-
Reconstructing Strings from Substrings with Quantum Queries
Authors:
Richard Cleve,
Kazuo Iwama,
François Le Gall,
Harumichi Nishimura,
Seiichiro Tani,
Junichi Teruyama,
Shigeru Yamashita
Abstract:
This paper investigates the number of quantum queries made to solve the problem of reconstructing an unknown string from its substrings in a certain query model. More concretely, the goal of the problem is to identify an unknown string $S$ by making queries of the following form: "Is $s$ a substring of $S$?", where $s$ is a query string over the given alphabet. The number of queries required to id…
▽ More
This paper investigates the number of quantum queries made to solve the problem of reconstructing an unknown string from its substrings in a certain query model. More concretely, the goal of the problem is to identify an unknown string $S$ by making queries of the following form: "Is $s$ a substring of $S$?", where $s$ is a query string over the given alphabet. The number of queries required to identify the string $S$ is the query complexity of this problem.
First we show a quantum algorithm that exactly identifies the string $S$ with at most $3/4N + o(N)$ queries, where $N$ is the length of $S$. This contrasts sharply with the classical query complexity $N$. Our algorithm uses Skiena and Sundaram's classical algorithm and the Grover search as subroutines. To make them effectively work, we develop another subroutine that finds a string appearing only once in $S$, which may have an independent interest. We also prove two lower bounds. The first one is a general lower bound of $Ω(\frac{N}{\log^2{N}})$, which means we cannot achieve a query complexity of $O(N^{1-ε})$ for any constant $ε$. The other one claims that if we cannot use queries of length roughly between $\log N$ and $3 \log N$, then we cannot achieve a query complexity of any sublinear function in $N$.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2012;
originally announced April 2012.
-
Quantum Counterfeit Coin Problems
Authors:
Kazuo Iwama,
Harumichi Nishimura,
Rudy Raymond,
Junichi Teruyama
Abstract:
The counterfeit coin problem requires us to find all false coins from a given bunch of coins using a balance scale. We assume that the balance scale gives us only ``balanced'' or ``tilted'' information and that we know the number k of false coins in advance. The balance scale can be modeled by a certain type of oracle and its query complexity is a measure for the cost of weighing algorithms (the n…
▽ More
The counterfeit coin problem requires us to find all false coins from a given bunch of coins using a balance scale. We assume that the balance scale gives us only ``balanced'' or ``tilted'' information and that we know the number k of false coins in advance. The balance scale can be modeled by a certain type of oracle and its query complexity is a measure for the cost of weighing algorithms (the number of weighings). In this paper, we study the quantum query complexity for this problem. Let Q(k,N) be the quantum query complexity of finding all k false coins from the N given coins. We show that for any k and N such that k < N/2, Q(k,N)=O(k^{1/4}), contrasting with the classical query complexity, Ω(k\log(N/k)), that depends on N. So our quantum algorithm achieves a quartic speed-up for this problem. We do not have a matching lower bound, but we show some evidence that the upper bound is tight: any algorithm, including our algorithm, that satisfies certain properties needs Ω(k^{1/4}) queries.
△ Less
Submitted 2 September, 2010;
originally announced September 2010.
-
Average/Worst-Case Gap of Quantum Query Complexities by On-Set Size
Authors:
Andris Ambainis,
Kazuo Iwama,
Masaki Nakanishi,
Harumichi Nishimura,
Rudy Raymond,
Seiichiro Tani,
Shigeru Yamashita
Abstract:
This paper considers the query complexity of the functions in the family F_{N,M} of N-variable Boolean functions with onset size M, i.e., the number of inputs for which the function value is 1, where 1<= M <= 2^{N}/2 is assumed without loss of generality because of the symmetry of function values, 0 and 1. Our main results are as follows: (1) There is a super-linear gap between the average-case…
▽ More
This paper considers the query complexity of the functions in the family F_{N,M} of N-variable Boolean functions with onset size M, i.e., the number of inputs for which the function value is 1, where 1<= M <= 2^{N}/2 is assumed without loss of generality because of the symmetry of function values, 0 and 1. Our main results are as follows: (1) There is a super-linear gap between the average-case and worst-case quantum query complexities over F_{N,M} for a certain range of M. (2) There is no super-linear gap between the average-case and worst-case randomized query complexities over F_{N,M} for every M. (3) For every M bounded by a polynomial in N, any function in F_{N,M} has quantum query complexity Theta (sqrt{N}). (4) For every M=O(2^{cN}) with an arbitrary large constant c<1, any function in F_{N,M} has randomized query complexity Omega (N).
