default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCIDArtificial Intelligence and Law, Volume 29
Volume 29, Number 1, March 2021
- Faraz Dadgostari
, Mauricio Guim, Peter A. Beling, Michael A. Livermore, Daniel N. Rockmore:
Correction to: Modeling law search as prediction. 1 - Faraz Dadgostari, Mauricio Guim, Peter A. Beling, Michael A. Livermore, Daniel N. Rockmore:
Modeling law search as prediction. 3-34 - Neda Sakhaee, Mark C. Wilson:
Information extraction framework to build legislation network. 35-58 - Emad Abdel Rahim Dahiyat:
Law and software agents: Are they "Agents" by the way? 59-86 - Markku Suksi:
Administrative due process when using automated decision-making in public administration: some notes from a Finnish perspective. 87-110
Volume 29, Number 2, June 2021
- Marius Miron, Songül Tolan, Emilia Gómez, Carlos Castillo:
Evaluating causes of algorithmic bias in juvenile criminal recidivism. 111-147 - Adrien Bibal, Michael Lognoul, Alexandre de Streel, Benoît Frénay:
Legal requirements on explainability in machine learning. 149-169 - Llio Humphreys, Guido Boella, Leendert van der Torre, Livio Robaldo, Luigi Di Caro, Sepideh Ghanavati, Robert Muthuri:
Populating legal ontologies using semantic role labeling. 171-211 - Luther Karl Branting, Craig Pfeifer, Bradford Brown, Lisa Ferro, John S. Aberdeen, Brandy Weiss, Mark Pfaff, Bill Liao:
Scalable and explainable legal prediction. 213-238 - Arthur Dyevre:
The promise and pitfall of automated text-scaling techniques for the analysis of jurisprudential change. 239-269 - John F. Horty:
Modifying the reason model. 271-285
Volume 29, Number 3, September 2021
- Adilson Luiz Bonifácio, Wellington Aparecido Della Mura:
Automatically running experiments on checking multi-party contracts. 287-310 - Martín O. Moguillansky, Luciano H. Tamargo:
On argument acceptability change towards legal interpretation dynamics. 311-350 - Björn Lellmann, Francesca Gulisano, Agata Ciabattoni:
Mīmāṃsā deontic reasoning using specificity: a proof theoretic approach. 351-394 - Piotr Kulicki, Robert Trypuz, Marek J. Sergot:
Who is obliged when many are involved? Labelled transition system modelling of how obligation arises. 395-415 - Arpan Mandal, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Saptarshi Ghosh, Sekhar Mandal:
Unsupervised approaches for measuring textual similarity between legal court case reports. 417-451
Volume 29, Number 4, December 2021
- Navid Bagherian-Marandi, Mehdi Ravanshadnia, Mohammad-R. Akbarzadeh-T.:
Two-layered fuzzy logic-based model for predicting court decisions in construction contract disputes. 453-484 - Erwin Filtz, Sabrina Kirrane, Axel Polleres:
The linked legal data landscape: linking legal data across different countries. 485-539 - Wachara Fungwacharakorn, Kanae Tsushima, Ken Satoh:
Resolving counterintuitive consequences in law using legal debugging. 541-557 - Henry Prakken:
A formal analysis of some factor- and precedent-based accounts of precedential constraint. 559-585 - Julieth Patricia Castellanos Ardila, Barbara Gallina, Guido Governatori:
Compliance-aware engineering process plans: the case of space software engineering processes. 587-627
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2025-02-27 22:47 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
