for a greater good, the goodness measured against some criteria. As is also commonly understood, however, a coalition may deliver benefits to a group X at the sacrifice of something that X was able to do before coalition formation, which X may be no longer able to do under the coalition. Use of the typical conflict-free sets of arguments is not very fitting for accommodating this aspect of coalition, which prompts us to turn to a weaker notion, conflict-eliminability, as a property that a set of arguments should primarily satisfy. We require numerical quantification of attack strengths as well as of argument strengths for its characterisation. We will first analyse semantics of profitability of a given conflict-eliminable set forming a coalition with another conflict-eliminable set, and will then provide four coalition formability semantics, each of which formalises certain utility postulate(s) taking the coalition profitability into account.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2017; v1 submitted 2 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
An Architecture for Autonomously Controlling Robot with Embodiment in Real World
Authors:
Megumi Fujita,
Yuki Goto,
Naoyuki Nide,
Ken Satoh,
Hiroshi Hosobe
Abstract:
In the real world, robots with embodiment face various issues such as dynamic continuous changes of the environment and input/output disturbances. The key to solving these issues can be found in daily life; people `do actions associated with sensing' and `dynamically change their plans when necessary'. We propose the use of a new concept, enabling robots to do these two things, for autonomously co…
▽ More
In the real world, robots with embodiment face various issues such as dynamic continuous changes of the environment and input/output disturbances. The key to solving these issues can be found in daily life; people `do actions associated with sensing' and `dynamically change their plans when necessary'. We propose the use of a new concept, enabling robots to do these two things, for autonomously controlling mobile robots. We implemented our concept to make two experiments under static/dynamic environments. The results of these experiments show that our idea provides a way to adapt to dynamic changes of the environment in the real world.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2013;
originally announced July 2013.
-
Normative design using inductive learning
Authors:
Domenico Corapi,
Alessandra Russo,
Marina De Vos,
Julian Padget,
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
In this paper we propose a use-case-driven iterative design methodology for normative frameworks, also called virtual institutions, which are used to govern open systems. Our computational model represents the normative framework as a logic program under answer set semantics (ASP). By means of an inductive logic programming approach, implemented using ASP, it is possible to synthesise new rules an…
▽ More
In this paper we propose a use-case-driven iterative design methodology for normative frameworks, also called virtual institutions, which are used to govern open systems. Our computational model represents the normative framework as a logic program under answer set semantics (ASP). By means of an inductive logic programming approach, implemented using ASP, it is possible to synthesise new rules and revise the existing ones. The learning mechanism is guided by the designer who describes the desired properties of the framework through use cases, comprising (i) event traces that capture possible scenarios, and (ii) a state that describes the desired outcome. The learning process then proposes additional rules, or changes to current rules, to satisfy the constraints expressed in the use cases. Thus, the contribution of this paper is a process for the elaboration and revision of a normative framework by means of a semi-automatic and iterative process driven from specifications of (un)desirable behaviour. The process integrates a novel and general methodology for theory revision based on ASP.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
-
Consistency Management of Normal Logic Program by Top-down Abductive Proof Procedure
Authors:
Ken Satoh
Abstract:
This paper presents a method of computing a revision of a function-free normal logic program. If an added rule is inconsistent with a program, that is, if it leads to a situation such that no stable model exists for a new program, then deletion and addition of rules are performed to avoid inconsistency. We specify a revision by translating a normal logic program into an abductive logic program w…
▽ More
This paper presents a method of computing a revision of a function-free normal logic program. If an added rule is inconsistent with a program, that is, if it leads to a situation such that no stable model exists for a new program, then deletion and addition of rules are performed to avoid inconsistency. We specify a revision by translating a normal logic program into an abductive logic program with abducibles to represent deletion and addition of rules. To compute such deletion and addition, we propose an adaptation of our top-down abductive proof procedure to compute a relevant abducibles to an added rule. We compute a minimally revised program, by choosing a minimal set of abducibles among all the sets of abducibles computed by a top-down proof procedure.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2000;
originally announced March 2000.
-
Computing Circumscriptive Databases by Integer Programming: Revisited (Extended Abstract)
Authors:
Ken Satoh,
Hidenori Okamoto
Abstract:
In this paper, we consider a method of computing minimal models in circumscription using integer programming in propositional logic and first-order logic with domain closure axioms and unique name axioms. This kind of treatment is very important since this enable to apply various technique developed in operations research to nonmonotonic reasoning.
Nerode et al. (1995) are the first to propose…
▽ More
In this paper, we consider a method of computing minimal models in circumscription using integer programming in propositional logic and first-order logic with domain closure axioms and unique name axioms. This kind of treatment is very important since this enable to apply various technique developed in operations research to nonmonotonic reasoning.
Nerode et al. (1995) are the first to propose a method of computing circumscription using integer programming. They claimed their method was correct for circumscription with fixed predicate, but we show that their method does not correctly reflect their claim. We show a correct method of computing all the minimal models not only with fixed predicates but also with varied predicates and we extend our method to compute prioritized circumscription as well.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2000;
originally announced March 2000.