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2009;
originally announced August 2009.
-
Unbounded-Error Classical and Quantum Communication Complexity
Authors:
Kazuo Iwama,
Harumichi Nishimura,
Rudy Raymond,
Shigeru Yamashita
Abstract:
Since the seminal work of Paturi and Simon \cite[FOCS'84 & JCSS'86]{PS86}, the unbounded-error classical communication complexity of a Boolean function has been studied based on the arrangement of points and hyperplanes. Recently, \cite[ICALP'07]{INRY07} found that the unbounded-error {\em quantum} communication complexity in the {\em one-way communication} model can also be investigated using t…
▽ More
Since the seminal work of Paturi and Simon \cite[FOCS'84 & JCSS'86]{PS86}, the unbounded-error classical communication complexity of a Boolean function has been studied based on the arrangement of points and hyperplanes. Recently, \cite[ICALP'07]{INRY07} found that the unbounded-error {\em quantum} communication complexity in the {\em one-way communication} model can also be investigated using the arrangement, and showed that it is exactly (without a difference of even one qubit) half of the classical one-way communication complexity. In this paper, we extend the arrangement argument to the {\em two-way} and {\em simultaneous message passing} (SMP) models. As a result, we show similarly tight bounds of the unbounded-error two-way/one-way/SMP quantum/classical communication complexities for {\em any} partial/total Boolean function, implying that all of them are equivalent up to a multiplicative constant of four. Moreover, the arrangement argument is also used to show that the gap between {\em weakly} unbounded-error quantum and classical communication complexities is at most a factor of three.
△ Less
Submitted 18 September, 2007;
originally announced September 2007.
-
Unbounded-error One-way Classical and Quantum Communication Complexity
Authors:
Kazuo Iwama,
Harumichi Nishimura,
Rudy Raymond,
Shigeru Yamashita
Abstract:
This paper studies the gap between quantum one-way communication complexity $Q(f)$ and its classical counterpart $C(f)$, under the {\em unbounded-error} setting, i.e., it is enough that the success probability is strictly greater than 1/2. It is proved that for {\em any} (total or partial) Boolean function $f$, $Q(f)=\lceil C(f)/2 \rceil$, i.e., the former is always exactly one half as large as…
▽ More
This paper studies the gap between quantum one-way communication complexity $Q(f)$ and its classical counterpart $C(f)$, under the {\em unbounded-error} setting, i.e., it is enough that the success probability is strictly greater than 1/2. It is proved that for {\em any} (total or partial) Boolean function $f$, $Q(f)=\lceil C(f)/2 \rceil$, i.e., the former is always exactly one half as large as the latter. The result has an application to obtaining (again an exact) bound for the existence of $(m,n,p)$-QRAC which is the $n$-qubit random access coding that can recover any one of $m$ original bits with success probability $\geq p$. We can prove that $(m,n,>1/2)$-QRAC exists if and only if $m\leq 2^{2n}-1$. Previously, only the construction of QRAC using one qubit, the existence of $(O(n),n,>1/2)$-RAC, and the non-existence of $(2^{2n},n,>1/2)$-QRAC were known.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2007;
originally announced June 2007.
