Temporal Locality in Online Algorithms
Authors:
Maciej Pacut,
Mahmoud Parham,
Joel Rybicki,
Stefan Schmid,
Jukka Suomela,
Aleksandr Tereshchenko
Abstract:
Online algorithms make decisions based on past inputs. In general, the decision may depend on the entire history of inputs. If many computers run the same online algorithm with the same input stream but are started at different times, they do not necessarily make consistent decisions.
In this work we introduce time-local online algorithms. These are online algorithms where the output at a given…
▽ More
Online algorithms make decisions based on past inputs. In general, the decision may depend on the entire history of inputs. If many computers run the same online algorithm with the same input stream but are started at different times, they do not necessarily make consistent decisions.
In this work we introduce time-local online algorithms. These are online algorithms where the output at a given time only depends on $T = O(1)$ latest inputs. The use of (deterministic) time-local algorithms in a distributed setting automatically leads to globally consistent decisions.
Our key observation is that time-local online algorithms (in which the output at a given time only depends on local inputs in the temporal dimension) are closely connected to local distributed graph algorithms (in which the output of a given node only depends on local inputs in the spatial dimension). This makes it possible to interpret prior work on distributed graph algorithms from the perspective of online algorithms.
We describe an algorithm synthesis method that one can use to design optimal time-local online algorithms for small values of $T$. We demonstrate the power of the technique in the context of a variant of the online file migration problem, and show that e.g. for two nodes and unit migration costs there exists a $3$-competitive time-local algorithm with horizon $T=4$, while no deterministic online algorithm (in the classic sense) can do better. We also derive upper and lower bounds for a more general version of the problem; we show that there is a $6$-competitive deterministic time-local algorithm and a $2.62$-competitive randomized time-local algorithm for any migration cost $α\ge 1$.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2022; v1 submitted 18 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
Locally Checkable Problems in Rooted Trees
Authors:
Alkida Balliu,
Sebastian Brandt,
Yi-Jun Chang,
Dennis Olivetti,
Jan Studený,
Jukka Suomela,
Aleksandr Tereshchenko
Abstract:
Consider any locally checkable labeling problem $Π$ in rooted regular trees: there is a finite set of labels $Σ$, and for each label $x \in Σ$ we specify what are permitted label combinations of the children for an internal node of label $x$ (the leaf nodes are unconstrained). This formalism is expressive enough to capture many classic problems studied in distributed computing, including vertex co…
▽ More
Consider any locally checkable labeling problem $Π$ in rooted regular trees: there is a finite set of labels $Σ$, and for each label $x \in Σ$ we specify what are permitted label combinations of the children for an internal node of label $x$ (the leaf nodes are unconstrained). This formalism is expressive enough to capture many classic problems studied in distributed computing, including vertex coloring, edge coloring, and maximal independent set.
We show that the distributed computational complexity of any such problem $Π$ falls in one of the following classes: it is $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ rounds in trees with $n$ nodes (and all of these classes are nonempty). We show that the complexity of any given problem is the same in all four standard models of distributed graph algorithms: deterministic $\mathsf{LOCAL}$, randomized $\mathsf{LOCAL}$, deterministic $\mathsf{CONGEST}$, and randomized $\mathsf{CONGEST}$ model. In particular, we show that randomness does not help in this setting, and the complexity class $Θ(\log \log n)$ does not exist (while it does exist in the broader setting of general trees).
We also show how to systematically determine the complexity class of any such problem $Π$, i.e., whether $Π$ takes $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ rounds. While the algorithm may take exponential time in the size of the description of $Π$, it is nevertheless practical: we provide a freely available implementation of the classifier algorithm, and it is fast enough to classify many problems of interest.
△ Less
Submitted 2 September, 2022; v1 submitted 18 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
