Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Metz, M

Searching in archive eess. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2308.01318  [pdf, other

    eess.IV cs.CV physics.med-ph

    Framing image registration as a landmark detection problem for label-noise-aware task representation (HitR)

    Authors: Diana Waldmannstetter, Ivan Ezhov, Benedikt Wiestler, Francesco Campi, Ivan Kukuljan, Stefan Ehrlich, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Bhakti Baheti, Satrajit Chakrabarty, Ujjwal Baid, Spyridon Bakas, Julian Schwarting, Marie Metz, Jan S. Kirschke, Daniel Rueckert, Rolf A. Heckemann, Marie Piraud, Bjoern H. Menze, Florian Kofler

    Abstract: Accurate image registration is pivotal in biomedical image analysis, where selecting suitable registration algorithms demands careful consideration. While numerous algorithms are available, the evaluation metrics to assess their performance have remained relatively static. This study addresses this challenge by introducing a novel evaluation metric termed Landmark Hit Rate (HitR), which focuses on… ▽ More

    Submitted 1 July, 2024; v1 submitted 31 July, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

  2. arXiv:2304.01601  [pdf, other

    eess.IV cs.CV

    Primitive Simultaneous Optimization of Similarity Metrics for Image Registration

    Authors: Diana Waldmannstetter, Benedikt Wiestler, Julian Schwarting, Ivan Ezhov, Marie Metz, Spyridon Bakas, Bhakti Baheti, Satrajit Chakrabarty, Daniel Rueckert, Jan S. Kirschke, Rolf A. Heckemann, Marie Piraud, Bjoern H. Menze, Florian Kofler

    Abstract: Even though simultaneous optimization of similarity metrics is a standard procedure in the field of semantic segmentation, surprisingly, this is much less established for image registration. To help closing this gap in the literature, we investigate in a complex multi-modal 3D setting whether simultaneous optimization of registration metrics, here implemented by means of primitive summation, can b… ▽ More

    Submitted 12 October, 2023; v1 submitted 4 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

  3. Federated Learning Enables Big Data for Rare Cancer Boundary Detection

    Authors: Sarthak Pati, Ujjwal Baid, Brandon Edwards, Micah Sheller, Shih-Han Wang, G Anthony Reina, Patrick Foley, Alexey Gruzdev, Deepthi Karkada, Christos Davatzikos, Chiharu Sako, Satyam Ghodasara, Michel Bilello, Suyash Mohan, Philipp Vollmuth, Gianluca Brugnara, Chandrakanth J Preetha, Felix Sahm, Klaus Maier-Hein, Maximilian Zenk, Martin Bendszus, Wolfgang Wick, Evan Calabrese, Jeffrey Rudie, Javier Villanueva-Meyer , et al. (254 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: Although machine learning (ML) has shown promise in numerous domains, there are concerns about generalizability to out-of-sample data. This is currently addressed by centrally sharing ample, and importantly diverse, data from multiple sites. However, such centralization is challenging to scale (or even not feasible) due to various limitations. Federated ML (FL) provides an alternative to train acc… ▽ More

    Submitted 25 April, 2022; v1 submitted 22 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

    Comments: federated learning, deep learning, convolutional neural network, segmentation, brain tumor, glioma, glioblastoma, FeTS, BraTS

  4. arXiv:2111.04090  [pdf, other

    physics.med-ph cs.CE cs.LG eess.IV

    Learn-Morph-Infer: a new way of solving the inverse problem for brain tumor modeling

    Authors: Ivan Ezhov, Kevin Scibilia, Katharina Franitza, Felix Steinbauer, Suprosanna Shit, Lucas Zimmer, Jana Lipkova, Florian Kofler, Johannes Paetzold, Luca Canalini, Diana Waldmannstetter, Martin Menten, Marie Metz, Benedikt Wiestler, Bjoern Menze

    Abstract: Current treatment planning of patients diagnosed with a brain tumor, such as glioma, could significantly benefit by accessing the spatial distribution of tumor cell concentration. Existing diagnostic modalities, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast sufficiently well areas of high cell density. In gliomas, however, they do not portray areas of low cell concentration, which can often serv… ▽ More

    Submitted 25 October, 2022; v1 submitted 7 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

  5. arXiv:2009.04240  [pdf, other

    cs.CE eess.IV

    Geometry-aware neural solver for fast Bayesian calibration of brain tumor models

    Authors: Ivan Ezhov, Tudor Mot, Suprosanna Shit, Jana Lipkova, Johannes C. Paetzold, Florian Kofler, Fernando Navarro, Chantal Pellegrini, Marcel Kollovieh, Marie Metz, Benedikt Wiestler, Bjoern Menze

    Abstract: Modeling of brain tumor dynamics has the potential to advance therapeutic planning. Current modeling approaches resort to numerical solvers that simulate the tumor progression according to a given differential equation. Using highly-efficient numerical solvers, a single forward simulation takes up to a few minutes of compute. At the same time, clinical applications of tumor modeling often imply so… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 April, 2021; v1 submitted 9 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.