-
Quantum Network Coding for General Graphs
Authors:
Kazuo Iwama,
Harumichi Nishimura,
Rudy Raymond,
Shigeru Yamashita
Abstract:
Network coding is often explained by using a small network model called Butterfly. In this network, there are two flow paths, s_1 to t_1 and s_2 to t_2, which share a single bottleneck channel of capacity one. So, if we consider conventional flow (of liquid, for instance), then the total amount of flow must be at most one in total, say 1/2 for each path. However, if we consider information flow,…
▽ More
Network coding is often explained by using a small network model called Butterfly. In this network, there are two flow paths, s_1 to t_1 and s_2 to t_2, which share a single bottleneck channel of capacity one. So, if we consider conventional flow (of liquid, for instance), then the total amount of flow must be at most one in total, say 1/2 for each path. However, if we consider information flow, then we can send two bits (one for each path) at the same time by exploiting two side links, which are of no use for the liquid-type flow, and encoding/decoding operations at each node. This is known as network coding and has been quite popular since its introduction by Ahlswede, Cai, Li and Yeung in 2000. In QIP 2006, Hayashi et al showed that quantum network coding is possible for Butterfly, namely we can send two qubits simultaneously with keeping their fidelity strictly greater than 1/2.
In this paper, we show that the result can be extended to a large class of general graphs by using a completely different approach. The underlying technique is a new cloning method called entanglement-free cloning which does not produce any entanglement at all. This seems interesting on its own and to show its possibility is an even more important purpose of this paper. Combining this new cloning with approximation of general quantum states by a small number of fixed ones, we can design a quantum network coding protocol which ``simulates'' its classical counterpart for the same graph.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2006; v1 submitted 3 November, 2006;
originally announced November 2006.
-
(4,1)-Quantum Random Access Coding Does Not Exist
Authors:
Masahito Hayashi,
Kazuo Iwama,
Harumichi Nishimura,
Rudy Raymond,
Shigeru Yamashita
Abstract:
An (n,1,p)-Quantum Random Access (QRA) coding, introduced by Ambainis, Nayak, Ta-shma and Vazirani in ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing 1999, is the following communication system: The sender which has n-bit information encodes his/her information into one qubit, which is sent to the receiver. The receiver can recover any one bit of the original n bits correctly with probability at least p, throu…
▽ More
An (n,1,p)-Quantum Random Access (QRA) coding, introduced by Ambainis, Nayak, Ta-shma and Vazirani in ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing 1999, is the following communication system: The sender which has n-bit information encodes his/her information into one qubit, which is sent to the receiver. The receiver can recover any one bit of the original n bits correctly with probability at least p, through a certain decoding process based on positive operator-valued measures. Actually, Ambainis et al. shows the existence of a (2,1,0.85)-QRA coding and also proves the impossibility of its classical counterpart. Chuang immediately extends it to a (3,1,0.79)-QRA coding and whether or not a (4,1,p)-QRA coding such that p > 1/2 exists has been open since then. This paper gives a negative answer to this open question.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2006;
originally announced April 2006.
-
Quantum Network Coding
Authors:
Masahito Hayashi,
Kazuo Iwama,
Harumichi Nishimura,
Rudy Raymond,
Shigeru Yamashita
Abstract:
Since quantum information is continuous, its handling is sometimes surprisingly harder than the classical counterpart. A typical example is cloning; making a copy of digital information is straightforward but it is not possible exactly for quantum information. The question in this paper is whether or not quantum network coding is possible. Its classical counterpart is another good example to sho…
▽ More
Since quantum information is continuous, its handling is sometimes surprisingly harder than the classical counterpart. A typical example is cloning; making a copy of digital information is straightforward but it is not possible exactly for quantum information. The question in this paper is whether or not quantum network coding is possible. Its classical counterpart is another good example to show that digital information flow can be done much more efficiently than conventional (say, liquid) flow.
