Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Schwarting, J

Framing image registration as a landmark detection problem for label-noise-aware task representation (HitR)

Authors: Diana Waldmannstetter, Ivan Ezhov, Benedikt Wiestler, Francesco Campi, Ivan Kukuljan, Stefan Ehrlich, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Bhakti Baheti, Satrajit Chakrabarty, Ujjwal Baid, Spyridon Bakas, Julian Schwarting, Marie Metz, Jan S. Kirschke, Daniel Rueckert, Rolf A. Heckemann, Marie Piraud, Bjoern H. Menze, Florian Kofler

Abstract: Accurate image registration is pivotal in biomedical image analysis, where selecting suitable registration algorithms demands careful consideration. While numerous algorithms are available, the evaluation metrics to assess their performance have remained relatively static. This study addresses this challenge by introducing a novel evaluation metric termed Landmark Hit Rate (HitR), which focuses on… ▽ More Accurate image registration is pivotal in biomedical image analysis, where selecting suitable registration algorithms demands careful consideration. While numerous algorithms are available, the evaluation metrics to assess their performance have remained relatively static. This study addresses this challenge by introducing a novel evaluation metric termed Landmark Hit Rate (HitR), which focuses on the clinical relevance of image registration accuracy. Unlike traditional metrics such as Target Registration Error, which emphasize subresolution differences, HitR considers whether registration algorithms successfully position landmarks within defined confidence zones. This paradigm shift acknowledges the inherent annotation noise in medical images, allowing for more meaningful assessments. To equip HitR with label-noise-awareness, we propose defining these confidence zones based on an Inter-rater Variance analysis. Consequently, hit rate curves are computed for varying landmark zone sizes, enabling performance measurement for a task-specific level of accuracy. Our approach offers a more realistic and meaningful assessment of image registration algorithms, reflecting their suitability for clinical and biomedical applications. △ Less

Submitted 1 July, 2024; v1 submitted 31 July, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Primitive Simultaneous Optimization of Similarity Metrics for Image Registration

Authors: Diana Waldmannstetter, Benedikt Wiestler, Julian Schwarting, Ivan Ezhov, Marie Metz, Spyridon Bakas, Bhakti Baheti, Satrajit Chakrabarty, Daniel Rueckert, Jan S. Kirschke, Rolf A. Heckemann, Marie Piraud, Bjoern H. Menze, Florian Kofler

Abstract: Even though simultaneous optimization of similarity metrics is a standard procedure in the field of semantic segmentation, surprisingly, this is much less established for image registration. To help closing this gap in the literature, we investigate in a complex multi-modal 3D setting whether simultaneous optimization of registration metrics, here implemented by means of primitive summation, can b… ▽ More Even though simultaneous optimization of similarity metrics is a standard procedure in the field of semantic segmentation, surprisingly, this is much less established for image registration. To help closing this gap in the literature, we investigate in a complex multi-modal 3D setting whether simultaneous optimization of registration metrics, here implemented by means of primitive summation, can benefit image registration. We evaluate two challenging datasets containing collections of pre- to post-operative and pre- to intra-operative MR images of glioma. Employing the proposed optimization, we demonstrate improved registration accuracy in terms of TRE on expert neuroradiologists' landmark annotations. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2023; v1 submitted 4 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

The Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) Challenge: Establishing Correspondence Between Pre-Operative and Follow-up MRI Scans of Diffuse Glioma Patients

Authors: Bhakti Baheti, Satrajit Chakrabarty, Hamed Akbari, Michel Bilello, Benedikt Wiestler, Julian Schwarting, Evan Calabrese, Jeffrey Rudie, Syed Abidi, Mina Mousa, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Brandon K. K. Fields, Florian Kofler, Russell Takeshi Shinohara, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Tony C. W. Mok, Albert C. S. Chung, Marek Wodzinski, Artur Jurgas, Niccolo Marini, Manfredo Atzori, Henning Muller, Christoph Grobroehmer, Hanna Siebert, Lasse Hansen , et al. (48 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Registration of longitudinal brain MRI scans containing pathologies is challenging due to dramatic changes in tissue appearance. Although there has been progress in developing general-purpose medical image registration techniques, they have not yet attained the requisite precision and reliability for this task, highlighting its inherent complexity. Here we describe the Brain Tumor Sequence Registr… ▽ More Registration of longitudinal brain MRI scans containing pathologies is challenging due to dramatic changes in tissue appearance. Although there has been progress in developing general-purpose medical image registration techniques, they have not yet attained the requisite precision and reliability for this task, highlighting its inherent complexity. Here we describe the Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) challenge, as the first public benchmark environment for deformable registration algorithms focusing on estimating correspondences between pre-operative and follow-up scans of the same patient diagnosed with a diffuse brain glioma. The BraTS-Reg data comprise de-identified multi-institutional multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) scans, curated for size and resolution according to a canonical anatomical template, and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Clinical experts annotated ground truth (GT) landmark points of anatomical locations distinct across the temporal domain. Quantitative evaluation and ranking were based on the Median Euclidean Error (MEE), Robustness, and the determinant of the Jacobian of the displacement field. The top-ranked methodologies yielded similar performance across all evaluation metrics and shared several methodological commonalities, including pre-alignment, deep neural networks, inverse consistency analysis, and test-time instance optimization per-case basis as a post-processing step. The top-ranked method attained the MEE at or below that of the inter-rater variability for approximately 60% of the evaluated landmarks, underscoring the scope for further accuracy and robustness improvements, especially relative to human experts. The aim of BraTS-Reg is to continue to serve as an active resource for research, with the data and online evaluation tools accessible at https://bratsreg.github.io/. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2024; v1 submitted 13 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.