-
Latent Alignment with Deep Set EEG Decoders
Authors:
Stylianos Bakas,
Siegfried Ludwig,
Dimitrios A. Adamos,
Nikolaos Laskaris,
Yannis Panagakis,
Stefanos Zafeiriou
Abstract:
The variability in EEG signals between different individuals poses a significant challenge when implementing brain-computer interfaces (BCI). Commonly proposed solutions to this problem include deep learning models, due to their increased capacity and generalization, as well as explicit domain adaptation techniques. Here, we introduce the Latent Alignment method that won the Benchmarks for EEG Tra…
▽ More
The variability in EEG signals between different individuals poses a significant challenge when implementing brain-computer interfaces (BCI). Commonly proposed solutions to this problem include deep learning models, due to their increased capacity and generalization, as well as explicit domain adaptation techniques. Here, we introduce the Latent Alignment method that won the Benchmarks for EEG Transfer Learning (BEETL) competition and present its formulation as a deep set applied on the set of trials from a given subject. Its performance is compared to recent statistical domain adaptation techniques under various conditions. The experimental paradigms include motor imagery (MI), oddball event-related potentials (ERP) and sleep stage classification, where different well-established deep learning models are applied on each task. Our experimental results show that performing statistical distribution alignment at later stages in a deep learning model is beneficial to the classification accuracy, yielding the highest performance for our proposed method. We further investigate practical considerations that arise in the context of using deep learning and statistical alignment for EEG decoding. In this regard, we study class-discriminative artifacts that can spuriously improve results for deep learning models, as well as the impact of class-imbalance on alignment. We delineate a trade-off relationship between increased classification accuracy when alignment is performed at later modeling stages, and susceptibility to class-imbalance in the set of trials that the statistics are computed on.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
2021 BEETL Competition: Advancing Transfer Learning for Subject Independence & Heterogenous EEG Data Sets
Authors:
Xiaoxi Wei,
A. Aldo Faisal,
Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,
Alexandre Gramfort,
Sylvain Chevallier,
Vinay Jayaram,
Camille Jeunet,
Stylianos Bakas,
Siegfried Ludwig,
Konstantinos Barmpas,
Mehdi Bahri,
Yannis Panagakis,
Nikolaos Laskaris,
Dimitrios A. Adamos,
Stefanos Zafeiriou,
William C. Duong,
Stephen M. Gordon,
Vernon J. Lawhern,
Maciej Śliwowski,
Vincent Rouanne,
Piotr Tempczyk
Abstract:
Transfer learning and meta-learning offer some of the most promising avenues to unlock the scalability of healthcare and consumer technologies driven by biosignal data. This is because current methods cannot generalise well across human subjects' data and handle learning from different heterogeneously collected data sets, thus limiting the scale of training data. On the other side, developments in…
▽ More
Transfer learning and meta-learning offer some of the most promising avenues to unlock the scalability of healthcare and consumer technologies driven by biosignal data. This is because current methods cannot generalise well across human subjects' data and handle learning from different heterogeneously collected data sets, thus limiting the scale of training data. On the other side, developments in transfer learning would benefit significantly from a real-world benchmark with immediate practical application. Therefore, we pick electroencephalography (EEG) as an exemplar for what makes biosignal machine learning hard. We design two transfer learning challenges around diagnostics and Brain-Computer-Interfacing (BCI), that have to be solved in the face of low signal-to-noise ratios, major variability among subjects, differences in the data recording sessions and techniques, and even between the specific BCI tasks recorded in the dataset. Task 1 is centred on the field of medical diagnostics, addressing automatic sleep stage annotation across subjects. Task 2 is centred on Brain-Computer Interfacing (BCI), addressing motor imagery decoding across both subjects and data sets. The BEETL competition with its over 30 competing teams and its 3 winning entries brought attention to the potential of deep transfer learning and combinations of set theory and conventional machine learning techniques to overcome the challenges. The results set a new state-of-the-art for the real-world BEETL benchmark.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Team Cogitat at NeurIPS 2021: Benchmarks for EEG Transfer Learning Competition
Authors:
Stylianos Bakas,
Siegfried Ludwig,
Konstantinos Barmpas,
Mehdi Bahri,
Yannis Panagakis,
Nikolaos Laskaris,
Dimitrios A. Adamos,
Stefanos Zafeiriou
Abstract:
Building subject-independent deep learning models for EEG decoding faces the challenge of strong covariate-shift across different datasets, subjects and recording sessions. Our approach to address this difficulty is to explicitly align feature distributions at various layers of the deep learning model, using both simple statistical techniques as well as trainable methods with more representational…
▽ More
Building subject-independent deep learning models for EEG decoding faces the challenge of strong covariate-shift across different datasets, subjects and recording sessions. Our approach to address this difficulty is to explicitly align feature distributions at various layers of the deep learning model, using both simple statistical techniques as well as trainable methods with more representational capacity. This follows in a similar vein as covariance-based alignment methods, often used in a Riemannian manifold context. The methodology proposed herein won first place in the 2021 Benchmarks in EEG Transfer Learning (BEETL) competition, hosted at the NeurIPS conference. The first task of the competition consisted of sleep stage classification, which required the transfer of models trained on younger subjects to perform inference on multiple subjects of older age groups without personalized calibration data, requiring subject-independent models. The second task required to transfer models trained on the subjects of one or more source motor imagery datasets to perform inference on two target datasets, providing a small set of personalized calibration data for multiple test subjects.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
A Tutorial on Graph Theory for Brain Signal Analysis
Authors:
Nikolaos Laskaris,
Dimitrios A. Adamos,
Anastasios Bezerianos
Abstract:
This tutorial paper refers to the use of graph-theoretic concepts for analyzing brain signals. For didactic purposes it splits into two parts: theory and application. In the first part, we commence by introducing some basic elements from graph theory and stemming algorithmic tools, which can be employed for data-analytic purposes. Next, we describe how these concepts are adapted for handling evolv…
▽ More
This tutorial paper refers to the use of graph-theoretic concepts for analyzing brain signals. For didactic purposes it splits into two parts: theory and application. In the first part, we commence by introducing some basic elements from graph theory and stemming algorithmic tools, which can be employed for data-analytic purposes. Next, we describe how these concepts are adapted for handling evolving connectivity and gaining insights into network reorganization. Finally, the notion of signals residing on a given graph is introduced and elements from the emerging field of graph signal processing (GSP) are provided. The second part serves as a pragmatic demonstration of the tools and techniques described earlier. It is based on analyzing a multi-trial dataset containing single-trial responses from a visual ERP paradigm. The paper ends with a brief outline of the most recent trends in graph theory that are about to shape brain signal processing in the near future and a more general discussion on the relevance of graph-theoretic methodologies for analyzing continuous-mode neural recordings.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