Our answer to the question is similar to the case of cloning, namely, it is shown that quantum network coding is possible if approximation is allowed, by using a simple network model called Butterfly. In this network, there are two flow paths, s_1 to t_1 and s_2 to t_2, which shares a single bottleneck channel of capacity one. In the classical case, we can send two bits simultaneously, one for each path, in spite of the bottleneck. Our results for quantum network coding include: (i) We can send any quantum state |psi_1> from s_1 to t_1 and |psi_2> from s_2 to t_2 simultaneously with a fidelity strictly greater than 1/2. (ii) If one of |psi_1> and |psi_2> is classical, then the fidelity can be improved to 2/3. (iii) Similar improvement is also possible if |psi_1> and |psi_2> are restricted to only a finite number of (previously known) states. (iv) Several impossibility results including the general upper bound of the fidelity are also given.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2006; v1 submitted 13 January, 2006;
originally announced January 2006.
-
Robust Quantum Algorithms for Oracle Identification
Authors:
Andris Ambainis,
Kazuo Iwama,
Akinori Kawachi,
Rudy Raymond,
Shigeru Yamashita
Abstract:
The oracle identification problem (OIP) was introduced by Ambainis et al. \cite{AIKMRY04}. It is given as a set $S$ of $M$ oracles and a blackbox oracle $f$. Our task is to figure out which oracle in $S$ is equal to the blackbox $f$ by making queries to $f$. OIP includes several problems such as the Grover Search as special cases. In this paper, we improve the algorithms in \cite{AIKMRY04} by pr…
▽ More
The oracle identification problem (OIP) was introduced by Ambainis et al. \cite{AIKMRY04}. It is given as a set $S$ of $M$ oracles and a blackbox oracle $f$. Our task is to figure out which oracle in $S$ is equal to the blackbox $f$ by making queries to $f$. OIP includes several problems such as the Grover Search as special cases. In this paper, we improve the algorithms in \cite{AIKMRY04} by providing a mostly optimal upper bound of query complexity for this problem: ($i$) For any oracle set $S$ such that $|S| \le 2^{N^d}$ ($d < 1$), we design an algorithm whose query complexity is $O(\sqrt{N\log{M}/\log{N}})$, matching the lower bound proved in \cite{AIKMRY04}. ($ii$) Our algorithm also works for the range between $2^{N^d}$ and $2^{N/\log{N}}$ (where the bound becomes O(N)), but the gap between the upper and lower bounds worsens gradually. ($iii$) Our algorithm is robust, namely, it exhibits the same performance (up to a constant factor) against the noisy oracles as also shown in the literatures \cite{AC02,BNRW03,HMW03} for special cases of OIP.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2006; v1 submitted 29 November, 2004;
originally announced November 2004.
-
Quantum Identification of Boolean Oracles
Authors:
Andris Ambainis,
Kazuo Iwama,
Akinori Kawachi,
Hiroyuki Masuda,
Raymond H. Putra,
Shigeru Yamashita
Abstract:
The oracle identification problem (OIP) is, given a set $S$ of $M$ Boolean oracles out of $2^{N}$ ones, to determine which oracle in $S$ is the current black-box oracle. We can exploit the information that candidates of the current oracle is restricted to $S$. The OIP contains several concrete problems such as the original Grover search and the Bernstein-Vazirani problem. Our interest is in the…
▽ More
The oracle identification problem (OIP) is, given a set $S$ of $M$ Boolean oracles out of $2^{N}$ ones, to determine which oracle in $S$ is the current black-box oracle. We can exploit the information that candidates of the current oracle is restricted to $S$. The OIP contains several concrete problems such as the original Grover search and the Bernstein-Vazirani problem. Our interest is in the quantum query complexity, for which we present several upper and lower bounds. They are quite general and mostly optimal: (i) The query complexity of OIP is $O(\sqrt{N\log M \log N}\log\log M)$ for {\it any} $S$ such that $M = |S| > N$, which is better than the obvious bound $N$ if $M < 2^{N/\log^{3}N}$. (ii) It is $O(\sqrt{N})$ for {\it any} $S$ if $|S| = N$, which includes the upper bound for the Grover search as a special case. (iii) For a wide range of oracles ($|S| = N$) such as random oracles and balanced oracles, the query complexity is $Θ(\sqrt{N/K})$, where $K$ is a simple parameter determined by $S$.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2004;
originally announced March 2004.
