-
Localized growth drives spongy mesophyll morphogenesis
Authors:
John D. Treado,
Adam B. Roddy,
Guillaume Théroux-Rancourt,
Liyong Zhang,
Chris Ambrose,
Craig Brodersen,
Mark D. Shattuck,
Corey S. O'Hern
Abstract:
The spongy mesophyll is a complex, porous tissue found in plant leaves that enables carbon capture and provides mechanical stability. Unlike many other biological tissues, which remain confluent throughout development, the spongy mesophyll must develop from an initially confluent tissue into a tortuous network of cells with a large proportion of intercellular airspace. How the airspace in the spon…
▽ More
The spongy mesophyll is a complex, porous tissue found in plant leaves that enables carbon capture and provides mechanical stability. Unlike many other biological tissues, which remain confluent throughout development, the spongy mesophyll must develop from an initially confluent tissue into a tortuous network of cells with a large proportion of intercellular airspace. How the airspace in the spongy mesophyll develops while the cells remain mechanically stable remains unknown. Here, we used computer simulations of deformable particles to develop a purely mechanical model for the development of the spongy mesophyll tissue. By stipulating that (1) cell perimeter grows only near voids, (2) cells both form and break adhesive bonds, and (3) the tissue pressure remains constant, the computational model was able to recapitulate the developmental trajectory of the microstructure of the spongy mesophyll observed in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Robust generation of pore space in the spongy mesophyll requires a balance of cell growth, adhesion, stiffness and tissue pressure to ensure cell networks remain both porous yet mechanically robust. The success of this mechanical model of tissue growth and porosity evolution suggests that simple physical principles can coordinate and drive the development of complex plant tissues like the spongy mesophyll.
△ Less
Submitted 18 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Using physical features of protein core packing to distinguish real proteins from decoys
Authors:
Alex T. Grigas,
Zhe Mei,
John D. Treado,
Zachary A. Levine,
Lynne Regan,
Corey S. O'Hern
Abstract:
The ability to consistently distinguish real protein structures from computationally generated model decoys is not yet a solved problem. One route to distinguish real protein structures from decoys is to delineate the important physical features that specify a real protein. For example, it has long been appreciated that the hydrophobic cores of proteins contribute significantly to their stability.…
▽ More
The ability to consistently distinguish real protein structures from computationally generated model decoys is not yet a solved problem. One route to distinguish real protein structures from decoys is to delineate the important physical features that specify a real protein. For example, it has long been appreciated that the hydrophobic cores of proteins contribute significantly to their stability. As a dataset of decoys to compare with real protein structures, we studied submissions to the bi-annual CASP competition (specifically CASP11, 12, and 13), in which researchers attempt to predict the structure of a protein only knowing its amino acid sequence. Our analysis reveals that many of the submissions possess cores that do not recapitulate the features that define real proteins. In particular, the model structures appear more densely packed (because of energetically unfavorable atomic overlaps), contain too few residues in the core, and have improper distributions of hydrophobic residues throughout the structure. Based on these observations, we developed a deep learning method, which incorporates key physical features of protein cores, to predict how well a computational model recapitulates the real protein structure without knowledge of the structure of the target sequence. By identifying the important features of protein structure, our method is able to rank decoys from the CASP competitions equally well, if not better than, state-of-the-art methods that incorporate many additional features.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Analyses of protein cores reveal fundamental differences between solution and crystal structures
Authors:
Zhe Mei,
John D. Treado,
Alex T. Grigas,
Zachary A. Levine,
Lynne Regan,
Corey S. O'Hern
Abstract:
There have been several studies suggesting that protein structures solved by NMR spectroscopy and x-ray crystallography show significant differences. To understand the origin of these differences, we assembled a database of high-quality protein structures solved by both methods. We also find significant differences between NMR and crystal structures---in the root-mean-square deviations of the C…
▽ More
There have been several studies suggesting that protein structures solved by NMR spectroscopy and x-ray crystallography show significant differences. To understand the origin of these differences, we assembled a database of high-quality protein structures solved by both methods. We also find significant differences between NMR and crystal structures---in the root-mean-square deviations of the C$_α$ atomic positions, identities of core amino acids, backbone and sidechain dihedral angles, and packing fraction of core residues. In contrast to prior studies, we identify the physical basis for these differences by modelling protein cores as jammed packings of amino-acid-shaped particles. We find that we can tune the jammed packing fraction by varying the degree of thermalization used to generate the packings. For an athermal protocol, we find that the average jammed packing fraction is identical to that observed in the cores of protein structures solved by x-ray crystallography. In contrast, highly thermalized packing-generation protocols yield jammed packing fractions that are even higher than those observed in NMR structures. These results indicate that thermalized systems can pack more densely than athermal systems, which suggests a physical basis for the structural differences between protein structures solved by NMR and x-ray crystallography.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Void distributions reveal structural link between jammed packings and protein cores
Authors:
John D. Treado,
Zhe Mei,
Lynne Regan,
Corey S. O'Hern
Abstract:
Dense packing of hydrophobic residues in the cores of globular proteins determines their stability. Recently, we have shown that protein cores possess packing fraction $φ\approx 0.56$, which is the same as dense, random packing of amino acid-shaped particles. In this article, we compare the structural properties of protein cores and jammed packings of amino acid-shaped particles in much greater de…
▽ More
Dense packing of hydrophobic residues in the cores of globular proteins determines their stability. Recently, we have shown that protein cores possess packing fraction $φ\approx 0.56$, which is the same as dense, random packing of amino acid-shaped particles. In this article, we compare the structural properties of protein cores and jammed packings of amino acid-shaped particles in much greater depth by measuring their local and connected void regions. We find that the distributions of surface Voronoi cell volumes and local porosities obey similar statistics in both systems. We also measure the probability that accessible, connected void regions percolate as a function of the size of a spherical probe particle and show that both systems possess the same critical probe size. By measuring the critical exponent $τ$ that characterizes the size distribution of connected void clusters at the onset of percolation, we show that void percolation in packings of amino acid-shaped particles and protein cores belong to the same universality class, which is different from that for void percolation in jammed sphere packings. We propose that the connected void regions of proteins are a defining feature of proteins and can be used to differentiate experimentally observed proteins from decoy structures that are generated using computational protein design software. This work emphasizes that jammed packings of amino acid-shaped particles can serve as structural and mechanical analogs of protein cores, and could therefore be useful in modeling the response of protein cores to cavity-expanding and -reducing mutations.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
