The purpose was to assess differences in mean scores of 23 men and 28 women who rated immediate s... more The purpose was to assess differences in mean scores of 23 men and 28 women who rated immediate stress low and 11 men and 34 women who rated immediate stress high. Analysis of variance of mean differences was significant for sex but not for immediate stress or their interaction on the Coping Resources Inventory, Emotional Domain.
When mean scores on the Spiritual or Philosophical Domain of the Coping Resources Inventory for 9... more When mean scores on the Spiritual or Philosophical Domain of the Coping Resources Inventory for 96 university students of ages 20 to 47 years, were compared with means of the standardization sample, values fell outside the upper limit of the 99% confidence interval, suggesting the scale may not have external validity for a sample of students.
For 55 students (13 men, 42 women) there was a significant inverse correlation for scores on the ... more For 55 students (13 men, 42 women) there was a significant inverse correlation for scores on the Self-acceptance Scale and scores on the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, thereby giving credence to the construct validity of both scales, that is, the more one accepts oneself, the less negative evaluation there is of oneself.
The purpose was to assess differences in mean scores of 23 men and 28 women who rated immediate s... more The purpose was to assess differences in mean scores of 23 men and 28 women who rated immediate stress low and 11 men and 34 women who rated immediate stress high. Analysis of variance of mean differences was significant for sex but not for immediate stress or their interaction on the Coping Resources Inventory, Emotional Domain.
When mean scores on the Spiritual or Philosophical Domain of the Coping Resources Inventory for 9... more When mean scores on the Spiritual or Philosophical Domain of the Coping Resources Inventory for 96 university students of ages 20 to 47 years, were compared with means of the standardization sample, values fell outside the upper limit of the 99% confidence interval, suggesting the scale may not have external validity for a sample of students.
For 55 students (13 men, 42 women) there was a significant inverse correlation for scores on the ... more For 55 students (13 men, 42 women) there was a significant inverse correlation for scores on the Self-acceptance Scale and scores on the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, thereby giving credence to the construct validity of both scales, that is, the more one accepts oneself, the less negative evaluation there is of oneself.
Uploads
Papers by patricia glaze