-
Quantum Evaluation of Multi-Valued Boolean Functions
Authors:
Kazuo Iwama,
Akinori Kawachi,
Hiroyuki Masuda,
Raymond H. Putra,
Shigeru Yamashita
Abstract:
Our problem is to evaluate a multi-valued Boolean function $F$ through oracle calls. If $F$ is one-to-one and the size of its domain and range is the same, then our problem can be formulated as follows: Given an oracle $f(a,x): \{0,1\}^n\times\{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ and a fixed (but hidden) value $a_0$, we wish to obtain the value of $a_0$ by querying the oracle $f(a_0,x)$. Our goal is to minimiz…
▽ More
Our problem is to evaluate a multi-valued Boolean function $F$ through oracle calls. If $F$ is one-to-one and the size of its domain and range is the same, then our problem can be formulated as follows: Given an oracle $f(a,x): \{0,1\}^n\times\{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ and a fixed (but hidden) value $a_0$, we wish to obtain the value of $a_0$ by querying the oracle $f(a_0,x)$. Our goal is to minimize the number of such oracle calls (the query complexity) using a quantum mechanism.
Two popular oracles are the EQ-oracle defined as $f(a,x)=1$ iff $x=a$ and the IP-oracle defined as $f(a,x)= a\cdot x \mod 2$. It is also well-known that the query complexity is $Θ(\sqrt{N})$ ($N=2^n$) for the EQ-oracle while only O(1) for the IP-oracle. The main purpose of this paper is to fill this gap or to investigate what causes this large difference. To do so, we introduce a parameter $K$ as the maximum number of 1's in a single column of $T_f$ where $T_f$ is the $N\times N$ truth-table of the oracle $f(a,x)$. Our main result shows that the (quantum) query complexity is heavily governed by this parameter $K$: ($i$) The query complexity is $Ω(\sqrt{N/K})$. ($ii$) This lower bound is tight in the sense that we can construct an explicit oracle whose query complexity is $O(\sqrt{N/K})$. ($iii$) The tight complexity, $Θ(\frac{N}{K}+\log{K})$, is also obtained for the classical case. Thus, the quantum algorithm needs a quadratically less number of oracle calls when $K$ is small and this merit becomes larger when $K$ is large, e.g., $\log{K}$ v.s. constant when $K = cN$.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2003;
originally announced April 2003.
-
Exploiting the Difference in Probability Calculation between Quantum and Probabilistic Computations
Authors:
Masami Amano,
Kazuo Iwama,
Rudy Raymond
Abstract:
The main purpose of this paper is to show that we can exploit the difference ($l_1$-norm and $l_2$-norm) in the probability calculation between quantum and probabilistic computations to claim the difference in their space efficiencies. It is shown that there is a finite language $L$ which contains sentences of length up to $O(n^{c+1})$ such that: ($i$) There is a one-way quantum finite automaton…
▽ More
The main purpose of this paper is to show that we can exploit the difference ($l_1$-norm and $l_2$-norm) in the probability calculation between quantum and probabilistic computations to claim the difference in their space efficiencies. It is shown that there is a finite language $L$ which contains sentences of length up to $O(n^{c+1})$ such that: ($i$) There is a one-way quantum finite automaton (qfa) of $O(n^{c+4})$ states which recognizes $L$. ($ii$) However, if we try to simulate this qfa by a probabilistic finite automaton (pfa) \textit{using the same algorithm}, then it needs $Ω(n^{2c+4})$ states. It should be noted that we do not prove real lower bounds for pfa's but show that if pfa's and qfa's use exactly the same algorithm, then qfa's need much less states.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2002;
originally announced April 2002.
